NATION

PASSWORD

GOP rep discovers terrifying fact: That non-Christians exist

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Veladio
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1360
Founded: Jul 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Veladio » Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:51 pm

The Mongol Ilkhanate wrote:
Wikkiwallana wrote:And if it was limited to being practiced only on those who likely never heard the gospel, it might almost be tolerable. The tendency to do it on every nameable dead person ever who wasn't a Mormon in life is completely ridiculous.


I'd like every to take note of the fact he's admitted he's being intolerant at the moment.

Is it any more offensive than me saying "Hey brah, wanna join the church?" No. There's no compulsion.

There most certainly is. Like i said, some religions, like Wicca, believe that prayers can have an adverse affect on our will, therefore almost forcing us to follow your prayer.
I am a Wiccan. Do not assume I am an Atheist in Religion threads simply because I support complete Secularization of Government Entities.

Social Libertarian (could care less about Economics, there are people who are more educated at it, so it is a waste of time to try and debate me on it.). As stated above I am a Wiccan, and I find solidarity with the Egyptian Deities. I support government secularization as well as complete freedom of religion, as I believe that to truly be secular, the state must respect all beliefs, and favor none. And I recently enlisted in the United States Navy.

User avatar
Goldwateria (Ancient)
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 134
Founded: Jul 03, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Goldwateria (Ancient) » Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:53 pm

Veladio wrote:
The Mongol Ilkhanate wrote:
I'd like every to take note of the fact he's admitted he's being intolerant at the moment.

Is it any more offensive than me saying "Hey brah, wanna join the church?" No. There's no compulsion.

There most certainly is. Like i said, some religions, like Wicca, believe that prayers can have an adverse affect on our will, therefore almost forcing us to follow your prayer.

Important detail: Do you folks actually believe other religion's prayers can affect your will? Just curious, not trying to be an ass, but it seems relevant.
--I'm a woman, address me as such or there Will Be Consequences (Try making your own sandwich mister, you'll starve.)
--On Republicans: To quote the great Western philosopher Lemmy Killmister "Evangelistic Nazis, you cannot frighten me."

User avatar
Wikkiwallana
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22500
Founded: Mar 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Wikkiwallana » Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:53 pm

The Mongol Ilkhanate wrote:
Wikkiwallana wrote:And if it was limited to being practiced only on those who likely never heard the gospel, it might almost be tolerable. The tendency to do it on every nameable dead person ever who wasn't a Mormon in life is completely ridiculous.


I'd like every to take note of the fact he's admitted he's being intolerant at the moment.

Is it any more offensive than me saying "Hey brah, wanna join the church?" No. There's no compulsion.

Sorry, but compulsion or not, you don't have the right to perform religious ceremonies on others without their consent. You have no right to force rites.
Proud Scalawag and Statist!

Please don't confuse my country for my politics; my country is being run as a parody, my posts aren't.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Xenohumanity wrote:
Nulono wrote:Snip
I'm a pro-lifer who runs a nation of dragon-men...
And even I think that's stupid.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

User avatar
The Mongol Ilkhanate
Minister
 
Posts: 3347
Founded: Jun 07, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Mongol Ilkhanate » Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:53 pm

Veladio wrote:
The Mongol Ilkhanate wrote:
I'd like every to take note of the fact he's admitted he's being intolerant at the moment.

Is it any more offensive than me saying "Hey brah, wanna join the church?" No. There's no compulsion.

There most certainly is. Like i said, some religions, like Wicca, believe that prayers can have an adverse affect on our will, therefore almost forcing us to follow your prayer.



There's no rules or guidelines in that prayer, so...yeah, you aren't "following" anything.

User avatar
Frisivisia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18164
Founded: Aug 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Frisivisia » Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:54 pm

Wikkiwallana wrote:
The Mongol Ilkhanate wrote:
I'd like every to take note of the fact he's admitted he's being intolerant at the moment.

Is it any more offensive than me saying "Hey brah, wanna join the church?" No. There's no compulsion.

Sorry, but compulsion or not, you don't have the right to perform religious ceremonies on others without their consent. You have no right to force rites.

I see what you did there.
Impeach The Queen, Legalize Anarchy, Stealing Things Is Not Theft. Sex Pistols 2017.
I'm the evil gubmint PC inspector, here to take your Guns, outlaw your God, and steal your freedom and give it to black people.
I'm Joe Biden. So far as you know.

For: Anarchy, Punk Rock Fury
Against: Thatcher, Fascists, That Fascist Thatcher, Reagan, Nazi Punks, Everyone
"Am I buggin' ya? I don't mean to bug ya." - Bono
Let's cram some more shit in my sig. Cool people cram shit in their sigs. In TECHNICOLOR!

User avatar
Silent Majority
Minister
 
Posts: 2496
Founded: Jun 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Silent Majority » Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:54 pm

Frisivisia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:
Fixed. My posterior is always prepared.

My body is ready. :D


Kinky
“It is the ultimate irony of history that radical individualism serves as the ideological justification of the unconstrained power of what the large majority of individuals experience as a vast anonymous power, which, without any democratic public control, regulates their lives.”
― Slavoj Žižek

User avatar
Frisivisia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18164
Founded: Aug 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Frisivisia » Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:55 pm

Silent Majority wrote:
Frisivisia wrote:My body is ready. :D


Kinky

That's an E3 reference.
Impeach The Queen, Legalize Anarchy, Stealing Things Is Not Theft. Sex Pistols 2017.
I'm the evil gubmint PC inspector, here to take your Guns, outlaw your God, and steal your freedom and give it to black people.
I'm Joe Biden. So far as you know.

For: Anarchy, Punk Rock Fury
Against: Thatcher, Fascists, That Fascist Thatcher, Reagan, Nazi Punks, Everyone
"Am I buggin' ya? I don't mean to bug ya." - Bono
Let's cram some more shit in my sig. Cool people cram shit in their sigs. In TECHNICOLOR!

User avatar
The Mongol Ilkhanate
Minister
 
Posts: 3347
Founded: Jun 07, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Mongol Ilkhanate » Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:55 pm

Wikkiwallana wrote:
The Mongol Ilkhanate wrote:
I'd like every to take note of the fact he's admitted he's being intolerant at the moment.

Is it any more offensive than me saying "Hey brah, wanna join the church?" No. There's no compulsion.

Sorry, but compulsion or not, you don't have the right to perform religious ceremonies on others without their consent. You have no right to force rites.


We're not. In the case of baptisms FOR (notice), not on, the dead, it's me (well, I'm old enough I could be the baptizer), getting baptized. Then, in the afterlife, the guy gets the option "do you want to affirm that baptism as your baptism?" (notice, without that affirmation the baptism is meaningless and NOT HIS)

I don't take the guys name or anything. I'm being baptized on his behalf. Me.
Last edited by The Mongol Ilkhanate on Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:56 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:56 pm

The Mongol Ilkhanate wrote:
Wikkiwallana wrote:And if it was limited to being practiced only on those who likely never heard the gospel, it might almost be tolerable. The tendency to do it on every nameable dead person ever who wasn't a Mormon in life is completely ridiculous.


I'd like every to take note of the fact he's admitted he's being intolerant at the moment.

Is it any more offensive than me saying "Hey brah, wanna join the church?" No. There's no compulsion.

If you were asking rather than consecrating, maybe I could see it. But I can't imagine you want to ask the dead.

User avatar
Wikkiwallana
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22500
Founded: Mar 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Wikkiwallana » Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:57 pm

The Mongol Ilkhanate wrote:
Wikkiwallana wrote:Sorry, but compulsion or not, you don't have the right to perform religious ceremonies on others without their consent. You have no right to force rites.


We're not. In the case of baptisms FOR (notice), not on, the dead, it's me (well, I'm old enough I could be the baptizer), getting baptized. Then, in the afterlife, the guy gets the option "do you want to affirm that baptism as your baptism?" (notice, without that affirmation the baptism is meaningless and NOT HIS)

Yeah, sorry, I don't care. It's proxy ritual, and as such you can stuff it.
Proud Scalawag and Statist!

Please don't confuse my country for my politics; my country is being run as a parody, my posts aren't.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Xenohumanity wrote:
Nulono wrote:Snip
I'm a pro-lifer who runs a nation of dragon-men...
And even I think that's stupid.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

User avatar
Veladio
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1360
Founded: Jul 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Veladio » Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:57 pm

Goldwateria wrote:
Veladio wrote:There most certainly is. Like i said, some religions, like Wicca, believe that prayers can have an adverse affect on our will, therefore almost forcing us to follow your prayer.

Important detail: Do you folks actually believe other religion's prayers can affect your will? Just curious, not trying to be an ass, but it seems relevant.

Yes. Like if someone says, "I pray that you accept Jesus into your life." It could affect our free will to do so, and in turn cause us to follow and accept Jesus into our life.
I am a Wiccan. Do not assume I am an Atheist in Religion threads simply because I support complete Secularization of Government Entities.

Social Libertarian (could care less about Economics, there are people who are more educated at it, so it is a waste of time to try and debate me on it.). As stated above I am a Wiccan, and I find solidarity with the Egyptian Deities. I support government secularization as well as complete freedom of religion, as I believe that to truly be secular, the state must respect all beliefs, and favor none. And I recently enlisted in the United States Navy.

User avatar
Veladio
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1360
Founded: Jul 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Veladio » Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:58 pm

The Mongol Ilkhanate wrote:
Veladio wrote:There most certainly is. Like i said, some religions, like Wicca, believe that prayers can have an adverse affect on our will, therefore almost forcing us to follow your prayer.



There's no rules or guidelines in that prayer, so...yeah, you aren't "following" anything.

"Follow" as in forced into accepting your prayer.
I am a Wiccan. Do not assume I am an Atheist in Religion threads simply because I support complete Secularization of Government Entities.

Social Libertarian (could care less about Economics, there are people who are more educated at it, so it is a waste of time to try and debate me on it.). As stated above I am a Wiccan, and I find solidarity with the Egyptian Deities. I support government secularization as well as complete freedom of religion, as I believe that to truly be secular, the state must respect all beliefs, and favor none. And I recently enlisted in the United States Navy.

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:58 pm

The Mongol Ilkhanate wrote:
Wikkiwallana wrote:Sorry, but compulsion or not, you don't have the right to perform religious ceremonies on others without their consent. You have no right to force rites.


We're not. In the case of baptisms FOR (notice), not on, the dead, it's me (well, I'm old enough I could be the baptizer), getting baptized. Then, in the afterlife, the guy gets the option "do you want to affirm that baptism as your baptism?" (notice, without that affirmation the baptism is meaningless and NOT HIS)

I don't take the guys name or anything. I'm being baptized on his behalf. Me.

What you think happens in the supposed afterlife has no bearing on the fact that you're performing a religious ritual on a person without their family and loved ones' consent.

User avatar
The Mongol Ilkhanate
Minister
 
Posts: 3347
Founded: Jun 07, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Mongol Ilkhanate » Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:58 pm

Maurepas wrote:
The Mongol Ilkhanate wrote:
I'd like every to take note of the fact he's admitted he's being intolerant at the moment.

Is it any more offensive than me saying "Hey brah, wanna join the church?" No. There's no compulsion.

If you were asking rather than consecrating, maybe I could see it. But I can't imagine you want to ask the dead.


You're using that word without actually knowing what it means.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/consecrating

I don't see in there "asking someone if they want to join the Church"

User avatar
The Mongol Ilkhanate
Minister
 
Posts: 3347
Founded: Jun 07, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Mongol Ilkhanate » Fri Jul 06, 2012 11:00 pm

Maurepas wrote:
The Mongol Ilkhanate wrote:
We're not. In the case of baptisms FOR (notice), not on, the dead, it's me (well, I'm old enough I could be the baptizer), getting baptized. Then, in the afterlife, the guy gets the option "do you want to affirm that baptism as your baptism?" (notice, without that affirmation the baptism is meaningless and NOT HIS)

I don't take the guys name or anything. I'm being baptized on his behalf. Me.

What you think happens in the supposed afterlife has no bearing on the fact that you're performing a religious ritual on a person without their family and loved ones' consent.


Who is getting put in the water? Me. Whose name is being baptized? mine. Remember "Brother so and so, I baptize you". It's only their baptism if they want it to be. If they don't, it wasn't their baptism.

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Fri Jul 06, 2012 11:01 pm

The Mongol Ilkhanate wrote:
Maurepas wrote:If you were asking rather than consecrating, maybe I could see it. But I can't imagine you want to ask the dead.


You're using that word without actually knowing what it means.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/consecrating

I don't see in there "asking someone if they want to join the Church"

And nowhere in your statement did I hear that you ask the corpse if it wants to join the church. You merely baptise the person who was buried, and there's a difference.

How you rationalize it is irrelevant, you're not asking them to join anything, you're performing a religious ritual.

The only way I'd see your "prayer" as anything but a forced consecration is if the corpse somehow answered the question "Would you like to join our church?" with a "Yes". Nothing else.

But I somehow doubt that ever happens.

User avatar
The Mongol Ilkhanate
Minister
 
Posts: 3347
Founded: Jun 07, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Mongol Ilkhanate » Fri Jul 06, 2012 11:01 pm

Veladio wrote:
The Mongol Ilkhanate wrote:

There's no rules or guidelines in that prayer, so...yeah, you aren't "following" anything.

"Follow" as in forced into accepting your prayer.


It wasn't a prayer. Mormon prayers are adressed to Heavenly Father, said in the name of Jesus Christ.

User avatar
Frisivisia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18164
Founded: Aug 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Frisivisia » Fri Jul 06, 2012 11:01 pm

I hate to say it, but Mongol has a point. I think BFTD are dumb, but I don't think that there's anything hugely wrong with them.
Impeach The Queen, Legalize Anarchy, Stealing Things Is Not Theft. Sex Pistols 2017.
I'm the evil gubmint PC inspector, here to take your Guns, outlaw your God, and steal your freedom and give it to black people.
I'm Joe Biden. So far as you know.

For: Anarchy, Punk Rock Fury
Against: Thatcher, Fascists, That Fascist Thatcher, Reagan, Nazi Punks, Everyone
"Am I buggin' ya? I don't mean to bug ya." - Bono
Let's cram some more shit in my sig. Cool people cram shit in their sigs. In TECHNICOLOR!

User avatar
The Mongol Ilkhanate
Minister
 
Posts: 3347
Founded: Jun 07, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Mongol Ilkhanate » Fri Jul 06, 2012 11:02 pm

Maurepas wrote:
The Mongol Ilkhanate wrote:
You're using that word without actually knowing what it means.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/consecrating

I don't see in there "asking someone if they want to join the Church"

And nowhere in your statement did I hear that you ask the corpse if it wants to join the church. You merely baptise the person who was buried, and there's a difference.

How you rationalize it is irrelevant, you're not asking them to join anything, you're performing a religious ritual.

The only way I'd see your "prayer" as anything but a forced consecration is if the corpse somehow answered the question "Would you like to join our church?" with a "Yes". Nothing else.

But I somehow doubt that ever happens.


What definition of that word are you using?

The asking happens in the hereafter. "Is this your baptism?" if they say "No" then it was not, their was no religious ritual performed on them, and nothing done without their consent regarding their religious status.

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Fri Jul 06, 2012 11:04 pm

The Mongol Ilkhanate wrote:
Maurepas wrote:And nowhere in your statement did I hear that you ask the corpse if it wants to join the church. You merely baptise the person who was buried, and there's a difference.

How you rationalize it is irrelevant, you're not asking them to join anything, you're performing a religious ritual.

The only way I'd see your "prayer" as anything but a forced consecration is if the corpse somehow answered the question "Would you like to join our church?" with a "Yes". Nothing else.

But I somehow doubt that ever happens.


What definition of that word are you using?

The asking happens in the hereafter
. "Is this your baptism?" if they say "No" then it was not, their was no religious ritual performed on them, and nothing done without their consent regarding their religious status.

Hence the problem with the whole thing. The dispute has nothing to do with what you believe happens in your supposed "hereafter" it has to do with the fact that you didn't ask in the now.

User avatar
Veladio
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1360
Founded: Jul 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Veladio » Fri Jul 06, 2012 11:05 pm

The Mongol Ilkhanate wrote:
Veladio wrote:"Follow" as in forced into accepting your prayer.


It wasn't a prayer. Mormon prayers are adressed to Heavenly Father, said in the name of Jesus Christ.

Prayer, Ritual, whatever you want to call it. Its being addressed to another individual besides yourself, correct? My point is that that can have an adverse affect on my will.
I am a Wiccan. Do not assume I am an Atheist in Religion threads simply because I support complete Secularization of Government Entities.

Social Libertarian (could care less about Economics, there are people who are more educated at it, so it is a waste of time to try and debate me on it.). As stated above I am a Wiccan, and I find solidarity with the Egyptian Deities. I support government secularization as well as complete freedom of religion, as I believe that to truly be secular, the state must respect all beliefs, and favor none. And I recently enlisted in the United States Navy.

User avatar
The Mongol Ilkhanate
Minister
 
Posts: 3347
Founded: Jun 07, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Mongol Ilkhanate » Fri Jul 06, 2012 11:06 pm

Maurepas wrote:
The Mongol Ilkhanate wrote:
What definition of that word are you using?

The asking happens in the hereafter
. "Is this your baptism?" if they say "No" then it was not, their was no religious ritual performed on them, and nothing done without their consent regarding their religious status.

Hence the problem with the whole thing. The dispute has nothing to do with what you believe happens in your supposed "hereafter" it has to do with the fact that you didn't ask in the now.


Do I have to ask to be able to ask to be able to ask to be able to ask to be able to ask to be able to ask to be able to ask to be able to ask to be able to ask to be able to ask to be able to ask to be able to ask to be able to ask to be able to ask to be able to ask to be able to ask to be able to ask if you want to see a movie?

All the baptism thing really is is a question.
Last edited by The Mongol Ilkhanate on Fri Jul 06, 2012 11:07 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
The Mongol Ilkhanate
Minister
 
Posts: 3347
Founded: Jun 07, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Mongol Ilkhanate » Fri Jul 06, 2012 11:07 pm

Veladio wrote:
The Mongol Ilkhanate wrote:
It wasn't a prayer. Mormon prayers are adressed to Heavenly Father, said in the name of Jesus Christ.

Prayer, Ritual, whatever you want to call it. Its being addressed to another individual besides yourself, correct? My point is that that can have an adverse affect on my will.


Uhm, no?

It's being addressed to the person who is being put in the water, Brother So and So, who is Mormon.

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Fri Jul 06, 2012 11:10 pm

The Mongol Ilkhanate wrote:
Maurepas wrote:Hence the problem with the whole thing. The dispute has nothing to do with what you believe happens in your supposed "hereafter" it has to do with the fact that you didn't ask in the now.


Do I have to ask to be able to ask to be able to ask to be able to ask to be able to ask to be able to ask to be able to ask to be able to ask to be able to ask to be able to ask to be able to ask to be able to ask to be able to ask to be able to ask to be able to ask to be able to ask to be able to ask if you want to see a movie?

All the baptism thing really is is a question.

You have to ask before you put them in the theater and demand to know whether they want to see a movie, yeah.

It's a little late to be asking me once you've already put me there.

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Fri Jul 06, 2012 11:10 pm

The Mongol Ilkhanate wrote:
Maurepas wrote:Hence the problem with the whole thing. The dispute has nothing to do with what you believe happens in your supposed "hereafter" it has to do with the fact that you didn't ask in the now.


Do I have to ask to be able to ask to be able to ask to be able to ask to be able to ask to be able to ask to be able to ask to be able to ask to be able to ask to be able to ask to be able to ask to be able to ask to be able to ask to be able to ask to be able to ask to be able to ask to be able to ask if you want to see a movie?

All the baptism thing really is is a question.


Sure it is.

Wiesel to Romney: Stop LDS Baptisms of Holocaust Victims

Mormons baptize Holocaust victim Anne Frank posthumously, says report
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Achan, Arucaria, Channel Union, Corpoterra, Fartsniffage, Galactic Powers, Galimencia, Hidrandia, Immoren, James_xenoland, Juansonia, Mitzerland, North Korea Choson, Primitive Communism, Soviet Haaregrad, The North Polish Union, The Rio Grande River Basin, The Selkie, Valles Marineris Mining co, Yokron pro-government partisans

Advertisement

Remove ads