No, just laughing at that guy.
Advertisement

by The Mongol Ilkhanate » Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:09 pm

by Chyeknovostan Republic » Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:09 pm
The Mongol Ilkhanate wrote:Chyeknovostan Republic wrote:
Where the heck did you learn geography from??
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleutian_Islands
I for one find the irony in this whole situation very hilarious. Saying Sarah Palin is stupid while not knowing that Alaska has islands...

by The Mongol Ilkhanate » Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:11 pm

by The UK in Exile » Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:11 pm
The Mongol Ilkhanate wrote:Chyeknovostan Republic wrote:
Where the heck did you learn geography from??
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleutian_Islands
I for one find the irony in this whole situation very hilarious. Saying Sarah Palin is stupid while not knowing that Alaska has islands...

by Frisivisia » Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:11 pm


by Chyeknovostan Republic » Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:13 pm

by Chyeknovostan Republic » Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:13 pm

by New Chalcedon » Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:14 pm
The Mongol Ilkhanate wrote:Veladio wrote:In theory...yes it is a GREAT idea but as Wikkiwallana said, there are other players that the establishment doesn't like. Unless everyone is given equal opportunity, regardless of religious affiliation, etc. Then vouchers are a bad idea
I'm in favor of equal opportunity. If the Govt must pay for education, let parents decide what's best for the child.
The Mongol Ilkhanate wrote:Vouchers are good, using fundie schools to take that away is ridiculous. With vouchers, BAD schools with bad teachers lose money, while good schools with good teachers gain money.

by David Williams » Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:14 pm


by The Mongol Ilkhanate » Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:18 pm
Of course. And of course, we also know that factors outside the classroom don't affect learning one bit, nosiree. We don't know, for instance, that kids who have to go to an 8 hour work shift right after school will learn less well than those who get to learn at home in the company of a private tutor. Or that kids from economically-disadvantages areas are likelier to suffer one form or another of abuse from their caregivers. Or any of a hundred other factors that are completely outsidethe school's/teacher's control.
We know none of that, so let's just blame the lazy public schools/teachers. So much easier.

by Mavorpen » Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:19 pm
The Mongol Ilkhanate wrote:
Just go watch Waiting for Superman. It'll instruct you more thoroughly than I can.

by The Mongol Ilkhanate » Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:19 pm
- The presumptive nominee of the Republican Party, Mitt Romney, is so evangelical that he attempted to convert someone to Mormnism after they had died.

by Frisivisia » Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:20 pm
The Mongol Ilkhanate wrote:- The presumptive nominee of the Republican Party, Mitt Romney, is so evangelical that he attempted to convert someone to Mormnism after they had died.
As a Mormon, I know you're misconstruing what baptism for the dead really is. It gives them the opportunity to join in the next life, it doesn't auto make them a member.

by Mavorpen » Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:21 pm
The Mongol Ilkhanate wrote:- The presumptive nominee of the Republican Party, Mitt Romney, is so evangelical that he attempted to convert someone to Mormnism after they had died.
As a Mormon, I know you're misconstruing what baptism for the dead really is. It gives them the opportunity to join in the next life, it doesn't auto make them a member.

by Frisivisia » Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:22 pm
Mavorpen wrote:The Mongol Ilkhanate wrote:
As a Mormon, I know you're misconstruing what baptism for the dead really is. It gives them the opportunity to join in the next life, it doesn't auto make them a member.
So what happens if in the night, I take a Mormon's dead body and preform an anti-baptism ritual on them?

by Gauthier » Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:23 pm
The Mongol Ilkhanate wrote:- The presumptive nominee of the Republican Party, Mitt Romney, is so evangelical that he attempted to convert someone to Mormnism after they had died.
As a Mormon, I know you're misconstruing what baptism for the dead really is. It gives them the opportunity to join in the next life, it doesn't auto make them a member.

by Chyeknovostan Republic » Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:23 pm
David Williams wrote::palm:
Fuck how did this thread get derailed into a debate about geography![]()
Ok what happened is someone put down a post that suggested Palin thinks Alaska is an island, and I don't challenge people's credibility too easy.
I reacted to this with a post.
This happens to not be true, and I accepted that, but I refuse to take responsibility for "spreading bullshit".
Get over it, someone made a post with incorrect information and I wasn't going to challenge it, take it up with the person who made the post in the first place

by Mavorpen » Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:23 pm

by Wikkiwallana » Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:25 pm
New Heathera wrote:Common Territories wrote:Why can't lawmakers keep to the constitution they run by? Keep public learning facilities for learning information, not brainwashing your religious beliefs on kids who are impressionable.
First ammendment: Freedom of the press, speech, expression, and religion.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

by Frisivisia » Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:25 pm

by The Mongol Ilkhanate » Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:26 pm
More seriously:
- The last Republican President (George Bush) was a great friend to theocrats America-wide, opening the Treasury's doors for them to proselytize and browbeat people into converting as the price of getting basic social assistance.
- The Texas Republican Party's platform for 2012 opposes the teaching of critical thinking skills, claiming that the "have the purpose of challenging the student’s fixed beliefs and undermining parental authority". The TX GOP's platform also notes that every Republican in Texas is responsible for promulgating the platform. Now, I'm sure that you don't need these dots connected, but others might: criticial thinking is the worst enemy of theocracy - a population that thinks for itself is one that doesn't obey the priests.
- The presumptive nominee of the Republican Party, Mitt Romney, is so evangelical that he attempted to convert someone to Mormnism after they had died.
- The South Dakota Republican-dominated legislature has demanded that any woman seeking an abortion must first go through three days of proselytization by anti-choice, Christian fundamentalist "counsellors".
How many more examples do you need? I can provide as many as you want, given the time to do the typing. The Republican Party is about imposing Christianity - specifically, their narrow-minded, intolerant version of Christianity - onto America's public discourse with or without America's consent. They are a theocratic party.

by Veladio » Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:26 pm



by Trotskylvania » Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:27 pm
Your Friendly Neighborhood Ultra - The Left Wing of the Impossible
Putting the '-sadism' in PosadismKarl Marx, Wage Labour and Capital
Anton Pannekoek, World Revolution and Communist Tactics
Amadeo Bordiga, Dialogue With Stalin
Nikolai Bukharin, The ABC of Communism
Gilles Dauvé, When Insurrections Die"The hell of capitalism is the firm, not the fact that the firm has a boss."- Bordiga

by Mavorpen » Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:29 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Achan, Arucaria, Channel Union, Corpoterra, Galactic Powers, Galimencia, Hidrandia, Immoren, Incelastan, James_xenoland, Juansonia, Mitzerland, North Korea Choson, Primitive Communism, Soviet Haaregrad, The Foxes Swamp, The North Polish Union, The Rio Grande River Basin, Yokron pro-government partisans
Advertisement