Advertisement

by The Ancient World » Thu Jan 03, 2013 6:47 pm

by Qazox » Fri Jan 04, 2013 1:13 am


by Northern Dominus » Fri Jan 04, 2013 4:18 am

by West Angola » Fri Jan 04, 2013 5:45 am
Chetssaland wrote:Snip

by Northern Dominus » Fri Jan 04, 2013 6:24 am
Again, if they're so good, why don't we see them setting out to prove it? Why didn't we see Alabama at least take on Oregon or West Virginia or Oklahoma in addition to Michigan, you know, Bowl winners from last year? Why didn't they play on the road more often? Why didn't they have a return game during the regular season againstWest Angola wrote:Chetssaland wrote:Snip
Most of this is true, I'd just like to respond to a couple things in it.
1. Every team pads their schedules to some degree. If not with FCS schools, then with really bad FBS schools. Alabama scheduled then-#8 Michigan as their opener, it's not their fault Michigan absolutely sucked this year. My point is, Alabama is not trying to schedule only awful teams for nonconference, it just sorta turned out that way.
2. I live in Oklahoma (though I'm originally from Alabama), and let me tell you they arenot as good as people think they are. I get drowned in massive vats of kool-aid from the Oklahoma media, which also thinks Bob Stoops is the messiah. OU is overrated, and Bob Stoops does not have the skills to win a national championship in the modern era.
I'm an Alabama fan, but I'm the first to admit that we're not in the national championship of our own accord.
In 2009 we needed Terrence Cody to block two field goals at Tennessee to beat them.
In 2010 we needed OSU to lose to Iowa State on a field goal that was good, but was not called as such.
In 2011 we needed a freak loss to Baylor by KSU and an upset of Oregon by Stanford.
While I think, straight up, Alabama has a very good team, that is only true when they play their best. And really, they aren't playing their best, and they haven't for a while.

by Torisakia » Fri Jan 04, 2013 7:54 am
Northern Dominus wrote:Again, if they're so good, why don't we see them setting out to prove it? Why didn't we see Alabama at least take on Oregon or West Virginia or Oklahoma in addition to Michigan, you know, Bowl winners from last year? Why didn't they play on the road more often? Why didn't they have a return game during the regular season against
I'd expect the winners of last year's BCS bowl to be willing to step up and prove they're worth their own hype. I'd expect them to re-enforce their winning ways by beating bowl-winning teams in their own backyards, rather than trucking in eventual 7-6 and 1-10 teams more than one time per season to their home stadium.
I expect a championship-winning team to act as such and prove it, especially with all the ballyhooing that Alabama and other SEC teams receive. Until they do try to live up to their hype during the regular season, until they commit to that challenge, then I refuse to view any declaration of Alabama's supposed "greatness" this year as puffery wrapped up in delusion.

by Chetssaland » Fri Jan 04, 2013 9:11 am
West Angola wrote:Chetssaland wrote:Snip
Most of this is true, I'd just like to respond to a couple things in it.
1. Every team pads their schedules to some degree. If not with FCS schools, then with really bad FBS schools. Alabama scheduled then-#8 Michigan as their opener, it's not their fault Michigan absolutely sucked this year. My point is, Alabama is not trying to schedule only awful teams for nonconference, it just sorta turned out that way.

by Chetssaland » Fri Jan 04, 2013 9:14 am
Torisakia wrote:Northern Dominus wrote:Again, if they're so good, why don't we see them setting out to prove it? Why didn't we see Alabama at least take on Oregon or West Virginia or Oklahoma in addition to Michigan, you know, Bowl winners from last year? Why didn't they play on the road more often? Why didn't they have a return game during the regular season against
I'd expect the winners of last year's BCS bowl to be willing to step up and prove they're worth their own hype. I'd expect them to re-enforce their winning ways by beating bowl-winning teams in their own backyards, rather than trucking in eventual 7-6 and 1-10 teams more than one time per season to their home stadium.
I expect a championship-winning team to act as such and prove it, especially with all the ballyhooing that Alabama and other SEC teams receive. Until they do try to live up to their hype during the regular season, until they commit to that challenge, then I refuse to view any declaration of Alabama's supposed "greatness" this year as puffery wrapped up in delusion.
Haters gonna hate.

by The Emerald Dawn » Fri Jan 04, 2013 9:30 am

by Saugeais » Fri Jan 04, 2013 12:42 pm

by Northern Dominus » Fri Jan 04, 2013 12:53 pm
And since Torisakia is going down the haters/hate path, since he's the OP of this thread take a look at which school is glaringly absent from that poll above...Chetssaland wrote:Torisakia wrote:Haters gonna hate.
That's not an argument, it's a pitiful deflection. As if I would expect anything less from a *typical SEC homer.
*T-sak is the only SEC fan in this thread that I would argue is a typical SEC homer. The rest of you can actually hold a logical conversation.

by Thorendium » Fri Jan 04, 2013 12:56 pm
Saugeais wrote:20-11 with the Oregon win yesterday. Still on pace to match my record last year of 24-11, but outside of the Cotton Bowl, these last ones are gonna be tricky.


by The Emerald Dawn » Fri Jan 04, 2013 12:57 pm

by Thorendium » Fri Jan 04, 2013 12:59 pm


by The Emerald Dawn » Fri Jan 04, 2013 1:00 pm

by Thorendium » Fri Jan 04, 2013 1:01 pm


by West Angola » Fri Jan 04, 2013 2:32 pm
Northern Dominus wrote:And since Torisakia is going down the haters/hate path, since he's the OP of this thread take a look at which school is glaringly absent from that poll above...

by Torisakia » Fri Jan 04, 2013 4:03 pm
Chetssaland wrote:Torisakia wrote:Haters gonna hate.
That's not an argument, it's a pitiful deflection. As if I would expect anything less from a *typical SEC homer.
*T-sak is the only SEC fan in this thread that I would argue is a typical SEC homer. The rest of you can actually hold a logical conversation.

by The Emerald Dawn » Fri Jan 04, 2013 4:04 pm
Torisakia wrote:Chetssaland wrote:
That's not an argument, it's a pitiful deflection. As if I would expect anything less from a *typical SEC homer.
*T-sak is the only SEC fan in this thread that I would argue is a typical SEC homer. The rest of you can actually hold a logical conversation.
Haters still gonna hate

by Chetssaland » Fri Jan 04, 2013 4:11 pm
Torisakia wrote:Chetssaland wrote:
That's not an argument, it's a pitiful deflection. As if I would expect anything less from a *typical SEC homer.
*T-sak is the only SEC fan in this thread that I would argue is a typical SEC homer. The rest of you can actually hold a logical conversation.
Haters still gonna hate

by Northern Dominus » Fri Jan 04, 2013 5:17 pm
If we're going to play that game... why isn't Notre Dame on your little poll up at the top? Hmm?Torisakia wrote:Chetssaland wrote:
That's not an argument, it's a pitiful deflection. As if I would expect anything less from a *typical SEC homer.
*T-sak is the only SEC fan in this thread that I would argue is a typical SEC homer. The rest of you can actually hold a logical conversation.
Haters still gonna hate

by West Angola » Fri Jan 04, 2013 5:58 pm
Northern Dominus wrote:If we're going to play that game... why isn't Notre Dame on your little poll up at the top? Hmm?

by Chetssaland » Fri Jan 04, 2013 6:03 pm

by Northern Dominus » Fri Jan 04, 2013 6:09 pm
Aaaand...what's the problem with that exactly? He's making the case of people being "haters", yet by not updating his poll, by all appearances he's the one that's "hating".

by Torisakia » Fri Jan 04, 2013 6:37 pm
Northern Dominus wrote:Aaaand...what's the problem with that exactly? He's making the case of people being "haters", yet by not updating his poll, by all appearances he's the one that's "hating".West Angola wrote:
Well, that's actually not his fault. No one saw Notre Dame coming this year, except (maybe) Brian Kelly, and if you change the things in a poll the poll resets.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: EuroStralia, Google [Bot], Khardsland, Likhinia, Nantoraka, Picairn, The Archregimancy, Vistulange
Advertisement