NATION

PASSWORD

How does the GOP maintain the level of support they do?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
The Black Forrest
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55601
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Black Forrest » Sun Jul 01, 2012 3:00 pm

North Calaveras wrote:
Frisivisia wrote:I think that it should be your right, but not ridiculousness. No assault arms, no explosive rounds, etc. reasonable restrictions.


what would be reasonable would be assault rifles and pistols as well as sniper rifles, the basics of a militia, obviously rockets and the like are a little extreme, but the average citizen should be able to arm himself like the average infantryman.


In the days when there wasn't a standing army, sure.

There are a great many people (relatives and friends) who I am glad who don't have access to high grade weapons.......
*I am a master proofreader after I click Submit.
* There is actually a War on Christmas. But Christmas started it, with it's unparalleled aggression against the Thanksgiving Holiday, and now Christmas has seized much Lebensraum in November, and are pushing into October. The rest of us seek to repel these invaders, and push them back to the status quo ante bellum Black Friday border. -Trotskylvania
* Silence Is Golden But Duct Tape Is Silver.
* I felt like Ayn Rand cornered me at a party, and three minutes in I found my first objection to what she was saying, but she kept talking without interruption for ten more days. - Max Barry talking about Atlas Shrugged

User avatar
Frisivisia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18164
Founded: Aug 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Frisivisia » Sun Jul 01, 2012 3:00 pm

North Calaveras wrote:
Frisivisia wrote:I think that it should be your right, but not ridiculousness. No assault arms, no explosive rounds, etc. reasonable restrictions.


what would be reasonable would be assault rifles and pistols as well as sniper rifles, the basics of a militia, obviously rockets and the like are a little extreme, but the average citizen should be able to arm himself like the average infantryman.

I disagree, I think that a bit worse than the average infantryman would do it, after all, if a large majority expressed concern that there was tyranny in government, that's all they would need. I think assault weapons are out, and submachineguns should require a tough license. Shotguns, hunting rifles, pistols, etc. are ok, because they can be used for hunting, home protection, and, in dire circumstances, war.
Impeach The Queen, Legalize Anarchy, Stealing Things Is Not Theft. Sex Pistols 2017.
I'm the evil gubmint PC inspector, here to take your Guns, outlaw your God, and steal your freedom and give it to black people.
I'm Joe Biden. So far as you know.

For: Anarchy, Punk Rock Fury
Against: Thatcher, Fascists, That Fascist Thatcher, Reagan, Nazi Punks, Everyone
"Am I buggin' ya? I don't mean to bug ya." - Bono
Let's cram some more shit in my sig. Cool people cram shit in their sigs. In TECHNICOLOR!

User avatar
North Calaveras
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16483
Founded: Mar 22, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby North Calaveras » Sun Jul 01, 2012 3:01 pm

The Black Forrest wrote:
North Calaveras wrote:
what would be reasonable would be assault rifles and pistols as well as sniper rifles, the basics of a militia, obviously rockets and the like are a little extreme, but the average citizen should be able to arm himself like the average infantryman.


In the days when there wasn't a standing army, sure.

There are a great many people (relatives and friends) who I am glad who don't have access to high grade weapons.......


That's nice, I guess since your glad no one else may have them
Government: Romanist Ceasarist Dictatorship
Political Themes: Nationalism, Romanticism, Ceasarism, Militarism, Social Liberalism, Cult of Personality
Ethnic Groups: American, Latino, Filipino

User avatar
Katganistan
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 35947
Founded: Antiquity
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Katganistan » Sun Jul 01, 2012 3:02 pm

New Nassrau wrote:the extremely high pensions


You mean the pensions people earned by NOT having a higher salary? Those pensions?
Jesus Christ, break some more contracts, why don't you? Contracts are GREAT when they are benefiting the corporations, but fuck the working class -- STEAL their benefits!

User avatar
Chetssaland
Senator
 
Posts: 4669
Founded: May 15, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Chetssaland » Sun Jul 01, 2012 3:02 pm

North Calaveras wrote:Hey im just defending an integral part of American cultural that is being withered away


Don't get me wrong, I'm actually pro-gun. One of the few conservative positions I take. I just wanted to use a conservative phrase against you. 8)

User avatar
The Black Forrest
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55601
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Black Forrest » Sun Jul 01, 2012 3:03 pm

North Calaveras wrote:Hey im just defending an integral part of American cultural that is being withered away


Do you seriously think the second amendment was designed to keep the government at bay?
*I am a master proofreader after I click Submit.
* There is actually a War on Christmas. But Christmas started it, with it's unparalleled aggression against the Thanksgiving Holiday, and now Christmas has seized much Lebensraum in November, and are pushing into October. The rest of us seek to repel these invaders, and push them back to the status quo ante bellum Black Friday border. -Trotskylvania
* Silence Is Golden But Duct Tape Is Silver.
* I felt like Ayn Rand cornered me at a party, and three minutes in I found my first objection to what she was saying, but she kept talking without interruption for ten more days. - Max Barry talking about Atlas Shrugged

User avatar
North Calaveras
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16483
Founded: Mar 22, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby North Calaveras » Sun Jul 01, 2012 3:04 pm

The Black Forrest wrote:
North Calaveras wrote:Hey im just defending an integral part of American cultural that is being withered away


Do you seriously think the second amendment was designed to keep the government at bay?


Yes I do, as well as protect us against foriegn threats as well
Government: Romanist Ceasarist Dictatorship
Political Themes: Nationalism, Romanticism, Ceasarism, Militarism, Social Liberalism, Cult of Personality
Ethnic Groups: American, Latino, Filipino

User avatar
The Black Forrest
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55601
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Black Forrest » Sun Jul 01, 2012 3:04 pm

North Calaveras wrote:
The Black Forrest wrote:
In the days when there wasn't a standing army, sure.

There are a great many people (relatives and friends) who I am glad who don't have access to high grade weapons.......


That's nice, I guess since your glad no one else may have them


I don't get your concern. There are many "legal" hunting rifles which are rather effective.

Military weapons? Why?
*I am a master proofreader after I click Submit.
* There is actually a War on Christmas. But Christmas started it, with it's unparalleled aggression against the Thanksgiving Holiday, and now Christmas has seized much Lebensraum in November, and are pushing into October. The rest of us seek to repel these invaders, and push them back to the status quo ante bellum Black Friday border. -Trotskylvania
* Silence Is Golden But Duct Tape Is Silver.
* I felt like Ayn Rand cornered me at a party, and three minutes in I found my first objection to what she was saying, but she kept talking without interruption for ten more days. - Max Barry talking about Atlas Shrugged

User avatar
The UK in Exile
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12023
Founded: Jul 27, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby The UK in Exile » Sun Jul 01, 2012 3:05 pm

The Black Forrest wrote:
North Calaveras wrote:
That's nice, I guess since your glad no one else may have them


I don't get your concern. There are many "legal" hunting rifles which are rather effective.

Military weapons? Why?


because in his head its 1775.
"We fought for the public good and would have enfranchised the people and secured the welfare of the whole groaning creation, if the nation had not more delighted in servitude than in freedom"

"My actions are as noble as my thoughts, That never relish’d of a base descent.I came unto your court for honour’s cause, And not to be a rebel to her state; And he that otherwise accounts of me, This sword shall prove he’s honour’s enemy."

"Wählte Ungnade, wo Gehorsam nicht Ehre brachte."
DEFCON 0 - not at war
DEFCON 1 - at war "go to red alert!" "are you absolutely sure sir? it does mean changing the lightbulb."

User avatar
North Calaveras
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16483
Founded: Mar 22, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby North Calaveras » Sun Jul 01, 2012 3:06 pm

The Black Forrest wrote:
North Calaveras wrote:
That's nice, I guess since your glad no one else may have them


I don't get your concern. There are many "legal" hunting rifles which are rather effective.

Military weapons? Why?


A flintlock will still kill to, so why don't we just use them?
Government: Romanist Ceasarist Dictatorship
Political Themes: Nationalism, Romanticism, Ceasarism, Militarism, Social Liberalism, Cult of Personality
Ethnic Groups: American, Latino, Filipino

User avatar
The UK in Exile
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12023
Founded: Jul 27, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby The UK in Exile » Sun Jul 01, 2012 3:08 pm

North Calaveras wrote:
The Black Forrest wrote:
I don't get your concern. There are many "legal" hunting rifles which are rather effective.

Military weapons? Why?


A flintlock will still kill to, so why don't we just use them?


would make more sense given your claim that its an integral part of american culture.
"We fought for the public good and would have enfranchised the people and secured the welfare of the whole groaning creation, if the nation had not more delighted in servitude than in freedom"

"My actions are as noble as my thoughts, That never relish’d of a base descent.I came unto your court for honour’s cause, And not to be a rebel to her state; And he that otherwise accounts of me, This sword shall prove he’s honour’s enemy."

"Wählte Ungnade, wo Gehorsam nicht Ehre brachte."
DEFCON 0 - not at war
DEFCON 1 - at war "go to red alert!" "are you absolutely sure sir? it does mean changing the lightbulb."

User avatar
The Black Forrest
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55601
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Black Forrest » Sun Jul 01, 2012 3:08 pm

North Calaveras wrote:
The Black Forrest wrote:
Do you seriously think the second amendment was designed to keep the government at bay?


Yes I do, as well as protect us against foriegn threats as well


Well? It wasn't and the last "invasion" (I don't really call Attu a "real" invasion) was 1846 by the Mexicans and 1812.

Today it's rather hard to invade and even if we were, much of the country will be devastated first......
*I am a master proofreader after I click Submit.
* There is actually a War on Christmas. But Christmas started it, with it's unparalleled aggression against the Thanksgiving Holiday, and now Christmas has seized much Lebensraum in November, and are pushing into October. The rest of us seek to repel these invaders, and push them back to the status quo ante bellum Black Friday border. -Trotskylvania
* Silence Is Golden But Duct Tape Is Silver.
* I felt like Ayn Rand cornered me at a party, and three minutes in I found my first objection to what she was saying, but she kept talking without interruption for ten more days. - Max Barry talking about Atlas Shrugged

User avatar
Revolutopia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5741
Founded: May 25, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Revolutopia » Sun Jul 01, 2012 3:08 pm

North Calaveras wrote: its the same thing with democrats with firearms and politcal correctness


Might I ask what Political Correctness laws are you complaining about? Additionally, the GOP loves itself some political correctness also.
The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little.-FDR

Economic Left/Right: -3.12|Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.49

Who is Tom Joad?

User avatar
Katganistan
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 35947
Founded: Antiquity
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Katganistan » Sun Jul 01, 2012 3:09 pm

The UK in Exile wrote:
Ifreann wrote:No defence of the Republicans, no opposition to the claim they use underhanded tactics, just another "The Democrats are bad, too!" attack.


this from the poster that dismissed watergate.

who are you america, who do not know their history?

But see, it's ok, because Republicans SAY so!

User avatar
North Calaveras
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16483
Founded: Mar 22, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby North Calaveras » Sun Jul 01, 2012 3:09 pm

The Black Forrest wrote:
North Calaveras wrote:
Yes I do, as well as protect us against foriegn threats as well


Well? It wasn't and the last "invasion" (I don't really call Attu a "real" invasion) was 1846 by the Mexicans and 1812.

Today it's rather hard to invade and even if we were, much of the country will be devastated first......


Then what was it for oh enlightend one?
Government: Romanist Ceasarist Dictatorship
Political Themes: Nationalism, Romanticism, Ceasarism, Militarism, Social Liberalism, Cult of Personality
Ethnic Groups: American, Latino, Filipino

User avatar
Christian Democrats
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10089
Founded: Jul 29, 2009
New York Times Democracy

Postby Christian Democrats » Sun Jul 01, 2012 3:10 pm

Saluterre wrote:They draw support from the religious, the uneducated, and some rural citizens, with whom their socially conservative ideas carry weight.


Exit Polls for Elections of the U.S. House of Representatives (Level of Education)

Not a high school graduate

1984: 60% Democrat
1986: 57% Democrat
1988: 63% Democrat
1990: 60% Democrat
1992: 67% Democrat
1994: 58% Democrat
1996: 65% Democrat
1998: 58% Democrat
2000: 58% Democrat
2002: 63% Democrat
2004: Tie between parties
2006: 64% Democrat
2008: 69% Democrat
2010: 61% Democrat

TOTAL: 13 Democrats, 1 tie

College graduate

1984: Tie between parties
1986: 54% Republican
1988: 53% Republican
1990: Tie between parties
1992: 54% Republican
1994: 55% Republican
1996: 57% Republican
1998: 55% Republican
2000: 54% Republican
2002: 58% Republican
2004: 53% Republican
2006: Tie between parties
2008: 51% Democrat
2010: 58% Republican

TOTAL: 10 Republicans, 1 Democrat, 3 ties

Source: The New York Times
Leo Tolstoy wrote:Wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority share in it.
GA#160: Forced Marriages Ban Act (79%)
GA#175: Organ and Blood Donations Act (68%)^
SC#082: Repeal "Liberate Catholic" (80%)
GA#200: Foreign Marriage Recognition (54%)
GA#213: Privacy Protection Act (70%)
GA#231: Marital Rape Justice Act (81%)^
GA#233: Ban Profits on Workers' Deaths (80%)*
GA#249: Stopping Suicide Seeds (70%)^
GA#253: Repeal "Freedom in Medical Research" (76%)
GA#285: Assisted Suicide Act (70%)^
GA#310: Disabled Voters Act (81%)
GA#373: Repeal "Convention on Execution" (54%)
GA#468: Prohibit Private Prisons (57%)^

* denotes coauthorship
^ repealed resolution
#360: Electile Dysfunction
#452: Foetal Furore
#560: Bicameral Backlash
#570: Clerical Errors

User avatar
North Calaveras
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16483
Founded: Mar 22, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby North Calaveras » Sun Jul 01, 2012 3:10 pm

Revolutopia wrote:
North Calaveras wrote: its the same thing with democrats with firearms and politcal correctness


Might I ask what Political Correctness laws are you complaining about? Additionally, the GOP loves itself some political correctness also.


they both do but Democrats always seem to be the ones who push on about hate speech and the like, and hate crimes(makes no sense lol)
Government: Romanist Ceasarist Dictatorship
Political Themes: Nationalism, Romanticism, Ceasarism, Militarism, Social Liberalism, Cult of Personality
Ethnic Groups: American, Latino, Filipino

User avatar
The Black Forrest
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55601
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Black Forrest » Sun Jul 01, 2012 3:11 pm

Katganistan wrote:
New Nassrau wrote:the extremely high pensions


You mean the pensions people earned by NOT having a higher salary? Those pensions?
Jesus Christ, break some more contracts, why don't you? Contracts are GREAT when they are benefiting the corporations, but fuck the working class -- STEAL their benefits!


Well you leeches really don't do anything. Everybody knows it's the government officials and the corporate execs who earn their salaries. They earn them so much their compensation has grown a few thousand percent in the last 50 years........
*I am a master proofreader after I click Submit.
* There is actually a War on Christmas. But Christmas started it, with it's unparalleled aggression against the Thanksgiving Holiday, and now Christmas has seized much Lebensraum in November, and are pushing into October. The rest of us seek to repel these invaders, and push them back to the status quo ante bellum Black Friday border. -Trotskylvania
* Silence Is Golden But Duct Tape Is Silver.
* I felt like Ayn Rand cornered me at a party, and three minutes in I found my first objection to what she was saying, but she kept talking without interruption for ten more days. - Max Barry talking about Atlas Shrugged

User avatar
Katganistan
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 35947
Founded: Antiquity
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Katganistan » Sun Jul 01, 2012 3:12 pm

Hippostania wrote:
Norstal wrote:No. You agreed to pay taxes. That money is yours no longer. It has been snuffed away, fizzled, gone, you are bereft of your money, tis no longer under your jurisdiction anymore.

That doesn't mean however, you can elect candidates to represent you to influence how the government works, vote on a proposition, etc.

I did not agree to pay taxes. And don't give me any ''social contract'' bullshit, I have not agreed to pay taxes in any form, yet I am forced to do so.

You can always not pay your taxes, or live away from society and take none of the benefits like roads, police, fire departments, et cetera.

User avatar
Revolutopia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5741
Founded: May 25, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Revolutopia » Sun Jul 01, 2012 3:13 pm

North Calaveras wrote:
Revolutopia wrote:
Might I ask what Political Correctness laws are you complaining about? Additionally, the GOP loves itself some political correctness also.


they both do but Democrats always seem to be the ones who push on about hate speech and the like, and hate crimes(makes no sense lol)


And that is PC how?

Also Hate Speech is not banned in the USA.
Last edited by Revolutopia on Sun Jul 01, 2012 3:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little.-FDR

Economic Left/Right: -3.12|Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.49

Who is Tom Joad?

User avatar
Socialist EU
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1825
Founded: Aug 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Socialist EU » Sun Jul 01, 2012 3:14 pm

Frisivisia wrote:
Christian Democrats wrote:People like lower taxes, and they want the government to spend money responsibly.

Most Americans agree with the social views of the Republican Party.

Many people do not want to live in a nanny state.

Etc.

That's funny because most Americans are Democrats, they just don't show up as well to the polls. Imagine that, there are non-white Americans.


Actually, most Americans are non-voters, (about 43%)...I personally do not really care who wins....(Obama or Romney, :meh: )

Saluterre said:
All of this, combined with the trouble of the center/right-wing two-party system, lead to the problems in American democracy today. We'd be much better off if the two largest parties were the Socialists and the Libertarians, as opposed to the do-nothing, wishy-washy Democrats and the ham-fisted, authoritarian, lying Republicans. A multi-party system is the only way to produce REAL political representation.


You need patience, the only thing I'm looking out for,(post November elections) is all those non-voters voting for a left party, in other words, I'd consider it a positive result to see a socialist party reach above 5%, or at least get close to that.
Last edited by Socialist EU on Sun Jul 01, 2012 3:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Egypt:
Spontaneous protests will not produce organisation, it is more likely to lead to an oppressive clampdown! There needs to be a long-term strategy to build the left towards..
-mass parties of the left
-mass trade unions
-mass left-wing publications

Europe
For a United socialist Europe under democratic working class rule.
For the unity of the working class across Europe and eventually* take power.
*'Towards a communist party of the EU'

Britain
For a voluntary federated democratic republic.

Scotland
Abstain on independence referendum, Salmond wants to keep within the union!

User avatar
North Calaveras
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16483
Founded: Mar 22, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby North Calaveras » Sun Jul 01, 2012 3:14 pm

Revolutopia wrote:
North Calaveras wrote:
they both do but Democrats always seem to be the ones who push on about hate speech and the like, and hate crimes(makes no sense lol)


And that is PC how?


because for some reason elements of the left love the idea of making it against the law to offend someone. But i guess i can't complain to much as there are fringe elements on both sides
Government: Romanist Ceasarist Dictatorship
Political Themes: Nationalism, Romanticism, Ceasarism, Militarism, Social Liberalism, Cult of Personality
Ethnic Groups: American, Latino, Filipino

User avatar
Revolutopia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5741
Founded: May 25, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Revolutopia » Sun Jul 01, 2012 3:15 pm

North Calaveras wrote:
Revolutopia wrote:
And that is PC how?


because for some reason elements of the left love the idea of making it against the law to offend someone. But i guess i can't complain to much as there are fringe elements on both sides


Hate Speech is not banned, thus explain how Hate Crimes are PC and wrong.
The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little.-FDR

Economic Left/Right: -3.12|Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.49

Who is Tom Joad?

User avatar
Chetssaland
Senator
 
Posts: 4669
Founded: May 15, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Chetssaland » Sun Jul 01, 2012 3:16 pm

North Calaveras wrote:
Revolutopia wrote:
And that is PC how?


because for some reason elements of the left love the idea of making it against the law to offend someone. But i guess i can't complain to much as there are fringe elements on both sides


I don't think they want to make it against the law.

User avatar
Socialist EU
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1825
Founded: Aug 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Socialist EU » Sun Jul 01, 2012 3:16 pm

Norstal wrote:
Hippostania wrote:So if I come and steal your money while threatening you with a shotgun, it's mine because you gave it to me? Alrighty then!

What are you an anarchist? This stupid anarcho-capitalist argument has been debunked many times.

But if you can't come up with a better argument, well, I have America's finest protecting and I'd like to see you try. :)


I would say he is closer to the archaic classical liberal ideology.
Egypt:
Spontaneous protests will not produce organisation, it is more likely to lead to an oppressive clampdown! There needs to be a long-term strategy to build the left towards..
-mass parties of the left
-mass trade unions
-mass left-wing publications

Europe
For a United socialist Europe under democratic working class rule.
For the unity of the working class across Europe and eventually* take power.
*'Towards a communist party of the EU'

Britain
For a voluntary federated democratic republic.

Scotland
Abstain on independence referendum, Salmond wants to keep within the union!

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Emotional Support Crocodile, Fractalnavel, The Rio Grande River Basin, Ventura Bay

Advertisement

Remove ads