NATION

PASSWORD

All Y’all Atheists.

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
The Blaatschapen
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 62662
Founded: Antiquity
Anarchy

Postby The Blaatschapen » Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:45 pm

Macenheim wrote:I'll tell you why you are allowed to screw up. God is a father to us all and every just father allows his children freedom to follow him or their own desires. And God did not create us perfectly, but of His own image meaning that we are modeled after God but we are inferior to him because we are not the same as God.


Thanks that we're allowed to "screw up". Now leave us be at our "mistakes" :)
The Blaatschapen should resign

User avatar
Greater Shoggothia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 129
Founded: Jul 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater Shoggothia » Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:45 pm

The Federated States of Chezchosiberia wrote:
Veladio wrote:
...wow, talk about intolerance. The deepest pit is reserved for atheists? Not murderers or child molesters... I hope to the GODS that this is satire :palm:


Murder and Child Molestation are not as Amoral ( no concept of morality ) as Atheism :palm:

You know there is a whole thread on atheist morality. Why don't you go there?

User avatar
Demon Cleaner
Secretary
 
Posts: 30
Founded: Jul 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Demon Cleaner » Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:45 pm

Greater Shoggothia wrote:Oh you want an actual refutation of the ten commandments?

Okay: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwxvawKq_W8


Let's see:

His criticism of #1-4 and #10 are ultimately pointless when we talk about Jesus.
Christian Apologist

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:46 pm

Veladio wrote:
The Federated States of Chezchosiberia wrote:
Murder and Child Molestation are not as Amoral ( no concept of morality ) as Atheism :palm:

Amoral>Immoral

Don't feed him.

User avatar
Demon Cleaner
Secretary
 
Posts: 30
Founded: Jul 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Demon Cleaner » Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:46 pm

The Federated States of Chezchosiberia wrote:ATTENTION MY FELLOW CHRISTIANS
Athiests,they don't belive in anything, they are smaller and weaker ( in terms of size and influence )than christians.
Their all going to HELL anyway so when we are all dead we can laugh at them from our mansions in HEAVEN
Why do Athiests even need a forum?
So they can talk about everything that they don't belive in?
To complain about how Christians are trying to convert them every time they mention god?
(Paranoia)

"The Christians are trying to convert me, ALWAYS trying to convert me" :shock:
-every atheists EVER!!!!!

The guy who made this thread was looking for a fight, (typical Atheist)
he wanted to take a dump on our beliefs so he could feel better about his, like a bully, and this is true about all Atheists.
Yep that's right, don't feel sorry for atheists when they tell you they were bullied because now they are the bullies.
The deepest pit in hell is reserved for Atheists.

My belief in God is sound
it's as solid as the ground
and no servent of damnation
will ever shake its foundation


^Christian who does not endorse this statement.^
Christian Apologist

User avatar
Seperates
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14622
Founded: Sep 03, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Seperates » Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:46 pm

The Federated States of Chezchosiberia wrote:ATTENTION MY FELLOW CHRISTIANS
Athiests,they don't belive in anything, they are smaller and weaker ( in terms of size and influence )than christians.
Their all going to HELL anyway so when we are all dead we can laugh at them from our mansions in HEAVEN
Why do Athiests even need a forum?
So they can talk about everything that they don't belive in?
To complain about how Christians are trying to convert them every time they mention god?
(Paranoia)

"The Christians are trying to convert me, ALWAYS trying to convert me" :shock:
-every atheists EVER!!!!!

The guy who made this thread was looking for a fight, (typical Atheist)
he wanted to take a dump on our beliefs so he could feel better about his, like a bully, and this is true about all Atheists.
Yep that's right, don't feel sorry for atheists when they tell you they were bullied because now they are the bullies.
The deepest pit in hell is reserved for Atheists.

My belief in God is sound
it's as solid as the ground
and no servent of damnation
will ever shake its foundation

Hey, your unorginality is cramping my style,
you should just go on back home because I think you're quite vile.
Take a shower man, because that shit does reek,
You can't fake me out because I'm here almost everyday of the week

A bully? Me? Sir, you're far too kind.
Your ideas are even worse than your rythym and rhyme.
So put on your glove on your tougue and prepare for a fight,
because you are posting on a muth'afucking debate website.

(Well, technically a debate forum, but fuck it, sometimes you have to go with the flow.)
Last edited by Seperates on Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:51 pm, edited 2 times in total.
This Debate is simply an exercise in Rhetoric. Truth is a fickle being with no intentions of showing itself today.

Non fui, fui, non sum, non curo

"The most important fact about us: that we are greater than the institutions and cultures we build."--Roberto Mangabeira Unger

User avatar
Wilsonbiggs
Attaché
 
Posts: 67
Founded: Jun 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Wilsonbiggs » Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:46 pm

The bible is interesting. I love the history and such behind it, but I don't believe in it. The "Dead Sea Scrolls" exhibit at my local science museum was VERY interesting. I atually want to read the bible someday, as a novel, instead of as a factbook.
My website
My music

Compasses
I am a left moderate social libertarian. I am also a moderate non-interventionist, and a moderate cultural liberal.
Left/Right: -3.24
Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.55
Foreign Policy: -2.59
Culture: -4.27
Left/Right: -2.5950
Pragmatism: 0.0997

User avatar
The Federated States of Chezchosiberia
Secretary
 
Posts: 29
Founded: Jun 07, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Federated States of Chezchosiberia » Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:47 pm

Wamitoria wrote:
The Federated States of Chezchosiberia wrote:-SNIP-

Yes, the deepest pit is reserved for atheists. Not for child molesters, rapists, mass murderers, etc.

This kind of shit is why I'm a Deist.



Indeed the deepest pit of hell is reserved for atheists, so glad to see you agree with me :clap:

ha ha oh im a riot :rofl:

User avatar
Greater Shoggothia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 129
Founded: Jul 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater Shoggothia » Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:49 pm

Demon Cleaner wrote:
Greater Shoggothia wrote:Oh you want an actual refutation of the ten commandments?

Okay: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwxvawKq_W8


Let's see:

His criticism of #1-4 and #10 are ultimately pointless when we talk about Jesus.

So your defense of the ten commandments is that half of them are irrelevant anyway? This makes them even worse as a moral guide, not better.

User avatar
Demon Cleaner
Secretary
 
Posts: 30
Founded: Jul 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Demon Cleaner » Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:49 pm

The Federated States of Chezchosiberia wrote:
Wamitoria wrote:Yes, the deepest pit is reserved for atheists. Not for child molesters, rapists, mass murderers, etc.

This kind of shit is why I'm a Deist.



Indeed the deepest pit of hell is reserved for atheists, so glad to see you agree with me :clap:

ha ha oh im a riot :rofl:


This isn't Divine Comedy.
Christian Apologist

User avatar
Demon Cleaner
Secretary
 
Posts: 30
Founded: Jul 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Demon Cleaner » Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:50 pm

Greater Shoggothia wrote:
Demon Cleaner wrote:
Let's see:

His criticism of #1-4 and #10 are ultimately pointless when we talk about Jesus.

So your defense of the ten commandments is that half of them are irrelevant anyway? This makes them even worse as a moral guide, not better.


Let me save myself the words and use the bold feature instead.

If you don't understand my point after that, then you haven't read the New Testament.
Christian Apologist

User avatar
Seperates
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14622
Founded: Sep 03, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Seperates » Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:50 pm

The Federated States of Chezchosiberia wrote:
Wamitoria wrote:Yes, the deepest pit is reserved for atheists. Not for child molesters, rapists, mass murderers, etc.

This kind of shit is why I'm a Deist.



Indeed the deepest pit of hell is reserved for atheists, so glad to see you agree with me :clap:

ha ha oh im a riot :rofl:

Really, though, you are quite absurd.
What even makes you think that I care about your Word?
I've debated with teachers, I've debated with preists,
And I've come out stronger in my disbelief to say the least.
This Debate is simply an exercise in Rhetoric. Truth is a fickle being with no intentions of showing itself today.

Non fui, fui, non sum, non curo

"The most important fact about us: that we are greater than the institutions and cultures we build."--Roberto Mangabeira Unger

User avatar
The Federated States of Chezchosiberia
Secretary
 
Posts: 29
Founded: Jun 07, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Federated States of Chezchosiberia » Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:50 pm

Seperates wrote:
The Federated States of Chezchosiberia wrote:ATTENTION MY FELLOW CHRISTIANS
Athiests,they don't belive in anything, they are smaller and weaker ( in terms of size and influence )than christians.
Their all going to HELL anyway so when we are all dead we can laugh at them from our mansions in HEAVEN
Why do Athiests even need a forum?
So they can talk about everything that they don't belive in?
To complain about how Christians are trying to convert them every time they mention god?
(Paranoia)

"The Christians are trying to convert me, ALWAYS trying to convert me" :shock:
-every atheists EVER!!!!!

The guy who made this thread was looking for a fight, (typical Atheist)
he wanted to take a dump on our beliefs so he could feel better about his, like a bully, and this is true about all Atheists.
Yep that's right, don't feel sorry for atheists when they tell you they were bullied because now they are the bullies.
The deepest pit in hell is reserved for Atheists.

My belief in God is sound
it's as solid as the ground
and no servent of damnation
will ever shake its foundation

Hey, your unorginality is cramping my style,
you should just go on back home because I think you're quite vile.
Take a shower man, because that shit does reek,
You can't fake me out because I'm here almost everyday of the week

A bully? Me? Sir, you're far too kind.
Your ideas are even worse than your rythym and rhyme.
So put on your glove on your tougue and prepare for a fight,
because you are posting on a muth'afucking debate website.

Well, technically a debate forum, but fuck it, sometimes you have to go with the flow.)


Okay that was pretty good :o
i'll concede, i'm tired of arguing :meh:

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:51 pm

Seperates wrote:
The Federated States of Chezchosiberia wrote:

Indeed the deepest pit of hell is reserved for atheists, so glad to see you agree with me :clap:

ha ha oh im a riot :rofl:

Really, though, you are quite absurd.
What even makes you think that I care about your Word?
I've debated with teachers, I've debated with preists,
And I've come out stronger in my disbelief to say the least.

I recommend you stop feeding him.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:52 pm

Demon Cleaner wrote:I stated that the principles of not judging others, doing onto others as you would have them do onto you, and other teachings were as tolerant as you could get. If any other religion is teaching the same moral statements, then they must be on the same level, not below it, as they are the same teachings.

Except, I never said that Christianity has the same exact moral statements as all other religions. Moreover, it's not just about the moral statements themselves, but the reasoning behind the moral statements.
Demon Cleaner wrote:When I say ''not the most tolerant'', all I am trying to do is say that I don't think what Jesus taught is better than any Eastern religion, as it's mostly the same.

Except, this isn't true at all.
Demon Cleaner wrote:
I would say that Jainism = Buddhism = Jesys, but have it your way.

...This is ignorance at it's best. I'm a Buddhist, and even I would put Jainism above Buddhism when it comes to morality. You cannot beat Jainism in that department, you simply can't. But seriously, you should try backing up your claim for once.
Demon Cleaner wrote:Present the argument yourself. I'm not refuting a link to a YouTube video from a dead comedian. If I linked WLC giving his five arguments for the existence of God, it would not be fair for me to expect you to refute it all.

Except, I WOULD refute them. Just because you don't like refuting evidence, doesn't mean I don't.
Demon Cleaner wrote:Not judging other people when you're not perfect is logical, because doing so would be hypocritical and self-defeating.

Except this is downright impossible. Judging others is not bad. If you believe so, prove it. But otherwise, this is a useless "moral" point.
Demon Cleaner wrote:Doing onto others as you would have them do onto you is logical, because you should extend the same moral rights to others you would want to be extended by other people to yourself. You wouldn't expect to be treated nicely by others if you treated them like dirt.

Actually, no. The Golden Rule has been pointed out to be flawed heavily. The Golden Rule tries to justify being moral, but it fails miserably. This is another reason why Jainism and Buddhism are better in the department of morality. They don't adhere to the faulty Golden Rule.

Demon Cleaner wrote:Please stop acting like things such as ''learn to read'' and ''educate yourself'' are actual arguments and not personal attacks that ruin the productivity of the discussion.

I'm not going to argue something I never said, or strawmen you create.
Demon Cleaner wrote:The only conclusion I can get from ''The teachings of Jesus are not original'' is that they must be equal to the same teachings that came before him. If everything Jesus said completely unoriginal and taken from Buddhism, Jainism, etc., then why are they logical and deep, when his are illogical and primitive?


Where did I say they were completely unoriginal? His moral teachings were, but his teachings altogether as a whole obviously were, otherwise Christianity would not be a distinct religion. But ignoring that, many of his teachings weren't logical themselves. There are major differences between the moral teachings of Christianity and a religion such as Jainism. At the core, they try to get the basics across (don't murder, don't steal, etc) but the reasoning behind them and the actual depth of the philosophies are very contrasting.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Seperates
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14622
Founded: Sep 03, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Seperates » Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:52 pm

Divair wrote:
Seperates wrote:Really, though, you are quite absurd.
What even makes you think that I care about your Word?
I've debated with teachers, I've debated with preists,
And I've come out stronger in my disbelief to say the least.

I recommend you stop feeding him.

At that point I was just feeling the beat more or less.
More about creativity, and less about arguement.
Last edited by Seperates on Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
This Debate is simply an exercise in Rhetoric. Truth is a fickle being with no intentions of showing itself today.

Non fui, fui, non sum, non curo

"The most important fact about us: that we are greater than the institutions and cultures we build."--Roberto Mangabeira Unger

User avatar
The Federated States of Chezchosiberia
Secretary
 
Posts: 29
Founded: Jun 07, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Federated States of Chezchosiberia » Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:53 pm

Demon Cleaner wrote:
The Federated States of Chezchosiberia wrote:

Indeed the deepest pit of hell is reserved for atheists, so glad to see you agree with me :clap:

ha ha oh im a riot :rofl:


This isn't Divine Comedy.


Just trying to lighten the mood >:(

User avatar
The Blaatschapen
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 62662
Founded: Antiquity
Anarchy

Postby The Blaatschapen » Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:54 pm

Seperates wrote:
The Federated States of Chezchosiberia wrote:

Indeed the deepest pit of hell is reserved for atheists, so glad to see you agree with me :clap:

ha ha oh im a riot :rofl:

Really, though, you are quite absurd.
What even makes you think that I care about your Word?
I've debated with teachers, I've debated with preists,
And I've come out stronger in my disbelief to say the least.


The last Word I cared about was from Microsoft.
The Blaatschapen should resign

User avatar
The Orson Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31416
Founded: Mar 20, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Orson Empire » Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:55 pm

Seperates wrote:
Macenheim wrote:the truth about God, if anyone has ever read the Bible, is that he gives us the choice between good and evil. God didn't desire Adam and Eve to choose pride over sanctuary, but we are the greatest of His creations because we have free will and are considered above the Heavenly angels. So I don't buy anyone saying they can just get along without God. Its like saying that if you jump out of an airplane from 10,000 feet in the air, without a parachute, you'll survive simply because you think you'll just hit the ground and live. And for all you people who are experiencing a crisis of faith, don't focus on dogma or doctrine or too much biblical study; the best thing for you is prayer and worship. because In the end it doesn't matter how much you KNOW about God; it matters how well you accepted whatever you DIDN'T know about Him, what you took on faith. "Blessed are they that have not seen and still believe." (please excuse my absence of acknowledgement of passage.)

Why? What has prayer and worship ever done for anyone? I'll tell you. Nothing that can't be done by simple relaxation or meditation.

Have you ever heard the saying "God helps those who help themselves"? Well, that's because God doesn't do anything because he doesn't exist.

Adam and Eve never existed, so your conjecture is pointless.

Well He has helped me out. And I can prove it.
This isn't meant to be trolling or against the rules.
Last edited by The Orson Empire on Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Greater Shoggothia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 129
Founded: Jul 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater Shoggothia » Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:56 pm

Demon Cleaner wrote:
Greater Shoggothia wrote:So your defense of the ten commandments is that half of them are irrelevant anyway? This makes them even worse as a moral guide, not better.


Let me save myself the words and use the bold feature instead.

If you don't understand my point after that, then you haven't read the New Testament.

I've read the New Testament. I particularly liked the bit in Revelations where Jesus commands his followers to be intolerant, a point you seem to have ignored. Much like you have ignored entirely Hitchen's critique, and apparently have no answer even for those criticisms you acknowledge.

Have you ever read any Buddhist Sūtras? You seem quite convinced that Jesus is their moral equal, and yet I doubt if you've read even a single one of them.


As for myself, having read quite extensively on these subjects, I would say that morally the New Testament falls somewhere between the Avesta and the Bhagavad Gita. Except for that the Bhagavad Gita has better poetry, and the Avesta a more just deity.

User avatar
Seperates
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14622
Founded: Sep 03, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Seperates » Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:56 pm

The Blaatschapen wrote:
Seperates wrote:Really, though, you are quite absurd.
What even makes you think that I care about your Word?
I've debated with teachers, I've debated with preists,
And I've come out stronger in my disbelief to say the least.


The last Word I cared about was from Microsoft.

Ok, that's definitly true... Ah, that was so damn punny though... Word as in Biblical Word, along with word as in "taking his word for it". Ah, language is so fun and stupid sometimes. :D
This Debate is simply an exercise in Rhetoric. Truth is a fickle being with no intentions of showing itself today.

Non fui, fui, non sum, non curo

"The most important fact about us: that we are greater than the institutions and cultures we build."--Roberto Mangabeira Unger

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:56 pm

The Orson Empire wrote:Well He has helped me out. And I can prove it.
This isn't meant to be trolling or against the rules.


Question: Why has God never healed amputees? Does he not like them?
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Veladio
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1360
Founded: Jul 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Veladio » Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:56 pm

The Blaatschapen wrote:
Seperates wrote:Really, though, you are quite absurd.
What even makes you think that I care about your Word?
I've debated with teachers, I've debated with preists,
And I've come out stronger in my disbelief to say the least.


The last Word I cared about was from Microsoft.

Nope, I use Libre Office :p
I am a Wiccan. Do not assume I am an Atheist in Religion threads simply because I support complete Secularization of Government Entities.

Social Libertarian (could care less about Economics, there are people who are more educated at it, so it is a waste of time to try and debate me on it.). As stated above I am a Wiccan, and I find solidarity with the Egyptian Deities. I support government secularization as well as complete freedom of religion, as I believe that to truly be secular, the state must respect all beliefs, and favor none. And I recently enlisted in the United States Navy.

User avatar
Stovokor
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1109
Founded: Dec 14, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Stovokor » Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:56 pm

The Federated States of Chezchosiberia wrote:
Seperates wrote:Hey, your unorginality is cramping my style,
you should just go on back home because I think you're quite vile.
Take a shower man, because that shit does reek,
You can't fake me out because I'm here almost everyday of the week

A bully? Me? Sir, you're far too kind.
Your ideas are even worse than your rythym and rhyme.
So put on your glove on your tougue and prepare for a fight,
because you are posting on a muth'afucking debate website.

Well, technically a debate forum, but fuck it, sometimes you have to go with the flow.)


Okay that was pretty good :o
i'll concede, i'm tired of arguing :meh:



you didn't even argue ..
If i'm responding to you directly, it is generally safe to disregard everything that was said and assume i'm calling you a twit.
I Roleplay as such my nation is not a representation of my political, economic, and spiritual beliefs.

Economic Left/Right: 1.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.92

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:57 pm

Stovokor wrote:
you didn't even argue ..


Don't encourage him to try.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, American Legionaries, Bradfordville, Des-Bal, Dimetrodon Empire, Dtn, Emotional Support Crocodile, Ethel mermania, Heavenly Assault, Jilia, Nilokeras, Riviere Renard, Tarsonis, Vassenor, Yasuragi

Advertisement

Remove ads