Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 1:17 pmTen pounds says that even after we're extinct, feminists will still find a way to blame us for womankind's problems
Yes. I could also be eating sausage wrapped in bacon and covered with butter.
NationStates
Because sometimes even national leaders just want to hang out
https://forum.nationstates.net/
Too much sex will destroy humanity!
Page 2 of 6
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 1:17 pmPosted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 1:19 pmPosted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 1:19 pmGuess that's why in T.V. the future sometimes becomes an Earth inhabited by only women... Yeah, no, I don't think it'll happen. Evolution won't let it.
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 1:19 pmPosted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 1:20 pmI think I heard somewhere that a female egg can impregnate another. It's a failsafe that the female body has in case a male population drops drastically.
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 1:20 pmNope, feminists will start blaming other feminists; some feminists will just create males in labs to piss the other feminists off.Lenehen wrote:Ten pounds says that even after we're extinct, feminists will still find a way to blame us for womankind's problems
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 1:20 pmPosted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 1:21 pmHydralis wrote:I think I heard somewhere that a female egg can impregnate another. It's a failsafe that the female body has in case a male population drops drastically.
I call bullshit on whoever told you that.
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 1:21 pmI will stay back, however. I'm told I can't watch, much less go in.
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 1:21 pm
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 1:22 pm
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 1:22 pmPosted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 1:22 pmPosted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 1:23 pmI don't know how you do it, Ende. I honestly have no idea how you do it. Not only do I not consider this to be nonsensical drivel, but it's possibly the funniest thing I've ever read. Thank you. Oh my god, this is hilarious.
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 1:23 pmYes, but the lube, motel-by-the hour, and rubber industries will do well, at least in the short run.
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 1:24 pmI for one look forward to fighting in the male resistance.
Considering the way humanity has acted throughout history, this really doesn't surprise me all that much. For whatever reason, men took the leadership role very early on, and with that comes the fighting each other for various reasons, hence we men have been outnumbered by women since we put ourselves in harms way for the sake of the women in one way or another. The idea has always been that women be protected so they can raise children and all that, at least that's how I see it. That does sound sexist, but that's the way this psychotic otaku sees it, so it really shouldn't matter. Women have yet to take over the leadership from the household and to the workplace, but perhaps now it's starting. And this thread does raise a good point, even if it does sound a bit radical in my lowly opinion.
At any rate we can only hope genetics will sort itself out somehow before the women capitalize on this, though it would be a fun fight for me because I'm kind of a jerk who's never gotten sick of messing with the opposite sex.
Considering the way humanity has acted throughout history, this really doesn't surprise me all that much. For whatever reason, men took the leadership role very early on, and with that comes the fighting each other for various reasons, hence we men have been outnumbered by women since we put ourselves in harms way for the sake of the women in one way or another. The idea has always been that women be protected so they can raise children and all that, at least that's how I see it. That does sound sexist, but that's the way this psychotic otaku sees it, so it really shouldn't matter. Women have yet to take over the leadership from the household and to the workplace, but perhaps now it's starting. And this thread does raise a good point, even if it does sound a bit radical in my lowly opinion.
At any rate we can only hope genetics will sort itself out somehow before the women capitalize on this, though it would be a fun fight for me because I'm kind of a jerk who's never gotten sick of messing with the opposite sex.
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 1:24 pm
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 1:25 pmWhy does everyone care? You cannot have too much sex, as long as you are using contraception and nobody has a STD.
If not, then we are screwed.
If not, then we are screwed.
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 1:27 pmSomeday every man will be forced to have sex every day...[sarcasm]God no, how will I ever get by[/sarcasm]
But in all reality, scientists have proven that someday the recessive genes will all die out, among them are men and gingers(Iam the last of my kind
) However I have also seen studies that suggest that someday the x chromosome will absorb the Y through the same effect that it disables it. At that point women will be able to reproduce asexually. The question is whether this will happen before the y is destroyed. We have an interesting couple of million years coming 
But in all reality, scientists have proven that someday the recessive genes will all die out, among them are men and gingers(Iam the last of my kind
) However I have also seen studies that suggest that someday the x chromosome will absorb the Y through the same effect that it disables it. At that point women will be able to reproduce asexually. The question is whether this will happen before the y is destroyed. We have an interesting couple of million years coming Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 1:30 pmSince women hate each other so much that's probably one of the most likely things to happen.
Plus women do become..... crazy when there aren't any men paying attention to them or aren't receiving any attention at all, that drives them nuts and makes me laugh. You see it a lot in wars; the men go away, the women are left alone, things happen, very bad things if they were married.
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 1:30 pmNot really, there is compelling new evidence:The lepearchauns wrote:Someday every man will be forced to have sex every day...[sarcasm]God no, how will I ever get by[/sarcasm]
But in all reality, scientists have proven that someday the recessive genes will all die out, among them are men and gingers(Iam the last of my kind
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/americas/ ... 97520.htmlHer boss, David Page, said he had been fighting the notion of the "rotting Y" for the past 10 years and believed the new paper "simply destroys" the theory.
"I can't give a talk without being asked by the disappearing Y," he complained. "This idea has been so pervasive that it has kept us from moving on to address the really important questions about the Y."
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 1:32 pmThe lepearchauns wrote:Someday every man will be forced to have sex every day...[sarcasm]God no, how will I ever get by[/sarcasm]
But in all reality, scientists have proven that someday the recessive genes will all die out, among them are men and gingers(Iam the last of my kind
like the Asari form Mass Effect?
Oh wait that's parthenogenesis, but I wonder if that's where they got the idea for them or if that's just a sexual fantasy, perhaps both.
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 1:36 pmNah, females will just branch off and asexuality and homosexuality will be the norm; and there will still be transsexuals i.e. those that want/need to take on the opposite gender to live a truly fulfilling/happy life.Haktiva wrote:New Rogernomics wrote:Nope, feminists will start blaming other feminists; some feminists will just create males in labs to piss the other feminists off.
Since women hate each other so much that's probably one of the most likely things to happen.
Plus women do become..... crazy when there aren't any men paying attention to them or aren't receiving any attention at all, that drives them nuts and makes me laugh. You see it a lot in wars; the men go away, the women are left alone, things happen, very bad things if they were married.
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 1:40 pmEnde wrote:No, I'm not a social conservative middle aged women.
But thank you for gathering that from the title. No, what I have to say here is much more interesting than that drivel.
Chances are you haven’t noticed it, but there’s a war between the sexes going on. A foul, chemical war it is, a bitter battle to the death. Gladly, it’s a rather small-scale war. The parties doing the fighting are sex chromosomes: tiny, curled-up molecules of DNA, that lay hidden within each human cell. Still, the future of mankind is what’s at stake. You see, it’s a war between boys and girls -- literally. And here’s the latest news from the battlefield: the women are winning. At least, that's what it looks like. The girls are about to wipe the boys from the face of the earth.
As you may know (or not), there are two kinds of sex chromosomes: X and Y. If you inherited two X’s at conception (one X from every parent), you’re a woman. When your father gave you a Y-chromosome, it adds up to XY -- which stands for man. All in all, the Y-chromosome is the thing that makes a man a man. On Y, you’ll find all the stuff that a man needs. You’ll find genetic instructions for how to make sperm, if you please. If there exists a gene for watching football and telling lame jokes, you’ll definitely find it on the Y-chromosome. But on Y, you’ll also find stuff that is harmful to women. For example: sperm contains chemicals that attack the woman’s body. See, semen comes with chemicals that shut down the woman’s immune system, so that it can make it into the womb alive.
That's why X, the female chromosome, hates Y. In response, X is constantly throwing all kinds of wicked chemicals at Y. X is killing Y. Take a look through the microscope, and you can immediately see Y is in trouble. Y is a tiny, crumpled chromosome -- not exactly a proud symbol of manliness. Ever since Y split off from the other chromosomes, some 300 million years ago, its number of genes went down from about 1,000 to 80. How did it ever get so tiny? You guessed it: that's because of the female chromosome's attacks. But even without a microscope, the signs are clear. The fact that some people are gay or transsexual could be a direct consequence of the battle between the X- and the Y-chromosome, some geneticists think.
And there are more grisly clues. For example, every now and then, doctors coincidentally stumble upon a woman who has XY for chromosomes -- the ‘male’ combination. Somehow these ladies' X-chromosomes have found a way to disable the Y-chromosome. In 1947, a French hospital admitted a female patient who gave birth to a baby girl. The woman wasn’t the least surprised. All births in her family were females, she told the doctors. Scientific investigation confirmed this. Somehow, the family’s genes had found a way to overcome the ‘man-problem’. Her family had learned how to kill Y. And now, the family's women no longer gave birth to any boys. Perhaps the most spine-chilling clue comes from the men. As we speak, 1 to 2 percent of all men is infertile because of a malfunctioning Y-chromosome. That doesn't seem like much. However, it is astounding. because the defects cannot have been inherited. So in other words: 1 to 2 percent of all men have their Y-chromosome disabled during their life.
You don’t have to be a rocket scientist to see where that could lead. A couple of thousands of years more, and Y could be history. Suddenly, you would see the number of men dropping sharply. According to an estimate of the British geneticist Brian Sykes, it could take only 5,000 generations before the world turned into a place almost exclusively inhabited by women.
So...in the end, everyone will be dead. Without men, no babies. Without babies, no mankind.
And do you know what? Every time you have sex, you initiate the battle between X and Y. And you give X an advantage over Y. Every single time you get laid? You're killing humanity.
By sex.
Also, credit goes to http://www.exitmundi.nl/exitmundi.htm for most of the essay because I'm too lazy to write all that myself.
We're condemned to a future of redhot girl on girl action?
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 1:41 pmWhat was the point in quoting the whole OP for that tiny little comment?
On the other hand, I smiled.
On the other hand, I smiled.