NATION

PASSWORD

"President Obama Must Be Defeated"

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Tue Jun 19, 2012 4:40 am

Hippostania wrote:Oh really? Maybe he's going to discover that the Earth is round next.

Napkiraly wrote:As a lot of people on here have been saying, this professor is an idiot. If anyone actually took hims seriously Romney would win, which would be a big disaster. Obama isn't perfect, however he's the best the US has right now and needs to be reelected.

Yes, more spending, unconstitutional Obamacare and big government is going to save us!

1) Said spending prevented the economy from collapsing, the auto industry should be especially thankful since they are now doing a lot better than they have in a long time. You spend/invest during recessions to spur growth, then during economic growth you can cut spending/ have austerity to balance the budget as there is now a better and more active job market. Also remember, a good portion of that spending goes towards funding those crusades interventions you love to support so much.
2) Obamacare should have been true universal healthcare. Access to healthcare is a right, not a privilege. Not to mention its actually good for the economy.
3) A strong central government is a good thing, though obviously it shouldn't be too powerful. Big government in America is merely mismanaged, that is why its damaging. There are other nations with big governments and they aren't doing half bad.

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Tue Jun 19, 2012 5:14 am

Mike the Progressive wrote:
Orleania wrote:Don't be narrow minded, we have enough time to November to find an alternate candidate. Just because the Republicans and Democrats have candidates doesn't mean some average-Joe can't swoon the nation.


No, we really don't. The problem is yes, Obama has been a disappointment in many ways, but Romney would be more of a disappointment.

The problem with the lessor of evils mind set is it keeps you from electing a good.
Sometimes the big evil is needed so people look for the good.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Tue Jun 19, 2012 5:16 am

Laerod wrote:
Hippostania wrote:Oh really? Maybe he's going to discover that the Earth is round next.


Yes, more spending, unconstitutional Obamacare and big government is going to save us!

Don't be silly, Hippo. You're Finnish.

Can he not be? I'm sure all the Scandinavians are facepalming at everything he says.

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Tue Jun 19, 2012 5:17 am

Aeronos wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:the election of george bush was supposed to be the wakeup call to america. instead we re-elected him and are thinking of giving him a 3rd term with mitt romney.

he is very wrong.

We already gave him a 3rd term with Obama. The continued erosion of civil liberties mixed with an accelerated transfer of wealth to the upper-classes - arguably the only thing Obama has improved upon Bush was LGBT rights. In many ways he's even to the right of Bush. Bush's Administration wanted some degree of stimulus and bailouts going directly into the pockets of the underwater mortgage owners, but it was explicitly thanks to Obama that this did not happen. That is scary.

Mitt Romney isn't Bush III. He would be Bush IV: Ultra-Enhanced Edition.

It's a drastic shame that Bernie Sanders isn't running. Because Obama's betrayal of liberalism in favour of intense neoliberalism has cut the balls off a powerful left-wing platform. For some obscure reason, rather than outright declaring "Yes, we are hugely disappointed with what we've gotten, we voted progressive liberal and got a conservative neolib continuation of the previous admin", the moderate left-wing has attempted to square the circle and resolve the cognitive dissonance with excuses and excuses. Republican blockades do not explain why BP wasn't punished anywhere near hard enough, why the war on drugs is being doubly enhanced, why the crusades abroad are still going full-pelt, why the Fed has barely even been touched by Congress, why the NDAA passed, why drone strikes have begun, why he has kill lists, and so on and so on and so on (and oh how much I could go on v_v).

And I'm not even a "liberal" really! Though I feel closer bound to the left than I do to the right, I'm generally a libertarian (though I probably class as one of those heathen socialists over there in the US). I just find this wholesale collective Stockholm Syndrome extremely painful to witness. The left-wing is dying and decaying. The middle and lower-classes are being looted in a grand daylight robbery by an established kleptocracy of banking cartels.

Choosing the lesser of two evils in game theory always ultimately leads to more evil.


strangely enough the next american president will be an american president. we dont stray far from our basic american values.
whatever

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Tue Jun 19, 2012 5:21 am

Keronika wrote:Obama and Bush made the same mistake. They surrounded themselves with incompetent and corrupt people and got the same results. Romney will not make that mistake!

this is a joke right?

romney has already made that mistake.
whatever

User avatar
Laerod
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26183
Founded: Jul 17, 2004
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Laerod » Tue Jun 19, 2012 5:22 am

Divair wrote:
Laerod wrote:Don't be silly, Hippo. You're Finnish.

Can he not be? I'm sure all the Scandinavians are facepalming at everything he says.

Scandinavia doesn't include Finland...

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Tue Jun 19, 2012 5:24 am

Laerod wrote:
Divair wrote:Can he not be? I'm sure all the Scandinavians are facepalming at everything he says.

Scandinavia doesn't include Finland...

Most people consider it to be for three reasons.

A. Large presence of Swedes in Finland.
B. Connection to the other Scandinavian nations throughout history.
C. Similarity.

User avatar
Laerod
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26183
Founded: Jul 17, 2004
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Laerod » Tue Jun 19, 2012 5:27 am

Divair wrote:
Laerod wrote:Scandinavia doesn't include Finland...

Most people consider it to be for three reasons.

A. Large presence of Swedes in Finland.
B. Connection to the other Scandinavian nations throughout history.
C. Similarity.

It's Nordic, not Scandinavian. Scandinavia is Denmark, Norway, and Sweden and that's it. Nordic includes Finland, Faroe Islands, and Iceland, possibly Estonia.

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Tue Jun 19, 2012 5:45 am

Gauthier wrote:Complain about Obama whatever you will, but insisting he be replaced by an out of touch flip-flopper who lacks the balls to take a stand against his own constituents, much less any foreign figures? Seriously?

a man who wont even tell you the specifics of what he plans to do (today). who wants to vote for a guy you dont believe when he says where he stands? every other politician will at least take a stand and give out details of the plans he has.
whatever

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Tue Jun 19, 2012 5:48 am

ALMF wrote:
Orleania wrote:According to Prof. Roberto Unger of Harvard Law School and former professsor to President Obama, the president must be defeated. This video was posted on YouTube earlier today, and when I watched I heard the words of Teddy Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson in his speech. Many of the Progessive ideology of the early nineteeth century was heard in the man's words. He spoke of a "political reversal" that gives powers back to the people of America. The question is: Was Prof. Unger right or wrong?
Here is the link: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/obama-harvard-professor-defeated-article-1.1097944

If and only if a more progressive person wold win. Mit romni wold be a disatser

aye

if you want a more progressive president you have to start NOW in promoting a true progressive democrat for '16. you cant conjure up a great progressive candidate who will get elected 139 days from now.
whatever

User avatar
Orleania
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 448
Founded: Apr 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Orleania » Tue Jun 19, 2012 5:52 am

Ashmoria wrote:
ALMF wrote:If and only if a more progressive person wold win. Mit romni wold be a disatser

aye

if you want a more progressive president you have to start NOW in promoting a true progressive democrat for '16. you cant conjure up a great progressive candidate who will get elected 139 days from now.

We haven't seen a Progessive since the days of FDR, although many call him a Socialist, but he was actually a Progessive. America needs to breed Progessive minds like rabbits for '16. I wish Hillary Clinton would run again...
Correspondence the Joint Offices of The Federal Republic of Orleania


The President of the Federal Republic of Orleania - Nancy Sutherland
Orleanian Department of State - Marilyn Dobbner
Orleanian Department of Defense and Warfare - Bryce Harlow

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Tue Jun 19, 2012 5:56 am

Orleania wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:aye

if you want a more progressive president you have to start NOW in promoting a true progressive democrat for '16. you cant conjure up a great progressive candidate who will get elected 139 days from now.

We haven't seen a Progessive since the days of FDR, although many call him a Socialist, but he was actually a Progessive. America needs to breed Progessive minds like rabbits for '16. I wish Hillary Clinton would run again...

hillary wouldnt be more progressive.

just like whining about 3rd parties not getting votes, you dont get to whine about there not being true democratic progressives. if you want progressive candidates you have to go out and promote them. you have to convince the public that that is what we need. good candidates dont come out of nowhere. they need support.
whatever

User avatar
Krownsinburg
Diplomat
 
Posts: 792
Founded: Mar 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Krownsinburg » Tue Jun 19, 2012 5:57 am

Vote Obama 2012 if you want America to die. :)
Just your average Liberal Capitalist Christian Deist American.
The Germanic Confederation of Kröwnsinburg is NOT Fascist!
Monfrox wrote:Your GPS is not always right, especially if it tells you to drive into the Pacific Ocean.


Nightkill the Emperor wrote:Everything is Britain's fault.


Hydesland wrote:If we go down this route we'll eventually be blaming William the Conqueror.


Divair wrote:
Krownsinburg wrote:Vote Obama 2012 if you want America to die. :)

Such a good argument.

User avatar
Orleania
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 448
Founded: Apr 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Orleania » Tue Jun 19, 2012 5:59 am

Ashmoria wrote:
Orleania wrote:We haven't seen a Progessive since the days of FDR, although many call him a Socialist, but he was actually a Progessive. America needs to breed Progessive minds like rabbits for '16. I wish Hillary Clinton would run again...

hillary wouldnt be more progressive.

just like whining about 3rd parties not getting votes, you dont get to whine about there not being true democratic progressives. if you want progressive candidates you have to go out and promote them. you have to convince the public that that is what we need. good candidates dont come out of nowhere. they need support.

Where are these Progessive candidates? I don't see anyone with Progessive agendas on CNN or MSNBC gaining notoriety.
Correspondence the Joint Offices of The Federal Republic of Orleania


The President of the Federal Republic of Orleania - Nancy Sutherland
Orleanian Department of State - Marilyn Dobbner
Orleanian Department of Defense and Warfare - Bryce Harlow

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Tue Jun 19, 2012 5:59 am

Krownsinburg wrote:Vote Obama 2012 if you want America to die. :)

Such a good argument.

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Tue Jun 19, 2012 5:59 am

Orleania wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:hillary wouldnt be more progressive.

just like whining about 3rd parties not getting votes, you dont get to whine about there not being true democratic progressives. if you want progressive candidates you have to go out and promote them. you have to convince the public that that is what we need. good candidates dont come out of nowhere. they need support.

Where are these Progessive candidates? I don't see anyone with Progessive agendas on CNN or MSNBC gaining notoriety.

Bernie Sanders 2016.
Jared Polis 2016.
Pete Stark 2016.


I'd vote for those three instantly.

User avatar
Laerod
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26183
Founded: Jul 17, 2004
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Laerod » Tue Jun 19, 2012 6:00 am

Krownsinburg wrote:Vote Obama 2012 if you want America to die. :)

Indeed, everyone should vote for Obama. People who don't want America to die should vote for Obama too.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163846
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Tue Jun 19, 2012 6:02 am

Divair wrote:
Orleania wrote:Where are these Progessive candidates? I don't see anyone with Progessive agendas on CNN or MSNBC gaining notoriety.

Bernie Sanders 2016.
Jared Polis 2016.
Pete Stark 2016.


I'd vote for those three instantly.

Vote early. Vote often.


Laerod wrote:
Krownsinburg wrote:Vote Obama 2012 if you want America to die. :)

Indeed, everyone should vote for Obama. People who don't want America to die should vote for Obama too.

Multiple times. And from beyond the grave. And from abroad.
Last edited by Ifreann on Tue Jun 19, 2012 6:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Orleania
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 448
Founded: Apr 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Orleania » Tue Jun 19, 2012 6:04 am

Divair wrote:
Orleania wrote:Where are these Progessive candidates? I don't see anyone with Progessive agendas on CNN or MSNBC gaining notoriety.

Bernie Sanders 2016.
Jared Polis 2016.
Pete Stark 2016.


I'd vote for those three instantly.

2/3 are old white males. We need young, fresh, new faces in power not some 50 year old man who won't give up his seat in Congress.
Correspondence the Joint Offices of The Federal Republic of Orleania


The President of the Federal Republic of Orleania - Nancy Sutherland
Orleanian Department of State - Marilyn Dobbner
Orleanian Department of Defense and Warfare - Bryce Harlow

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Tue Jun 19, 2012 6:05 am

Orleania wrote:
Divair wrote:Bernie Sanders 2016.
Jared Polis 2016.
Pete Stark 2016.


I'd vote for those three instantly.

2/3 are old white males. We need young, fresh, new faces in power not some 50 year old man who won't give up his seat in Congress.

FDR was an old white male :eyebrow:

User avatar
Laerod
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26183
Founded: Jul 17, 2004
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Laerod » Tue Jun 19, 2012 6:07 am

Ifreann wrote:
Laerod wrote:Indeed, everyone should vote for Obama. People who don't want America to die should vote for Obama too.

Multiple times. And from beyond the grave. And from abroad.

I'll be doing the latter, incidentally =P

User avatar
Orleania
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 448
Founded: Apr 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Orleania » Tue Jun 19, 2012 6:08 am

Divair wrote:
Orleania wrote:2/3 are old white males. We need young, fresh, new faces in power not some 50 year old man who won't give up his seat in Congress.

FDR was an old white male :eyebrow:

FDR actually established agencies and departments that work today. And I never said I had a problem with the era of FDR, those politicians worked together to accomplish things.
Correspondence the Joint Offices of The Federal Republic of Orleania


The President of the Federal Republic of Orleania - Nancy Sutherland
Orleanian Department of State - Marilyn Dobbner
Orleanian Department of Defense and Warfare - Bryce Harlow

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Tue Jun 19, 2012 6:08 am

Orleania wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:hillary wouldnt be more progressive.

just like whining about 3rd parties not getting votes, you dont get to whine about there not being true democratic progressives. if you want progressive candidates you have to go out and promote them. you have to convince the public that that is what we need. good candidates dont come out of nowhere. they need support.

Where are these Progessive candidates? I don't see anyone with Progessive agendas on CNN or MSNBC gaining notoriety.


me either. at least not among the big likelies of '16. but there ARE progressive democrats. if more people supported progressive groups, caucuses, movements then more candidates would emerge.

you have to do the ground work if you want your ideas to win the day.
whatever

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Tue Jun 19, 2012 6:10 am

Orleania wrote:
Divair wrote:FDR was an old white male :eyebrow:

FDR actually established agencies and departments that work today. And I never said I had a problem with the era of FDR, those politicians worked together to accomplish things.

And I'm sure the three I mentioned would do the same.

User avatar
Orleania
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 448
Founded: Apr 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Orleania » Tue Jun 19, 2012 6:10 am

Ashmoria wrote:
Orleania wrote:Where are these Progessive candidates? I don't see anyone with Progessive agendas on CNN or MSNBC gaining notoriety.


me either. at least not among the big likelies of '16. but there ARE progressive democrats. if more people supported progressive groups, caucuses, movements then more candidates would emerge.

you have to do the ground work if you want your ideas to win the day.

I follow the Congressional Progessive group on Twitter! They are there put no one is stepping up to the incumbent. His own party is afraid to say Obama is wrong.
Correspondence the Joint Offices of The Federal Republic of Orleania


The President of the Federal Republic of Orleania - Nancy Sutherland
Orleanian Department of State - Marilyn Dobbner
Orleanian Department of Defense and Warfare - Bryce Harlow

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cerula, Elejamie, General TN, Ifreann, Infected Mushroom, Port Carverton, Three Galaxies

Advertisement

Remove ads