NATION

PASSWORD

Denmark has legalized same sex marriage!

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Do you agree with Denmark's decision?

Yes
679
81%
No
131
16%
Other
25
3%
 
Total votes : 835

User avatar
Ceannairceach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26637
Founded: Sep 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Ceannairceach » Fri Jun 08, 2012 5:46 am

Jormengand wrote:
Ceannairceach wrote:We get what you want to do. But what you want to do is appeasement and appeasement of fundies is stupid.

Why? It does everything you want to do, costs no more, and stops riots. Until you can come up with a good reason why this is a bad thing, stop arguing.

You know what? If homosexuals don't get to use the word marriage, then I am going to riot. You heard me.

Now what?

@}-;-'---

"But who prays for Satan? Who in eighteen centuries, has had the common humanity to pray for the one sinner that needed it most..." -Mark Twain

User avatar
Jormengand
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8414
Founded: May 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Jormengand » Fri Jun 08, 2012 5:46 am

Samuraikoku wrote:
Jormengand wrote:Look, look, I am not suggesting we reduce rights. I am suggesting that we give fundies a nice little word to cuddle when they go to bed. Until you get that, this argument is over.


What you don't understand is that there is no reason to do that, other than them threatening violence.

And there is no reason whatsoever not to. Little>none.
Jormengand wrote:It would be really meta if I sigged this.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159021
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Fri Jun 08, 2012 5:47 am

Jormengand wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Maybe we shouldn't have given black people rights either. I mean, racists still get violently angry about that every now and then. Best to oppress people rather than upset their oppressors.

Look, look, I am not suggesting we reduce rights. I am suggesting that we give fundies a nice little word to cuddle when they go to bed. Until you get that, this argument is over.

I do get it. It's not just a word, though. It's the principle of the thing. You're proposing letting the violent minority dictate terms to society, and there's no way that's going to stop at the word "marriage".

User avatar
Blouman Empire
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16184
Founded: Sep 05, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Blouman Empire » Fri Jun 08, 2012 5:47 am

Ceannairceach wrote:
Jormengand wrote:Why? It does everything you want to do, costs no more, and stops riots. Until you can come up with a good reason why this is a bad thing, stop arguing.

You know what? If homosexuals don't get to use the word marriage, then I am going to riot. You heard me.

Now what?


We sit back and laugh at a one man riot?
You know you've made it on NSG when you have a whole thread created around what you said.
On the American/United Statesian matter "I'd suggest Americans go to their nation settings and change their nation prefix to something cooler." - The Kangaroo Republic
http://nswiki.net/index.php?title=Blouman_Empire

DBC26-Winner

User avatar
Jormengand
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8414
Founded: May 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Jormengand » Fri Jun 08, 2012 5:47 am

Ceannairceach wrote:
Jormengand wrote:Why? It does everything you want to do, costs no more, and stops riots. Until you can come up with a good reason why this is a bad thing, stop arguing.

You know what? If homosexuals don't get to use the word marriage, then I am going to riot. You heard me.

Now what?

Oh, well now we'll arrest you, and compensate the families of those you kill, and they'll have justice.
Jormengand wrote:It would be really meta if I sigged this.

User avatar
Ceannairceach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26637
Founded: Sep 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Ceannairceach » Fri Jun 08, 2012 5:47 am

Jormengand wrote:
Samuraikoku wrote:
What you don't understand is that there is no reason to do that, other than them threatening violence.

And there is no reason whatsoever not to. Little>none.

There is a reason that you gleefully ignore; Discrimination and appeasement.

@}-;-'---

"But who prays for Satan? Who in eighteen centuries, has had the common humanity to pray for the one sinner that needed it most..." -Mark Twain

User avatar
Ceannairceach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26637
Founded: Sep 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Ceannairceach » Fri Jun 08, 2012 5:48 am

Jormengand wrote:
Ceannairceach wrote:You know what? If homosexuals don't get to use the word marriage, then I am going to riot. You heard me.

Now what?

Oh, well now we'll arrest you, and compensate the families of those you kill, and they'll have justice.

I thought that was stupid, and wasteful, and not enough. :roll:

And by your own words, rioting is the only criteria for social change. Or does it only work for people that aren't homosexual?

@}-;-'---

"But who prays for Satan? Who in eighteen centuries, has had the common humanity to pray for the one sinner that needed it most..." -Mark Twain

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159021
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Fri Jun 08, 2012 5:49 am

Jormengand wrote:
Ceannairceach wrote:We get what you want to do. But what you want to do is appeasement and appeasement of fundies is stupid.

Why? It does everything you want to do, costs no more, and stops riots. Until you can come up with a good reason why this is a bad thing, stop arguing.

It won't stop riots. It'll delay them until the anti-gay crowd picks a something else to take away from gays once you give them marriage.

User avatar
Jormengand
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8414
Founded: May 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Jormengand » Fri Jun 08, 2012 5:49 am

Ceannairceach wrote:
Jormengand wrote:And there is no reason whatsoever not to. Little>none.

There is a reason that you gleefully ignore; Discrimination and appeasement.

Discrimination? I personally don't care what word you use if I marry another man any more than I care what word you use if I marry a woman. Appeasement? Well, that's a good point in my plan, it stops the fundamentalists killing everyone...
Jormengand wrote:It would be really meta if I sigged this.

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Fri Jun 08, 2012 5:49 am

Jormengand wrote:And there is no reason whatsoever not to. Little>none.


There is. The reason is that marriage isn't a religious word. Religion should not interfere in the matters of the state. And marriage is a legal institution that can very well be called such without the need for religious people complaining.

User avatar
Ceannairceach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26637
Founded: Sep 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Ceannairceach » Fri Jun 08, 2012 5:49 am

Blouman Empire wrote:
Ceannairceach wrote:You know what? If homosexuals don't get to use the word marriage, then I am going to riot. You heard me.

Now what?


We sit back and laugh at a one man riot?

I think Ifreann is coming.

@}-;-'---

"But who prays for Satan? Who in eighteen centuries, has had the common humanity to pray for the one sinner that needed it most..." -Mark Twain

User avatar
Ceannairceach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26637
Founded: Sep 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Ceannairceach » Fri Jun 08, 2012 5:49 am

Jormengand wrote:
Ceannairceach wrote:There is a reason that you gleefully ignore; Discrimination and appeasement.

Discrimination? I personally don't care what word you use if I marry another man any more than I care what word you use if I marry a woman. Appeasement? Well, that's a good point in my plan, it stops the fundamentalists killing everyone...

They would kill no one. As I said, they aren't as organized or as well funded as you think they are.

@}-;-'---

"But who prays for Satan? Who in eighteen centuries, has had the common humanity to pray for the one sinner that needed it most..." -Mark Twain

User avatar
Galician-Volhynian Federation
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 425
Founded: Dec 16, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Galician-Volhynian Federation » Fri Jun 08, 2012 5:50 am

Ifreann wrote:
Jormengand wrote:So you want to provoke them? I'll just leave you to it...

I don't know why you think appeasing them will protect you.

Ask Neville Chamberlain and Édouard Daladier where appeasement gets you.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159021
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Fri Jun 08, 2012 5:50 am

Ceannairceach wrote:
Blouman Empire wrote:
We sit back and laugh at a one man riot?

I think Ifreann is coming.

*brohoof*


Jormengand wrote:
Ceannairceach wrote:There is a reason that you gleefully ignore; Discrimination and appeasement.

Discrimination? I personally don't care what word you use if I marry another man any more than I care what word you use if I marry a woman. Appeasement? Well, that's a good point in my plan, it stops the fundamentalists killing everyone...

Stop them killing anyone because they don't own the word marriage. Won't stop them killing people over gay people getting to be openly gay in public.

User avatar
Blouman Empire
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16184
Founded: Sep 05, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Blouman Empire » Fri Jun 08, 2012 5:51 am

Ceannairceach wrote:
Blouman Empire wrote:
We sit back and laugh at a one man riot?

I think Ifreann is coming.


I thought he was pouring beers.

I'll go on a riot if I don't get my beer
You know you've made it on NSG when you have a whole thread created around what you said.
On the American/United Statesian matter "I'd suggest Americans go to their nation settings and change their nation prefix to something cooler." - The Kangaroo Republic
http://nswiki.net/index.php?title=Blouman_Empire

DBC26-Winner

User avatar
Jormengand
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8414
Founded: May 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Jormengand » Fri Jun 08, 2012 5:51 am

Ceannairceach wrote:
Jormengand wrote:Oh, well now we'll arrest you, and compensate the families of those you kill, and they'll have justice.

I thought that was stupid, and wasteful, and not enough. :roll:

And by your own words, rioting is the only criteria for social change. Or does it only work for people that aren't homosexual?

Citation needed. I said it was one, even in the absence of any other - in fact no, not for social change, for wordplay to keep people quiet. I think you fail to realise that I'm doing the same thing as you, and keeping people quiet.
Jormengand wrote:It would be really meta if I sigged this.

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Fri Jun 08, 2012 5:51 am

Jormengand wrote:Appeasement? Well, that's a good point in my plan, it stops the fundamentalists killing everyone...


That is the job of the law.

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111674
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Fri Jun 08, 2012 5:52 am

Ceannairceach wrote:
Jormengand wrote:Discrimination? I personally don't care what word you use if I marry another man any more than I care what word you use if I marry a woman. Appeasement? Well, that's a good point in my plan, it stops the fundamentalists killing everyone...

They would kill no one. As I said, they aren't as organized or as well funded as you think they are.

How many states allow gay marriage now? Six? Eight? I do watch the news and I have not heard of Christian fundamentalists rioting and killing people.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159021
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Fri Jun 08, 2012 5:52 am

Ceannairceach wrote:
Jormengand wrote:Discrimination? I personally don't care what word you use if I marry another man any more than I care what word you use if I marry a woman. Appeasement? Well, that's a good point in my plan, it stops the fundamentalists killing everyone...

They would kill no one. As I said, they aren't as organized or as well funded as you think they are.

I don't think anyone has died in Denmark yet. Maybe we just haven't heard. How about any of the US states where gay marriage was legalised? How many lives were lost in the resulting riots? Were there riots?

User avatar
Jormengand
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8414
Founded: May 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Jormengand » Fri Jun 08, 2012 5:52 am

Ceannairceach wrote:
Jormengand wrote:Discrimination? I personally don't care what word you use if I marry another man any more than I care what word you use if I marry a woman. Appeasement? Well, that's a good point in my plan, it stops the fundamentalists killing everyone...

They would kill no one. As I said, they aren't as organized or as well funded as you think they are.

One man with a gun can kill dozens. And are you really willing to take that chance?
Jormengand wrote:It would be really meta if I sigged this.

User avatar
Jormengand
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8414
Founded: May 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Jormengand » Fri Jun 08, 2012 5:53 am

Ifreann wrote:
Ceannairceach wrote:They would kill no one. As I said, they aren't as organized or as well funded as you think they are.

I don't think anyone has died in Denmark yet. Maybe we just haven't heard. How about any of the US states where gay marriage was legalised? How many lives were lost in the resulting riots? Were there riots?

And all the US states where it was legalised were pretty liberal...
Jormengand wrote:It would be really meta if I sigged this.

User avatar
Ceannairceach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26637
Founded: Sep 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Ceannairceach » Fri Jun 08, 2012 5:53 am

Jormengand wrote:
Ceannairceach wrote:They would kill no one. As I said, they aren't as organized or as well funded as you think they are.

One man with a gun can kill dozens. And are you really willing to take that chance?

Sure, if it will result in better rights, and that gunman off the streets. I'll be one of the dozens, if it takes that.

@}-;-'---

"But who prays for Satan? Who in eighteen centuries, has had the common humanity to pray for the one sinner that needed it most..." -Mark Twain

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Fri Jun 08, 2012 5:53 am

Jormengand wrote:One man with a gun can kill dozens. And are you really willing to take that chance?


Yes. There's law enforcement.

User avatar
Jormengand
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8414
Founded: May 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Jormengand » Fri Jun 08, 2012 5:54 am

Samuraikoku wrote:
Jormengand wrote:Appeasement? Well, that's a good point in my plan, it stops the fundamentalists killing everyone...


That is the job of the law.

And that's why no crimes have been committed by anyone, ever, of course... :roll:
Jormengand wrote:It would be really meta if I sigged this.

User avatar
Jormengand
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8414
Founded: May 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Jormengand » Fri Jun 08, 2012 5:54 am

Ceannairceach wrote:
Jormengand wrote:One man with a gun can kill dozens. And are you really willing to take that chance?

Sure, if it will result in better rights, and that gunman off the streets. I'll be one of the dozens, if it takes that.

So you will die for wordplay? Sense make does not that....
Jormengand wrote:It would be really meta if I sigged this.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Cannonio, El Lazaro, Floofybit, Galloism, Hispida, Ifreann, Necroghastia, Oceasia, Point Blob, Ryemarch, Stellar Colonies, Umeria

Advertisement

Remove ads