Pretty much. But with a really godawful hairdo thrown in on top of everything else.
Advertisement
by Glorious Brittania » Wed Aug 29, 2012 2:19 am
by Bordurian » Wed Aug 29, 2012 4:25 am
by Disserbia » Wed Aug 29, 2012 10:50 pm
Delvoir wrote:Disserbia wrote:Thats funny, because it worked pretty well for Museveni in Uganda. Doing research always helps when making arguments.
I'd like to point out that Uganda is a third world country and therefore it's very likely that a high population of both homosexual and heterosexual people are infected with STDs due to the lack of contraception.
by Disserbia » Wed Aug 29, 2012 10:53 pm
The Emerald Dawn wrote:Disserbia wrote:Thats funny, because it worked pretty well for Museveni in Uganda. Doing research always helps when making arguments.
the difference is that Gaddafi didn't invade the US and try to kill Obama, and then justify it as working for the benefit of the American people. Sure he did, but so do Western governments when its to their advantage, so its pretty stupid of them to use it as a reason to invade a sovereign nation and break international law conventions, especially when that isn't the reason they're doing it. Meanwhile in Syria...
The US didn't invade. We were rather insistent on not entering the country.
by Shofercia » Wed Aug 29, 2012 11:14 pm
Disserbia wrote:The Emerald Dawn wrote:The US didn't invade. We were rather insistent on not entering the country.
I didn't say they invaded. If we were really that insistent we wouldn't have participated in military action...its a really easy thing not to do...particularly during a global recession where our troops still have other commitments abroad.
by Disserbia » Thu Aug 30, 2012 12:44 am
Shofercia wrote:Disserbia wrote:I didn't say they invaded. If we were really that insistent we wouldn't have participated in military action...its a really easy thing not to do...particularly during a global recession where our troops still have other commitments abroad.
I think that the Lockheed-Martin missiles and bombs that entered the country certainly did the objectives they hit a disserbice
by Zutendaal » Thu Aug 30, 2012 1:58 am
Disserbia wrote:Delvoir wrote:
I'd like to point out that Uganda is a third world country and therefore it's very likely that a high population of both homosexual and heterosexual people are infected with STDs due to the lack of contraception.
Wow that shows how little you know what I'm talking about. Like I said, its generally a good idea to be able to back up your views concretely before debating with someone that can do this. If you are not familiar with Museveni's policies concerning the aids epidemic and homosexuality in Uganda, its stupid to make assumptions about it. Do your homework please.
by Disserbia » Thu Aug 30, 2012 2:47 am
Zutendaal wrote:Disserbia wrote:Wow that shows how little you know what I'm talking about. Like I said, its generally a good idea to be able to back up your views concretely before debating with someone that can do this. If you are not familiar with Museveni's policies concerning the aids epidemic and homosexuality in Uganda, its stupid to make assumptions about it. Do your homework please.
this is MY homework
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjnrLt3VuSM
oh,yes.He is very serious
by Horsefish » Thu Aug 30, 2012 3:47 am
Glorious Brittania wrote:He massacred French civilians, brutally quashed any religious dissidence
Areopagitican wrote:I'm not an expert in the field of moron, but what I think he's saying is that if you have to have sex with Shakira (or another dirty ethnic), at the very least, it must be part of a threesome with a white woman. It's a sacrifice, but someone has to make it.
Geniasis wrote:Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go bludgeon some whales to death with my 12-ft dick.
The Western Reaches wrote:I learned that YOU are the reason I embarrassed myself by saying "Horsefish" instead of "Seahorse" this one time in school.
by Prussia-Steinbach » Fri Aug 31, 2012 3:51 pm
Ethel mermania wrote:All those inidans needed was decent border security and the country would still be free.
by Nu Sparta » Fri Aug 31, 2012 10:42 pm
by New Sapienta » Fri Aug 31, 2012 10:43 pm
Nu Sparta wrote:If i had to change one thing in history it would either be
1. That the religions of the "god of Abraham" never developed and the world remained mostly pagan.
or
2. That people never forgot they ARE animals and NOT above nature, and instead of changing the planet to suit their needs they adapted to their surroundings.
by Nu Sparta » Fri Aug 31, 2012 10:45 pm
New Sapienta wrote:Nu Sparta wrote:If i had to change one thing in history it would either be
1. That the religions of the "god of Abraham" never developed and the world remained mostly pagan.
or
2. That people never forgot they ARE animals and NOT above nature, and instead of changing the planet to suit their needs they adapted to their surroundings.
You know many pagan religion were just a violent as the Christian Theocracies right?
by New Sapienta » Fri Aug 31, 2012 10:45 pm
by New England and The Maritimes » Fri Aug 31, 2012 10:53 pm
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.
by New Sapienta » Fri Aug 31, 2012 10:57 pm
by Nu Sparta » Fri Aug 31, 2012 10:59 pm
by Conserative Morality » Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:01 pm
Nu Sparta wrote:2. That people never forgot they ARE animals and NOT above nature, and instead of changing the planet to suit their needs they adapted to their surroundings.
The Ball and the Cross wrote:"Yes, in a real sense nature does not exist. I mean that nobody can discover what the original nature of things would have been if things had not interfered with it. The first blade of grass began to tear up the earth and eat it; it was interfering with nature, if there is any nature. The first wild ox began to tear up the grass and eat it; he was interfering with nature, if there is any nature. In the same way," continued Turnbull, "the human when it asserts its dominance over nature is just as natural as the thing which it destroys."
by New Sapienta » Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:02 pm
Nu Sparta wrote:New Sapienta wrote:Then why change it?
Because I believe that ancient religions were much truer then Christianity, Islam, and Judaism. I find it hard to believe that people all over the world would believe in multitudes of gods for absolute no reason what so ever without any sort of proof. I find things in their (Christianity and Islam, don't really have that much of a problem with Judaism) holy books hard to believe. Like the fact that they say we are all created in their one god's image but we all look and act quite differently. Or if there were only two people created at the beginning of the world who did their children marry if not each other, so we should all be inbred and sterile. Or if he is all knowing and omnipresent and supreme intelligence why hasn't he come to the conclusion that just showing himself and snapping his fingers to remake us "perfect" is the best solution. I find it easier to accept that ancient gods existed and were much like us yet more powerful. I also find it easier to accept that they've decided to go "Fuck you, you aren't paying attention to us" and have either left us or are just ignoring us now. Not saying they shouldn't have existed just wish they didn't take over the world. At least the world would be a more diverse place that way.
by Nu Sparta » Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:05 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:Nu Sparta wrote:2. That people never forgot they ARE animals and NOT above nature, and instead of changing the planet to suit their needs they adapted to their surroundings.The Ball and the Cross wrote:"Yes, in a real sense nature does not exist. I mean that nobody can discover what the original nature of things would have been if things had not interfered with it. The first blade of grass began to tear up the earth and eat it; it was interfering with nature, if there is any nature. The first wild ox began to tear up the grass and eat it; he was interfering with nature, if there is any nature. In the same way," continued Turnbull, "the human when it asserts its dominance over nature is just as natural as the thing which it destroys."
by Conserative Morality » Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:07 pm
Nu Sparta wrote:And to that i say stop over thinking things.
I'm not saying human beings shouldn't have gathered resources. I'm saying we shouldn't have done massive land clearing just to build a city. I would of preferred human kind stay in its tribal form.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Castelia, Hwiteard, Ifreann, Spirit of Hope, Sveniland, The Xenopolis Confederation
Advertisement