NATION

PASSWORD

Abortion discussion in Turkey

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69785
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:19 pm

Jedi8246 wrote:
Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:what the fuck? Yes it is. Being pregnant is a medical condition.

We're not aborting a condition here though. We're aborting a baby.

No we're not.
This is a baby.
Image

This is a zygote.
Image


Learn the difference.
Anarcho-Communist, Democratic Confederalist
"The Earth isn't dying, it's being killed. And those killing it have names and addresses." -Utah Phillips

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:20 pm

Chinese Regions wrote:
Jedi8246 wrote:She gave permission when she had sex.

And if she was raped?


He also failed to answer that question.

User avatar
Christian Democrats
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10089
Founded: Jul 29, 2009
New York Times Democracy

Postby Christian Democrats » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:20 pm

Hallistar wrote:
Christian Democrats wrote:I can't ask for an organ back that I've donated to someone after transplantation has occurred. The woman can't ask for her uterus back after conception has occurred. She must wait until the child is done using it.


There isn't a great possibility of being killed in the road, so one does not consent to that.


Except you wanted to give the organ to somebody else. The woman never wanted her uterus to be used for a fetus, if she was seeking a pregnancy.

It doesn't matter what someone wants; it's about their actions.

A drunk driver might say that he didn't want to hit a pedestrian, but he still must take responsibility for what he did.

It's all about what people do, not what they want to have happened.
Leo Tolstoy wrote:Wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority share in it.
GA#160: Forced Marriages Ban Act (79%)
GA#175: Organ and Blood Donations Act (68%)^
SC#082: Repeal "Liberate Catholic" (80%)
GA#200: Foreign Marriage Recognition (54%)
GA#213: Privacy Protection Act (70%)
GA#231: Marital Rape Justice Act (81%)^
GA#233: Ban Profits on Workers' Deaths (80%)*
GA#249: Stopping Suicide Seeds (70%)^
GA#253: Repeal "Freedom in Medical Research" (76%)
GA#285: Assisted Suicide Act (70%)^
GA#310: Disabled Voters Act (81%)
GA#373: Repeal "Convention on Execution" (54%)
GA#468: Prohibit Private Prisons (57%)^

* denotes coauthorship
^ repealed resolution
#360: Electile Dysfunction
#452: Foetal Furore
#560: Bicameral Backlash
#570: Clerical Errors

User avatar
Hallistar
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6144
Founded: Nov 21, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Hallistar » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:20 pm

Parpolitic Citizens wrote:
EnragedMaldivians wrote:
Not the same as consenting to actually becoming pregnant or carrying to term if she does. What was it you were blabbering about actually thinking things through to avoid posting opinions that are fucking stupid?


Can you people not follow logical chain of events?


Can you not follow reality that consenting to sex doesn't mean you are consenting to being pregnant, and that it is technically a byproduct of the genetic material the body receives from the sperm?

User avatar
Chinese Regions
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16326
Founded: Apr 24, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Chinese Regions » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:20 pm

Jedi8246 wrote:
Genivaria wrote:Burden of Proof is on you.

No it isn't. He made a claim, I'm asking him to back up that claim,

yes he did he made a valid argument
You aren't backing up your when you say 'yes it is' or 'no it isn't'.
Fan of Transformers?|Fan of Star Trek?|你会说中文吗?
Geopolitics: Internationalist, Pan-Asian, Pan-African, Pan-Arab, Pan-Slavic, Eurofederalist,
  • For the promotion of closer ties between Europe and Russia but without Dugin's anti-intellectual quackery.
  • Against NATO, the Anglo-American "special relationship", Israel and Wahhabism.

Sociopolitics: Pro-Intellectual, Pro-Science, Secular, Strictly Anti-Theocractic, for the liberation of PoCs in Western Hemisphere without the hegemony of white liberals
Economics: Indifferent

User avatar
Jedi8246
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6132
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Jedi8246 » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:20 pm

Chinese Regions wrote:
Jedi8246 wrote:She gave permission when she had sex.

And if she was raped?

Good question. I'm still determine my beliefs in that circumstance.
Official Member of the Fall of Gods RP Council
Conservative Morality wrote:When you call Bieber feminine, you insult all women.


Agadar wrote:Next thing you know, God turns out to be some weird green space monster with tentacles and a monocle.


Khadgar wrote:Oddly enough, a lot of people who are plotting to harm other people aren't really interested in legal niceties.
Rank #87 in World Cup
Factbook
Jedi8246 is a far-right social libertarian. He is also a non-interventionist and somewhat culturally conservative. Jedi8246's scores (from 0 to 10):
Economic issues: +9.53 right
Social issues: -7.91 libertarian
Foreign policy: -7.32 non-interventionist
Cultural identification: +0.92 conservative

User avatar
AiliailiA
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27722
Founded: Jul 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby AiliailiA » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:21 pm

Jedi8246 wrote:
Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:No such thing as a soul.

Prove it.


"The soul" is a rather subjective thing. I certainly would not attempt to disprove the existence of your soul.

I don't think I have one. So it can't have desires.

But speaking for your own soul: what do you mean when you say "the soul of a person has desires"?

What are the desires of your soul?
My name is voiced AIL-EE-AIL-EE-AH. My time zone: UTC.

Cannot think of a name wrote:"Where's my immortality?" will be the new "Where's my jetpack?"
Maineiacs wrote:"We're going to build a canal, and we're going to make Columbia pay for it!" -- Teddy Roosevelt
Ifreann wrote:That's not a Freudian slip. A Freudian slip is when you say one thing and mean your mother.
Ethel mermania wrote:
Ifreann wrote:
DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:
: eugenics :
What are the colons meant to convey here?
In my experience Colons usually convey shit

NSG junkie. Getting good shit for free, why would I give it up?

User avatar
Torcularis Septentrionalis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9398
Founded: May 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Torcularis Septentrionalis » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:21 pm

Jedi8246 wrote:
Gideus wrote:So essentially having sex with a woman forces you to pay to have sex. AKA, you basically just likened all women into whores/prostitutes because if they get impregnated they require thousands of dollars from man. This is not only wrong but it is also insulting to women and most of the women I know would not agree with you. How about we have some women join in on this argument? I don't see why we(men) get to decide for them, it's THEIR body. They choose what to do with it.

They can do whatever they want with their body. Can't decide what to do the baby's body unless she decides to parent it. And even then, she can't kill it.

So you think men shouldn't have to pay child support?

And women can decide to stop being pregnant, which is choosing to do something with their own body.
Hurrah!
The Andromeda Islands wrote:This! Is! A! Bad! Idea!
Furious Grandmothers wrote:Why are you talking about murder when we are talking about abortion? Murdering a fetus is impossible. It's like smelling an echo. You're not making sense.



20 year old female. Camgirl/student. Call me Torc/TS/Alix

User avatar
Jedi8246
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6132
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Jedi8246 » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:21 pm

Genivaria wrote:
Jedi8246 wrote:We're not aborting a condition here though. We're aborting a baby.

No we're not.
This is a baby.
Image

This is a zygote.
Image


Learn the difference.

I see no difference.
Official Member of the Fall of Gods RP Council
Conservative Morality wrote:When you call Bieber feminine, you insult all women.


Agadar wrote:Next thing you know, God turns out to be some weird green space monster with tentacles and a monocle.


Khadgar wrote:Oddly enough, a lot of people who are plotting to harm other people aren't really interested in legal niceties.
Rank #87 in World Cup
Factbook
Jedi8246 is a far-right social libertarian. He is also a non-interventionist and somewhat culturally conservative. Jedi8246's scores (from 0 to 10):
Economic issues: +9.53 right
Social issues: -7.91 libertarian
Foreign policy: -7.32 non-interventionist
Cultural identification: +0.92 conservative

User avatar
Hallistar
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6144
Founded: Nov 21, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Hallistar » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:21 pm

Christian Democrats wrote:
Hallistar wrote:
Except you wanted to give the organ to somebody else. The woman never wanted her uterus to be used for a fetus, if she was seeking a pregnancy.

It doesn't matter what someone wants; it's about their actions.

A drunk driver might say that he didn't want to hit a pedestrian, but he still must take responsibility for what he did.

It's all about what people do, not what they want to have happened.


The drunk driver commited a misdemeanor or felony (depending on jurisdiction) by being intoxicated behind the wheel.

User avatar
Parpolitic Citizens
Diplomat
 
Posts: 665
Founded: May 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Parpolitic Citizens » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:22 pm

Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:
Parpolitic Citizens wrote:
Pretending that the victim has no responsibility is as equally stupid as pretending that they have all the responsibility.

I'm walking down the street and I get mugged.
How da fuq is any of that my fault?
"You were walking down the street, ma'am? Well, sorry, then it's your fault you got mugged since you knew that leaving your house posed a risk, so the police force will not be helping you."


Yes you do hold some of the responsibility, if you were walking down an ill lite street at night in a known area where the odds of getting mugged are high.

I don't walk into a tiger's cage and not consent to the risks involved. Seriously think for second.
Damned commie
Economic Left/Right: -8.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.92

User avatar
Scotovy
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 365
Founded: Feb 18, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Scotovy » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:22 pm

Jedi8246 wrote:
Genivaria wrote:No we're not.
This is a baby.
Image

This is a zygote.
Image


Learn the difference.

I see no difference.


:blink:
"I'd rather laugh with the sinners than cry with the saints"

Economic Left/Right: -8.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.46

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:22 pm

Jedi8246 wrote:I see no difference.


See? Ignoring everything thrown at you, just to say "yes it is" or "no it isn't" statements. This is why you're on my foe list.

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69785
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:22 pm

Jedi8246 wrote:
Genivaria wrote:No we're not.
This is a baby.
Image

This is a zygote.
Image


Learn the difference.

I see no difference.

Then I'd recommend a pair of these.
Image
Anarcho-Communist, Democratic Confederalist
"The Earth isn't dying, it's being killed. And those killing it have names and addresses." -Utah Phillips

User avatar
Torcularis Septentrionalis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9398
Founded: May 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Torcularis Septentrionalis » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:23 pm

Jedi8246 wrote:
Chinese Regions wrote:And if she was raped?

Good question. I'm still determine my beliefs in that circumstance.

I was raped on July 17, 2010 by a friend after we went to the movies. I was impregnated and found out three weeks later. I had an abortion because it is my fucking right to not be pregnant, whether or not I was raped.
The Andromeda Islands wrote:This! Is! A! Bad! Idea!
Furious Grandmothers wrote:Why are you talking about murder when we are talking about abortion? Murdering a fetus is impossible. It's like smelling an echo. You're not making sense.



20 year old female. Camgirl/student. Call me Torc/TS/Alix

User avatar
Chinese Regions
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16326
Founded: Apr 24, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Chinese Regions » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:23 pm

Jedi8246 wrote:
Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:what the fuck? Yes it is. Being pregnant is a medical condition.

We're not aborting a condition here though. We're aborting a baby.

No we are aborting a foetus. And by that process we are terminating the condition, the pregnancy.
Fan of Transformers?|Fan of Star Trek?|你会说中文吗?
Geopolitics: Internationalist, Pan-Asian, Pan-African, Pan-Arab, Pan-Slavic, Eurofederalist,
  • For the promotion of closer ties between Europe and Russia but without Dugin's anti-intellectual quackery.
  • Against NATO, the Anglo-American "special relationship", Israel and Wahhabism.

Sociopolitics: Pro-Intellectual, Pro-Science, Secular, Strictly Anti-Theocractic, for the liberation of PoCs in Western Hemisphere without the hegemony of white liberals
Economics: Indifferent

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159035
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:23 pm

Parpolitic Citizens wrote:
Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:I'm walking down the street and I get mugged.
How da fuq is any of that my fault?
"You were walking down the street, ma'am? Well, sorry, then it's your fault you got mugged since you knew that leaving your house posed a risk, so the police force will not be helping you."


Yes you do hold some of the responsibility, if you were walking down an ill lite street at night in a known area where the odds of getting mugged are high.

Because people never get mugged in low crime areas .

User avatar
Swedish Union
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 8
Founded: May 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Swedish Union » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:23 pm

For me its a insane question, all women should of course have the right to do what they want with there body regardless of what religios groups has to say about it.. In Sweden that question is so easy it would be considerd madness to even bring it up. i Thought Turkey was more evolved then this i must say, your membership in EU will always be questioned when then come with this opinions.

User avatar
Hallistar
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6144
Founded: Nov 21, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Hallistar » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:24 pm

Jedi8246 wrote:
Genivaria wrote:No we're not.
This is a baby.

This is a zygote.


Learn the difference.

I see no difference.


Then perhaps you need a new pair of reading glasses.

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:24 pm

Parpolitic Citizens wrote:Yes you do hold some of the responsibility, if you were walking down an ill lite street at night in a known area where the odds of getting mugged are high.

I don't walk into a tiger's cage and not consent to the risks involved. Seriously think for second.


Because going in a public area and having a right violated is the same situation as entering a cage with a wild animal that might probably feel threatened and attack me.

Makes sense.

User avatar
Parpolitic Citizens
Diplomat
 
Posts: 665
Founded: May 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Parpolitic Citizens » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:24 pm

Hallistar wrote:
Parpolitic Citizens wrote:
Can you people not follow logical chain of events?


Can you not follow reality that consenting to sex doesn't mean you are consenting to being pregnant, and that it is technically a byproduct of the genetic material the body receives from the sperm?


If I eat a thousand hamburgers I accept the notion of keeling over from a heart attack.
Damned commie
Economic Left/Right: -8.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.92

User avatar
Scotovy
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 365
Founded: Feb 18, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Scotovy » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:24 pm

Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:
Jedi8246 wrote:Good question. I'm still determine my beliefs in that circumstance.

I was raped on July 17, 2010 by a friend after we went to the movies. I was impregnated and found out three weeks later. I had an abortion because it is my fucking right to not be pregnant, whether or not I was raped.


Sorry to hear that. :(
"I'd rather laugh with the sinners than cry with the saints"

Economic Left/Right: -8.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.46

User avatar
Christian Democrats
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10089
Founded: Jul 29, 2009
New York Times Democracy

Postby Christian Democrats » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:25 pm

Hallistar wrote:
Christian Democrats wrote:It doesn't matter what someone wants; it's about their actions.

A drunk driver might say that he didn't want to hit a pedestrian, but he still must take responsibility for what he did.

It's all about what people do, not what they want to have happened.


The drunk driver commited a misdemeanor or felony (depending on jurisdiction) by being intoxicated behind the wheel.

And the woman did not commit a crime, but she did commit an action for which she must be responsible.

The responsible thing for someone pregnant is to give birth. After that, she can decide whether or not she wants the child.
Leo Tolstoy wrote:Wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority share in it.
GA#160: Forced Marriages Ban Act (79%)
GA#175: Organ and Blood Donations Act (68%)^
SC#082: Repeal "Liberate Catholic" (80%)
GA#200: Foreign Marriage Recognition (54%)
GA#213: Privacy Protection Act (70%)
GA#231: Marital Rape Justice Act (81%)^
GA#233: Ban Profits on Workers' Deaths (80%)*
GA#249: Stopping Suicide Seeds (70%)^
GA#253: Repeal "Freedom in Medical Research" (76%)
GA#285: Assisted Suicide Act (70%)^
GA#310: Disabled Voters Act (81%)
GA#373: Repeal "Convention on Execution" (54%)
GA#468: Prohibit Private Prisons (57%)^

* denotes coauthorship
^ repealed resolution
#360: Electile Dysfunction
#452: Foetal Furore
#560: Bicameral Backlash
#570: Clerical Errors

User avatar
Hallistar
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6144
Founded: Nov 21, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Hallistar » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:25 pm

Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:
Jedi8246 wrote:Good question. I'm still determine my beliefs in that circumstance.

I was raped on July 17, 2010 by a friend after we went to the movies. I was impregnated and found out three weeks later. I had an abortion because it is my fucking right to not be pregnant, whether or not I was raped.


But obviously your rights can go to hell because you had a gurgling baby inside of you and ITS NOT ANY LESS OF A BABY JUST BECAUSE YOU WERE RAPED!!one.

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69785
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:25 pm

Parpolitic Citizens wrote:
Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:I'm walking down the street and I get mugged.
How da fuq is any of that my fault?
"You were walking down the street, ma'am? Well, sorry, then it's your fault you got mugged since you knew that leaving your house posed a risk, so the police force will not be helping you."


Yes you do hold some of the responsibility, if you were walking down an ill lite street at night in a known area where the odds of getting mugged are high.

I don't walk into a tiger's cage and not consent to the risks involved. Seriously think for second.

Is it possible for either you or the Paulbot to say something that DOESN'T make everyone in the thread face-palm? :eyebrow:
Anarcho-Communist, Democratic Confederalist
"The Earth isn't dying, it's being killed. And those killing it have names and addresses." -Utah Phillips

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Emotional Support Crocodile

Advertisement

Remove ads