NATION

PASSWORD

Abortion discussion in Turkey

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69785
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:15 pm

Jedi8246 wrote:
Hallistar wrote:
Oh, so she allowed the semen to enter and possibly give her Genital Herpes as well. Thus, she should be forced to stick with that std and not have it treated because she consented to it by having sex.

A baby is not a medical condition.

A baby? No. Pregnancy sure as hell is.
Anarcho-Communist, Democratic Confederalist
"The Earth isn't dying, it's being killed. And those killing it have names and addresses." -Utah Phillips

User avatar
Torcularis Septentrionalis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9398
Founded: May 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Torcularis Septentrionalis » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:15 pm

Jedi8246 wrote:
Hallistar wrote:
Oh, so she allowed the semen to enter and possibly give her Genital Herpes as well. Thus, she should be forced to stick with that std and not have it treated because she consented to it by having sex.

A baby is not a medical condition.

what the fuck? Yes it is. Being pregnant is a medical condition.
The Andromeda Islands wrote:This! Is! A! Bad! Idea!
Furious Grandmothers wrote:Why are you talking about murder when we are talking about abortion? Murdering a fetus is impossible. It's like smelling an echo. You're not making sense.



20 year old female. Camgirl/student. Call me Torc/TS/Alix

User avatar
Hallistar
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6144
Founded: Nov 21, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Hallistar » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:15 pm

Christian Democrats wrote:
Genivaria wrote:'Donated' implies permission, if a woman wants to get an abortion she obviously is NOT donating.

I can't ask for an organ back that I've donated to someone after transplantation has occurred. The woman can't ask for her uterus back after conception has occurred. She must wait until the child is done using it.

Great Nepal wrote:If one consents to go out on the road, one accepts the possibility of getting killed.

There isn't a great possibility of being killed in the road, so one does not consent to that.


Except you wanted to give the organ to somebody else. The woman never wanted her uterus to be used for a fetus, if she was seeking a pregnancy.

User avatar
Great Nepal
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28677
Founded: Jan 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Nepal » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:15 pm

Christian Democrats wrote:
Genivaria wrote:'Donated' implies permission, if a woman wants to get an abortion she obviously is NOT donating.

I can't ask for an organ back that I've donated to someone after transplantation has occurred. The woman can't ask for her uterus back after conception has occurred. She must wait until the child is done using it.

Again, when did she sign a written or verbal contract regarding lease of her uterus?

Christian Democrats wrote:There isn't a great possibility of being killed in the road, so one does not consent to that.

Whats the magical percentage when consent transfers?
Last edited by Great Nepal on Sun Nov 29, 1995 7:02 am, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
EnragedMaldivians
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8450
Founded: Feb 01, 2010
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby EnragedMaldivians » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:15 pm

Parpolitic Citizens wrote:
Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:Consent to sex =/= consent to pregnancy.
This is not a hard concept, sweetie.
If the fetus originated in a bathtub or a meadow of daisies, sure, it has a right to remain there. But it originates in a woman's body, and has no right to use another person's body against their will, whether or not it will cause harm. No one and nothing has any right to anyone's body ever, for any purpose.


Every woman who allows a penis inside her knows that she may get pregnant. Consent to sex is consent to the possibility of pregnancy.


Not the same as consenting to actually becoming pregnant or carrying to term if she does. What was it you were blabbering about actually thinking things through to avoid posting opinions that are fucking stupid?
Taking a break.

User avatar
Jedi8246
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6132
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Jedi8246 » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:15 pm

Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:
Jedi8246 wrote:Its not irrelevant. Ae you implying that even if you accept humans have the natural right to life, you'd still condone abortion?

Yes.
Because a fetus doesn't get the right to violate a woman's rights.
Do you get the right to violate my rights?
No?
Then neither does a fuckin' fetus.

You don't have the right to kill! It is not a women's right to murder.
Official Member of the Fall of Gods RP Council
Conservative Morality wrote:When you call Bieber feminine, you insult all women.


Agadar wrote:Next thing you know, God turns out to be some weird green space monster with tentacles and a monocle.


Khadgar wrote:Oddly enough, a lot of people who are plotting to harm other people aren't really interested in legal niceties.
Rank #87 in World Cup
Factbook
Jedi8246 is a far-right social libertarian. He is also a non-interventionist and somewhat culturally conservative. Jedi8246's scores (from 0 to 10):
Economic issues: +9.53 right
Social issues: -7.91 libertarian
Foreign policy: -7.32 non-interventionist
Cultural identification: +0.92 conservative

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:16 pm

Jedi8246 wrote:You don't have the right to kill! It is not a women's right to murder.


There is no person, therefore there isn't murder.

User avatar
Hallistar
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6144
Founded: Nov 21, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Hallistar » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:16 pm

EnragedMaldivians wrote:
Parpolitic Citizens wrote:
Every woman who allows a penis inside her knows that she may get pregnant. Consent to sex is consent to the possibility of pregnancy.


Not the same as consenting to actually becoming pregnant or carrying to term if she does. What was it you were blabbering about actually thinking things through to avoid posting opinions that are fucking stupid?


Not even near the same to consenting to paying hundreds of thousands of dollars, delaying your retirement and putting 18 years of your fucking life on hold just because someone thought that consent to sex was consent to pregnancy. Its silly, I know.

User avatar
Jedi8246
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6132
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Jedi8246 » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:17 pm

Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:
Jedi8246 wrote:A baby is not a medical condition.

what the fuck? Yes it is. Being pregnant is a medical condition.

We're not aborting a condition here though. We're aborting a baby.
Official Member of the Fall of Gods RP Council
Conservative Morality wrote:When you call Bieber feminine, you insult all women.


Agadar wrote:Next thing you know, God turns out to be some weird green space monster with tentacles and a monocle.


Khadgar wrote:Oddly enough, a lot of people who are plotting to harm other people aren't really interested in legal niceties.
Rank #87 in World Cup
Factbook
Jedi8246 is a far-right social libertarian. He is also a non-interventionist and somewhat culturally conservative. Jedi8246's scores (from 0 to 10):
Economic issues: +9.53 right
Social issues: -7.91 libertarian
Foreign policy: -7.32 non-interventionist
Cultural identification: +0.92 conservative

User avatar
Gideus
Minister
 
Posts: 2113
Founded: May 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Gideus » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:17 pm

Jedi8246 wrote:
Scotovy wrote:
You're shitting me?

... No?

So essentially having sex with a woman forces you to pay to have sex. AKA, you basically just likened all women into whores/prostitutes because if they get impregnated they require thousands of dollars from man. This is not only wrong but it is also insulting to women and most of the women I know would not agree with you. How about we have some women join in on this argument? I don't see why we(men) get to decide for them, it's THEIR body. They choose what to do with it.
Political Compass(12/18/12)
Economic Left: 5.75
Social Libertarian: 6.87
This represents my nation, Gideus, as well as me.

Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:Everything you said is perfect.

Those who ignore history's lessons in the ultimate folly of war are forced to do more than relive them ... they may be forced to die by them. - Dan Simmons, The Fall of Hyperion

My opinion on feminism, MRA movements, and other similar movements.
I DO NOT use NS statistics, unless specifically requested to do so for individual RPs. Rest assured I will not godmod, I will use logic.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159035
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:17 pm

Christian Democrats wrote:
Genivaria wrote:'Donated' implies permission, if a woman wants to get an abortion she obviously is NOT donating.

I can't ask for an organ back that I've donated to someone after transplantation has occurred. The woman can't ask for her uterus back after conception has occurred. She must wait until the child is done using it.

When you give away your kidney, it ceases being yours. When there is a baby in your uterus, it remains yours.

User avatar
Chulainan
Diplomat
 
Posts: 846
Founded: Apr 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Chulainan » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:17 pm

Gideus wrote:
Chulainan wrote:We don't discuss the issue of abortion in Ireland because we all have a phobia about religion in politics i.e. we look over the Atlantic and go "Fuck that shit" and go back to arguing about the economy and our local terrorist factions.

I wish the United States had a secular government like that...

One politician in my nation mention women committing Sodomy and the media almost exploded and the ruling party had too try and say she didn't mean sodomy but something else, she hasn't been in the public eye for a while now...
The Net is vast and infinite - Major Makoto Kusanagi
Major Motoko Kusanagi: If we all reacted the same way, we'd be predictable, and there's always more than one way to view a situation. What's true for the group is also true for the individual. It's simple: Overspecialize, and you breed in weakness. It's slow death.
Puppet Master: We have been subordinate to our limitations until now. The time has come to cast aside these bonds and to elevate our consciousness to a higher plane. It is time to become a part of all things.


Agymnum wrote:
The Laughing Goats wrote:Because it's gross. Duh.


I find shitting to be gross.

Shitting is therefore wrong. It should be banned and no one should be allowed to take a shit. Ever.

User avatar
Parpolitic Citizens
Diplomat
 
Posts: 665
Founded: May 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Parpolitic Citizens » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:17 pm

Great Nepal wrote:
Parpolitic Citizens wrote:
:palm: No, getting into a car is accepting the risk of life and limb being taken by an accident.

Seriously, give yourself one full minute to process the things you post. Their implications err on the ridiculous at times.

So, by your logic: every victim of every crime has only themselves to blame.
After all, if they chose not to go there - that wouldn't happen?


Pretending that the victim has no responsibility is as equally stupid as pretending that they have all the responsibility.
Damned commie
Economic Left/Right: -8.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.92

User avatar
Jedi8246
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6132
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Jedi8246 » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:17 pm

Samuraikoku wrote:
Jedi8246 wrote:You don't have the right to kill! It is not a women's right to murder.


There is no person, therefore there isn't murder.

Yes there is,
Official Member of the Fall of Gods RP Council
Conservative Morality wrote:When you call Bieber feminine, you insult all women.


Agadar wrote:Next thing you know, God turns out to be some weird green space monster with tentacles and a monocle.


Khadgar wrote:Oddly enough, a lot of people who are plotting to harm other people aren't really interested in legal niceties.
Rank #87 in World Cup
Factbook
Jedi8246 is a far-right social libertarian. He is also a non-interventionist and somewhat culturally conservative. Jedi8246's scores (from 0 to 10):
Economic issues: +9.53 right
Social issues: -7.91 libertarian
Foreign policy: -7.32 non-interventionist
Cultural identification: +0.92 conservative

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69785
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:17 pm

Christian Democrats wrote:
Genivaria wrote:'Donated' implies permission, if a woman wants to get an abortion she obviously is NOT donating.

I can't ask for an organ back that I've donated to someone after transplantation has occurred. The woman can't ask for her uterus back after conception has occurred. She must wait until the child is done using it.

Thats a very dishonest argument your using. You know why? Because the difference between the two is glaringly obvious.
You have to fill out alot paperwork to become an organ donor, you have to make a conscious choice.
You don't do either of those things when you get pregnant.
Anarcho-Communist, Democratic Confederalist
"The Earth isn't dying, it's being killed. And those killing it have names and addresses." -Utah Phillips

User avatar
Torcularis Septentrionalis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9398
Founded: May 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Torcularis Septentrionalis » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:17 pm

Jedi8246 wrote:
Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:Yes.
Because a fetus doesn't get the right to violate a woman's rights.
Do you get the right to violate my rights?
No?
Then neither does a fuckin' fetus.

You don't have the right to kill! It is not a women's right to murder.

It's a woman's right to protect her body from intruders.
Do you support the right for men to rape women?
The Andromeda Islands wrote:This! Is! A! Bad! Idea!
Furious Grandmothers wrote:Why are you talking about murder when we are talking about abortion? Murdering a fetus is impossible. It's like smelling an echo. You're not making sense.



20 year old female. Camgirl/student. Call me Torc/TS/Alix

User avatar
Hallistar
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6144
Founded: Nov 21, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Hallistar » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:18 pm

Jedi8246 wrote:
Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:Yes.
Because a fetus doesn't get the right to violate a woman's rights.
Do you get the right to violate my rights?
No?
Then neither does a fuckin' fetus.

You don't have the right to kill! It is not a women's right to murder.


You mean the illegal termination of a constituent member of a society's already active life?

No, its not your right to screw over a woman just because you think getting rid of a first or second trimester fetus is murder.

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:18 pm

Jedi8246 wrote:Yes there is,


Once again, prove it. You failed to do it pages ago.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159035
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:18 pm

Jedi8246 wrote:
Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:what the fuck? Yes it is. Being pregnant is a medical condition.

We're not aborting a condition here though. We're aborting a baby.

You're aborting a pregnancy.

User avatar
Chinese Regions
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16326
Founded: Apr 24, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Chinese Regions » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:18 pm

Jedi8246 wrote:
Gideus wrote:
Thinking is noticeable by bioelectric activity in certain cells if I'm not mistaken. Cells that fetuses lack until well into pregnancy.

The soul of a person has desires.

:palm:
Fan of Transformers?|Fan of Star Trek?|你会说中文吗?
Geopolitics: Internationalist, Pan-Asian, Pan-African, Pan-Arab, Pan-Slavic, Eurofederalist,
  • For the promotion of closer ties between Europe and Russia but without Dugin's anti-intellectual quackery.
  • Against NATO, the Anglo-American "special relationship", Israel and Wahhabism.

Sociopolitics: Pro-Intellectual, Pro-Science, Secular, Strictly Anti-Theocractic, for the liberation of PoCs in Western Hemisphere without the hegemony of white liberals
Economics: Indifferent

User avatar
Torcularis Septentrionalis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9398
Founded: May 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Torcularis Septentrionalis » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:19 pm

Parpolitic Citizens wrote:
Great Nepal wrote:So, by your logic: every victim of every crime has only themselves to blame.
After all, if they chose not to go there - that wouldn't happen?


Pretending that the victim has no responsibility is as equally stupid as pretending that they have all the responsibility.

I'm walking down the street and I get mugged.
How da fuq is any of that my fault?
"You were walking down the street, ma'am? Well, sorry, then it's your fault you got mugged since you knew that leaving your house posed a risk, so the police force will not be helping you."
The Andromeda Islands wrote:This! Is! A! Bad! Idea!
Furious Grandmothers wrote:Why are you talking about murder when we are talking about abortion? Murdering a fetus is impossible. It's like smelling an echo. You're not making sense.



20 year old female. Camgirl/student. Call me Torc/TS/Alix

User avatar
Parpolitic Citizens
Diplomat
 
Posts: 665
Founded: May 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Parpolitic Citizens » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:19 pm

EnragedMaldivians wrote:
Parpolitic Citizens wrote:
Every woman who allows a penis inside her knows that she may get pregnant. Consent to sex is consent to the possibility of pregnancy.


Not the same as consenting to actually becoming pregnant or carrying to term if she does. What was it you were blabbering about actually thinking things through to avoid posting opinions that are fucking stupid?


Can you people not follow logical chain of events?
Damned commie
Economic Left/Right: -8.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.92

User avatar
Chinese Regions
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16326
Founded: Apr 24, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Chinese Regions » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:19 pm

Jedi8246 wrote:
Genivaria wrote:'Donated' implies permission, if a woman wants to get an abortion she obviously is NOT donating.

She gave permission when she had sex.

And if she was raped?
Fan of Transformers?|Fan of Star Trek?|你会说中文吗?
Geopolitics: Internationalist, Pan-Asian, Pan-African, Pan-Arab, Pan-Slavic, Eurofederalist,
  • For the promotion of closer ties between Europe and Russia but without Dugin's anti-intellectual quackery.
  • Against NATO, the Anglo-American "special relationship", Israel and Wahhabism.

Sociopolitics: Pro-Intellectual, Pro-Science, Secular, Strictly Anti-Theocractic, for the liberation of PoCs in Western Hemisphere without the hegemony of white liberals
Economics: Indifferent

User avatar
Jedi8246
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6132
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Jedi8246 » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:19 pm

Gideus wrote:
Jedi8246 wrote:... No?

So essentially having sex with a woman forces you to pay to have sex. AKA, you basically just likened all women into whores/prostitutes because if they get impregnated they require thousands of dollars from man. This is not only wrong but it is also insulting to women and most of the women I know would not agree with you. How about we have some women join in on this argument? I don't see why we(men) get to decide for them, it's THEIR body. They choose what to do with it.

They can do whatever they want with their body. Can't decide what to do the baby's body unless she decides to parent it. And even then, she can't kill it.

So you think men shouldn't have to pay child support?
Official Member of the Fall of Gods RP Council
Conservative Morality wrote:When you call Bieber feminine, you insult all women.


Agadar wrote:Next thing you know, God turns out to be some weird green space monster with tentacles and a monocle.


Khadgar wrote:Oddly enough, a lot of people who are plotting to harm other people aren't really interested in legal niceties.
Rank #87 in World Cup
Factbook
Jedi8246 is a far-right social libertarian. He is also a non-interventionist and somewhat culturally conservative. Jedi8246's scores (from 0 to 10):
Economic issues: +9.53 right
Social issues: -7.91 libertarian
Foreign policy: -7.32 non-interventionist
Cultural identification: +0.92 conservative

User avatar
Hallistar
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6144
Founded: Nov 21, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Hallistar » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:19 pm

Parpolitic Citizens wrote:
Great Nepal wrote:So, by your logic: every victim of every crime has only themselves to blame.
After all, if they chose not to go there - that wouldn't happen?


Pretending that the victim has no responsibility is as equally stupid as pretending that they have all the responsibility.


How is it equally as stupid? If you were shot in a drive by, are you in any way at fault?

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Emotional Support Crocodile

Advertisement

Remove ads