you serve?
Advertisement
by Edward Richtofen » Thu May 31, 2012 7:22 pm
Nationalist State of Knox wrote:It seems like Donald has pulled out his Trump card.
Corrian wrote: I'm freaking Corrian.
Death Metal wrote:By the OP's logic:
-Communists are big fans of capitalism
-Anarchists believe in the necessity of the state
-Vegans fucking love to eat meat.
-Christians actually worship Satan.
-Homosexual men all like to sleep with women.
by Galloism » Thu May 31, 2012 7:24 pm
by Franklin Delano Bluth » Thu May 31, 2012 7:32 pm
by Neo Arcad » Thu May 31, 2012 7:41 pm
Trotskylvania wrote:Neo Arcad wrote:I would kill an intruder even if he wasn't doing anything. Heck, I'd kill him if he wasn't armed. If he's willing to break into my house, he'd best be ready to get glued back together... IN HELL! And I'd revel in his death, knowing that I was preventing him from committing further crimes or else draining my taxpayer funds in jail.
Good luck explaining that one to the jury.
"Did you fear for your life?"
"No, I did not. He was unarmed."
"Then why'd you kill him?"
"Because he was criminal scum trespassing in my house."
If you're lucky, they'll let you get away with a mitigated manslaughter rap.
Ostroeuropa wrote:Two shirtless men on a pushback with handlebar moustaches and a kettle conquered India, at 17:04 in the afternoon on a Tuesday. They rolled the bike up the hill and demanded that the natives set about acquiring bureaucratic records.
Des-Bal wrote:Modern politics is a series of assholes and liars trying to be more angry than each other until someone lets a racist epithet slip and they all scatter like roaches.
NSLV wrote:Introducing the new political text from acclaimed author/yak, NEO ARCAD, an exploration of nuclear power in the Middle East and Asia, "Nuclear Penis: He Won't Call You Again".
by Galloism » Thu May 31, 2012 7:43 pm
Neo Arcad wrote:Trotskylvania wrote:Good luck explaining that one to the jury.
"Did you fear for your life?"
"No, I did not. He was unarmed."
"Then why'd you kill him?"
"Because he was criminal scum trespassing in my house."
If you're lucky, they'll let you get away with a mitigated manslaughter rap.
lolno
Obviously, I wouldn't spin it like that. He was attempting to attack me, he must not have seen my gun or something, and I just had to think fast and stop him, so I put one through his skull. Who's going to present contrary eyewitness accounts? Deadington McSkullfucked? I don't think so. I'd get off with self-defense easily.
by Trollgaard » Thu May 31, 2012 7:44 pm
by Trotskylvania » Thu May 31, 2012 7:46 pm
Neo Arcad wrote:Trotskylvania wrote:Good luck explaining that one to the jury.
"Did you fear for your life?"
"No, I did not. He was unarmed."
"Then why'd you kill him?"
"Because he was criminal scum trespassing in my house."
If you're lucky, they'll let you get away with a mitigated manslaughter rap.
lolno
Obviously, I wouldn't spin it like that. He was attempting to attack me, he must not have seen my gun or something, and I just had to think fast and stop him, so I put one through his skull. Who's going to present contrary eyewitness accounts? Deadington McSkullfucked? I don't think so. I'd get off with self-defense easily.
Your Friendly Neighborhood Ultra - The Left Wing of the Impossible
Putting the '-sadism' in PosadismKarl Marx, Wage Labour and Capital
Anton Pannekoek, World Revolution and Communist Tactics
Amadeo Bordiga, Dialogue With Stalin
Nikolai Bukharin, The ABC of Communism
Gilles Dauvé, When Insurrections Die"The hell of capitalism is the firm, not the fact that the firm has a boss."- Bordiga
by Farnhamia » Thu May 31, 2012 8:21 pm
Trotskylvania wrote:Neo Arcad wrote:
lolno
Obviously, I wouldn't spin it like that. He was attempting to attack me, he must not have seen my gun or something, and I just had to think fast and stop him, so I put one through his skull. Who's going to present contrary eyewitness accounts? Deadington McSkullfucked? I don't think so. I'd get off with self-defense easily.
Yeah, I'm sure they're going to believe that you legitimately feared for your life, when the forensic evidence will likely show that the person was not actually trying to attack you, and was unarmed.
But that'll be after the police have you on a spitroast for eight hours, and work you over for even the slightest bit of fabrication.
by New Rogernomics » Thu May 31, 2012 8:25 pm
by Bornisia » Thu May 31, 2012 8:51 pm
Episarta wrote:Unfortunately we have no monsters in our nation (Unless you count my ex-wife. ZING!)
by Free South Califas » Thu May 31, 2012 9:14 pm
Caninope wrote:Spiritwolf wrote:This is the beauty of combat operations in the FMF........ they handle their own problems their way. Simply put, if you were in my Unit and i observed you "refusing to shoot the poor suckers with the other uniform on" i would make it my business to find an opportunity to waste your fucking ass. Then you could "avert your eyes" from six feet under all day long. My Marines are not gonna die in a firefight due to your inaction/moral objections.
I'm not familiar with what FMF stands for, but in any first world military, you would be court martialed and most likely imprisoned for the rest of your life.
by New Embossia » Thu May 31, 2012 9:20 pm
Hornesia wrote:Homosexuality may be a sin, but Jesus died for your sins. Therefore, feel free to gay it up.
by The Nuclear Fist » Thu May 31, 2012 9:25 pm
And you touch the distant beaches with tales of brave Ulysses. . .Farnhamia wrote:You're getting a little too fond of the jerkoff motions.
by Aquophia » Thu May 31, 2012 9:30 pm
by New Heathera » Thu May 31, 2012 9:32 pm
by The Nuclear Fist » Thu May 31, 2012 9:33 pm
Aquophia wrote:I'd use to say that I would just blast his kneecap off or something, but I think the unwritten rule that an intruder would be shot/attacked by a dog acts as a pretty good deterrent for home invasion. To say that that is not an option or you would not consider it in a state of fear would probably drive up home invasions.
And you touch the distant beaches with tales of brave Ulysses. . .Farnhamia wrote:You're getting a little too fond of the jerkoff motions.
by The Addams Family » Thu May 31, 2012 9:43 pm
by New Sapienta » Thu May 31, 2012 9:46 pm
by Cannot think of a name » Thu May 31, 2012 11:29 pm
by Azakhia » Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:31 am
by Azakhia » Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:32 am
Cannot think of a name wrote:I don't go around trying to find scenarios where I would be 'willing' to kill someone.
Must be something wrong with me.
by United State of America » Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:41 am
by Big Jim P » Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:41 am
Free South Califas wrote:Big Jim P wrote:
No, I did not say they had to do it my way. Just that if they aren't willing to step up and defend their own, then they do not deserve (nor will they receive) my consideration or respect.
Ah, thanks for clarifying. You said "any" consideration or respect earlier. Pretty different IMHO, sorry if this comes across as nitpicking.
by Azakhia » Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:45 am
United State of America wrote:To be honest, I don't know. I highly doubt that I'd kill him. I have no idea how I'd react in such a situation and don't want to find out.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aperistan, Nu Elysium, Page, Stellar Colonies, The Black Forrest, The Godfather Part III
Advertisement