Advertisement

by New Corda » Thu May 17, 2012 7:05 am

by Srboslavija » Thu May 17, 2012 7:12 am

by New Corda » Thu May 17, 2012 7:15 am
Srboslavija wrote:I'm not racist against women, but if you've ever seen a female police officer try to arrest a person who is resisting - you'll appreciate that gender equality in certain type of roles is like communism... only good in theory, lol.

by Ovisterra » Thu May 17, 2012 7:16 am
Srboslavija wrote:I'm not racist against women, but if you've ever seen a female police officer try to arrest a person who is resisting - you'll appreciate that gender equality in certain type of roles is like communism... only good in theory, lol.

by Srboslavija » Thu May 17, 2012 7:20 am

by Ovisterra » Thu May 17, 2012 7:21 am
Srboslavija wrote:My bad guys. For what it's worth - American isn't my native language.

by New Corda » Thu May 17, 2012 7:27 am

by Ifreann » Thu May 17, 2012 7:28 am
Srboslavija wrote:I'm not racist against women,
but if you've ever seen a female police officer try to arrest a person who is resisting - you'll appreciate that gender equality in certain type of roles is like communism... only good in theory, lol.

by Srboslavija » Thu May 17, 2012 7:40 am
Ifreann wrote:And just how many times have you seen someone successfully resist arrest by a female police officer but fail to do so under comparable circumstances with a male police officer?

by Genivaria » Thu May 17, 2012 7:44 am
New Sapienta wrote:As long as they have to sign up for the draft as well.

by Ovisterra » Thu May 17, 2012 7:45 am
Srboslavija wrote:Sorry, I'm doing the best I can with Google Translate, sometimes words come out comedian.
Ifreann wrote:And just how many times have you seen someone successfully resist arrest by a female police officer but fail to do so under comparable circumstances with a male police officer?
Well I don't have the exact stats on me, and any specific research into such a topic would probably be shut down due to being politically incorrect - but it would be safe to assume the successful arrest ratio between male/female officers would be staggering. That's just a physical reality for certain roles.

by Ifreann » Thu May 17, 2012 7:45 am
Srboslavija wrote:Sorry, I'm doing the best I can with Google Translate, sometimes words come out comedian.Ifreann wrote:And just how many times have you seen someone successfully resist arrest by a female police officer but fail to do so under comparable circumstances with a male police officer?
Well I don't have the exact stats on me, and any specific research into such a topic would probably be shut down due to being politically incorrect - but it would be safe to assume the successful arrest ratio between male/female officers would be staggering. That's just a physical reality for certain roles.

by Northern Dominus » Thu May 17, 2012 7:51 am
Right...if only they developed a device that directed a current of electricity into a violent subject that would incapacitate them....or another device that sprays a chemical derived from very hot chili peppers that would blind violent subjects and interfere with their breathing... why that would equalize everything wouldn't it? Then it wouldn't matter how big the other guy is, once they would get nailed by these theoretical devices and chemicals they would be pretty compliant no matter how big they are!Srboslavija wrote:Sorry, I'm doing the best I can with Google Translate, sometimes words come out comedian.Ifreann wrote:And just how many times have you seen someone successfully resist arrest by a female police officer but fail to do so under comparable circumstances with a male police officer?
Well I don't have the exact stats on me, and any specific research into such a topic would probably be shut down due to being politically incorrect - but it would be safe to assume the successful arrest ratio between male/female officers would be staggering. That's just a physical reality for certain roles.

by Ifreann » Thu May 17, 2012 7:54 am
Northern Dominus wrote:Right...if only they developed a device that directed a current of electricity into a violent subject that would incapacitate them....or another device that sprays a chemical derived from very hot chili peppers that would blind violent subjects and interfere with their breathing... why that would equalize everything wouldn't it? Then it wouldn't matter how big the other guy is, once they would get nailed by these theoretical devices and chemicals they would be pretty compliant no matter how big they are!Srboslavija wrote:Sorry, I'm doing the best I can with Google Translate, sometimes words come out comedian.
Well I don't have the exact stats on me, and any specific research into such a topic would probably be shut down due to being politically incorrect - but it would be safe to assume the successful arrest ratio between male/female officers would be staggering. That's just a physical reality for certain roles.

by Northern Dominus » Thu May 17, 2012 7:58 am
Wow, that's a great idea! Better yet, they could come in different shapes as well! Maybe some could be designed to impart a lot of velocity and force into a subject but still be small enough to fit in a compact mechanism to propel these "bullets", and perhaps some can be shaped to be more streamlined and be backed by more explosive powder so that they could defeat potential protective efforts!Ifreann wrote:Northern Dominus wrote: Right...if only they developed a device that directed a current of electricity into a violent subject that would incapacitate them....or another device that sprays a chemical derived from very hot chili peppers that would blind violent subjects and interfere with their breathing... why that would equalize everything wouldn't it? Then it wouldn't matter how big the other guy is, once they would get nailed by these theoretical devices and chemicals they would be pretty compliant no matter how big they are!
Those are good, but I've been toying with the notion of using small amounts of explosive powder to propel metal slugs(or "bullets") at considerable speeds. I suspect that such a thing could be pretty good at killing fuckers, should the need arise.

by Genivaria » Thu May 17, 2012 7:58 am
Ifreann wrote:Northern Dominus wrote: Right...if only they developed a device that directed a current of electricity into a violent subject that would incapacitate them....or another device that sprays a chemical derived from very hot chili peppers that would blind violent subjects and interfere with their breathing... why that would equalize everything wouldn't it? Then it wouldn't matter how big the other guy is, once they would get nailed by these theoretical devices and chemicals they would be pretty compliant no matter how big they are!
Those are good, but I've been toying with the notion of using small amounts of explosive powder to propel metal slugs(or "bullets") at considerable speeds. I suspect that such a thing could be pretty good at killing fuckers, should the need arise.

by Srboslavija » Thu May 17, 2012 8:06 am
Ifreann wrote:If there is no research into the area then it most certainly is not safe to assume that at all. Indeed, without any evidence to the contrary I would be much more likely to assume that female police officers, having received the same training and passed the same tests, and using the same equipment, would be just as capable of arresting a resisting suspect as their male colleagues.

by Northern Dominus » Thu May 17, 2012 8:34 am
That form of misogyny is what this entire argument boils down to, pretty much. You can throw as many facts and examples as you want at people who believe that women shouldn't be able to undertake any combat-oriented MOS in the US Military, but in the end they're stuck in this preconception that women are the "fairer sex" in the old inequitable view IE lesser in strength and mental forititude, dainty etc.Samozaryadnyastan wrote:Northern Dominus wrote:See here's the issue with the more mysoginist punidts here. The problem is that women in combat gear look like this:
(Image)
and this:
(Image)
but not like this:
(Image)
Apparently if women aren't wearing something skimpy while shooting something then it's emasculating. Which is bullshit of course but there you go, there's the argument.
Fellas who are about to post otherwise, take it from me; women are just as capable of men, and the women who enlist or receive commissions and serve are probably braver, and therefore better, than you.
I never saw anyone make that claim.

by Ifreann » Thu May 17, 2012 8:57 am
Srboslavija wrote:Ifreann wrote:If there is no research into the area then it most certainly is not safe to assume that at all. Indeed, without any evidence to the contrary I would be much more likely to assume that female police officers, having received the same training and passed the same tests, and using the same equipment, would be just as capable of arresting a resisting suspect as their male colleagues.
In my country we have thing called 'Laws of Physics' which may help solve your doubts. Basically, the physical disposition between men and women (we call it 'genetics') provides the physical advantage needed in such roles (ie apprehending a suspect, or operating a tank).
Reading a textbook or doing push-ups can help only so much in a real life situation.
I mean no offence comrade, and if it's any consolation I think women are much ahead of men in terms of intellectual ability and physical attractiveness.
by Souseiseki » Thu May 17, 2012 9:03 am
Srboslavija wrote:I'm not racist against women, but if you've ever seen a female police officer try to arrest a person who is resisting - you'll appreciate that gender equality in certain type of roles is like communism... only good in theory, lol.

by Srboslavija » Thu May 17, 2012 4:13 pm
Souseiseki wrote:Srboslavija wrote:I'm not racist against women, but if you've ever seen a female police officer try to arrest a person who is resisting - you'll appreciate that gender equality in certain type of roles is like communism... only good in theory, lol.
i have
she beat the shit out of him (p.s. there's a reason police are pretty much never alone)
well that was fast
next point please

by Mosasauria » Thu May 17, 2012 4:45 pm

by The UK in Exile » Thu May 17, 2012 4:47 pm
Northern Dominus wrote:That form of misogyny is what this entire argument boils down to, pretty much. You can throw as many facts and examples as you want at people who believe that women shouldn't be able to undertake any combat-oriented MOS in the US Military, but in the end they're stuck in this preconception that women are the "fairer sex" in the old inequitable view IE lesser in strength and mental forititude, dainty etc.Samozaryadnyastan wrote:I never saw anyone make that claim.
Look at the first two pictures. Do any of those women look dainty, willowy, or any other limp-wristed honorific? I'd say not, they look just as confident and focused as any male in their position. That is the reality of women in the military; they're just as capable and not allowing them to serve in combat roles is marginalization, period.

by Neutraligon » Thu May 17, 2012 5:14 pm
Srboslavija wrote:Souseiseki wrote:i have
she beat the shit out of him (p.s. there's a reason police are pretty much never alone)
well that was fast
next point please
I believe the whole point of police training is the ability to subdue a suspect without the use of excess force, rather through proper technique. It requires a certain amount of physical exertion which favors a particular sex.
However in regards to OP, with all the advances in robotics and drone technology, women will play a crucial role in the armies of tomorrow. And that's something we can all embrace.

by Northern Dominus » Thu May 17, 2012 5:21 pm
And the funny part is most of the e-pundits here probably wouldn't be able to pass basic if they did managed to score high enough on the ASVAB.Mosasauria wrote:I see no reason why women shouldn't be on combat duty, all I see is a lot of misogynist attitudes, mostly from people who need to prove their manliness by never allowing a woman to do things better.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Fartsniffage, Ifreann, Kenmoria, La Cocina del Bodhi, Pizza Friday Forever91, Rary, The Huskar Social Union, Virue
Advertisement