That makes me feel better.
Advertisement

by Prussia-Steinbach » Sat May 19, 2012 6:19 pm

by The UK in Exile » Sat May 19, 2012 6:20 pm

by Italicia » Sat May 19, 2012 6:20 pm
The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:I would fight for the CSA, I would fight for anyone but Lincoln, I would fight for the Indians slaughtering innocent white people if it meant Lincoln wouldnt have won. Lincoln was one of the worst people in history and I would fight against him and his spitting on the constitution.

by Prussia-Steinbach » Sat May 19, 2012 6:21 pm

by The Nuclear Fist » Sat May 19, 2012 6:21 pm
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Wow. I am not easily offended, but you calling my ancestors serpentine traitors really, really did.
And you touch the distant beaches with tales of brave Ulysses. . .Farnhamia wrote:You're getting a little too fond of the jerkoff motions.

by Aleckandor » Sat May 19, 2012 6:22 pm
The Nuclear Fist wrote:Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Wow. I am not easily offended, but you calling my ancestors serpentine traitors really, really did.
All rebels are traitors, and the Confederacy was a den of serpentine traitors. Being a traitor is not necessarily a bad thing, but the Confederacy was a bad thing to its core.

by Prussia-Steinbach » Sat May 19, 2012 6:22 pm
Italicia wrote:The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:I would fight for the CSA, I would fight for anyone but Lincoln, I would fight for the Indians slaughtering innocent white people if it meant Lincoln wouldnt have won. Lincoln was one of the worst people in history and I would fight against him and his spitting on the constitution.
Worst people in history? He obliterated Slavery, making way for African-American rights, and thus, a EQUAL world, since you're so obviously a Communist, I would've though you would agree with one of THE BEST PRESIDENTS IN UNITED STATES HISTORY.
And the Indians slaughtering innocent white people? Get out, get the fuck out right now.

by Prussia-Steinbach » Sat May 19, 2012 6:24 pm
The Nuclear Fist wrote:Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Wow. I am not easily offended, but you calling my ancestors serpentine traitors really, really did.
All rebels are traitors, and the Confederacy was a den of serpentine traitors. Being a traitor is not necessarily a bad thing, but the Confederacy was a bad thing to its core.

by Aleckandor » Sat May 19, 2012 6:25 pm
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:The Confederates were not traitors. They were loyal to their States.

by The Nuclear Fist » Sat May 19, 2012 6:25 pm
Aleckandor wrote:Statement Irrelevant To Topic
And you touch the distant beaches with tales of brave Ulysses. . .Farnhamia wrote:You're getting a little too fond of the jerkoff motions.

by Prussia-Steinbach » Sat May 19, 2012 6:26 pm

by Aleckandor » Sat May 19, 2012 6:27 pm

by The Nuclear Fist » Sat May 19, 2012 6:27 pm
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:I do not see how being a traitor is not a bad thing.
The Confederates were not traitors. They were loyal to their States.
And you touch the distant beaches with tales of brave Ulysses. . .Farnhamia wrote:You're getting a little too fond of the jerkoff motions.

by The Nuclear Fist » Sat May 19, 2012 6:28 pm
And you touch the distant beaches with tales of brave Ulysses. . .Farnhamia wrote:You're getting a little too fond of the jerkoff motions.

by Aleckandor » Sat May 19, 2012 6:30 pm

by Aleckandor » Sat May 19, 2012 6:31 pm
The Nuclear Fist wrote: Sorry for the misunderstanding.

by Prussia-Steinbach » Sat May 19, 2012 6:31 pm
The Nuclear Fist wrote:Prussia-Steinbach wrote:I do not see how being a traitor is not a bad thing.
Not shedding blood for a cause you don't believe in is hardly bad.The Confederates were not traitors. They were loyal to their States.
They betrayed their rightful Federal Government, turning their backs to fight for the slave-holding South. They were traitors in the very sense of the word.

by Fradonia » Sat May 19, 2012 6:32 pm

by Prussia-Steinbach » Sat May 19, 2012 6:32 pm
Aleckandor wrote:Prussia-Steinbach wrote:And? I could call the Canadian Mounties traitors, but that doesn't make it so.
Well, to put it in simple terms (excuse my middle school logic), the South seceded from the Union. The Union's government did not appreciate this and the crises eventually escalated into armed conflict between the two factions, and hence, the South being 'rebels' and 'traitors' to the Union and not to themselves in the least.

by The Nuclear Fist » Sat May 19, 2012 6:33 pm
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:"trai·tor/ˈtrātər/
Noun:
A person who betrays a friend, country, principle, etc."
Nope, don't see how. They were loyal to their countries/States.
And you touch the distant beaches with tales of brave Ulysses. . .Farnhamia wrote:You're getting a little too fond of the jerkoff motions.

by Aleckandor » Sat May 19, 2012 6:33 pm
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Aleckandor wrote:
Well, to put it in simple terms (excuse my middle school logic), the South seceded from the Union. The Union's government did not appreciate this and the crises eventually escalated into armed conflict between the two factions, and hence, the South being 'rebels' and 'traitors' to the Union and not to themselves in the least.
If Germany left the European Union, that would make them traitors to the Union?

by Prussia-Steinbach » Sat May 19, 2012 6:34 pm
Fradonia wrote:While I, in no way, endorse slavery, I do support indentured servitude, which the Union didnt, and also sort of liked the idea of a southern confederacy. Plus Lee was a bette person overall than Grant, (he actually released ALL his slaves 3 years before the war started, while Grant realeased his long after the war.) I still cannot say I wouldve supported the Confederacy, (because of the slavery) but I wouldnt have supported the Union either. (Because their just dumb.)
I wouldnt have fought for any of them, since I'm not a military person.

by Farnhamia » Sat May 19, 2012 6:34 pm
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Aleckandor wrote:
Well, to put it in simple terms (excuse my middle school logic), the South seceded from the Union. The Union's government did not appreciate this and the crises eventually escalated into armed conflict between the two factions, and hence, the South being 'rebels' and 'traitors' to the Union and not to themselves in the least.
If Germany left the European Union, that would make them traitors to the Union?

by The Nuclear Fist » Sat May 19, 2012 6:34 pm
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:If Germany left the European Union, that would make them traitors to the Union?
And you touch the distant beaches with tales of brave Ulysses. . .Farnhamia wrote:You're getting a little too fond of the jerkoff motions.

by Wikkiwallana » Sat May 19, 2012 6:35 pm
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:The Nuclear Fist wrote:Not shedding blood for a cause you don't believe in is hardly bad.
They betrayed their rightful Federal Government, turning their backs to fight for the slave-holding South. They were traitors in the very sense of the word.
"trai·tor/ˈtrātər/
Noun:
A person who betrays a friend, country, principle, etc."
Nope, don't see how. They were loyal to their countries/States.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Belarusball, Emotional Support Crocodile, Ethel mermania, Gran Cordoba, Greater Miami Shores 3, Ifreann, Pizza Friday Forever91, Port Caverton, Soloman, Sublime Ottoman State 1800 RP
Advertisement