Are the mods corrupt/biased? Pff, you should be asking a different question!
Are the mods corrupt/biased
enough? I, for one, think they've still got an unfortunately long ways to go. I mean really, threads like this one and Karin's utterly absurd revolution thread are proof enough of that. Where is the hellfire and nuclear modbomb barrage? They ought to be more liberally applying their banhammers, and they are sorely lacking on their DEAT-stabbings. Their names should be making the peasantry flee in fear at the mere mention of them! Their wrath should be quickly and freely given, with none of this obnoxious escalating warnings and one-day softly-softly ban crap. Can you imagine? People getting unofficial notices and redtext warnings, instead of the skull-smashing impact of a banhammer at the first cause of modly annoyance! And don't even get me started on their idiotic appeals process! It's disgusting I tell you! Letting players get erroneous warnings overturned, letting them
question the infaliable Word of Mod? Preposterous!
Seriously, what kinda of mamby-pamby corruption is that? Sweet merciless BOFH, they are doing it completely wrong! Try harder, mods! Come on, you can do better than
this!
~Reploid Seductions
~She Who is Feared, She Who Wields the Oversized Butcher Knives of Deletion
~The Bastard Nationstates Game Moderator... from
HELL!