by Ultor Corporation » Wed May 09, 2012 11:29 pm
by Novaya Tselinoyarsk » Wed May 09, 2012 11:30 pm
by Cannot think of a name » Wed May 09, 2012 11:31 pm
by Ultor Corporation » Wed May 09, 2012 11:32 pm
Novaya Tselinoyarsk wrote:You're late to the "revolution", friend.
We've already decided the moderators are our benevolent supreme overlords.
by Juristonia » Wed May 09, 2012 11:33 pm
Ifreann wrote:Indeed, as far as I can recall only one poster has ever supported legalising bestiality, and he was fucking his cat and isn't welcome here any more, in no small part, I imagine, because he kept going on about how he was fucking his cat.
by Greed and Death » Wed May 09, 2012 11:34 pm
by The United Soviet Socialist Republic » Wed May 09, 2012 11:34 pm
by Cannot think of a name » Wed May 09, 2012 11:34 pm
Juristonia wrote:Didn't we have this exact same thread days before we even had the "revolution" thread already?
by Great Nepal » Wed May 09, 2012 11:35 pm
by Ostroeuropa » Wed May 09, 2012 11:35 pm
by Forsher » Wed May 09, 2012 11:36 pm
Ultor Corporation wrote:*Note to Moderators* I consulted the rules and did not find anything against criticizing moderation decisions or discussing former NS members. If this post violates rules I respectfully request an explanation of what I did wrong.
I have recently started to believe that the mods are acting in a corrupt or biased manner. The job of the mods is to fairly enforce the rules and while they do enforce the rules they act in a biased manner that is confusing and unfair to the players.
The mods seem to abuse their power to punish nations they dislike for whatever reason by issuing overly harsh punishments while turning a blind eye to other offenses. Mods and admins should respect the community and its members as it is us who make the site what it is.
This is evident in the banning of 1000 Cats. He should not have had his nation deleted for what he said; at most it should have had a warning. That was clearly a case of him being deleted because he wasn’t liked by the mod team, even though he is a popular member of the forums. In fact he was made DOS not for his repeating his original offence but for speaking out against the mods decision. 1000 Cats at the very least should not have been made DOS as he did not commit any “similar offences” to what his nation was deleted for on his new account. This is yet another example of moderator bias against a member.
He is not the only one though. I have heard of other members that suffered unfair treatment and overly-harsh sentences even though I am too new to have known them personally.
So what do you think NSG? Are the mods justified in their decisions or am I right about any of this? I would also like to hear the moderators opinion on this issue as well.
by Jerusalem and Damascus » Wed May 09, 2012 11:36 pm
Ultor Corporation wrote:*Note to Moderators* I consulted the rules and did not find anything against criticizing moderation decisions or discussing former NS members. If this post violates rules I respectfully request an explanation of what I did wrong.
I have recently started to believe that the mods are acting in a corrupt or biased manner. The job of the mods is to fairly enforce the rules and while they do enforce the rules they act in a biased manner that is confusing and unfair to the players.
The mods seem to abuse their power to punish nations they dislike for whatever reason by issuing overly harsh punishments while turning a blind eye to other offenses. Mods and admins should respect the community and its members as it is us who make the site what it is.
This is evident in the banning of 1000 Cats. He should not have had his nation deleted for what he said; at most it should have had a warning. That was clearly a case of him being deleted because he wasn’t liked by the mod team, even though he is a popular member of the forums. In fact he was made DOS not for his repeating his original offence but for speaking out against the mods decision. 1000 Cats at the very least should not have been made DOS as he did not commit any “similar offences” to what his nation was deleted for on his new account. This is yet another example of moderator bias against a member.
He is not the only one though. I have heard of other members that suffered unfair treatment and overly-harsh sentences even though I am too new to have known them personally.
So what do you think NSG? Are the mods justified in their decisions or am I right about any of this? I would also like to hear the moderators opinion on this issue as well.
by Novaya Tselinoyarsk » Wed May 09, 2012 11:36 pm
Ultor Corporation wrote:Novaya Tselinoyarsk wrote:You're late to the "revolution", friend.
We've already decided the moderators are our benevolent supreme overlords.
That "revolution" was just some joke thing. This is meant to be serious and I'm not calling for any sort of revolt of protest. It's just a discussion.
by NERVUN » Wed May 09, 2012 11:36 pm
by Ultor Corporation » Wed May 09, 2012 11:36 pm
Great Nepal wrote:No, and whats this month? Bash the Mod Month?
As for Cats, if I recall correctly - he was apparently warned not to promote Zoophilia but continued.
by Novaya Tselinoyarsk » Wed May 09, 2012 11:37 pm
NERVUN wrote:He was DOS'ed for disregarding an Administrator's instructions, repeatedly.
That's pretty much the end of it.
by Greed and Death » Wed May 09, 2012 11:38 pm
by NERVUN » Wed May 09, 2012 11:39 pm
Ostroeuropa wrote:Can we have another revolution just to be safe?
by Ultor Corporation » Wed May 09, 2012 11:39 pm
greed and death wrote:Seeing your low post count and recent join date I suspect you are 1000 cats.
Is it really worth using a proxy just to come here and complain about getting da boot.
by Novaya Tselinoyarsk » Wed May 09, 2012 11:40 pm
by Forsher » Wed May 09, 2012 11:40 pm
greed and death wrote:Seeing your low post count and recent join date I suspect you are 1000 cats.
Is it really worth using a proxy just to come here and complain about getting da boot.
by Stalliongrad and Far-Eastern Territories » Wed May 09, 2012 11:40 pm
by [violet] » Wed May 09, 2012 11:42 pm
Ultor Corporation wrote:This is evident in the banning of 1000 Cats. He should not have had his nation deleted for what he said; at most it should have had a warning. That was clearly a case of him being deleted because he wasn’t liked by the mod team
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Entropan, Ethel mermania, Grinning Dragon, Infected Mushroom, Kerwa, Neu California, The Matthew Islands, The Xenopolis Confederation, Tungstan
Advertisement