Advertisement
by Leistung » Sun May 03, 2009 8:19 pm
by Muravyets » Sun May 03, 2009 8:21 pm
Dread Lady Nathicana wrote:I nearly died reading the Cattlecar bit there. Thank you so much for making me practically snort my salad from the giggling. Now go start that thread
Still though, you bring up a good point. RP mixed in with General? (Not including the rp as self bits that have gone before) IT WOULD BE CHAOS!
"But you just said you favored the eating of babies and clubbing of seals!"
"I was just -playing- a person who supported that."
"How can we tell?"
"Because when its me I ... hrm. Wait now, I've got this, really ..."
by Leistung » Sun May 03, 2009 8:21 pm
Neesika wrote:Leistung wrote:Whining and bitching? Hardly. My point is simple, and has been made extremely clearly with as little filler as possible: moderators should abide by decisions already made. Otherwise, we open up a massive can of worms with mods siding with one side or the other simply because it catches their fancy. The rules cannot be bent to the whims of the enforcers.
Lemmetellyouwat. I'll start up a new nation called 'Jerk'. And everytime you call me 'Jerk', I'm going to cry about it in Moderation.
by Neo Kervoskia » Sun May 03, 2009 8:22 pm
by Leistung » Sun May 03, 2009 8:23 pm
by Muravyets » Sun May 03, 2009 8:24 pm
Neesika wrote:Is this what your 'new improved' General would look like? Constant whining and bitching? Oh oh, yes please, sounds lovely!
by Neesika » Sun May 03, 2009 8:25 pm
Leistung wrote:Yeah, because I'm clearly crying my eyes out over this. As far as I can tell, we're having a discussion on the rules and their applications, and you're veering the topic into the realm of personal attack because you cannot give me a reasonable point.
by The Cat-Tribe » Sun May 03, 2009 8:28 pm
Leistung wrote:Kryozerkia wrote:Jaredcohenia wrote:1: Yes, you are going to type out Jaredcohenia. I do not want my name posted on the board, I feel like it is an invasion of my privacy. Doing so is against the rules of the board.
I'm sorry, but shortening a poster's name is quite common here, and it's not against the rules of the board. Also, if you were concerned about your privacy, you wouldn't have used your real name in any way shape or form, as a name here is assumed to be an alias. No reasonable person would have no way of knowing. That said, you can request that someone address you a certain way. Some people may not comply, and intervention only happens when it's obvious the nickname is designed to purposely inflame. In this case, as it is taken directly out of the alias you have chosen, without the letters being rearranged, nor could be be taken as a flame, I cannot see how it would inflame.
This appears to be in contradiction to Ardchoille's ruling here: http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p ... ostcount=4
And yes, I just pulled precedent.
Jaredcohenia wrote:Kryozerkia wrote:Leistung wrote:This appears to be in contradiction to Ardchoille's ruling here: http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p ... ostcount=4
And yes, I just pulled precedent.
That may be a 'precedent', but having checked the post to which that responds, I must say that there was an obvious condescending tone in the post; the point of which was to annoy. I do not believe that there is intent to annoy. Also, Jaredcohenia alleges a violation of privacy, which your little precedent doesn't cover. There is no violation of privacy. For a precedent to work, the facts do have to be similar; I see discrepancies. The precedent doesn't address privacy, it addresses intent to annoy using nicknames.
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=589912
Precedent.
And if precedent isn't needed, then I would call it trolling.
by Dread Lady Nathicana » Sun May 03, 2009 8:30 pm
by Jaredcohenia » Sun May 03, 2009 8:33 pm
Dread Lady Nathicana wrote:Muravyets: Why thank you! *sweeps off big hat with a huge feather in it, bows, and promptly sneezes after said feather gets all tickly in the nose, and comes out looking rather worse for the now wasted effort*
And hey - got a simple solution for the name thing. Just call him 'Jar'. Which brings up another point ...
Use of a name imbedded in a nation name is, if I recall, not actionable. Outing someone's WHOLE name, the entirety of which is NOT in their nation name, is. So given what I recall of the incident, you're barking up the wrong tree with this bickering, Liestung.
Honestly, can this be done yet? General is General, and no one but Jar there seems frothing at the mouth for it to change. Move on, man. I think your crusade was dead before it even tried for a beachhead.
by Yootopia » Sun May 03, 2009 8:34 pm
Jaredcohenia wrote:Also, please do not call me Jared. It is Jaredcohenia.
by Dread Lady Nathicana » Sun May 03, 2009 8:35 pm
Jaredcohenia wrote:tl;dr, but for the most part (up until tonight's shitshow), my goal was achieved. I created a topic that didn't deviate from the given topic, which is one of my key facets. At the end, the topic did turn into a shitshow - which is one of the problems with a General topic. Once there's been enough debate, someone starts to banter and the topic becomes ridden with spam. See what I mean, in some way?
by Neo Kervoskia » Sun May 03, 2009 8:35 pm
by Cannot think of a name » Sun May 03, 2009 8:36 pm
The Cat-Tribe wrote:
Stop being ridiculous.
by Neesika » Sun May 03, 2009 8:36 pm
Jaredcohenia wrote:tl;dr, but for the most part (up until tonight's shitshow), my goal was achieved. I created a topic that didn't deviate from the given topic, which is one of my key facets. At the end, the topic did turn into a shitshow - which is one of the problems with a General topic. Once there's been enough debate, someone starts to banter and the topic becomes ridden with spam. See what I mean, in some way?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Blargoblarg, Bursken, Cyptopir, Dimetrodon Empire, El Lazaro, General TN, GMS Greater Miami Shores 1, Ithania, Kreushia, La Paz de Los Ricos, Maximum Imperium Rex, Pale Dawn, Republics of the Solar Union, The Jamesian Republic, Tungstan
Advertisement