Because the declaration of independence is just that- a declaration of independence. from britain. not a constitution. they could have written every thursday is free ice cream day, and they wouldnt have needed to implement it into the legal system.
Advertisement

by The Aryan Nations » Tue May 08, 2012 3:32 pm

by The Aryan Nations » Tue May 08, 2012 3:34 pm
Ceannairceach wrote:The Confederate Swamps wrote:Saw it before and i see it now. Slavery was common back then. It was a staple of the economy. The North was trying to ruin the South because they were making more money. So yeah. slavery was a right. slaves are property. We have the right to property, its not even an american right, its a basic human right.
Another basic human right is to be free from involuntary bondage. This right supersedes the right to property.

by Simon Cowell of the RR » Tue May 08, 2012 3:34 pm

by Norstal » Tue May 08, 2012 3:35 pm
Alien Space Bats wrote:Republic of Tropical Partiers wrote:When did genocide become better than slavery? How is treating someone like vermin to be deposed of, backwards things to get rid of any means possible , better than an trerating people like an investment.
You obviously didn't read my earlier remarks, did you?
I'm talking about people who say that Northerners can't criticize Southern slavery because Northerners had slaves, too; that they can't criticize Southern lynchings because the North had lynchings, too; that they can't criticize Southern segregation because the North had segregation, too.
My answer to that argument is (and has been throughout the bulk of this thread) that the difference between North and South lies in the length and extent of the evils perpetrated, the length and degree of refusal to recognized the evils perpetrated as evil, the length and ferocity of resistance to any effort to ameliorate, correct, or repair the evils perpetrated, and the continuing refusal to accept blame or criticism for any of the foregoing.
Genocide doesn't really come into it - although I might add that the South has the rest of the country whipped silly on that score, as well.
To say that the North is worse (or even no better) than the South because it committed genocide against the American Indian while the South "only" engaged in African slavery is more than a little disingenuous, considering that what the Shawnee, Blackhawk, Cheyenne Lakota, and Nez Perce suffered was nothing compared to what happened to the Cherokee, Choctaw, Creeks, Chickasaw, and Seminoles.
So greater crimes and a lack of remorse. I'm sensing a pattern here, aren't you?
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Norstal » Tue May 08, 2012 3:36 pm
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Simon Cowell of the RR » Tue May 08, 2012 3:37 pm
Jedi8246 wrote:Ceannairceach wrote:The refusal to recognize the rights of the homosexual in the American south comes to mind.
Perhaps you need a reminder of all the Northern states that don't grant homosexuals rights
Northern States that have Gay Marriage Banned:
-Michigan
-Ohio
-Pennsylvania
-Maine
-Illinois
-Indiana
I could go on, but aside from a small group of NE states and Iowa, it's banned. Stop your ignorance and stereotypes of the Southern area. You act as though the South is the only place that does so.And in fact, there are signs that many Southern states (Florida, Missouri, etc) are warming to the idea of allowing certain gay rights. SO do us all a favor and educate your bigotry before commenting on this thread again.

by Saiwania » Tue May 08, 2012 3:37 pm

by Farnhamia » Tue May 08, 2012 3:39 pm
Nidaria wrote:Ceannairceach wrote:The refusal to recognize the rights of the homosexual in the American south comes to mind.
So did Victorian England, which I admire for its social and cultural values. In my opinion, there is such a thing as being too open-minded and tolerant. Nothing keeps them from moving to the North or California.

by The Aryan Nations » Tue May 08, 2012 3:39 pm
Markinian Skrill wrote:The Aryan Nations wrote:
you do realize the american economy is built on the south, right? with the southern states leaving, so does a rather large chunk of the states that actually produce
It's not like we get food from the south for free, we have to buy it from them. But you know what they do get? My federal tax dollars for their obese population, medicare and medicaid (and best of all, they'll turn around and complain about socialism because they're ignorant bafoons to boot!)

by Hittanryan » Tue May 08, 2012 3:39 pm
Saiwania wrote:Southerners shouldn't care if people from Northern states hate them or not. More people in the US are migrating out of northern states and are moving to southern or western states than vice versa. The manufacturing jobs in the northeast are gone forever for the most part and with the cost of living being lower in the Southern states, the south will likely experience better economic and population growth over time. While most of the north can stagnate under stricter labor laws and higher taxes.

by The Aryan Nations » Tue May 08, 2012 3:40 pm
Farnhamia wrote:Nidaria wrote:So did Victorian England, which I admire for its social and cultural values. In my opinion, there is such a thing as being too open-minded and tolerant. Nothing keeps them from moving to the North or California.
England hasn't been "Victorian" in over a century, and they've progressed in terms of recognizing the rights of homosexual citizens to be treated like ... citizens. If you don't like the way the United States is affording its homosexual citizens the same simple rights you enjoy, I invite you to take your own advice and leave.

by The Aryan Nations » Tue May 08, 2012 3:41 pm
Hittanryan wrote:Saiwania wrote:Southerners shouldn't care if people from Northern states hate them or not. More people in the US are migrating out of northern states and are moving to southern or western states than vice versa. The manufacturing jobs in the northeast are gone forever for the most part and with the cost of living being lower in the Southern states, the south will likely experience better economic and population growth over time. While most of the north can stagnate under stricter labor laws and higher taxes.
Until their shoddy education systems catch up with them. Skilled labor is in demand, not high-school dropouts.

by Norstal » Tue May 08, 2012 3:41 pm
The Aryan Nations wrote:Farnhamia wrote:England hasn't been "Victorian" in over a century, and they've progressed in terms of recognizing the rights of homosexual citizens to be treated like ... citizens. If you don't like the way the United States is affording its homosexual citizens the same simple rights you enjoy, I invite you to take your own advice and leave.
Social contract.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Farnhamia » Tue May 08, 2012 3:41 pm
The Aryan Nations wrote:Farnhamia wrote:England hasn't been "Victorian" in over a century, and they've progressed in terms of recognizing the rights of homosexual citizens to be treated like ... citizens. If you don't like the way the United States is affording its homosexual citizens the same simple rights you enjoy, I invite you to take your own advice and leave.
Social contract.

by Norstal » Tue May 08, 2012 3:41 pm
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Hittanryan » Tue May 08, 2012 3:41 pm
The Aryan Nations wrote:Markinian Skrill wrote:
It's not like we get food from the south for free, we have to buy it from them. But you know what they do get? My federal tax dollars for their obese population, medicare and medicaid (and best of all, they'll turn around and complain about socialism because they're ignorant bafoons to boot!)
Texas is the 2nd largest economy in the nation (California), and the 15th largest economy in the world. you really dont care if that productivity leaves?
the south is the area least hit by the recession in america.

by The Aryan Nations » Tue May 08, 2012 3:42 pm

by New Nassrau » Tue May 08, 2012 3:42 pm

by Hittanryan » Tue May 08, 2012 3:42 pm
Turok wrote:I like the south. In fact, I think there is less racism in the south than in the north.
Also, the BBQ is fantastic. As is the Gulf.

by The Aryan Nations » Tue May 08, 2012 3:42 pm
Hittanryan wrote:The Aryan Nations wrote:
Texas is the 2nd largest economy in the nation (California), and the 15th largest economy in the world. you really dont care if that productivity leaves?
the south is the area least hit by the recession in america.
The South's job growth, especially Texas, is based on undercutting other states.

by Norstal » Tue May 08, 2012 3:43 pm
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Simon Cowell of the RR » Tue May 08, 2012 3:43 pm

by The Aryan Nations » Tue May 08, 2012 3:44 pm
Simon Cowell of the RR wrote:The Aryan Nations wrote:
how can i be a patriotic russian, but not loyal to the USSR?
Because, and this may come as a shock, the North is a heterogenous geographic region, not a despotic form of government.
Why is it that, in defense of the South, all the Southerners can do is attack the north?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Albaaa, Emotional Support Crocodile, Forsher, Imperial British State, Perikuresu, Rary, Siimyardo, Sublime Ottoman State 1800 RP, The Huskar Social Union, The Rio Grande River Basin
Advertisement