= No value in any of them
Advertisement

by Death Metal » Mon May 14, 2012 5:16 pm

by Amacia » Mon May 14, 2012 5:49 pm

by Occupied Deutschland » Mon May 14, 2012 6:32 pm


by Socialdemokraterne » Mon May 14, 2012 6:43 pm
Occupied Deutschland wrote:I mean, even assuming the whole plan goes balls-up ungodly bad that STILL means there'll be at least ONE currency.
Or are you seriously arguing the lack of a Federal Reserve will degenerate economical exchange to a barter system

by Amacia » Mon May 14, 2012 7:08 pm
Socialdemokraterne wrote:Occupied Deutschland wrote:I mean, even assuming the whole plan goes balls-up ungodly bad that STILL means there'll be at least ONE currency.
Or are you seriously arguing the lack of a Federal Reserve will degenerate economical exchange to a barter system
There will be an oligarchy of currencies that win out in the end, most likely. What they are and their value relative to one another will be in constant flux (making transactions and financial planning a bit of a nightmare), but there will still be some sort of currency.
Actually, what I'd expect to see in a modern context is exchanges of data on bank cards and different ranges of usability for said cards. In other words, I'd expect that if you eliminated central banking the entire financial sector would gradually transform into a credit/debit system using no physical currency and having no physical backing at all. It'd still be a fiat system, you'd just be getting a promise of value from banks instead of governments.
Or am I raving like a lunatic?

by The United Soviet Socialist Republic » Mon May 14, 2012 7:12 pm

by Socialdemokraterne » Mon May 14, 2012 7:30 pm

by Crogach » Mon May 14, 2012 7:52 pm

by The United Soviet Socialist Republic » Mon May 14, 2012 7:56 pm
Socialdemokraterne wrote:Economic plan
Tax breaks to important members of society (police officers, doctors, etc) <---- I can see the reasoning behind this. It provides some incentive to enter these professions.
Tax cuts to the poor <---- OK. Are you going to accompany that with increases in the tax levels for the rest of the brackets to make up the difference?
Repeal the age limit on getting a job <----- You want child labor to become more extensive? Why?
Make education optional <---- At all levels, or at a specific level? If the latter, at which level?
Social plan
Censor extremist sites including KKK, Nazi, extremist feminist, terrorist, and other sites of extremist people <---- You're talking about militant extremists. Don't censor them, investigate them. Their websites are practically a window into their activities, an invaluable resource for law enforcement agencies.
Illegalise discrimination against blacks, gays, women, or anyone in public or in getting a job and enfore discrimination laws <---- We've already done this.

by Socialdemokraterne » Mon May 14, 2012 8:01 pm
Crogach wrote:Honestly, what I'd like to see in the short term is basically a second New Deal combined with major changes to our current banking system, and in the long term I'd like to see America move toward where the Nordic countries are now in terms of social and economic policy, but maintaining a strong manufacturing sector and a highly diversified economy. I laid out a lot of this across multiple different posts on other fora, and I'm going to wind up linking to it rather than posting it all in one place because there isn't room. I'm fairly curious to see what people think of this and I'd like feedback if possible.

by Crogach » Mon May 14, 2012 8:13 pm
Socialdemokraterne wrote:Crogach wrote:Honestly, what I'd like to see in the short term is basically a second New Deal combined with major changes to our current banking system, and in the long term I'd like to see America move toward where the Nordic countries are now in terms of social and economic policy, but maintaining a strong manufacturing sector and a highly diversified economy. I laid out a lot of this across multiple different posts on other fora, and I'm going to wind up linking to it rather than posting it all in one place because there isn't room. I'm fairly curious to see what people think of this and I'd like feedback if possible.
That's an awfully large amount of supplementary reading, but the gist of what you're shooting at is summarized here. From this description of the direction you're trying to go, I look upon your plan favorably. Which Nordic model are you preferring to go after? I'm particularly fond of the Danish model myself.

by Rick Rollin » Mon May 14, 2012 8:22 pm
The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:Everyone I would like to expand my social and economic plans to include the following.
Economic plan
Tax breaks to important members of society (police officers, doctors, etc)
Tax cuts to the poor
Repeal the age limit on getting a job
Make education optional
Social plan
Censor extremist sites including KKK, Nazi, extremist feminist, terrorist, and other sites of extremist people
Illegalise discrimination against blacks, gays, women, or anyone in public or in getting a job and enfore discrimination laws

by The United Soviet Socialist Republic » Mon May 14, 2012 8:25 pm
Rick Rollin wrote:The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:Everyone I would like to expand my social and economic plans to include the following.
Economic plan
Tax breaks to important members of society (police officers, doctors, etc)
Tax cuts to the poor
Repeal the age limit on getting a job
Make education optional
Social plan
Censor extremist sites including KKK, Nazi, extremist feminist, terrorist, and other sites of extremist people
Illegalise discrimination against blacks, gays, women, or anyone in public or in getting a job and enfore discrimination laws
Yet moar Stalinism.

by Genivaria » Mon May 14, 2012 8:25 pm
Rick Rollin wrote:The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:Everyone I would like to expand my social and economic plans to include the following.
Economic plan
Tax breaks to important members of society (police officers, doctors, etc)
Tax cuts to the poor
Repeal the age limit on getting a job
Make education optional
Social plan
Censor extremist sites including KKK, Nazi, extremist feminist, terrorist, and other sites of extremist people
Illegalise discrimination against blacks, gays, women, or anyone in public or in getting a job and enfore discrimination laws
Yet moar Stalinism.

by The United Soviet Socialist Republic » Mon May 14, 2012 8:29 pm

by Rick Rollin » Mon May 14, 2012 8:30 pm

by The United Soviet Socialist Republic » Mon May 14, 2012 8:31 pm

by Rick Rollin » Mon May 14, 2012 8:36 pm
And I said no preference for government officials.

by The ancient Kingdom of Putacaia » Mon May 14, 2012 8:40 pm



by The United Soviet Socialist Republic » Mon May 14, 2012 8:40 pm
Rick Rollin wrote:The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:I said I want young people to be given the option to get a job early on if they choose, and for the same wage as everyone else, and only if they choose.
Happened in the Soviet Union.And I said no preference for government officials.
You wanted to give them tax breaks.

by Rick Rollin » Mon May 14, 2012 8:47 pm

by The United Soviet Socialist Republic » Mon May 14, 2012 8:49 pm

by Genivaria » Mon May 14, 2012 8:57 pm
The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:Genivaria wrote:Thats hardly Stalinism. A little bit too authoritarian for my taste with censoring extremist groups, but not Stalinist.
Do you have a problem with Nazis not being able to preach anti semitic views on the internet? Or the KKK not being allowed to post racist views on the internet? Or terrorists not being able to call for people to blow up buildings on the internet? Or for extremist Feminists to say men should be killed on the internet?

by The United Soviet Socialist Republic » Mon May 14, 2012 9:00 pm
Genivaria wrote:The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:Do you have a problem with Nazis not being able to preach anti semitic views on the internet? Or the KKK not being allowed to post racist views on the internet? Or terrorists not being able to call for people to blow up buildings on the internet? Or for extremist Feminists to say men should be killed on the internet?
Yes I DO have a problem with that, because if you do that then you set a precedent that it is ok to silence people who the government calls "terrorists". The government did exactly that to socialists, communists, and trade unionists in the 1950's.
I DISAGREE with alot of people, but I don't think they should be silenced.

by The Fallow Lands » Mon May 14, 2012 9:02 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Cannot think of a name, Central Slavia, Emotional Support Crocodile, EretzIsrael, Ifreann, Imperial Pravus, Khardsland, Kirav, Pilipinas and Malaya, Shrillland, Tarsonis, The Crimson Isles, The North Polish Union, Thermodolia, Theyra, Umeria
Advertisement