Advertisement

by The Cummunist State » Sat May 05, 2012 12:21 pm

by Rick Rollin » Sat May 05, 2012 12:22 pm
Auralia wrote:Frisbeeteria wrote:The Mighty Hand of Frisbeeteria
★★★ Senior Game Moderator ★★★
(Image)
Wielder of the Bolt of Justice
The following players have received *** Official Warnings for quoting inappropriate links ***. All of you clicked the link and commented on the contents, so it's apparent that you knew what you were quoting.
Norstal, Hallistar, Alowwvia, Straight From Above, Unchecked Expansion, Vousielle
The following players quoted the link stating that you would not click it. No warning, but c'mon, folks - it was obvious from thread context that the materials were inappropriate. Don't {quote] links.
Sailsia, The Cummunist State, Mavorpen, Katganistan
I'll also point out that holding a strong opinion, as Milennias did, does not equal trolling. This is a divisive issue with strong opinions on each side, and I'll expect you to respect that in future.
While Milennias was *** deleted as punishment *** for posting the link, that player is welcome to create another nation and continue the discussion. Anyone who steps out of line on either side of the debate will be dealt with according to site rules.
Isn't Katganistan also a Senior Game Moderator?
by Auralia » Sat May 05, 2012 12:26 pm
The Cummunist State wrote:I'm not sure why everyone is saying that fetuses aren't alive. Of course they are. They're biologically expanding and in a lose sense of the word, evolving. They may be parasitic, they may only be able to live at others' expense, but they are alive. It's when/if that life is more important than the mother is the issue. And I say, never.

by Galloism » Sat May 05, 2012 12:27 pm
Auralia wrote:The Cummunist State wrote:I'm not sure why everyone is saying that fetuses aren't alive. Of course they are. They're biologically expanding and in a lose sense of the word, evolving. They may be parasitic, they may only be able to live at others' expense, but they are alive. It's when/if that life is more important than the mother is the issue. And I say, never.
I believe that a fetus is a human being. I also believe that all human beings have inherent immeasurable value, and therefore have an inalienable right to life. Thus, I believe that the right to life of a fetus is more important than the right to bodily sovereignty of the mother. Therefore, I believe abortion is wrong in all cases except when the right to life of the mother is threatened.

by The Cummunist State » Sat May 05, 2012 12:27 pm
Auralia wrote:The Cummunist State wrote:I'm not sure why everyone is saying that fetuses aren't alive. Of course they are. They're biologically expanding and in a lose sense of the word, evolving. They may be parasitic, they may only be able to live at others' expense, but they are alive. It's when/if that life is more important than the mother is the issue. And I say, never.
I believe that a fetus is a human being. I also believe that all human beings have inherent immeasurable value, and therefore have an inalienable right to life. Thus, I believe that the right to life of a fetus is more important than the right to bodily sovereignty of the mother. Therefore, I believe abortion is wrong in all cases except when the right to life of the mother is threatened.
by Auralia » Sat May 05, 2012 12:31 pm
The Cummunist State wrote:Auralia wrote:
I believe that a fetus is a human being. I also believe that all human beings have inherent immeasurable value, and therefore have an inalienable right to life. Thus, I believe that the right to life of a fetus is more important than the right to bodily sovereignty of the mother. Therefore, I believe abortion is wrong in all cases except when the right to life of the mother is threatened.
Okay. First, proof of fetus being a person. Second, you can't force your morals on other people. If you don't like abortions DON'T HAVE ONE

by Rick Rollin » Sat May 05, 2012 12:32 pm
The Cummunist State wrote:Auralia wrote:
I believe that a fetus is a human being. I also believe that all human beings have inherent immeasurable value, and therefore have an inalienable right to life. Thus, I believe that the right to life of a fetus is more important than the right to bodily sovereignty of the mother. Therefore, I believe abortion is wrong in all cases except when the right to life of the mother is threatened.
Okay. First, proof of fetus being a person. Second, you can't force your morals on other people. If you don't like abortions DON'T HAVE ONE
Galloism wrote:Auralia wrote:
I believe that a fetus is a human being. I also believe that all human beings have inherent immeasurable value, and therefore have an inalienable right to life. Thus, I believe that the right to life of a fetus is more important than the right to bodily sovereignty of the mother. Therefore, I believe abortion is wrong in all cases except when the right to life of the mother is threatened.
I need a kidney.
You're a match.
Is my right to life more important than your right to bodily sovereignty?
Auralia wrote:The Cummunist State wrote:Okay. First, proof of fetus being a person. Second, you can't force your morals on other people. If you don't like abortions DON'T HAVE ONE
1. I define "person" as a living member of the species homo sapiens. How do you define it?
2. Yes, I can. I believe that depriving an innocent human being of their life is morally wrong, and should therefore be illegal. I'm sure you do too.

by The Cummunist State » Sat May 05, 2012 12:36 pm
Auralia wrote:The Cummunist State wrote:Okay. First, proof of fetus being a person. Second, you can't force your morals on other people. If you don't like abortions DON'T HAVE ONE
1. I define "person" as a living member of the species homo sapiens. How do you define it?
2. Yes, I can. I believe that depriving an innocent human being of their life is morally wrong, and should therefore be illegal. I'm sure you do too.

by Galloism » Sat May 05, 2012 12:38 pm
by Auralia » Sat May 05, 2012 12:38 pm
Rick Rollin wrote:'Freedom' from 'murder' is a negative 'right'.
'Freedom' of 'free organs' is a positive 'right'.
Rick Rollin wrote:Now answer this: What makes humans different?

by Galloism » Sat May 05, 2012 12:42 pm


by Rick Rollin » Sat May 05, 2012 12:44 pm
Galloism wrote:Rick Rollin wrote:'Freedom' from 'murder' is a negative 'right'.
'Freedom' of 'free organs' is a positive 'right'.
Get the difference?
Yes, but I'm not sure you do.
In order to support a fetus, the mother must take continuous positive action to support it, sharing her bodily nutrients and organs with the fetus until such time as it can survive on its own.
That is a "positive right".
When an abortion occurs, the fetus is removed from the continuous support of its mother. Unfortunately, due to the mother no longer taking these positive actions, the fetus dies.
It's really no different than pulling the plug on a braindead person in a hospital and allowing them to die.
Auralia wrote:Rick Rollin wrote:'Freedom' from 'murder' is a negative 'right'.
'Freedom' of 'free organs' is a positive 'right'.
Yes.Rick Rollin wrote:Now answer this: What makes humans different?
That's an excellent question. Why should humans have rights? Out of self-preservation? Out of perceived value to society? Or because they simply have an innate, immeasurable value? I prefer the latter option, since the other two are too utilitarian for my taste. They essentially allow you to remove or ignore human rights at any time, depending on the situation.

by Galloism » Sat May 05, 2012 12:46 pm
Rick Rollin wrote:Galloism wrote:Yes, but I'm not sure you do.
In order to support a fetus, the mother must take continuous positive action to support it, sharing her bodily nutrients and organs with the fetus until such time as it can survive on its own.
That is a "positive right".
When an abortion occurs, the fetus is removed from the continuous support of its mother. Unfortunately, due to the mother no longer taking these positive actions, the fetus dies.
It's really no different than pulling the plug on a braindead person in a hospital and allowing them to die.
The quotes were there for a reason.

by Wiztopia » Sat May 05, 2012 2:49 pm
Oppressorion wrote:For the record, I have been reading the posts after mine. They're...interesting. I've been...re-examining my priorities and drawing new conclusions.
Insulting me as a person rather than my arguments are still not OK.

by The Cummunist State » Sat May 05, 2012 2:54 pm

by Rick Rollin » Sat May 05, 2012 2:56 pm

by The Cummunist State » Sat May 05, 2012 3:01 pm

by DaWoad » Sat May 05, 2012 5:46 pm
Auralia wrote:The Cummunist State wrote:Okay. First, proof of fetus being a person. Second, you can't force your morals on other people. If you don't like abortions DON'T HAVE ONE
1. I define "person" as a living member of the species homo sapiens. How do you define it?
2. Yes, I can. I believe that depriving an innocent human being of their life is morally wrong, and should therefore be illegal. I'm sure you do too.

by The Cummunist State » Sat May 05, 2012 6:13 pm
Albicia wrote:Did over 100 people approve of abortion throughout the pregnancy. That is truly evil.

by Rick Rollin » Sat May 05, 2012 6:38 pm

by The Cummunist State » Sat May 05, 2012 6:40 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: 0cala, Aggicificicerous, Andsed, Bawkie, Elejamie, Frisemark, Frokolia, Google [Bot], Libertas Omnium Maximus, Rary, Reich of the New World Order, Tarsonis, Tinhampton, Tlaceceyaya, United Kingdom of Poland, Valyxias, Zibazap
Advertisement