NATION

PASSWORD

Is democracy the only good form of government?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Los Ireland
Attaché
 
Posts: 72
Founded: Mar 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Los Ireland » Mon Apr 30, 2012 2:43 pm

So far? Sure.

Depends.

User avatar
Bulgislavia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1493
Founded: Jan 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Bulgislavia » Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:18 pm

Growing up in a western "liberal democracy" (New Zealand) I guess Ive enjoyed great privileged and freedom and a life that is very blessed in comparison to those in less fortunate countries

I live under an economic system that despite global financial crisis I still have access to everything I need to survive (and a bit more)
I have exercised freedom from demonstrating, sharing my thoughts and opinions and have been openly critical about the government with no negative repercussions for me or my family.

I believe there is no end goal in human development and that the current system I live under is "Not the final solution" and that there will come a time where the system needs to be refreshed, improved or put back in its place.

Currently I believe that New Zealand Democracy is being subverted by a few power seeking individuals only in it for themselves, the same is true of our economic system which has seen it get ripped off by a few greedy individuals who were able to spoil it for everybody else. So this has opened up a few flaws that have never had to have been addressed by the public in as much depth before and has thrown some old certainties into question

I believe Democracy can fail just like any other government systems can fail (we have seen free nations fall into tyranny time and time again and history is currently being written as we speak so its probably we will see this cycle/pattern repeat itself)

The declining voter turn out meant the 2011 General election saw the lowest turnout since the 1980's. Most of the people who didn't vote were the youth and marginalized and disenfranchised who are beginning to no longer engage in their system (as they no longer see it as their system). While the privileged class did vote and ensured a second term right wing National Government bent on making a surplus in 2014 (no matter what the cost)

I think it takes a significant amount of maturity on the part of a people to maintain a free society.

With so many people taking their freedom for granted, new security laws and expansion of police powers, increase in social precarity and mistrust of the political system, I'm just afraid of where this path might lead us.

It is up to the people to make sure Democracy doesn't fail
Revolutionary Peoples Democracy

User avatar
Lord Tothe
Minister
 
Posts: 2632
Founded: Dec 19, 2007
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Lord Tothe » Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:24 pm

Any form of government is based on the idea that there can be a legitimate territorial monopoly in dispute resolution (including disputes with the monopolists), a monopoly in the legitimate use of violence, and the power to tax. No government, democratic or otherwise, is good. Even when governments are only intended to protect persons and property, an expropriating property protector is a contradiction in terms.
Last edited by Lord Tothe on Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:[...] TLDR; welcome to the internet. Bicker or GTFO.
"Why is self-control, autonomy, such a threat to authority? Because the person who controls himself, who is his own master, has no need for an authority to be his master. This, then, renders authority unemployed. What is he to do if he cannot control others? To be sure, he could mind his own business. But that is a fatuous answer, for those who are satisfied to mind their own business do not aspire to become authorities." ~ Thomas Szasz

User avatar
Bulgislavia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1493
Founded: Jan 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Bulgislavia » Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:31 pm

Lord Tothe wrote:Any form of government is based on the idea that there can be a legitimate territorial monopoly in dispute resolution (including disputes with the monopolists), a monopoly in the legitimate use of violence, and the power to tax. No government, democratic or otherwise, is good. Even when governments are only intended to protect persons and property, an expropriating property protector is a contradiction in terms.


Is there any way of some mass awakening and a global emancipation from these illegitimate systems of control if they cant be changed from the inside (Or can they be changed from the inside?) Like an establishment directly controlled by the people "like the government was an actually public service and owned and controlled by the people, government is a tool of the people etc" and that an establishment could actively prepare the people to accept some kind of understanding of "Transcending" the idea of entrusting the management of your life to these kind of systems of organization and control?
Revolutionary Peoples Democracy

User avatar
Prussia-Steinbach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22386
Founded: Mar 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Prussia-Steinbach » Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:32 pm

Bulgislavia wrote:Growing up in a western "liberal democracy" (New Zealand) I guess Ive enjoyed great privileged and freedom and a life that is very blessed in comparison to those in less fortunate countries

I live under an economic system that despite global financial crisis I still have access to everything I need to survive (and a bit more)
I have exercised freedom from demonstrating, sharing my thoughts and opinions and have been openly critical about the government with no negative repercussions for me or my family.

I believe there is no end goal in human development and that the current system I live under is "Not the final solution" and that there will come a time where the system needs to be refreshed, improved or put back in its place.

Currently I believe that New Zealand Democracy is being subverted by a few power seeking individuals only in it for themselves, the same is true of our economic system which has seen it get ripped off by a few greedy individuals who were able to spoil it for everybody else. So this has opened up a few flaws that have never had to have been addressed by the public in as much depth before and has thrown some old certainties into question

I believe Democracy can fail just like any other government systems can fail (we have seen free nations fall into tyranny time and time again and history is currently being written as we speak so its probably we will see this cycle/pattern repeat itself)

The declining voter turn out meant the 2011 General election saw the lowest turnout since the 1980's. Most of the people who didn't vote were the youth and marginalized and disenfranchised who are beginning to no longer engage in their system (as they no longer see it as their system). While the privileged class did vote and ensured a second term right wing National Government bent on making a surplus in 2014 (no matter what the cost)

I think it takes a significant amount of maturity on the part of a people to maintain a free society.

With so many people taking their freedom for granted, new security laws and expansion of police powers, increase in social precarity and mistrust of the political system, I'm just afraid of where this path might lead us.

It is up to the people to make sure Democracy doesn't fail

The people are the ones that make democracy fail! :palm:
I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. ― William S. Burroughs


User avatar
Lord Tothe
Minister
 
Posts: 2632
Founded: Dec 19, 2007
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Lord Tothe » Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:35 pm

Bulgislavia wrote:
Lord Tothe wrote:Any form of government is based on the idea that there can be a legitimate territorial monopoly in dispute resolution (including disputes with the monopolists), a monopoly in the legitimate use of violence, and the power to tax. No government, democratic or otherwise, is good. Even when governments are only intended to protect persons and property, an expropriating property protector is a contradiction in terms.


Is there any way of some mass awakening and a global emancipation from these illegitimate systems of control if they cant be changed from the inside (Or can they be changed from the inside?) Like an establishment directly controlled by the people "like the government was an actually public service and owned and controlled by the people, government is a tool of the people etc" and that an establishment could actively prepare the people to accept some kind of understanding of "Transcending" the idea of entrusting the management of your life to these kind of systems of organization and control?

The more you approach direct democracy, the more you suffer from mob rule and "mightnumbers makes right".
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:[...] TLDR; welcome to the internet. Bicker or GTFO.
"Why is self-control, autonomy, such a threat to authority? Because the person who controls himself, who is his own master, has no need for an authority to be his master. This, then, renders authority unemployed. What is he to do if he cannot control others? To be sure, he could mind his own business. But that is a fatuous answer, for those who are satisfied to mind their own business do not aspire to become authorities." ~ Thomas Szasz

User avatar
Bulgislavia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1493
Founded: Jan 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Bulgislavia » Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:39 pm

Well thats true too.

Remaining silent and letting government get away with anything sets precedents and by the time they attempt to speak out its already to late - in that sense the people in gave their consent to bad government

Also the people who dedicate their existence to accumulation of wealth and power and manage to maneuver systems of government also share responsibility - and the citizenry that tolerate their power seeking behavior

But people can also be responsible for ensuring dictatorship fails too

either by changing from the inside and setting in motion a series of dramatic events that lead to the downfall of that particular form of dictatorship (Like the fall of the USSR)

and by the people collectively standing up against it (Various revolutions, even the mass demonstrations in Europe are done by people resisting T.I.N.A (Acronym for "There Is No Alternative")
Revolutionary Peoples Democracy

User avatar
Bulgislavia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1493
Founded: Jan 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Bulgislavia » Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:41 pm

Lord Tothe wrote:
Bulgislavia wrote:
Is there any way of some mass awakening and a global emancipation from these illegitimate systems of control if they cant be changed from the inside (Or can they be changed from the inside?) Like an establishment directly controlled by the people "like the government was an actually public service and owned and controlled by the people, government is a tool of the people etc" and that an establishment could actively prepare the people to accept some kind of understanding of "Transcending" the idea of entrusting the management of your life to these kind of systems of organization and control?

The more you approach direct democracy, the more you suffer from mob rule and "mightnumbers makes right".


So can we continue down some path of gradual devolving of power down to the individual and communities begin to make their own destinies and within them every house can pioneer its own life style and people can be free to even administer their own kind of justice or the community agree's to handle matters on its own and have cooperative "Harmonious" approaches with other communities? or something?

and then the power of the Internet to help drive forward a new technological informed society with transparency and honesty, truth, freedom etc?
Last edited by Bulgislavia on Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Revolutionary Peoples Democracy

User avatar
Prussia-Steinbach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22386
Founded: Mar 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Prussia-Steinbach » Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:42 pm

Bulgislavia wrote:Well thats true too.

Remaining silent and letting government get away with anything sets precedents and by the time they attempt to speak out its already to late - in that sense the people in gave their consent to bad government

Also the people who dedicate their existence to accumulation of wealth and power and manage to maneuver systems of government also share responsibility - and the citizenry that tolerate their power seeking behavior

But people can also be responsible for ensuring dictatorship fails too

either by changing from the inside and setting in motion a series of dramatic events that lead to the downfall of that particular form of dictatorship (Like the fall of the USSR)

and by the people collectively standing up against it (Various revolutions, even the mass demonstrations in Europe are done by people resisting T.I.N.A (Acronym for "There Is No Alternative")

Communist/Socialist, totalitarian, tyrannical regimes have been voted in. Thus, democracy has efficiently failed.
I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. ― William S. Burroughs


User avatar
Bulgislavia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1493
Founded: Jan 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Bulgislavia » Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:50 pm

Prussia-Steinbach wrote:
Bulgislavia wrote:Well thats true too.

Remaining silent and letting government get away with anything sets precedents and by the time they attempt to speak out its already to late - in that sense the people in gave their consent to bad government

Also the people who dedicate their existence to accumulation of wealth and power and manage to maneuver systems of government also share responsibility - and the citizenry that tolerate their power seeking behavior

But people can also be responsible for ensuring dictatorship fails too

either by changing from the inside and setting in motion a series of dramatic events that lead to the downfall of that particular form of dictatorship (Like the fall of the USSR)

and by the people collectively standing up against it (Various revolutions, even the mass demonstrations in Europe are done by people resisting T.I.N.A (Acronym for "There Is No Alternative")

Communist/Socialist, totalitarian, tyrannical regimes have been voted in. Thus, democracy has efficiently failed.


The Last part of a life cycle for Democracies is an intense period of dissatisfaction, mistrust in a bloated, inept and inefficient government perceived by the people as corrupt. This is when emergent groups then claim to have the answer to all of societies problems and the people have blind faith in something other then what they know (sometimes this plays into the hands of a charismatic power seeker) and then rapidly the old order is replaced with something that sets up the emergent group as societies new leadership (and in a dictatorship cycle this leadership must be perceived as faultless and enlightened)

Where once the news papers condemned everything the government was doing there is then a radical change of seeing nothing but the Government doing everything right - I guess that's how you know your free society is starting to close (or has already closed)

But once dark times run their course something new, fresh, euphoric and revolutionary then breaks through the monotony so.... the cycle continues and humans will continue to write and reflect back on their history
Revolutionary Peoples Democracy

User avatar
The United Soviet Socialist Republic
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17944
Founded: Aug 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The United Soviet Socialist Republic » Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:53 pm

Prussia-Steinbach wrote:
The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:Oh my God yes! I totally agree.

Funny. Are you actually a Communist, or Socialist?

You should know I am only economicly socialist. I am conservative on all other political aspects.
Gay and Proudand also a brony
Political Compass:Left: 7.76, Authoritarian: 5.6
I am: Fascist/Corporatist on economy,
Conservative on social issues(Support same sex marriage),
Anti secularist on religion,
Anti-Republican on government,
Interventionist/Imperialist on international issues

User avatar
Prussia-Steinbach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22386
Founded: Mar 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Prussia-Steinbach » Mon Apr 30, 2012 11:20 pm

The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Funny. Are you actually a Communist, or Socialist?

You should know I am only economicly socialist. I am conservative on all other political aspects.

I have no way of knowing that.
I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. ― William S. Burroughs


User avatar
Lord Tothe
Minister
 
Posts: 2632
Founded: Dec 19, 2007
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Lord Tothe » Mon Apr 30, 2012 11:30 pm

Bulgislavia wrote:
Lord Tothe wrote:The more you approach direct democracy, the more you suffer from mob rule and "mightnumbers makes right".


So can we continue down some path of gradual devolving of power down to the individual and communities begin to make their own destinies and within them every house can pioneer its own life style and people can be free to even administer their own kind of justice or the community agree's to handle matters on its own and have cooperative "Harmonious" approaches with other communities? or something?

and then the power of the Internet to help drive forward a new technological informed society with transparency and honesty, truth, freedom etc?


Pretty much. Agorism, mutual aid societies, competing security and dispute resolution organizations.
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:[...] TLDR; welcome to the internet. Bicker or GTFO.
"Why is self-control, autonomy, such a threat to authority? Because the person who controls himself, who is his own master, has no need for an authority to be his master. This, then, renders authority unemployed. What is he to do if he cannot control others? To be sure, he could mind his own business. But that is a fatuous answer, for those who are satisfied to mind their own business do not aspire to become authorities." ~ Thomas Szasz

User avatar
The UK in Exile
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12023
Founded: Jul 27, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby The UK in Exile » Tue May 01, 2012 12:36 am

Prussia-Steinbach wrote:
Bulgislavia wrote:Growing up in a western "liberal democracy" (New Zealand) I guess Ive enjoyed great privileged and freedom and a life that is very blessed in comparison to those in less fortunate countries

I live under an economic system that despite global financial crisis I still have access to everything I need to survive (and a bit more)
I have exercised freedom from demonstrating, sharing my thoughts and opinions and have been openly critical about the government with no negative repercussions for me or my family.

I believe there is no end goal in human development and that the current system I live under is "Not the final solution" and that there will come a time where the system needs to be refreshed, improved or put back in its place.

Currently I believe that New Zealand Democracy is being subverted by a few power seeking individuals only in it for themselves, the same is true of our economic system which has seen it get ripped off by a few greedy individuals who were able to spoil it for everybody else. So this has opened up a few flaws that have never had to have been addressed by the public in as much depth before and has thrown some old certainties into question

I believe Democracy can fail just like any other government systems can fail (we have seen free nations fall into tyranny time and time again and history is currently being written as we speak so its probably we will see this cycle/pattern repeat itself)

The declining voter turn out meant the 2011 General election saw the lowest turnout since the 1980's. Most of the people who didn't vote were the youth and marginalized and disenfranchised who are beginning to no longer engage in their system (as they no longer see it as their system). While the privileged class did vote and ensured a second term right wing National Government bent on making a surplus in 2014 (no matter what the cost)

I think it takes a significant amount of maturity on the part of a people to maintain a free society.

With so many people taking their freedom for granted, new security laws and expansion of police powers, increase in social precarity and mistrust of the political system, I'm just afraid of where this path might lead us.

It is up to the people to make sure Democracy doesn't fail

The people are the ones that make democracy fail! :palm:


their the ones who make autocracies fail too.

their pretty much the weak point in any political system, the bastards.
"We fought for the public good and would have enfranchised the people and secured the welfare of the whole groaning creation, if the nation had not more delighted in servitude than in freedom"

"My actions are as noble as my thoughts, That never relish’d of a base descent.I came unto your court for honour’s cause, And not to be a rebel to her state; And he that otherwise accounts of me, This sword shall prove he’s honour’s enemy."

"Wählte Ungnade, wo Gehorsam nicht Ehre brachte."
DEFCON 0 - not at war
DEFCON 1 - at war "go to red alert!" "are you absolutely sure sir? it does mean changing the lightbulb."

Previous

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cachard Calia, Cannot think of a name, Casai, Dayganistan, EuroStralia, Fahran, Gun Manufacturers, Haganham, Heavenly Assault, Luna Amore, Major-Tom, Necroghastia, Northern Socialist Council Republics, San Lumen, Tarsonis, Umeria, Washington Resistance Army, Western Theram

Advertisement

Remove ads