Is democracy the only good form of government?

[Tagmatium]

Just because people vote for something you don't like doesn't mean that their vote shouldn't be ignored.

OH THE IRONY.

Isn't that why Hippo things that commies shouldn't vote?

[Tuthina]

Want to actually check my sources and my criticism for ones?

I just decided to ignore it since.. well, that shit was dumb. But oh well, sure.

If people want male MP's, then they vote for male MP's. If people want white MP's, they for white MP's. If people want rich MP's, they vote for rich MP's. Just because people vote for something you don't like doesn't mean that their vote shouldn't be ignored. Sure, I understand that commies are pissed because their candidate who wants to tax everything and murder everyone who's successful only recieves seven votes every year, but you just gotta deal with it.

Besides, MP's are rich and succesful because they've done lots of work to achieve it. No one wants to have some loser who doesn't know anything in the Parliament. And MP's deserve a high salary because they do lots of work, and the work they do is very important. Simple as that.

If it wasn't that long I would definitely put it in my sig.


Oh, concerning the question of OP,

No, and no.

[Ifreann]

OH THE IRONY.

Isn't that why Hippo things that commies shouldn't vote?

I don't think he minds if they vote. He just wants to ban the parties they'd vote for, if memory serves.

[Tuthina]

Isn't that why Hippo things that commies shouldn't vote?

I don't think he minds if they vote. He just wants to ban the parties they'd vote for, if memory serves.

Ain't that essentially be ignoring their votes?

[Prussia-Steinbach]

No, and no. That is ridiculous.

[Ifreann]

I don't think he minds if they vote. He just wants to ban the parties they'd vote for, if memory serves.

Ain't that essentially be ignoring their votes?

Yes. Well, unless they decide to vote for one of his preferred right wing parties.

[Volnotova]

Just because people vote for something you don't like doesn't mean that their vote shouldn't be ignored.

OH THE IRONY.

Indeed, straight from the mouth of El Presidente himself.

Mind you, it was Hippo that suggested locking up political enemies, even executing them and censoring them.

I rest my case.

[Hippostania]

Ain't that essentially be ignoring their votes?

No. Commies are free to vote for parties that aren't essentially criminal organizations that are trying to murder innocent people and make the government steal money and property from its citizens.

[Volnotova]

I just decided to ignore it since.. well, that shit was dumb. But oh well, sure.

If people want male MP's, then they vote for male MP's. If people want white MP's, they for white MP's. If people want rich MP's, they vote for rich MP's. Just because people vote for something you don't like doesn't mean that their vote shouldn't be ignored. Sure, I understand that commies are pissed because their candidate who wants to tax everything and murder everyone who's successful only recieves seven votes every year, but you just gotta deal with it.

The point was that the system is not representative and not democratic. It fails at this entire abysmal "governance by-proxy" thing.

Also, lol, are you insinuating I am a communist?

Besides, MP's are rich and succesful because they've done lots of work to achieve it. No one wants to have some loser who doesn't know anything in the Parliament. And MP's deserve a high salary because they do lots of work, and the work they do is very important. Simple as that.

*sigh*

The problem with you is not that you are dumb, because you are not.

The problem is that you deliberately ignore the point I was making.

My point was that "Liberal Democracies" are not representative.

[Drekka]

Just because people vote for something you don't like doesn't mean that their vote shouldn't be ignored.

OH THE IRONY.

I

^this 10x

[Tuthina]

No. Commies are free to vote for parties that aren't essentially criminal organizations that are trying to murder innocent people and make the government steal money and property from its citizens.

I agree, although I would argue not all leftists/fascists parties are like that, and criminal procedures generally do not charge people before they actually commit crimes.

[Volnotova]

Ain't that essentially be ignoring their votes?

No. Commies are free to vote for parties that aren't essentially criminal organizations that are trying to murder innocent people and make the government steal money and property from its citizens.

What about Republicans stating that civilian deaths are mere collateral damage? What about Bush and the illegal war in Iraq(See Kofi Annan's reply when asked whether the Iraq war was illegal or not, something deliberately ignored en messe in American media)?

[Ecans]

Well, yes and no

[Tuthina]

No. Commies are free to vote for parties that aren't essentially criminal organizations that are trying to murder innocent people and make the government steal money and property from its citizens.

What about Republicans stating that civilian deaths are mere collateral damage? What about Bush and the illegal war in Iraq(See Kofi Annan's reply when asked whether the Iraq war was illegal or not, something deliberately ignored en messe in American media)?

Inb4 necessary evil.

[The free state of Great Britain]

Most forms of government suck, but democracy has by far been the best so far.

[Volnotova]

What about Republicans stating that civilian deaths are mere collateral damage? What about Bush and the illegal war in Iraq(See Kofi Annan's reply when asked whether the Iraq war was illegal or not, something deliberately ignored en messe in American media)?

Inb4 necessary evil.

Inb4 "Spreading peace, democracy and liberty".

[Hippostania]

What about Republicans stating that civilian deaths are mere collateral damage? What about Bush and the illegal war in Iraq(See Kofi Annan's reply when asked whether the Iraq war was illegal or not, something deliberately ignored en messe in American media)?

Some unfortunate civilian casualties were necessary in the Iraqi people's struggle for freedom from Saddam's oppressive rule. They died so Iraq could be free.

And who cares if it wasn't legal according to some tinpot dictatorship? We liberated the people of Iraq and deposed a dictator, of course his dictator buddies were pissed.

[Tuthina]

Inb4 "Spreading peace, democracy and liberty".

To be fair, this is not a fundamentally bad idea. I just think that the flamboyant attitude would do more harm than good in that direction. I also think the liberty of getting intoxicated to be my fundamental rights too.

[Ifreann]

What about Republicans stating that civilian deaths are mere collateral damage? What about Bush and the illegal war in Iraq(See Kofi Annan's reply when asked whether the Iraq war was illegal or not, something deliberately ignored en messe in American media)?

Some unfortunate civilian casualties were necessary

Inb4 necessary evil.

in the Iraqi people's struggle for freedom from Saddam's oppressive rule. They died so Iraq could be free.

Inb4 "Spreading peace, democracy and liberty".

Two for two!

[Divair]

Some unfortunate civilian casualties were necessary

Inb4 necessary evil.

in the Iraqi people's struggle for freedom from Saddam's oppressive rule. They died so Iraq could be free.

Inb4 "Spreading peace, democracy and liberty".

Two for two!

Meh, ain't impressive. Hippo is predictable.

[Rainara]

It's like saying junk food is the only best thing in foods. Eating too much, you may sickness. If you force it on other people, they will love it, but they will get too much of it, and are in the risk of diseases.

Same goes for democracy.

[Volnotova]

What about Republicans stating that civilian deaths are mere collateral damage? What about Bush and the illegal war in Iraq(See Kofi Annan's reply when asked whether the Iraq war was illegal or not, something deliberately ignored en messe in American media)?

Some unfortunate civilian casualties were necessary in the Iraqi people's struggle for freedom from Saddam's oppressive rule. They died so Iraq could be free.

And who cares if it wasn't legal according to some tinpot dictatorship? We liberated the people of Iraq and deposed a dictator, of course his dictator buddies were pissed.

The UN is a tinpot dictatorship?

Now I have seen it all.

[Yootwopia]

Two for two!

Meh, ain't impressive. Hippo is predictable.

ikr

[Neohippies]

commies are pissed because their candidate who wants to tax everything and murder everyone who's successful

criminal organizations that are trying to murder innocent people and make the government steal money and property from its citizens

Nice far-right propaganda you got there. My answer to the questions? No and no.

[Videssos]

What about Republicans stating that civilian deaths are mere collateral damage? What about Bush and the illegal war in Iraq(See Kofi Annan's reply when asked whether the Iraq war was illegal or not, something deliberately ignored en messe in American media)?

Some unfortunate civilian casualties were necessary in the Iraqi people's struggle for freedom from Saddam's oppressive rule. They died so Iraq could be free.

And who cares if it wasn't legal according to some tinpot dictatorship? We liberated the people of Iraq and deposed a dictator, of course his dictator buddies were pissed.

Oh lol. Don't make me laugh!