is porn sex?

Advertisement

by Galloism » Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:19 am
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:Aelosia wrote:Cannot negate the fact that somehow, Treznor is the only I know, (although not personally), to be able to mix the "dirty old man", the "dandy gentleman", and the "smooth operator" stereotypes perfectly, with coherency. And that's something.
Admirable, I know.![]()
He's dirty and a gentleman, all wrapped up into one.

by Insertdecentnamehere » Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:20 am

by Kobrania » Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:20 am
Eternal Mysteries wrote:Treznor wrote:I don't think anyone can argue against the statement that humans are obsessed with sex. We're obsessed with having it, fantasizing about it or worrying about who is doing what to whom. It permeates our conversations, our politics, our literature and especially our advertising. So, as I'm sure has been done so many times before, let's get NSG's take on it: where do you stand on sex?
I am an unabashed hedonist. I see no point in repressing sex for religion or morality's sake, but I recognize the need for caution in sex regarding hygenic and emotional pitfalls. I don't see the point in telling two, three or fifty consenting adults who they can or can't have sex with, or how they can engage in it. I think it's a physical, emotional and mental union that can be as frivolous as a cheap thrill and as meaningful as a lasting relationship. I don't think sex can be restricted to any one thing, but can encompass whatever meaning we choose to assign to it.
******* NOTICE *******
I am male. I like fermales. So all you fags keep your buttplugs to yourself !!
![]()
![]()

by Nanatsu no Tsuki » Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:21 am
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGsRIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria
by Jello Biafra » Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:21 am
Eternal Mysteries wrote:******* NOTICE *******
I am male. I like fermales. So all you fags keep your buttplugs to yourself !!
![]()
![]()

by Aelosia » Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:22 am

by Aelosia » Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:23 am
Galloism wrote:Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:Aelosia wrote:Cannot negate the fact that somehow, Treznor is the only I know, (although not personally), to be able to mix the "dirty old man", the "dandy gentleman", and the "smooth operator" stereotypes perfectly, with coherency. And that's something.
Admirable, I know.![]()
He's dirty and a gentleman, all wrapped up into one.
Wish I could do that, but I can never get the "smooth operator" down.
I'll have to stick with the poor innocent southern boy.

by Treznor » Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:24 am
JuNii wrote:for me, not answering for RLC, it's because I view sex as an intimate act. a giving of oneself to another. when I find that special someone, I certainly don't want to give a used gift.
JuNii wrote:Iniika wrote:What if you wish you'd had more experience before, to keep things smooth and interesting with the one you want to be with, concievably, forever?
if you are a virgin, then wouldn't sex be new, interesting, and an adventure with that person? imagine, experiencing new things with someone you love.
JuNii wrote:the choice to with hold oneself until marriage doesn't have to be a religious one. and this is *MY* choice. if I find that significant other used to be a prostitute or porn star (hey... it's possible...) I certainly won't hold her to my standards or choices when it comes to sex. she made hers and if I love her, then I love her.

by Galloism » Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:26 am

by Muravyets » Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:29 am

by Galloism » Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:30 am
Muravyets wrote:Last night, I was talking with my mom about that amusing "all porn is gay porn" episode at the "values voters" Republican summit.
http://thinkprogress.org/2009/09/19/cob ... rnography/
And I couldn't quite figure out how he thought Playboy was gay porn. My mom, who understands everything, explained (and I quote), "Well, [Muravyets dear], when a guy jacks off, that's man on man sex. Obviously. Think about it."
So, yeah, according to Michael Schwartz, who I guess must know, porn is sex.
Gay, gay sex. Because only gay guys like vagina. Apparently.


by Ashmoria » Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:31 am
Muravyets wrote:
Last night, I was talking with my mom about that amusing "all porn is gay porn" episode at the "values voters" Republican summit.
http://thinkprogress.org/2009/09/19/cob ... rnography/
And I couldn't quite figure out how he thought Playboy was gay porn. My mom, who understands everything, explained (and I quote), "Well, [Muravyets dear], when a guy jacks off, that's man on man sex. Obviously. Think about it."
So, yeah, according to Michael Schwartz, who I guess must know, porn is sex.
Gay, gay sex. Because only gay guys like vagina. Apparently.

by Nanatsu no Tsuki » Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:32 am
Ashmoria wrote:Muravyets wrote:
Last night, I was talking with my mom about that amusing "all porn is gay porn" episode at the "values voters" Republican summit.
http://thinkprogress.org/2009/09/19/cob ... rnography/
And I couldn't quite figure out how he thought Playboy was gay porn. My mom, who understands everything, explained (and I quote), "Well, [Muravyets dear], when a guy jacks off, that's man on man sex. Obviously. Think about it."
So, yeah, according to Michael Schwartz, who I guess must know, porn is sex.
Gay, gay sex. Because only gay guys like vagina. Apparently.
yeah i had that discussion with my (thankfully adult) son. he was bemused by the notion.
so masturbation is gay. who knew?
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGsRIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

by Treznor » Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:32 am
Aelosia wrote:I think Treznor is Lord Henry Wotton, and that thought is scary.

by JuNii » Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:34 am
ah, but for the "virgin" stand point. how can it be a bad gift when you have someone who you can 'teach' all the things that will satisfy you. without the other person drawing up on experience that could be all wrong for you?Treznor wrote:JuNii wrote:for me, not answering for RLC, it's because I view sex as an intimate act. a giving of oneself to another. when I find that special someone, I certainly don't want to give a used gift.
Bad gifts are the worst ones of all. You don't want them, but you feel obligated to accept them or risk making the other person feel bad.
I find it better to comparison shop beforehand and pick out the gift I want so I know I'll be happy with it.
you quoted two sources for divorce. yet the 'Sex' is it because of bad sex or is it because of one person cheating on the other, which, involves sex?Treznor wrote:
A relationship (marriage or otherwise) can't be based entirely on sex. On the other hand, few marriages can survive harmoniously without good sex. Sex and money problems are the two biggest reasons cited for divorce in the modern western world.
The choice to wait has always been MY Choice. The problem is, that people assume that if one is Abstaining, they are doing so BECAUSE of Religious reasons. At the same time. others view promiscuity as being 'loose' and 'Slutty'.Treznor wrote:JuNii wrote:the choice to with hold oneself until marriage doesn't have to be a religious one. and this is *MY* choice. if I find that significant other used to be a prostitute or porn star (hey... it's possible...) I certainly won't hold her to my standards or choices when it comes to sex. she made hers and if I love her, then I love her.
That is the best answer by far in this post. Waiting for marriage, religious reasons, etc and so forth are all fine and good, but it should always be a matter of choice and not something you're pressured to do one way or another. People who choose to have sex need to have good communication before, during and after, or it all falls apart no matter what your foundation. It helps reduce the risk for nasty surprises, both physical and emotional.

by JuNii » Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:36 am
Muravyets wrote:
Last night, I was talking with my mom about that amusing "all porn is gay porn" episode at the "values voters" Republican summit.
http://thinkprogress.org/2009/09/19/cob ... rnography/
And I couldn't quite figure out how he thought Playboy was gay porn. My mom, who understands everything, explained (and I quote), "Well, [Muravyets dear], when a guy jacks off, that's man on man sex. Obviously. Think about it."
So, yeah, according to Michael Schwartz, who I guess must know, porn is sex.
Gay, gay sex. Because only gay guys like vagina. Apparently.


by Aelosia » Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:37 am
Treznor wrote:Aelosia wrote:I think Treznor is Lord Henry Wotton, and that thought is scary.
Okay, I'm blushing now. This thread wasn't intended to be all about me.
But I had to look up Lord Henry Wotton and I regret I don't get the reference. Plus, I'd be dead for over four hundred years which I find to be a distinct turn-off.

by JuNii » Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:37 am
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:Ashmoria wrote:Muravyets wrote:
Last night, I was talking with my mom about that amusing "all porn is gay porn" episode at the "values voters" Republican summit.
http://thinkprogress.org/2009/09/19/cob ... rnography/
And I couldn't quite figure out how he thought Playboy was gay porn. My mom, who understands everything, explained (and I quote), "Well, [Muravyets dear], when a guy jacks off, that's man on man sex. Obviously. Think about it."
So, yeah, according to Michael Schwartz, who I guess must know, porn is sex.
Gay, gay sex. Because only gay guys like vagina. Apparently.
yeah i had that discussion with my (thankfully adult) son. he was bemused by the notion.
so masturbation is gay. who knew?
So now everything is gay?
Then I'm a lesbian because I do like to touch myself.
Sheesh.


by Nanatsu no Tsuki » Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:38 am
JuNii wrote:Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:Ashmoria wrote:Muravyets wrote:
Last night, I was talking with my mom about that amusing "all porn is gay porn" episode at the "values voters" Republican summit.
http://thinkprogress.org/2009/09/19/cob ... rnography/
And I couldn't quite figure out how he thought Playboy was gay porn. My mom, who understands everything, explained (and I quote), "Well, [Muravyets dear], when a guy jacks off, that's man on man sex. Obviously. Think about it."
So, yeah, according to Michael Schwartz, who I guess must know, porn is sex.
Gay, gay sex. Because only gay guys like vagina. Apparently.
yeah i had that discussion with my (thankfully adult) son. he was bemused by the notion.
so masturbation is gay. who knew?
So now everything is gay?
Then I'm a lesbian because I do like to touch myself.
Sheesh.
So Nanatsu... Other than the fact that you have an SO... is there anything about you that I possibly could NOT like?
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGsRIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

by Treznor » Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:43 am
JuNii wrote:ah, but for the "virgin" stand point. how can it be a bad gift when you have someone who you can 'teach' all the things that will satisfy you. without the other person drawing up on experience that could be all wrong for you?Treznor wrote:Bad gifts are the worst ones of all. You don't want them, but you feel obligated to accept them or risk making the other person feel bad.
I find it better to comparison shop beforehand and pick out the gift I want so I know I'll be happy with it.
JuNii wrote:you quoted two sources for divorce. yet the 'Sex' is it because of bad sex or is it because of one person cheating on the other, which, involves sex?Treznor wrote:A relationship (marriage or otherwise) can't be based entirely on sex. On the other hand, few marriages can survive harmoniously without good sex. Sex and money problems are the two biggest reasons cited for divorce in the modern western world.![]()
JuNii wrote:The choice to wait has always been MY Choice. The problem is, that people assume that if one is Abstaining, they are doing so BECAUSE of Religious reasons. At the same time. others view promiscuity as being 'loose' and 'Slutty'.Treznor wrote:JuNii wrote:the choice to with hold oneself until marriage doesn't have to be a religious one. and this is *MY* choice. if I find that significant other used to be a prostitute or porn star (hey... it's possible...) I certainly won't hold her to my standards or choices when it comes to sex. she made hers and if I love her, then I love her.
That is the best answer by far in this post. Waiting for marriage, religious reasons, etc and so forth are all fine and good, but it should always be a matter of choice and not something you're pressured to do one way or another. People who choose to have sex need to have good communication before, during and after, or it all falls apart no matter what your foundation. It helps reduce the risk for nasty surprises, both physical and emotional.
by Jello Biafra » Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:46 am
Treznor wrote:Isn't one of the biggest reasons for infidelity the fact that you either aren't getting any at home, or what you are getting isn't what you want? Either way: sex.

by JuNii » Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:48 am
actually it's not. after all, if one is 'experienced' then one would know what they like and can then 'mold' the other into their ideal lover.Treznor wrote:JuNii wrote:ah, but for the "virgin" stand point. how can it be a bad gift when you have someone who you can 'teach' all the things that will satisfy you. without the other person drawing up on experience that could be all wrong for you?Treznor wrote:Bad gifts are the worst ones of all. You don't want them, but you feel obligated to accept them or risk making the other person feel bad.
I find it better to comparison shop beforehand and pick out the gift I want so I know I'll be happy with it.
That implies that the person you've given the gift of your virginity to is not also a virgin, which is held as the ideal: two virgins fumbling with each other, not having a clue what to do with themselves or each other. If they're not properly repressed about sex as this ideal generally requires, then they won't know what questions to ask, let alone that they should be asking them.
which does not point to one being a 'virgin' as being the problem. it could very well be two 'sexually experienced' people who just 'grew tired' of each other.Treznor wrote:JuNii wrote:you quoted two sources for divorce. yet the 'Sex' is it because of bad sex or is it because of one person cheating on the other, which, involves sex?Treznor wrote:A relationship (marriage or otherwise) can't be based entirely on sex. On the other hand, few marriages can survive harmoniously without good sex. Sex and money problems are the two biggest reasons cited for divorce in the modern western world.![]()
Isn't one of the biggest reasons for infidelity the fact that you either aren't getting any at home, or what you are getting isn't what you want? Either way: sex.
definately a better place? *nods*Treznor wrote:Ah, stereotypes. Where would we be without them?

by Treznor » Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:49 am
Aelosia wrote:Treznor wrote:Aelosia wrote:I think Treznor is Lord Henry Wotton, and that thought is scary.
Okay, I'm blushing now. This thread wasn't intended to be all about me.
But I had to look up Lord Henry Wotton and I regret I don't get the reference. Plus, I'd be dead for over four hundred years which I find to be a distinct turn-off.
The fictional character, my dear. On "The picture of Dorian Gray".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Picture_of_Dorian_Gray
I would say that finally for once my erudition beaten yours, but sadly it is not the case because I didn't know about the REAL character named Lord Henry Wotton.
Aelosia wrote:And yes, what murayvets said made my head explode too, but left a tasty feeling of warm satisfaction after the explosion.

Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ifreann, James_xenoland, Stralfcyde, The Astral Mandate
Advertisement