NATION

PASSWORD

Israel vs. Palestine

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Who do you support?

Israel
547
55%
Palestine
452
45%
 
Total votes : 999

User avatar
Noobubersland
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6170
Founded: Feb 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Noobubersland » Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:17 pm

Virana wrote:
Noobubersland wrote:Criminal's go to jail, boo fucking hoo

12 year olds being sent to jail for something they "may or may not have" committed (throwing stones at Israel's wall). Yep, they're criminals. I doubt any non-Palestinians get arrested for the same.

Don't throw stones at a wall then, seems pretty simple
Grand-Duc de Languedoc, Under Roi J&D I

User avatar
Disserbia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12012
Founded: Dec 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Disserbia » Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:18 pm

Noobubersland wrote:
Virana wrote:
Israelis then take it a little too far.

http://electronicintifada.net/content/b ... ners/11206

Criminal's go to jail, boo fucking hoo

Then most of the IDF should be in jail, its funny how you think that some people are entitled to their human rights more than others. If you're going to uphold the concept of human rights then you have to respect the fact that they belong to every person, or you're not actually upholding the concept at all.
You can't spell scat fetish without catfish.
Mollary wrote:Hate and alcohol can unite most people.

Souriya Al-Assad wrote:One does not simply Mossad The Assad.

New Maldorainia wrote:Dissy likes touching my walruses.

The Blaatschapen wrote:Remember, birthdays are good for you. The more you have, the longer you'll live.
Funniest shit on this shite
fakbuk and other random shit
PC:
Economic Left/Right: 3.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.00
PS:
Right: 1.45
Libertarian: 6.22
Non-interventionist: 5.82
Cultural liberal: 2.23
PT:
democratic National Liberal
In a more sane world I'd be a moderate Republican.

User avatar
Noobubersland
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6170
Founded: Feb 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Noobubersland » Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:19 pm

The UK in Exile wrote:
Noobubersland wrote:Criminal's go to jail, boo fucking hoo


being in an israeli jail doesn't nessecarily mean your a criminal, it just means you live in the wrong post code.

True, and shit like that should be discouraged
Grand-Duc de Languedoc, Under Roi J&D I

User avatar
The UK in Exile
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12023
Founded: Jul 27, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby The UK in Exile » Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:19 pm

Noobubersland wrote:
Virana wrote: 12 year olds being sent to jail for something they "may or may not have" committed (throwing stones at Israel's wall). Yep, they're criminals. I doubt any non-Palestinians get arrested for the same.

Don't throw stones at a wall then, seems pretty simple


or you know, be living near the wall when a bunch of conscripts get told to grab the kids throwing stones.

"is this the right one?"

"who cares!"
"We fought for the public good and would have enfranchised the people and secured the welfare of the whole groaning creation, if the nation had not more delighted in servitude than in freedom"

"My actions are as noble as my thoughts, That never relish’d of a base descent.I came unto your court for honour’s cause, And not to be a rebel to her state; And he that otherwise accounts of me, This sword shall prove he’s honour’s enemy."

"Wählte Ungnade, wo Gehorsam nicht Ehre brachte."
DEFCON 0 - not at war
DEFCON 1 - at war "go to red alert!" "are you absolutely sure sir? it does mean changing the lightbulb."

User avatar
Noobubersland
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6170
Founded: Feb 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Noobubersland » Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:20 pm

Disserbia wrote:
Noobubersland wrote:Criminal's go to jail, boo fucking hoo

Then most of the IDF should be in jail, its funny how you think that some people are entitled to their human rights more than others. If you're going to uphold the concept of human rights then you have to respect the fact that they belong to every person, or you're not actually upholding the concept at all.

Why should they be in jail? Killed people? That's what happens in war.
Grand-Duc de Languedoc, Under Roi J&D I

User avatar
Disserbia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12012
Founded: Dec 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Disserbia » Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:20 pm

Noobubersland wrote:
Virana wrote: 12 year olds being sent to jail for something they "may or may not have" committed (throwing stones at Israel's wall). Yep, they're criminals. I doubt any non-Palestinians get arrested for the same.

Don't throw stones at a wall then, seems pretty simple


Noobubersland wrote:
The UK in Exile wrote:
being in an israeli jail doesn't nessecarily mean your a criminal, it just means you live in the wrong post code.

True, and shit like that should be discouraged


I'm just gonna leave this here... :unsure:
You can't spell scat fetish without catfish.
Mollary wrote:Hate and alcohol can unite most people.

Souriya Al-Assad wrote:One does not simply Mossad The Assad.

New Maldorainia wrote:Dissy likes touching my walruses.

The Blaatschapen wrote:Remember, birthdays are good for you. The more you have, the longer you'll live.
Funniest shit on this shite
fakbuk and other random shit
PC:
Economic Left/Right: 3.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.00
PS:
Right: 1.45
Libertarian: 6.22
Non-interventionist: 5.82
Cultural liberal: 2.23
PT:
democratic National Liberal
In a more sane world I'd be a moderate Republican.

User avatar
Disco Volante
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 56
Founded: Jul 28, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Disco Volante » Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:20 pm

Noobubersland wrote:
The UK in Exile wrote:
being in an israeli jail doesn't nessecarily mean your a criminal, it just means you live in the wrong post code.

True, and shit like that should be discouraged

You for serious?

User avatar
Jafas United
Minister
 
Posts: 3396
Founded: Jul 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Jafas United » Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:20 pm

Disserbia wrote:No, you used a biased report to show that the existence of children as human shields was a "fact" (your own words), when I revealed that that report was compromised because it was not neutral, you failed to provide another source that proved the existence of children as human shields. Now, you can either provide a neutral source that shows the existence of children as human shields or concede the fact that there is no reasonable proof of this and go on your merry way. Its quite simple.

God, it isn't that hard to look things up for yourself. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2006/nov/20/israel

And I see you're dodging the point. You were denying that Palestine uses children as a weapon at all.

And when I disproved your argument, you then went on to back-pedal to the whole children as human shields issue. Are you still going to deny that Palestine uses children as a weapon?

User avatar
Disserbia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12012
Founded: Dec 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Disserbia » Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:21 pm

Noobubersland wrote:
Disserbia wrote:Then most of the IDF should be in jail, its funny how you think that some people are entitled to their human rights more than others. If you're going to uphold the concept of human rights then you have to respect the fact that they belong to every person, or you're not actually upholding the concept at all.

Why should they be in jail? Killed people? That's what happens in war.

For breaking geneva conventions, ever heard of those?
You can't spell scat fetish without catfish.
Mollary wrote:Hate and alcohol can unite most people.

Souriya Al-Assad wrote:One does not simply Mossad The Assad.

New Maldorainia wrote:Dissy likes touching my walruses.

The Blaatschapen wrote:Remember, birthdays are good for you. The more you have, the longer you'll live.
Funniest shit on this shite
fakbuk and other random shit
PC:
Economic Left/Right: 3.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.00
PS:
Right: 1.45
Libertarian: 6.22
Non-interventionist: 5.82
Cultural liberal: 2.23
PT:
democratic National Liberal
In a more sane world I'd be a moderate Republican.

User avatar
Jafas United
Minister
 
Posts: 3396
Founded: Jul 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Jafas United » Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:22 pm

Disserbia wrote:
Noobubersland wrote:Don't throw stones at a wall then, seems pretty simple


Noobubersland wrote:True, and shit like that should be discouraged


I'm just gonna leave this here... :unsure:

He's right, you know...

User avatar
Noobubersland
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6170
Founded: Feb 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Noobubersland » Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:23 pm

Disco Volante wrote:
Noobubersland wrote:True, and shit like that should be discouraged

You for serious?

If they're being picked up for no reason, yes, but if they believe the men is responable, don't see what's wrong
Grand-Duc de Languedoc, Under Roi J&D I

User avatar
Disserbia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12012
Founded: Dec 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Disserbia » Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:23 pm

Jafas United wrote:
Disserbia wrote:No, you used a biased report to show that the existence of children as human shields was a "fact" (your own words), when I revealed that that report was compromised because it was not neutral, you failed to provide another source that proved the existence of children as human shields. Now, you can either provide a neutral source that shows the existence of children as human shields or concede the fact that there is no reasonable proof of this and go on your merry way. Its quite simple.

God, it isn't that hard to look things up for yourself. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2006/nov/20/israel

And I see you're dodging the point. You were denying that Palestine uses children as a weapon at all.

And when I disproved your argument, you then went on to back-pedal to the whole children as human shields issue. Are you still going to deny that Palestine uses children as a weapon?

Its not my job to look up your argument for you. You can't find any reliable report of human shields and now you're crying about it. Good argument. You should probably ignore me because I pointed this out, since that's what you did with you other guy who posted a reliable source.
You can't spell scat fetish without catfish.
Mollary wrote:Hate and alcohol can unite most people.

Souriya Al-Assad wrote:One does not simply Mossad The Assad.

New Maldorainia wrote:Dissy likes touching my walruses.

The Blaatschapen wrote:Remember, birthdays are good for you. The more you have, the longer you'll live.
Funniest shit on this shite
fakbuk and other random shit
PC:
Economic Left/Right: 3.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.00
PS:
Right: 1.45
Libertarian: 6.22
Non-interventionist: 5.82
Cultural liberal: 2.23
PT:
democratic National Liberal
In a more sane world I'd be a moderate Republican.

User avatar
Jafas United
Minister
 
Posts: 3396
Founded: Jul 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Jafas United » Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:23 pm

Disserbia wrote:
Noobubersland wrote:Why should they be in jail? Killed people? That's what happens in war.

For breaking geneva conventions, ever heard of those?

Source that most of the IDF has broken the Geneva convention?

User avatar
Disserbia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12012
Founded: Dec 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Disserbia » Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:24 pm

Jafas United wrote:
Disserbia wrote:


I'm just gonna leave this here... :unsure:

He's right, you know...

see how you deleted the rest of the conversation, thats called taking out of context, if he were actually right, you wouldn't have to do that. Try again.
You can't spell scat fetish without catfish.
Mollary wrote:Hate and alcohol can unite most people.

Souriya Al-Assad wrote:One does not simply Mossad The Assad.

New Maldorainia wrote:Dissy likes touching my walruses.

The Blaatschapen wrote:Remember, birthdays are good for you. The more you have, the longer you'll live.
Funniest shit on this shite
fakbuk and other random shit
PC:
Economic Left/Right: 3.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.00
PS:
Right: 1.45
Libertarian: 6.22
Non-interventionist: 5.82
Cultural liberal: 2.23
PT:
democratic National Liberal
In a more sane world I'd be a moderate Republican.

User avatar
Noobubersland
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6170
Founded: Feb 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Noobubersland » Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:25 pm

Disserbia wrote:
Noobubersland wrote:Why should they be in jail? Killed people? That's what happens in war.

For breaking geneva conventions, ever heard of those?

Window dressing, it'll be torn up sooner or later
Grand-Duc de Languedoc, Under Roi J&D I

User avatar
Costa Fiero
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5247
Founded: Nov 24, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Costa Fiero » Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:25 pm

Disserbia wrote:For breaking geneva conventions, ever heard of those?


If you want to throw people in jail for breaking the conventions, you're going to need to throw in a hell of a lot more people than the IDF.

User avatar
Disserbia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12012
Founded: Dec 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Disserbia » Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:27 pm

Jafas United wrote:
Disserbia wrote:For breaking geneva conventions, ever heard of those?

Source that most of the IDF has broken the Geneva convention?

http://wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/9257
Switzerland. Switzerland is a neutral source. Not the Israeli govt.
You can't spell scat fetish without catfish.
Mollary wrote:Hate and alcohol can unite most people.

Souriya Al-Assad wrote:One does not simply Mossad The Assad.

New Maldorainia wrote:Dissy likes touching my walruses.

The Blaatschapen wrote:Remember, birthdays are good for you. The more you have, the longer you'll live.
Funniest shit on this shite
fakbuk and other random shit
PC:
Economic Left/Right: 3.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.00
PS:
Right: 1.45
Libertarian: 6.22
Non-interventionist: 5.82
Cultural liberal: 2.23
PT:
democratic National Liberal
In a more sane world I'd be a moderate Republican.

User avatar
Virana
Minister
 
Posts: 2547
Founded: Jan 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Virana » Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:27 pm

Jafas United wrote:
Disserbia wrote:No, you used a biased report to show that the existence of children as human shields was a "fact" (your own words), when I revealed that that report was compromised because it was not neutral, you failed to provide another source that proved the existence of children as human shields. Now, you can either provide a neutral source that shows the existence of children as human shields or concede the fact that there is no reasonable proof of this and go on your merry way. Its quite simple.

God, it isn't that hard to look things up for yourself. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2006/nov/20/israel

And I see you're dodging the point. You were denying that Palestine uses children as a weapon at all.

And when I disproved your argument, you then went on to back-pedal to the whole children as human shields issue. Are you still going to deny that Palestine uses children as a weapon?

Damn, are you still stuck on that?

Both sides commit atrocities. Neither one's are very justifiable, except when you consider that maybe the children wanted to be used as a weapon? Why else would a 15-year old child (this is from your Wiki article) become a suicide bomber? Of course not because his family/friends were abducted by an oppressive government, or that his brothers or friends were jailed for having been next to other children throwing stones at a wall. He did that because he felt everyone in Israel supported the actions of their government. And a large majority of Israeli Jews do.
II Mentor specializing in MT and GE&T. If you need help, TG me, visit our thread, or join our IRC channel, #NSMentors on irc.esper.net!

Mentors Hub | Welcome to II | RP Questions | #NSMentors
International Incidents Mentor | IIwiki Administrator

Owner of the United Republic of Emmeria and everything about it

User avatar
Disco Volante
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 56
Founded: Jul 28, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Disco Volante » Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:28 pm

Noobubersland wrote:
Disco Volante wrote:You for serious?

If they're being picked up for no reason, yes, but if they believe the men is responable, don't see what's wrong

Throwing stones at a wall isn't an offense by any measure.

Then again, Israel isn't a free country and they're racist against Palestinians so I guess throwing the folks in jail makes sense.

User avatar
Jafas United
Minister
 
Posts: 3396
Founded: Jul 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Jafas United » Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:28 pm

Disserbia wrote:Its not my job to look up your argument for you. You can't find any reliable report of human shields and now you're crying about it. Good argument. You should probably ignore me because I pointed this out, since that's what you did with you other guy who posted a reliable source.

Oh for God's sake, why do I even bother with you?

I have shown you an example where human shields, specifically children have been used by Palestinians. It was in the news report I linked you. Not biased at all. It's not my problem that you refuse to accept it in favor of your whole "Palestine has done no wrong" mentality.

And since you haven't answered my question, I'll make it extra big, just for you. Are you still denying that Palestine has ever used children as a weapon?

As I've already explained to you, (but you ignored that post), I ignored him because his post was not relevant at all. I'm still waiting for a response from you for that post. But sine you clearly have a hard time reading and I'm feeling nice, I'll link you to it again so you can't escape.

Might I also remind you that you ignored my credible sources. Which were relevant to the discussion, unlike his.
Last edited by Jafas United on Sat Jul 28, 2012 9:12 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Noobubersland
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6170
Founded: Feb 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Noobubersland » Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:29 pm

Disco Volante wrote:
Noobubersland wrote:If they're being picked up for no reason, yes, but if they believe the men is responable, don't see what's wrong

Throwing stones at a wall isn't an offense by any measure.

Then again, Israel isn't a free country and they're racist against Palestinians so I guess throwing the folks in jail makes sense.

Which is why there are no arab members of the israeli parlemient
Oh wait
How many jews in the arab governments?
Last edited by Noobubersland on Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Grand-Duc de Languedoc, Under Roi J&D I

User avatar
Jafas United
Minister
 
Posts: 3396
Founded: Jul 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Jafas United » Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:31 pm

Disserbia wrote:
Jafas United wrote:He's right, you know...

see how you deleted the rest of the conversation, thats called taking out of context, if he were actually right, you wouldn't have to do that. Try again.

Er...no. Unless you're a psychic, you can't read my mind.

I deleted the rest of the post because it was too long to quote. I do that with many long posts. I read the rest of the conversation, mind you.

Really, you're grasping at straws here.

User avatar
Jafas United
Minister
 
Posts: 3396
Founded: Jul 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Jafas United » Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:32 pm

Disserbia wrote:
Jafas United wrote:Source that most of the IDF has broken the Geneva convention?

http://wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/9257
Switzerland. Switzerland is a neutral source. Not the Israeli govt.

That's great. You said most of the IDF should be in jail for breaking the Geneva convention. That's what I want proof of.

User avatar
Virana
Minister
 
Posts: 2547
Founded: Jan 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Virana » Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:33 pm

Jafas United wrote:
Disserbia wrote:http://wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/9257
Switzerland. Switzerland is a neutral source. Not the Israeli govt.

That's great. You said most of the IDF should be in jail for breaking the Geneva convention. That's what I want proof of.

I think you took the hyperbole a little too seriously...
II Mentor specializing in MT and GE&T. If you need help, TG me, visit our thread, or join our IRC channel, #NSMentors on irc.esper.net!

Mentors Hub | Welcome to II | RP Questions | #NSMentors
International Incidents Mentor | IIwiki Administrator

Owner of the United Republic of Emmeria and everything about it

User avatar
The UK in Exile
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12023
Founded: Jul 27, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby The UK in Exile » Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:33 pm

Noobubersland wrote:
Disco Volante wrote:You for serious?

If they're being picked up for no reason, yes, but if they believe the men is responable, don't see what's wrong


if who believes the man/child/woman is responsible? the section commander who snatched him off the street?
"We fought for the public good and would have enfranchised the people and secured the welfare of the whole groaning creation, if the nation had not more delighted in servitude than in freedom"

"My actions are as noble as my thoughts, That never relish’d of a base descent.I came unto your court for honour’s cause, And not to be a rebel to her state; And he that otherwise accounts of me, This sword shall prove he’s honour’s enemy."

"Wählte Ungnade, wo Gehorsam nicht Ehre brachte."
DEFCON 0 - not at war
DEFCON 1 - at war "go to red alert!" "are you absolutely sure sir? it does mean changing the lightbulb."

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Hidrandia, Kannap, Keltionialang, Kreushia, Likhinia, Philjia, So uh lab here, The Vooperian Union, Trollgaard, Tungstan

Advertisement

Remove ads