NationStates

Prussia-Steinbach wrote:

An Slanaitheoir wrote:Well, if we are going by Catholic theology, he may be in heaven, If he had all mortal sins forgiven and did reparations for the forgiven mortal and venial sins (I don't have any examples). Although as he was a politician, I doubt he did make reparations.

You know, I've always been curious - where does Catholicism get the basis for penance? Where in the Bible does it say that we need to make reparations for our sins?

Forntag wrote:Zen Buddhist here, and with a question nonetheless.
My Christian friend and I were debating the other day, and I pointed out some of the socially backwards laws in the Old Testament, and she said "The Covenant changed when Jesus came, so we don't have to follow those laws anymore." And went on about different kinds of laws in the Bible. My other Christian friends, however, believe we should follow all of the Bible to the letter.
Can you elaborate on all this? What does she mean we don't have to follow those laws anymore? I thought you couldn't just pick and choose what to follow. I'm just curious.

Forntag wrote:Another quick question: Why don't many Christians accept the "lost books of the Bible", like the Gospel of Judas? Do they have any more or less relevance just because the Church deemed that they shouldn't be in the Bible?

SanctusEmpire wrote:

Stovokor wrote:


Can you draw a parallel today?

The Merchant Republics wrote:

Athartha wrote:Born a Catholic, I was always attracted to the Clergy. In my teen years, those pesky hormones got to me and I realized I kind of like girls, a lot... And that I wanted to, maybe some day, have a child and a wife. I asked out this girl I had a crush on for a while, and we dated for 4 years. We'd even talked about getting married. However, in my senior year of high school I got in a car accident. This crash shook me up badly, and while I was in the hospital all I could think about was "am I making the right choices in my life." Long story short, I decided to go ahead and go to seminary school, where I have been for 3 years now (nearly 4)

I know this probably won't help you any, but reading stuff like that always make me feel so bad for catholic clergy, I can't imagine a dedicated priest wouldn't make anything but a great father and husband.

Birkinghamia wrote:You know, Protestant denominations allow you to marry

Distruzio wrote:
Good for you! I considered the priesthood for a year or so but my Priest reminded me of my vanity. I couldn't deny that he had a point there. One doesn't choose the priesthood. One is chosen for it.

I'm far to much of a prick to be a priest. If civilian life doesn't work out for me, a monastery would be the perfect place to recuse myself.

The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:While I was on my cruise I bought a sterling sliver cross. Im wearing it right now.

Athartha wrote:Yes, I do know this. However, I do not agree with the Protestant Churches, I do not think they are God's one, holy, catholic and apostolic Church.

SanctusEmpire wrote:Relative in terms of believing in a set of ideals determined by our environment. I live in a "Christian" environment therefore I will be a Christian. And without truly understanding the ideals of other religions my religion is right. I think and its only my personal opinion that this is the reason behind the Mongol approach to religion. At the risk of displaying a Mongol bias, they believed in the spiritual self to attain a better understanding of a God being so to speak. Religions of Abraham to me seem preoccupied with worrying about everyone else rather than achieving a state of mind and body that compliments their beliefs. Let me add at this point that when the Mongols massacred men women and children they viewed it as a release from the constraints of the physical self. The Templars or Jihadists for example on the other hand view it as sending a heathen to eternal damnation.

So now I have talked myself into another angle of my question "Is religion relative?" I think religion is relative to our environment but according to the laws of relativity can religion survive without paganism or a different doctrine, a set of beliefs from the other side of world perhaps?
Or is it simply that my version of good is better than you're version of good?

SanctusEmpire wrote:

Bordurian wrote:

Then Religion is simply a tool used for manipulating masses to achieve non-religious goals. The Devil is truly Gods best Angel. I suspect the he truly understands the nature of man better than Jesus does

The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:While I was on my cruise I bought a sterling sliver cross. Im wearing it right now.

Athartha wrote:

Birkinghamia wrote:You know, Protestant denominations allow you to marry

Yes, I do know this. However, I do not agree with the Protestant Churches, I do not think they are God's one, holy, catholic and apostolic Church.

Birkinghamia wrote:

Athartha wrote:Yes, I do know this. However, I do not agree with the Protestant Churches, I do not think they are God's one, holy, catholic and apostolic Church.

They're based solely on the Bible, though, which I believe is the sole source of Christian truth.

Doesn't the Catholic Church have rituals/ceremonies that aren't noted in the Bible (ex. Confirmation)?

An Slanaitheoir wrote:

Birkinghamia wrote:They're based solely on the Bible, though, which I believe is the sole source of Christian truth.

Doesn't the Catholic Church have rituals/ceremonies that aren't noted in the Bible (ex. Confirmation)?

Are all of Jesus' miracles in the Bible?

Menassa wrote:

An Slanaitheoir wrote:Are all of Jesus' miracles in the Bible?

Wait... which bible?

An Slanaitheoir wrote:

Menassa wrote:Wait... which bible?

The one that he says is the source of Christian truth.

Menassa wrote:

An Slanaitheoir wrote:The one that he says is the source of Christian truth.

Sooooo that's teh new Testament right?

Menassa wrote:

An Slanaitheoir wrote:The one that he says is the source of Christian truth.

Sooooo that's teh new Testament right?

An Slanaitheoir wrote:

Menassa wrote:Sooooo that's teh new Testament right?

The New testament is a bible? I thought it was the latter half.

The Realm of God wrote:

An Slanaitheoir wrote:The New testament is a bible? I thought it was the latter half.

The Old Testement is not really important to the Christian as Jesus abolished the law.

An Slanaitheoir wrote:

Birkinghamia wrote:They're based solely on the Bible, though, which I believe is the sole source of Christian truth.

Doesn't the Catholic Church have rituals/ceremonies that aren't noted in the Bible (ex. Confirmation)?

Are all of Jesus' miracles in the Bible?

Liriena wrote:So, I'm a member of:
(Image)

(...and Catholic, but that's besides the point)

Your thoughts, my friends?

Liriena wrote:So, I'm a member of:
(Image)

(...and Catholic, but that's besides the point)

Your thoughts, my friends?

Liriena wrote:

The Realm of God wrote:
The Old Testement is not really important to the Christian as Jesus abolished the law.

Then...If a guy quotes Leviticus, I should tell him to GTFO?

Distruzio wrote:

Liriena wrote:
Then...If a guy quotes Leviticus, I should tell him to GTFO?

Yes.

The Merchant Republics wrote:

Distruzio wrote:



Yes.

I agree that you should.

But in what sense do you mean abolished the laws of the Old Testament? Where is that in scripture?