Tsuntion wrote:Menassa wrote:Well I do adore you for trying, your translation and context may be a bit off.
I default to the NIV, and rarely end up looking at alternate or more literal translations; I should probably do so more often. Thanks for writing the translation here.The words in the verse are: Ezer kenegdoi a helper oppisite him.
Ezer meaning helper nd keneged meanin oppisite the oi to say the word is masculine possesive referring to Adam.
A man cannot be the oppisite of another man.
A Democrat cannot be the opposite of another Democrat. A white person cannot be the opposite of another white person. Long hair cannot be the opposite of long hair. How far is oppositeness taken?
I'm currently reading a paper on the construction of gender, which argues that gender and gender roles are purely social constructs with no biological influence. Therefore, there may conceivably be a society in which men and women are not opposites and it is only their sexes which differ. As a physical attribute which may have little or no bearing on personality and all, I'd say that having sexes be opposite is as important as having hairstyles differ. Therefore, I do not think men and women being opposites is meaningful.
It's not that it's a different translation of the bible.
It is The Translation of the Bible from the direct Hebrew.
Regardless of what you mean by oppisite.... if you follow the law to the fullest extent having Homosexual relations as a man would be Asor m'Diaraisah you have transgressed on a commandment directly written in the Torah for I believe which the punishment is Keres.... from heaven.... and death on earth.... which is bad.... this however does not apply to say a Christian who does not follow the Law.



OHMYLOL!!! YES! YES! 