NATION

PASSWORD

Christian disscussion thread

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

You are a?

Catholic
215
29%
Mormon
16
2%
Orthodox
52
7%
Baptist
79
11%
Evangelical
38
5%
Presbyterian
24
3%
Lutheran
50
7%
Episcopal
23
3%
Society Of Friends (Quaker)
19
3%
Other(Other denomination, not other religion, only other Christian denominations)
216
30%
 
Total votes : 732

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 112551
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Sat Jul 28, 2012 3:09 pm

Norstal wrote:
Genivaria wrote:That doesn't make sense. He has a plan for all of us but we can do whatever we want?
Trying playing a game of chess where all your pieces have free will.

That'd be fun though.

Knight: fuck this shit. I'm moving vertically.

All the other pieces: *Gasps*

It's kind of breath-taking when someone realizes they can do that, huh?
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Germanic Templars
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20685
Founded: Jul 01, 2011
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Germanic Templars » Sat Jul 28, 2012 3:09 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Nordengrund wrote:
Being baptized does not get you saved. You can only be saved by accepting Christ into your life. My church does baptize people, but it is a symbolic ritual. We do it to symbolize that a saved person has been "born again"


Exactly, babies are not born accepting Christ. Babies are born Atheists.


But Babies, especially those unborn, never had the chance to fully develop moral views, therefore, you can't say they go to hell. scratch that, poor choice of words.

That's just a thought though.
Last edited by Germanic Templars on Sat Jul 28, 2012 3:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.

  • INTP
  • All American Patriotic Constitutionalist/Classic libertarian (with fiscal conservatism)
  • Religiously Tolerant
  • Roman Catholic
  • Hoplophilic/ammosexual
  • X=3.13, Y=2.41
  • Supports the Blue


I support Capitalism do you? If so, put this in your sig.

XY = Male, XX = Female

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Sat Jul 28, 2012 3:09 pm

Norstal wrote:
Genivaria wrote:That doesn't make sense. He has a plan for all of us but we can do whatever we want?
Trying playing a game of chess where all your pieces have free will.

That'd be fun though.

Knight: fuck this shit. I'm moving vertically.

All the other pieces: *Gasps*

:lol: *Karl Marx appears* "Pawns of the world unite!*
Kings: Uh oh.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Sat Jul 28, 2012 3:09 pm

Nordengrund wrote:A baby doesn't know better, a sapient human does. Since a baby is incapable of making a choice like that, it would not be fair to send it to hell for not knowing better.


Incorrect. A person who has never heard of Christianity would not believe in the Christian God, nor would a baby. Explain why one goes to heaven and the other doesn't?
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Adventus Secundus
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1518
Founded: May 07, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Adventus Secundus » Sat Jul 28, 2012 3:10 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Adventus Secundus wrote:
My mother was a nurse. She held a child exactly like that while it died on a Flight for Life helicopter. She believes that child is with God now. Your point?


Your mother would technically be wrong. The child must be baptized, because it is the passing on of the sins of humanity as well as other sins. That child would not go to heaven.


That's cute. Trying to use doctrine that you don't even believe.
“The supreme function of reason is to show man that some things are beyond reason”---Blaise Pascal
"Just by being themselves, they make the best case against humanism." Luke Winkie

Constantinopolis wrote:
To paraphrase C.S. Lewis, I would choose to live as if God existed even if I knew He didn't. Either I am on the side of Life Victorious, or I am making a defiant but hopeless last stand against the all-consuming abyss. It does not really matter which it is. I am doing the right thing either way.

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Sat Jul 28, 2012 3:10 pm

The Realm of God wrote:
Genivaria wrote:That doesn't make sense. He has a plan for all of us but we can do whatever we want?
Trying playing a game of chess where all your pieces have free will.


Try using a computer program running on a random allgorithum with set parameters to solve a problem.

That's not an apt comparison. A better one would be having a program with a number of threads, which are automatic processes, that allows the program to multi-task.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Sat Jul 28, 2012 3:10 pm

Germanic Templars wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:
Exactly, babies are not born accepting Christ. Babies are born Atheists.


But Babies, especially those unborn, never had the chance to fully develop moral views, therefore, you can't say they go to hell.

That's just a thought though.


And you also can't say they go to Heaven, because they have not chosen the "Christian moral" path.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
United States of Cascadia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1923
Founded: Jun 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby United States of Cascadia » Sat Jul 28, 2012 3:11 pm

Nordengrund wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:
So you're contradicting yourself. Why would Jesus bother telling you to spread the gospel if people who aren't aware of Christianity get into heaven? It makes no sense.


A baby doesn't know better, a sapient human does. Since a baby is incapable of making a choice like that, it would not be fair to send it to hell for not knowing better.

What of a person that was never exposed to christianity? Again, your god knew that someone would not be exposed to it, and yet still doomed them to torment.
The Archregimancy wrote:Max called the light “RP forums,” and the darkness he called “NSG.”

Geniasis wrote:Gay midget albino rottweiler porn.

I've yet to have a successful Lent... :(

Risottia wrote:The heterosexuals want a pride march so they can look at other half-naked heterosexuals of the same sex without feeling guilty.

H N Fiddlebottoms VIII wrote:I want my sperm to taste like peanut butter and jelly, because I am firmly of the belief that what is holding me back in life is my penis not being sufficiently appealing to six year olds.

Other people wrote:

Let's go Ravens!
Factbook of Cascadia
My Political Compass
Economic Left/Right: -4.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.74

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Sat Jul 28, 2012 3:11 pm

Adventus Secundus wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:
Your mother would technically be wrong. The child must be baptized, because it is the passing on of the sins of humanity as well as other sins. That child would not go to heaven.


That's cute. Trying to use doctrine that you don't even believe.

Belief is hardly required to know the doctrine.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Sat Jul 28, 2012 3:11 pm

Adventus Secundus wrote:
That's cute. Trying to use doctrine that you don't even believe.


That's cute, refusing to actually make an argument to back up things you actually believe.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 112551
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Sat Jul 28, 2012 3:11 pm

Adventus Secundus wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:
Your mother would technically be wrong. The child must be baptized, because it is the passing on of the sins of humanity as well as other sins. That child would not go to heaven.


That's cute. Trying to use doctrine that you don't even believe.

We can talk about it, surely. Saying the child isn't in heaven doesn't mean it's in hell. It's waiting and I'm sure, upon the adventus secundus, it will be saved.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Nordengrund
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7531
Founded: Jun 20, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Nordengrund » Sat Jul 28, 2012 3:11 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Nordengrund wrote:A baby doesn't know better, a sapient human does. Since a baby is incapable of making a choice like that, it would not be fair to send it to hell for not knowing better.


Incorrect. A person who has never heard of Christianity would not believe in the Christian God, nor would a baby. Explain why one goes to heaven and the other doesn't?


Hello, I speak English the baby doesn't know better.
1 John 1:9

User avatar
The Realm of God
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7562
Founded: Jan 26, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Realm of God » Sat Jul 28, 2012 3:12 pm

Genivaria wrote:
Norstal wrote:That'd be fun though.

Knight: fuck this shit. I'm moving vertically.

All the other pieces: *Gasps*

:lol: *Karl Marx appears* "Pawns of the world unite!*
Kings: Uh oh.


You have just explained the theory.

Goal-Overthrow King.
Parameters-All peices have free will.
Result-Pawns learn a philosophical arguement against the monarchy, Pawns overthrow King.
Goal is complete.
British, Orthodox Christian, humanist and stoic.

Pro. Disraelian Progressive Conservatism, One Nation Toryism, Distributionism, Civil Liberties, Pro UK, Pro US Constitution. Pro USA.

Progressive Conservative Economic Right: 0.38 Social Libertarian -2.00.

Christian Democrat NSG Senate.

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Sat Jul 28, 2012 3:12 pm

The Realm of God wrote:
Genivaria wrote:That doesn't make sense. He has a plan for all of us but we can do whatever we want?
Trying playing a game of chess where all your pieces have free will.


Try using a computer program running on a random allgorithum with set parameters to solve a problem.

......what

User avatar
The Realm of God
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7562
Founded: Jan 26, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Realm of God » Sat Jul 28, 2012 3:13 pm

Norstal wrote:
The Realm of God wrote:
Try using a computer program running on a random allgorithum with set parameters to solve a problem.

That's not an apt comparison. A better one would be having a program with a number of threads, which are automatic processes, that allows the program to multi-task.


That's better.
British, Orthodox Christian, humanist and stoic.

Pro. Disraelian Progressive Conservatism, One Nation Toryism, Distributionism, Civil Liberties, Pro UK, Pro US Constitution. Pro USA.

Progressive Conservative Economic Right: 0.38 Social Libertarian -2.00.

Christian Democrat NSG Senate.

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Sat Jul 28, 2012 3:13 pm

The Realm of God wrote:
Genivaria wrote: :lol: *Karl Marx appears* "Pawns of the world unite!*
Kings: Uh oh.


You have just explained the theory.

Goal-Overthrow King.
Parameters-All peices have free will.
Result-Pawns learn a philosophical arguement against the monarchy, Pawns overthrow King.
Goal is complete.

I feel the kings get kinda shafted in this plan. Why did the play along again?

User avatar
Avenio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11113
Founded: Feb 08, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Avenio » Sat Jul 28, 2012 3:13 pm

Nordengrund wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:
Incorrect. A person who has never heard of Christianity would not believe in the Christian God, nor would a baby. Explain why one goes to heaven and the other doesn't?


Hello, I speak English the baby doesn't know better.


Neither does the person who has never heard of Christianity. A hypothetical tribesman in Papua New Guinea who has never known anyone from outside of his tribe's valley will have never heard of Jesus or Christianity at all, let alone the existence of a world outside of his peoples' jungle.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Sat Jul 28, 2012 3:14 pm

Nordengrund wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:
Incorrect. A person who has never heard of Christianity would not believe in the Christian God, nor would a baby. Explain why one goes to heaven and the other doesn't?


Hello, I speak English the baby doesn't know better.


Neither does the person who has never heard of Christianity. They do not know they are wrong and are incapable of knowing they are wrong until they hear of Christianity. Unless people are all knowing, they are susceptible to "not knowing any better."
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Helcasia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1655
Founded: Dec 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Helcasia » Sat Jul 28, 2012 3:14 pm

United States of Cascadia wrote:
Nordengrund wrote:
Being baptized does not get you saved. You can only be saved by accepting Christ into your life. My church does baptize people, but it is a symbolic ritual. We do it to symbolize that a saved person has been "born again"

But a baby is not a sapient being yet, and hence is not capable of "accepting Christ", and since your god knows this, he created that being knowing that it would be tormented for eternity.


If by "tormented for eternity" you mean hell I have news for thee: There is no "Hell" in the bible. In the bible, the punishment for sin is death. Following God saves you from death and provides you with eternal life in heaven. By death, I mean the death of your soul, not your body. Your body can't won't live forever.
And don't try and tell me otherwise with a false translation which uses the word "hell".

User avatar
Prussia-Steinbach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22386
Founded: Mar 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Prussia-Steinbach » Sat Jul 28, 2012 3:14 pm

Cill Airne wrote:
Adventus Secundus wrote:
A fellow Coloradan! Opa! :) :hug:

Another person here in Colorado!

:hug:
I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. ― William S. Burroughs


User avatar
United States of Cascadia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1923
Founded: Jun 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby United States of Cascadia » Sat Jul 28, 2012 3:17 pm

Helcasia wrote:
United States of Cascadia wrote:But a baby is not a sapient being yet, and hence is not capable of "accepting Christ", and since your god knows this, he created that being knowing that it would be tormented for eternity.


If by "tormented for eternity" you mean hell I have news for thee: There is no "Hell" in the bible. In the bible, the punishment for sin is death. Following God saves you from death and provides you with eternal life in heaven. By death, I mean the death of your soul, not your body. Your body can't won't live forever.
And don't try and tell me otherwise with a false translation which uses the word "hell".

I know. Hell is an amalgamation of a variety of modern concepts as I stated a few pages back. I'm referring to the fundies hell.
The Archregimancy wrote:Max called the light “RP forums,” and the darkness he called “NSG.”

Geniasis wrote:Gay midget albino rottweiler porn.

I've yet to have a successful Lent... :(

Risottia wrote:The heterosexuals want a pride march so they can look at other half-naked heterosexuals of the same sex without feeling guilty.

H N Fiddlebottoms VIII wrote:I want my sperm to taste like peanut butter and jelly, because I am firmly of the belief that what is holding me back in life is my penis not being sufficiently appealing to six year olds.

Other people wrote:

Let's go Ravens!
Factbook of Cascadia
My Political Compass
Economic Left/Right: -4.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.74

User avatar
Helcasia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1655
Founded: Dec 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Helcasia » Sat Jul 28, 2012 3:22 pm

United States of Cascadia wrote:
Helcasia wrote:
If by "tormented for eternity" you mean hell I have news for thee: There is no "Hell" in the bible. In the bible, the punishment for sin is death. Following God saves you from death and provides you with eternal life in heaven. By death, I mean the death of your soul, not your body. Your body can't won't live forever.
And don't try and tell me otherwise with a false translation which uses the word "hell".

I know. Hell is an amalgamation of a variety of modern concepts as I stated a few pages back. I'm referring to the fundies hell.

Would it not be better to let them know that they are heretics?

User avatar
United States of Cascadia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1923
Founded: Jun 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby United States of Cascadia » Sat Jul 28, 2012 3:24 pm

Helcasia wrote:
United States of Cascadia wrote:I know. Hell is an amalgamation of a variety of modern concepts as I stated a few pages back. I'm referring to the fundies hell.

Would it not be better to let them know that they are heretics?

Would they believe that their religion has borrowed so heavily from what they would call pagan beliefs?
EDIT:
Fixed a spelling mistake...
Last edited by United States of Cascadia on Sat Jul 28, 2012 3:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The Archregimancy wrote:Max called the light “RP forums,” and the darkness he called “NSG.”

Geniasis wrote:Gay midget albino rottweiler porn.

I've yet to have a successful Lent... :(

Risottia wrote:The heterosexuals want a pride march so they can look at other half-naked heterosexuals of the same sex without feeling guilty.

H N Fiddlebottoms VIII wrote:I want my sperm to taste like peanut butter and jelly, because I am firmly of the belief that what is holding me back in life is my penis not being sufficiently appealing to six year olds.

Other people wrote:

Let's go Ravens!
Factbook of Cascadia
My Political Compass
Economic Left/Right: -4.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.74

User avatar
The Realm of God
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7562
Founded: Jan 26, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Realm of God » Sat Jul 28, 2012 3:25 pm

So then, this is a Fundie Q&A thread at the moment.

What do you think of the Fundiementalist Evangelical movement?

I think it ha had a huge negitive effect on Christianity and it's realtionship with outsiders and each other.
British, Orthodox Christian, humanist and stoic.

Pro. Disraelian Progressive Conservatism, One Nation Toryism, Distributionism, Civil Liberties, Pro UK, Pro US Constitution. Pro USA.

Progressive Conservative Economic Right: 0.38 Social Libertarian -2.00.

Christian Democrat NSG Senate.

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Sat Jul 28, 2012 3:26 pm

The Realm of God wrote:So then, this is a Fundie Q&A thread at the moment.

What do you think of the Fundiementalist Evangelical movement?

I think it ha had a huge negitive effect on Christianity and it's realtionship with outsiders and each other.

Its divisive for Christians which is good news for Atheists.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Bawkie, Bovad, Duvniask, El Lazaro, Eurocom, Ifreann, Kubra, Likhinia, New haven america, Plan Neonie, Port Carverton, Shrillland, So uh lab here, The Black Forrest, Valrifall, Valyxias

Advertisement

Remove ads