Advertisement

by Dagnia » Thu Apr 19, 2012 12:02 pm

by The Steel Magnolia » Thu Apr 19, 2012 12:03 pm
Nidaria wrote:The United Britannian States wrote:im british but i want obama to win. romney is a facist, homophobic, racist, anti abortionist pig. along with all the other republican candidates
And Obama is a socialist, homosexual, affirmative action, pro-abortionist pig. All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others.

by The Steel Magnolia » Thu Apr 19, 2012 12:06 pm
Dagnia wrote:Definitely Romney. It will be one of the rare the times I vote for one of the major parties, but Obama has been such a disaster I'll have to hold my nose and do it. Of the past presidents in my lifetime, 4 out of the 5 have "inherited" recessions from the previous ones (only Bush I got a good economy from his predecessor, the rest entered their presidency in one) and only Obama has continued to blame his failures on his predecessor into his last year. Bush was horrible in several respects, but I can't remember him mentioning Clinton or the dot-com bubble created under him once (and if Romney wins, the economy does not markedly improve and Romney breathes a word about Obama being responsible, the Democrat will get my vote in 2016).

by Warriors United » Thu Apr 19, 2012 12:11 pm
Dagnia wrote:Definitely Romney. It will be one of the rare the times I vote for one of the major parties, but Obama has been such a disaster I'll have to hold my nose and do it. Of the past presidents in my lifetime, 4 out of the 5 have "inherited" recessions from the previous ones (only Bush I got a good economy from his predecessor, the rest entered their presidency in one) and only Obama has continued to blame his failures on his predecessor into his last year. Bush was horrible in several respects, but I can't remember him mentioning Clinton or the dot-com bubble created under him once (and if Romney wins, the economy does not markedly improve and Romney breathes a word about Obama being responsible, the Democrat will get my vote in 2016).

by Wikkiwallana » Thu Apr 19, 2012 12:14 pm
Pahlavistan wrote:GO Paul
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

by Warriors United » Thu Apr 19, 2012 12:15 pm
The Steel Magnolia wrote:Dagnia wrote:Definitely Romney. It will be one of the rare the times I vote for one of the major parties, but Obama has been such a disaster I'll have to hold my nose and do it. Of the past presidents in my lifetime, 4 out of the 5 have "inherited" recessions from the previous ones (only Bush I got a good economy from his predecessor, the rest entered their presidency in one) and only Obama has continued to blame his failures on his predecessor into his last year. Bush was horrible in several respects, but I can't remember him mentioning Clinton or the dot-com bubble created under him once (and if Romney wins, the economy does not markedly improve and Romney breathes a word about Obama being responsible, the Democrat will get my vote in 2016).
http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center ... alecon.pdf
He's blaming it on Bush because it was because of Bush. Besides, the economy has been improving, despite a nearly unworkable congress.


by Divair » Thu Apr 19, 2012 12:17 pm
Warriors United wrote:The Steel Magnolia wrote:
http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center ... alecon.pdf
He's blaming it on Bush because it was because of Bush. Besides, the economy has been improving, despite a nearly unworkable congress.
Obama raised this nation's debt in three years more than Bush did in eight. I am sick of people still pulling the "its Bush's fault" card. Bush has not been in office since 2008. He was not great. But give the guy a break. At least he did not go on apology tours around the world like Obama. NEVER APOLOGIZE TO PEOPLE THAT WANT TO KILL YOU!

by Wikkiwallana » Thu Apr 19, 2012 12:19 pm
Warriors United wrote:The Steel Magnolia wrote:
http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center ... alecon.pdf
He's blaming it on Bush because it was because of Bush. Besides, the economy has been improving, despite a nearly unworkable congress.
Obama raised this nation's debt in three years more than Bush did in eight. I am sick of people still pulling the "its Bush's fault" card. Bush has not been in office since 2008. He was not great. But give the guy a break. At least he did not go on apology tours around the world like Obama. NEVER APOLOGIZE TO PEOPLE THAT WANT TO KILL YOU!

Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

by Warriors United » Thu Apr 19, 2012 12:24 pm
Divair wrote:Warriors United wrote:Obama raised this nation's debt in three years more than Bush did in eight. I am sick of people still pulling the "its Bush's fault" card. Bush has not been in office since 2008. He was not great. But give the guy a break. At least he did not go on apology tours around the world like Obama. NEVER APOLOGIZE TO PEOPLE THAT WANT TO KILL YOU!
Do you know WHY the Taliban and Al-Qaeda want to kill you? Because you stick your noses in everyone else's business. You even FUNDED and TRAINED the Taliban and Al-Qaeda yourself. Then they turned on you because you defend Israel no matter how much they fuck up.
P.S. It is Bush's fault. He deregulated the market, make ridiculous tax cuts, and launched two unnecessary, expensive wars.

by Transmaris » Thu Apr 19, 2012 12:27 pm

by Nidaria » Thu Apr 19, 2012 12:27 pm
Warriors United wrote:Divair wrote:Do you know WHY the Taliban and Al-Qaeda want to kill you? Because you stick your noses in everyone else's business. You even FUNDED and TRAINED the Taliban and Al-Qaeda yourself. Then they turned on you because you defend Israel no matter how much they fuck up.
P.S. It is Bush's fault. He deregulated the market, make ridiculous tax cuts, and launched two unnecessary, expensive wars.
UNNECESSARY?!?YOU HIT US, WE HIT YOU BACK HARDER! Nearly three thousand people were killed. And I think we would be better off leaving the rest of the world to itself. See how well it does. We can stop shipping food and supplies to the countries that hate us. I would have long time ago.

by Divair » Thu Apr 19, 2012 12:27 pm
Warriors United wrote:Divair wrote:Do you know WHY the Taliban and Al-Qaeda want to kill you? Because you stick your noses in everyone else's business. You even FUNDED and TRAINED the Taliban and Al-Qaeda yourself. Then they turned on you because you defend Israel no matter how much they fuck up.
P.S. It is Bush's fault. He deregulated the market, make ridiculous tax cuts, and launched two unnecessary, expensive wars.
UNNECESSARY?!?YOU HIT US, WE HIT YOU BACK HARDER! Nearly three thousand people were killed. And I think we would be better off leaving the rest of the world to itself. See how well it does. We can stop shipping food and supplies to the countries that hate us. I would have long time ago.

by IshCong » Thu Apr 19, 2012 12:28 pm

by Salandriagado » Thu Apr 19, 2012 12:32 pm
Dagnia wrote:Definitely Romney. It will be one of the rare the times I vote for one of the major parties, but Obama has been such a disaster I'll have to hold my nose and do it. Of the past presidents in my lifetime, 4 out of the 5 have "inherited" recessions from the previous ones (only Bush I got a good economy from his predecessor, the rest entered their presidency in one) and only Obama has continued to blame his failures on his predecessor into his last year. Bush was horrible in several respects, but I can't remember him mentioning Clinton or the dot-com bubble created under him once (and if Romney wins, the economy does not markedly improve and Romney breathes a word about Obama being responsible, the Democrat will get my vote in 2016).

by ReVaQ » Thu Apr 19, 2012 1:16 pm
Warriors United wrote:Divair wrote:Do you know WHY the Taliban and Al-Qaeda want to kill you? Because you stick your noses in everyone else's business. You even FUNDED and TRAINED the Taliban and Al-Qaeda yourself. Then they turned on you because you defend Israel no matter how much they fuck up.
P.S. It is Bush's fault. He deregulated the market, make ridiculous tax cuts, and launched two unnecessary, expensive wars.
UNNECESSARY?!?YOU HIT US, WE HIT YOU BACK HARDER! Nearly three thousand people were killed. And I think we would be better off leaving the rest of the world to itself. See how well it does. We can stop shipping food and supplies to the countries that hate us. We help our allies and thats it.
Divair wrote:Warriors United wrote:Obama raised this nation's debt in three years more than Bush did in eight. I am sick of people still pulling the "its Bush's fault" card. Bush has not been in office since 2008. He was not great. But give the guy a break. At least he did not go on apology tours around the world like Obama. NEVER APOLOGIZE TO PEOPLE THAT WANT TO KILL YOU!
Do you know WHY the Taliban and Al-Qaeda want to kill you? Because you stick your noses in everyone else's business. You even FUNDED and TRAINED the Taliban and Al-Qaeda yourself. Then they turned on you because you defend Israel no matter how much they fuck up.
P.S. It is Bush's fault. He deregulated the market, make ridiculous tax cuts, and launched two unnecessary, expensive wars.

by Nidaria » Thu Apr 19, 2012 1:38 pm
ReVaQ wrote:P.S. It is Bush's fault. He deregulated the market, make ridiculous tax cuts, and launched two unnecessary, expensive wars.
The attacks of the twin towers, known as 9/11 is due to both the poking and sticking ones nose in others business but it wouldn't happend if their religion was in the mix. They hijacked the plane thinking that they did it for Allah and the good of human kind beacuse of religion. Sure, they were extremist fundementalist muslims, but religion granted "it's good beacuse we know that the scripture says so and it's good!" I'm sure they wouldn't do it if they had lack of religious indocrination. To unfortunate actually one might call it.
P.s. It's both Bush fault and you the americans that let this occur.

by Ashmoria » Thu Apr 19, 2012 1:52 pm
Warriors United wrote:Romney because he is not Obama. Almost anyone would be better. I don't care for Romney...he changes to much. Gingrich on the other hand is really smart and could tear Obama down on any topic. Too bad he likely won't be the canidate according to polls...

by Inter de Milano » Thu Apr 19, 2012 6:15 pm

by Hittanryan » Thu Apr 19, 2012 6:17 pm
Inter de Milano wrote:Its all squared up now. Alone, according to the newest PPP poll, Obama beats Romney 49-46. However, If Romney were to choose NJ Gov. Chris Christie as VP things would be tied at 47-47. Jeb Bush would put Romney one point away from Obama 48-47, while former Gov. Mike Huckabee and Sen. Rick Santorum would put Romney behind 2 points, 48-46. Game on!http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2012/04/obama-has-small-lead-christie-would-help-romney.html

by Zonolia » Thu Apr 19, 2012 6:19 pm
Kim Berloni- President of Zonolia. Population (Homeland+Colonies-As of 03/14/2014): 19,874,000,000 Current Year: 2014 Territories: (Jikilo Brothers Incorporated) S Islands Archipelago Commonwealths: Cubanonoa The Island of Gu Proud Progressive! Political Compass Economic Left/Right: -5.00 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.49 |

by XxGAMERZxX » Thu Apr 19, 2012 6:19 pm


by Wamitoria » Thu Apr 19, 2012 6:21 pm
Inter de Milano wrote:Its all squared up now. Alone, according to the newest PPP poll, Obama beats Romney 49-46. However, If Romney were to choose NJ Gov. Chris Christie as VP things would be tied at 47-47. Jeb Bush would put Romney one point away from Obama 48-47, while former Gov. Mike Huckabee and Sen. Rick Santorum would put Romney behind 2 points, 48-46. Game on!http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2012/04/obama-has-small-lead-christie-would-help-romney.html

by Tmutarakhan » Thu Apr 19, 2012 6:23 pm
The United Britannian States wrote:im british but i want obama to win. romney is a facist, homophobic, racist, anti abortionist pig. along with all the other republican candidates

by Wamitoria » Thu Apr 19, 2012 6:24 pm

by Inter de Milano » Thu Apr 19, 2012 6:26 pm
Wamitoria wrote:Inter de Milano wrote:Its all squared up now. Alone, according to the newest PPP poll, Obama beats Romney 49-46. However, If Romney were to choose NJ Gov. Chris Christie as VP things would be tied at 47-47. Jeb Bush would put Romney one point away from Obama 48-47, while former Gov. Mike Huckabee and Sen. Rick Santorum would put Romney behind 2 points, 48-46. Game on!http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2012/04/obama-has-small-lead-christie-would-help-romney.html
Yes, but all three of those would overshadow him. People would be voting for the VP candidate.
Also, never get excited about one poll. It's about the trend, not the individual results.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Cappedore, DutchFormosa, Elejamie, Greater Valkyr, Hidrandia, Hispida, Pizza Friday Forever91, Tarsonis, The Crimson Isles, The Noble Thatcherites, The Union of The People of Britannia
Advertisement