Advertisement

by Mahlen » Wed May 16, 2012 12:18 am

by Progenitoria » Wed May 16, 2012 12:29 am

by Risottia » Wed May 16, 2012 12:31 am
The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote: I support Mitt Romney, he is not the best candidate the republicans have ever sent out

by Mike the Progressive » Wed May 16, 2012 12:35 am

by Lowell Leber » Wed May 16, 2012 12:40 am

by Alien Space Bats » Wed May 16, 2012 12:49 am
Mike the Progressive wrote:Eh, as if there really is a difference. Romney isn't as right as he is playing to be and Obama will continue on governing from the center. Glad those are the choices (rather than actual radically different candidates).

by The United Soviet Socialist Republic » Wed May 16, 2012 12:52 am

by Vyvansia » Wed May 16, 2012 1:04 am
The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:I had no idea Obama would be so popular, I sure hope Romney can swing the independant voters to his side.

by The United Soviet Socialist Republic » Wed May 16, 2012 1:29 am
Vyvansia wrote:The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:I had no idea Obama would be so popular, I sure hope Romney can swing the independant voters to his side.
Considering the fact that the NSG population is heavily weighted toward the liberal/leftist side of things, I don't find it surprising at all.

by Jafas United » Wed May 16, 2012 3:01 am
The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:I had no idea Obama would be so popular, I sure hope Romney can swing the independant voters to his side.

by Northern Dominus » Wed May 16, 2012 3:44 am
The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:I had no idea Obama would be so popular, I sure hope Romney can swing the independant voters to his side.

by Condunum » Wed May 16, 2012 7:08 am
The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:Well after Obama endorsed gay marrige that may have cost him the election, Ohio, Florida, and other socially conservative swing states will now most likely be won by Romney.
The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:I had no idea Obama would be so popular, I sure hope Romney can swing the independant voters to his side.

by Snoopin Around » Wed May 16, 2012 7:50 am

by Condunum » Wed May 16, 2012 7:50 am
Snoopin Around wrote:Obama.
If people actually realised who would be best for the job, Ron Paul would be going against Obama and I'd support him. But either way, Mitt Romney is an idiot.

by Northern Dominus » Wed May 16, 2012 8:25 am
What views? His entire platform is "Eh, we'll let everyone else figure it out, no need for gov't intervention in day to day workings of society."

by Farnhamia » Wed May 16, 2012 8:28 am
Northern Dominus wrote:What views? His entire platform is "Eh, we'll let everyone else figure it out, no need for gov't intervention in day to day workings of society."Condunum wrote:Lol. Ron Paul is not good for America. His views are... Bad.
That's not a view, nor is it leadership. It's an old man out to lunch.

by Northern Dominus » Wed May 16, 2012 8:56 am
Oh of course. And if I feel like seceding from the state and creating my own province of "Gofuckistan", then surely that would be acceptable too.Farnhamia wrote:Northern Dominus wrote: What views? His entire platform is "Eh, we'll let everyone else figure it out, no need for gov't intervention in day to day workings of society."
That's not a view, nor is it leadership. It's an old man out to lunch.
No need for Federal government interference. Dr. Paul is quite content to let the state governments interfere as much as they like.

by Ifreann » Wed May 16, 2012 9:11 am
Northern Dominus wrote:What views? His entire platform is "Eh, we'll let everyone else figure it out, no need for gov't intervention in day to day workings of society."Condunum wrote:Lol. Ron Paul is not good for America. His views are... Bad.
That's not a view, nor is it leadership. It's an old man out to lunch.


by Northern Dominus » Wed May 16, 2012 9:12 am
Ifreann wrote:Northern Dominus wrote: What views? His entire platform is "Eh, we'll let everyone else figure it out, no need for gov't intervention in day to day workings of society."
That's not a view, nor is it leadership. It's an old man out to lunch.
Ye gods, do you know what this means? Ron Paul's platform is...
CAN'T SOMEONE ELSE DO IT?

by Laerod » Wed May 16, 2012 9:15 am
Ifreann wrote:Northern Dominus wrote: What views? His entire platform is "Eh, we'll let everyone else figure it out, no need for gov't intervention in day to day workings of society."
That's not a view, nor is it leadership. It's an old man out to lunch.
Ye gods, do you know what this means? Ron Paul's platform is...
CAN'T SOMEONE ELSE DO IT?

by Res republica » Wed May 16, 2012 9:21 am

by Farnhamia » Wed May 16, 2012 9:23 am
Res republica wrote:The US is screwed regardless of who takes over the reins. Ron Paul is out now, so we might as well get on our knees and pray..

by Res republica » Wed May 16, 2012 9:38 am
Farnhamia wrote:Right ... I don't pray but I would very much love to see Ron Paul as the GOP nominee.
Just out of curiosity ... "Res republica"? Meaning "a republic"?

by Laerod » Wed May 16, 2012 9:47 am
Res republica wrote:Farnhamia wrote:Right ... I don't pray but I would very much love to see Ron Paul as the GOP nominee.
Just out of curiosity ... "Res republica"? Meaning "a republic"?
It was meant to be res publica, the origin of republic, but that was seemingly taken, so I took the next that got into my head, but in retrospect it sounds stupid
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Abserdia, American Legionaries, Arikea, Bradfordville, Cannot think of a name, Ethel mermania, EuroStralia, Galloism, Great Britain eke Northern Ireland, Hauthamatra, Hirota, Ifreann, Immoren, Kenmoria, Lord Dominator, Narland, Ostroeuropa, Port Caverton, Riviere Renard, The Jamesian Republic, The Two Jerseys, Trollgaard, Valyxias
Advertisement