Advertisement
by Jolleus » Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:06 am
by The lepearchauns » Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:07 am
by Katganistan » Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:07 am
Jocabia wrote:Odins Scandinavia wrote:
nah, no way stopping offshore drilling would have any effect on prices at the pump. but no more blood for oil, amirite?
Liberals gonna lib
Again, oil production in the US is the highest it has been in 8 years. What you're claiming simply isn't true. There is no evidence that increasing domestic production lowers local prices. None. Oil does not work like that.
Quick question, BP, a company that has been responsible for a number of oil disasters that cost the US economy billions of dollars, is from what country? Hint: it ain't the US. Why would foreign companies give special treatment to the US when they are not required to?
by Lancaster of Wessex » Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:07 am
Coffee Cakes wrote:Lancaster of Wessex wrote:
Source for his TRIPLING of the US national debt?
Tripling is being quite generous.
Obama has racked up more debt than every other POTUS combined.
While some of his goals are quite noble actually, (ObamaCare, being the most obvious) we don't have the funds to support any of it.
by Salandriagado » Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:10 am
Coffee Cakes wrote:Lancaster of Wessex wrote:
Source for his TRIPLING of the US national debt?
Tripling is being quite generous.
Obama has racked up more debt than every other POTUS combined.
While some of his goals are quite noble actually, (ObamaCare, being the most obvious) we don't have the funds to support any of it.
by Coffee Cakes » Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:10 am
Ceannairceach wrote:Coffee Cakes wrote:
Tripling is being quite generous.
Obama has racked up more debt than every other POTUS combined.
While some of his goals are quite noble actually, (ObamaCare, being the most obvious) we don't have the funds to support any of it.
I believed he asked for a source, not more bitching.
Transnapastain wrote:CC!
Posting mod mistakes now are we?
Well, sir, you can have a Vindictive warning for making us look incompetent
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:You're Invisi Gay. Super hero of the Rainbow Equality Brigade!
Nana wrote:Being CC's bf is a death worse than fate.
Nana wrote:Finally, another reasonable individual.
Nana wrote: You're Ben. And Ben is many things wrapped into one being. :)
Quotes Singing Contest of DOOM Champ. SoftballGeniasis wrote:I've seen people lose credibility. It's been a while since I've seen it cast aside so gleefully.
by Grave_n_idle » Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:10 am
by Jocabia » Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:12 am
Katganistan wrote:Odins Scandinavia wrote:
nah, no way stopping offshore drilling would have any effect on prices at the pump. but no more blood for oil, amirite?
Liberals gonna lib
No way oil pouring into the water destroyed the tourist industry or the fishing industry because the regulated to hell company couldn't be bothered to get off its ass and plug the damned thing for three months. And no way that was a waste of your precious oil, amirite?
Going to troll some more?
by Jocabia » Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:15 am
by Running Dog Capitalists » Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:15 am
by Hittanryan » Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:17 am
Running Dog Capitalists wrote:He has increased the debt by $1.13 trillion. As a bonus, the U.S. debt-to-GDP has passed 100%. Good for my kids and grandkids.
He has demonized those who actually invest and provide capital for small business.
He has demonized two industries that I work in. Healthcare and Finance.
He has demonized anyone who wants to tackle economic issues, entitlement stability, or joblessness as social darwinists.
He has taken over a car company for the benefit of his Union pals and then closed down a production plant in my area which has destroyed the local economy.
He has increased the unemployment rate of my country but, fortunately, he has figured out a way to adjust the numbers without really employing anyone.
All in all it is exactly what I expected from Obama before he got elected. On a positive note, I did win a large sum of money from people who thought he wouldn't get elected.
by Northwest Slobovia » Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:19 am
by Grave_n_idle » Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:20 am
by Ende » Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:20 am
by Huskvarneque » Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:21 am
by Coffee Cakes » Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:21 am
Grave_n_idle wrote:Coffee Cakes wrote:
Tripling is being quite generous.
Obama has racked up more debt than every other POTUS combined.
Not really.
http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3036
You can't blame the incumbent for the contributions of his predecessors.
Transnapastain wrote:CC!
Posting mod mistakes now are we?
Well, sir, you can have a Vindictive warning for making us look incompetent
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:You're Invisi Gay. Super hero of the Rainbow Equality Brigade!
Nana wrote:Being CC's bf is a death worse than fate.
Nana wrote:Finally, another reasonable individual.
Nana wrote: You're Ben. And Ben is many things wrapped into one being. :)
Quotes Singing Contest of DOOM Champ. SoftballGeniasis wrote:I've seen people lose credibility. It's been a while since I've seen it cast aside so gleefully.
by New England and The Maritimes » Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:22 am
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.
by Laerod » Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:22 am
Northwest Slobovia wrote:Katganistan wrote:
Oh, I see you have confused sending troops by UN request with actually starting a war.
Nah, looks like "sending troops" isn't "war" when it's your guy ordering the bombing. Both the fighting in Afghanistan and Libya were authorized by the UNSC. (Technically, of course, UNSC resolution 1973 specifically didn't authorize troops.)
Or you do mean the key difference is that we asked the French and the British to take the lead on the UNSC resolution on Libya, so it wouldn't look like a US war? OK, have your fig leaf. But the point remains that the US was not obligated to send forces by the resolution on Libya, but was permitted to and chose to... for perfectly good reasons, which I support. But "Obama didn't start another war" is simply not factual.
by Ashmoria » Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:23 am
Ende wrote:Increased the debt and made taxes higher.
On the plus side, he didn't invade anyone. And some of the stuff he's done has been decent.
On the negative side, we still have troops in Iraq and Afganistan. And he actually moved more soldiers into Afganistan.
by Jocabia » Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:23 am
New England and The Maritimes wrote:Coffee Cakes wrote:
Uh, putting a near stop to offshore drilling and opposing Keystone isn't gonna help lower gas prices or foster independence from oil for our enemies will it? Exactly.
CC, the Obama administration has issued more drilling permits than any other administration in American history. Oil production is at the highest point since 2004 today. The problem with gas prices is this pissing contest in Iran and rampant speculation, not Barack Obama.
by Laerod » Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:25 am
Ende wrote:Increased the debt and made taxes higher.
On the plus side, he didn't invade anyone. And some of the stuff he's done has been decent.
On the negative side, we still have troops in Iraq and Afganistan. And he actually moved more soldiers into Afganistan.
by Ashmoria » Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:25 am
Huskvarneque wrote:Nothing.... then again what can I say, I'm a sixteen year old teen, what affect would any of this have on me, at least at the moment.... unless I'm missing something here. >.>"
by Samuraikoku » Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:25 am
by Grave_n_idle » Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:26 am
Coffee Cakes wrote:Grave_n_idle wrote:
Not really.
http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3036
You can't blame the incumbent for the contributions of his predecessors.
I addressed that a few posts ago while admitting I was wrong about it.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Cyptopir, Foxyshire, Ineva, Keltionialang, Kostane, Maximum Imperium Rex, Pale Dawn, Shrillland, The Jamesian Republic, Tungstan, Washington Resistance Army, Welskerland
Advertisement