NationStates

Ceannairceach wrote:

The IASM wrote:I currently Fascist but I am working on a new form of politics called Technoism

By name alone, that sounds similar to Technocracy. Have you looked at that yet?

Yes I have a Technocracy is the most democratic form of Technoism and Despotic Technoship being the most fascist.

The IASM wrote:

Ceannairceach wrote:By name alone, that sounds similar to Technocracy. Have you looked at that yet?

Yes I have a Technocracy is the most democratic form of Technoism and Despotic Technoship being the most fascist.

Technocracy simply describes the method. You can have a democratic technocracy or a despotic technocracy. Or a communistic technocracy, or a fascistic technocracy, or a theocratic technocracy. "Technocracy" simply means "rule by science", or some such.

Moderate Liberal.

I'm a separatist and nationalist, social conservative, agrarianist, slightly socialist (economically), protectionst and moralist. Other ideologies I support are in my sig. I voted "Religious", though, I dislike it being the same alternative as theocracy. That should have been changed.

Marxist Communist

Left/Center Liberal!

Social Democrat

Vestr-Norig wrote:I'm a separatist and nationalist, social conservative, agrarianist, slightly socialist (economically), protectionst and moralist. Other ideologies I support are in my sig. I voted "Religious", though, I dislike it being the same alternative as theocracy. That should have been changed.

Religious governments are theocratic by definition. Why anyone would desire a theocracy is beyond me, however.

Fiscal conservative, socially moderate, economically libertarian.

This pretty much sums up my views.

Here I stand a parliamentarian atheist. I'm an anarcho-monarchist ideally and a monarchist pragmatically. I'm a right-libertarian politically.

I am a fiscally conservative libertarian. So in general, less government around the board = more freedom, that's how I feel about it. Not to long ago was I a liberal but my political ideology really shifted with Ron Paul's campaign.

Auttumn wrote:My old thread only had 3 specific groups so i want to know more specific results. Cause most people chose other. Im a liberal-socialist. What are you? I wanna find the majority in nation states. So lets begin!

Democratic Market Socialist
or
Social Market Democrat

Left-Central on issues. Has an appreciation for national traditions and culture, however.

I'm a Democratic Socialist and proud.

the internet tells me I'm a leftist militaristic authoritarian, or a statist.
I agree with this evaluation.

...-/foreveralone.jpg

Ski Apache Nation wrote:

Auttumn wrote:My old thread only had 3 specific groups so i want to know more specific results. Cause most people chose other. Im a liberal-socialist. What are you? I wanna find the majority in nation states. So lets begin!

Democratic Market Socialist
or
Social Market Democrat

Left-Central on issues. Has an appreciation for national traditions and culture, however.

Oddly enough, my favorite U.S. president was Nixon, however...

Progressive/liberal/Social-democrat/pirate.

The IASM wrote:

Ceannairceach wrote:By name alone, that sounds similar to Technocracy. Have you looked at that yet?

Yes I have a Technocracy is the most democratic form of Technoism and Despotic Technoship being the most fascist.

I like you. Are you influenced by Mosley too, or is the bolt just for aesthetics like my avvie's H&S is?

Euugheyegeh. Technocratic, definitely. Always have been a Technocrat. Pretty liberal on some points, pretty conservative on others. Most people call me communist (although it is very apparent I am not, despite my nation's name being a play on the word and Nationstates being a idiot and saying private enterprise is illegal in my country even though it isn't)

I'm not sure exactly what I'm for in the economics department, I've never been keen on that, however I do know a bit more about types of governments. Moreso, the types I don't like. Namely, in no particular order, Communism, Monarchies Theocracies, Despotism, Dictatorships, Democracies, such and such.

I really don't know what umbrella fits me, aside from Technocratic. I go more on a law-by-law basis, as I find really none of the big categories fit me.

Yorick wrote:

The IASM wrote:Yes I have a Technocracy is the most democratic form of Technoism and Despotic Technoship being the most fascist.

I like you. Are you influenced by Mosley too, or is the bolt just for aesthetics like my avvie's H&S is?

There is major dissonance between your flag and the quote in your sig...

Distruzio wrote:Here I stand a parliamentarian atheist.

Is that sarcasm or something?

Anyways, I'm an (anti-capitalist) anarchist and deep green environmentalist (not primitivist, though).

Meryuma wrote:

Distruzio wrote:Here I stand a parliamentarian atheist.

Is that sarcasm or something?

Anyways, I'm an (anti-capitalist) anarchist and deep green environmentalist (not primitivist, though).

Seriously, Diz, the needless obscurantism should go.

I'm a radical leftist

Trotskylvania wrote:

Yorick wrote:
I like you. Are you influenced by Mosley too, or is the bolt just for aesthetics like my avvie's H&S is?

There is major dissonance between your flag and the quote in your sig...

Haha. Can't help myself, for a joke movement Nazbols' got style.

The Cummunist State wrote:Euugheyegeh. Technocratic, definitely. Always have been a Technocrat. Pretty liberal on some points, pretty conservative on others. Most people call me communist (although it is very apparent I am not, despite my nation's name being a play on the word and Nationstates being a idiot and saying private enterprise is illegal in my country even though it isn't)

I'm not sure exactly what I'm for in the economics department, I've never been keen on that, however I do know a bit more about types of governments. Moreso, the types I don't like. Namely, in no particular order, Communism, Monarchies Theocracies, Despotism, Dictatorships, Democracies, such and such.

I really don't know what umbrella fits me, aside from Technocratic. I go more on a law-by-law basis, as I find really none of the big categories fit me.

Ahh, a technocracy.

I don't think I could tolerate being run by engineers, since the universal rule seems to be that engineers are pricks.

Jerusalem and Damascus wrote:

The Cummunist State wrote:Euugheyegeh. Technocratic, definitely. Always have been a Technocrat. Pretty liberal on some points, pretty conservative on others. Most people call me communist (although it is very apparent I am not, despite my nation's name being a play on the word and Nationstates being a idiot and saying private enterprise is illegal in my country even though it isn't)

I'm not sure exactly what I'm for in the economics department, I've never been keen on that, however I do know a bit more about types of governments. Moreso, the types I don't like. Namely, in no particular order, Communism, Monarchies Theocracies, Despotism, Dictatorships, Democracies, such and such.

I really don't know what umbrella fits me, aside from Technocratic. I go more on a law-by-law basis, as I find really none of the big categories fit me.

Ahh, a technocracy.

I don't think I could tolerate being run by engineers, since the universal rule seems to be that engineers are pricks.

Hahaha! Not all of them are engineers, lots of them don't actually work with machines that way.