Yes I have a Technocracy is the most democratic form of Technoism and Despotic Technoship being the most fascist.
Advertisement
by The IASM » Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:09 am
by Ceannairceach » Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:10 am
by Vestr-Norig » Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:19 am
by The Huskar Social Union » Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:20 am
by Calimera » Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:20 am
by Ceannairceach » Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:39 am
Vestr-Norig wrote:I'm a separatist and nationalist, social conservative, agrarianist, slightly socialist (economically), protectionst and moralist. Other ideologies I support are in my sig. I voted "Religious", though, I dislike it being the same alternative as theocracy. That should have been changed.
by Alternate Universe 912 » Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:43 am
by Distruzio » Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:55 am
by Chiki » Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:59 am
by Ski Apache Nation » Tue Apr 10, 2012 11:10 am
Auttumn wrote:My old thread only had 3 specific groups so i want to know more specific results. Cause most people chose other. Im a liberal-socialist. What are you? I wanna find the majority in nation states. So lets begin!
by Zarodia » Tue Apr 10, 2012 11:12 am
Dumb Ideologies wrote:I am not sure there is sufficient gunpowder around to cannon-launch enough of them to Manhattan from their parents' basements.
by Ski Apache Nation » Tue Apr 10, 2012 11:13 am
Ski Apache Nation wrote:Auttumn wrote:My old thread only had 3 specific groups so i want to know more specific results. Cause most people chose other. Im a liberal-socialist. What are you? I wanna find the majority in nation states. So lets begin!
Democratic Market Socialist
or
Social Market Democrat
Left-Central on issues. Has an appreciation for national traditions and culture, however.
by Immoren » Tue Apr 10, 2012 11:28 am
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there
by Yorick » Tue Apr 10, 2012 11:30 am
by The Cummunist State » Tue Apr 10, 2012 11:41 am
by Trotskylvania » Tue Apr 10, 2012 11:45 am
Your Friendly Neighborhood Ultra - The Left Wing of the Impossible
Putting the '-sadism' in PosadismKarl Marx, Wage Labour and Capital
Anton Pannekoek, World Revolution and Communist Tactics
Amadeo Bordiga, Dialogue With Stalin
Nikolai Bukharin, The ABC of Communism
Gilles Dauvé, When Insurrections Die"The hell of capitalism is the firm, not the fact that the firm has a boss."- Bordiga
by Meryuma » Tue Apr 10, 2012 11:49 am
Distruzio wrote:Here I stand a parliamentarian atheist.
Niur wrote: my soul has no soul.
Saint Clair Island wrote:The English language sucks. From now on, I will refer to the second definition of sexual as "fucktacular."
Trotskylvania wrote:Alternatively, we could go on an epic quest to Plato's Cave to find the legendary artifact, Ockham's Razor.
Norstal wrote:Gunpowder Plot: America.
Meryuma: "Well, I just hope these hyperboles don't...
*puts on sunglasses*
blow out of proportions."
YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
by Trotskylvania » Tue Apr 10, 2012 11:52 am
Your Friendly Neighborhood Ultra - The Left Wing of the Impossible
Putting the '-sadism' in PosadismKarl Marx, Wage Labour and Capital
Anton Pannekoek, World Revolution and Communist Tactics
Amadeo Bordiga, Dialogue With Stalin
Nikolai Bukharin, The ABC of Communism
Gilles Dauvé, When Insurrections Die"The hell of capitalism is the firm, not the fact that the firm has a boss."- Bordiga
by Yorick » Tue Apr 10, 2012 11:59 am
by Jerusalem and Damascus » Tue Apr 10, 2012 3:38 pm
The Cummunist State wrote:Euugheyegeh. Technocratic, definitely. Always have been a Technocrat. Pretty liberal on some points, pretty conservative on others. Most people call me communist (although it is very apparent I am not, despite my nation's name being a play on the word and Nationstates being a idiot and saying private enterprise is illegal in my country even though it isn't)
I'm not sure exactly what I'm for in the economics department, I've never been keen on that, however I do know a bit more about types of governments. Moreso, the types I don't like. Namely, in no particular order, Communism, Monarchies Theocracies, Despotism, Dictatorships, Democracies, such and such.
I really don't know what umbrella fits me, aside from Technocratic. I go more on a law-by-law basis, as I find really none of the big categories fit me.
by The Cummunist State » Tue Apr 10, 2012 3:49 pm
Jerusalem and Damascus wrote:The Cummunist State wrote:Euugheyegeh. Technocratic, definitely. Always have been a Technocrat. Pretty liberal on some points, pretty conservative on others. Most people call me communist (although it is very apparent I am not, despite my nation's name being a play on the word and Nationstates being a idiot and saying private enterprise is illegal in my country even though it isn't)
I'm not sure exactly what I'm for in the economics department, I've never been keen on that, however I do know a bit more about types of governments. Moreso, the types I don't like. Namely, in no particular order, Communism, Monarchies Theocracies, Despotism, Dictatorships, Democracies, such and such.
I really don't know what umbrella fits me, aside from Technocratic. I go more on a law-by-law basis, as I find really none of the big categories fit me.
Ahh, a technocracy.
I don't think I could tolerate being run by engineers, since the universal rule seems to be that engineers are pricks.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadhirisian Puppet Nation, Andsed, Luziyca, Tungstan
Advertisement