NATION

PASSWORD

Your opinion on homosexuality?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Your opinion on homosexuality?

Homosexuality is wrong. Leviticus
54
11%
Gays shouldnt be able to be together
4
1%
Gays should be able to be togther but not get married
42
9%
Homosexuals have every right to be together
304
65%
I am gay
67
14%
 
Total votes : 471

User avatar
Person012345
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16783
Founded: Feb 16, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Person012345 » Fri Apr 06, 2012 8:10 am

Western Democrotic Germany wrote:Leviticus 18:22 read it

Again, it's a fairy tale from a fiction book, why are you bringing it up? Go watch star trek next generation episode 5.

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Fri Apr 06, 2012 8:10 am

Salandriagado wrote:
Western Democrotic Germany wrote:Leviticus 18:22 read it


Leviticus 18:22 wrote:And with a male, thou shalt not lie down in

a woman's bed; it is an abomination.


Nope, no ban on homosexuality here.

Also, Leviticus 18:23 says that "But two chicks is totally hot."
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Fri Apr 06, 2012 8:11 am

Norstal wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:


Nope, no ban on homosexuality here.

Also, Leviticus 18:23 says that "But two chicks is totally hot."


That too.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Simon Cowell of the RR
Minister
 
Posts: 2038
Founded: May 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Simon Cowell of the RR » Fri Apr 06, 2012 8:12 am

Romans 1:28 - Romans 2:2.
I can play this game too!
Yes, I might be trolling. No, not like the guy who created the thread about towel heads.
I troll by making even the most outlandish opinions sound reasonable. The question is, am I doing that here?

User avatar
Person012345
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16783
Founded: Feb 16, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Person012345 » Fri Apr 06, 2012 8:13 am

For you bible believers, do you stone your children to death when they misbehave? If not, why not? Before you bring up jesus dying for our sins, jesus specifically scolded people for not following that rule in particular. So do tell.

User avatar
Northern Dominus
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14337
Founded: Aug 23, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Northern Dominus » Fri Apr 06, 2012 8:15 am

Simon Cowell of the RR wrote:Romans 1:28 - Romans 2:2.
I can play this game too!

Personally I'm a fan of Matthew 6:1-6
“Be careful not to practice your righteousness in front of others to be seen by them. If you do, you will have no reward from your Father in heaven.
“So when you give to the needy, do not announce it with trumpets, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and on the streets, to be honored by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full. But when you give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, so that your giving may be in secret. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you.

And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full. ut when you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your Father, who is unseen. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you."
Battletech RP: Giant walking war machines, space to surface fighters, and other implements blowing things up= lots of fun! Sign up here
We even have a soundtrack!

RIP Caroll Shelby 1923-2012
Aurora, Oak Creek, Happy Valley, Sandy Hook. Just how high a price are we willing to pay?

User avatar
Simon Cowell of the RR
Minister
 
Posts: 2038
Founded: May 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Simon Cowell of the RR » Fri Apr 06, 2012 8:15 am

Person012345 wrote:For you bible believers, do you stone your children to death when they misbehave? If not, why not? Before you bring up jesus dying for our sins, jesus specifically scolded people for not following that rule in particular. So do tell.

Actually, Jesus prevented the stoning of an adulteress by saying, "Let ye who is sinless among you cast the first stone".
Yes, I might be trolling. No, not like the guy who created the thread about towel heads.
I troll by making even the most outlandish opinions sound reasonable. The question is, am I doing that here?

User avatar
Person012345
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16783
Founded: Feb 16, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Person012345 » Fri Apr 06, 2012 8:17 am

Simon Cowell of the RR wrote:
Person012345 wrote:For you bible believers, do you stone your children to death when they misbehave? If not, why not? Before you bring up jesus dying for our sins, jesus specifically scolded people for not following that rule in particular. So do tell.

Actually, Jesus prevented the stoning of an adulteress by saying, "Let ye who is sinless among you cast the first stone".

9 And he continued, “You have a fine way of setting aside the commands of God in order to observe[c] your own traditions! 10 For Moses said, ‘Honor your father and mother,’[d] and, ‘Anyone who curses their father or mother is to be put to death.’[e] 11 But you say that if anyone declares that what might have been used to help their father or mother is Corban (that is, devoted to God)— 12 then you no longer let them do anything for their father or mother. 13 Thus you nullify the word of God by your tradition that you have handed down. And you do many things like that.”

User avatar
Celritannia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17114
Founded: Nov 10, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Celritannia » Fri Apr 06, 2012 8:18 am

Homosexuality is fine, people who say other wise are idiots.
Why should it matter who loves who? it is no ones choice except the people who are in love.
I a firm believer in the JSM Harm Principle, if there is no inflicted violence and consent then the state has noe right to interfere with personnal affaurs.
No one can force others to follow a certain path, everyone has a choice, and it is their choice to make.
Any one who does not allow people to follow their own path is standing in the way of human progress.

I do not even think there is any logical argument against homosexuality.

My DeviantArt
Obey
When you annoy a Celritannian
U W0T M8?
Zirkagrad wrote:A person with a penchant for flying lions with long tongues, could possibly be a fan of Kiss. Maybe the classiest nation with a lion with its tongue hanging out. Enjoys only the finest tea.

Nakena wrote:NSG's Most Serene Salad
Citizen of Earth, Commonwealthian, European, British, Yorkshireman.
Atheist, Environmentalist, Pansexual, Left-Libertarian.

User avatar
Person012345
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16783
Founded: Feb 16, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Person012345 » Fri Apr 06, 2012 8:18 am

Ok, so it doesn't say stoning, my memory failed me there. But "put to death" anyway.

User avatar
Wazkyraque
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12527
Founded: May 23, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Wazkyraque » Fri Apr 06, 2012 8:20 am

Western Democrotic Germany wrote:Leviticus 18:22 read it

That's the same ridiculous law book that says you can't eat shellfish, or wear mixed fabric; or you should be killed, though I may be wrong about this last part about being killed for it; and it most notably says: "Your male and female slaves are to come from the nations around you; from them you may buy slaves".

Not really a reliable argument.
Last edited by Wazkyraque on Fri Apr 06, 2012 8:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
"Everything takes time. Bees have to move very fast to stay still."

User avatar
Hittanryan
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9061
Founded: Mar 10, 2011
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Hittanryan » Fri Apr 06, 2012 8:21 am

If they're members of the species homo sapiens, then they get the same rights as everyone else. It's the only way that makes sense.
In-character name of the nation is "Adiron," because I like the name better.

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Fri Apr 06, 2012 8:22 am

Hittanryan wrote:If they're members of the species homo sapiens, then they get the same rights as everyone else. It's the only way that makes sense.


Far too narrow. If they are intelligent/sapient/sentient/whatever else-ient and/or request rights, they get them.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Neohippies
Envoy
 
Posts: 268
Founded: Apr 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Neohippies » Fri Apr 06, 2012 8:26 am

Gay people should have all the same rights as straight people.

Marriage is not for the state to decide. It's for the church.

User avatar
Ceannairceach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26637
Founded: Sep 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Ceannairceach » Fri Apr 06, 2012 8:28 am

Neohippies wrote:Marriage is not for the state to decide. It's for the church.

No. It. Is. Not.

Marriage is a STATE FUNCTION, and is thereby controlled by the government, at least in the case of the United States of America and many other Western nations.

@}-;-'---

"But who prays for Satan? Who in eighteen centuries, has had the common humanity to pray for the one sinner that needed it most..." -Mark Twain

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Fri Apr 06, 2012 8:28 am

Neohippies wrote:Gay people should have all the same rights as straight people.

Marriage is not for the state to decide. It's for the church.


It's got fuck all to do with the church. There are exactly two people involved in a decision to enter into a monogamous marriage.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Phing Phong
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1748
Founded: Sep 04, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Phing Phong » Fri Apr 06, 2012 8:31 am

Neohippies wrote:Gay people should have all the same rights as straight people.

Marriage is not for the state to decide. It's for the church.


What about in countries where there is no state church, such as Turkey, or the state religion does not have a centralised organising body, such as Thailand?
Incompetent Buddhist, liberal centrist and militant queer

Embassy Program | NSwiki Pages | Factbook | Map | National Anthem | Constitution | Phing Phong Fine Rices | Culture Test
Member of the Stonewall Alliance, open to all LGBT-friendly nations!

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Fri Apr 06, 2012 8:38 am

Homosexuals have every right to be together. The law should grant them the same rights as heterosexuals independently of what any sector of society might say.

User avatar
Chinese Regions
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16326
Founded: Apr 24, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Chinese Regions » Fri Apr 06, 2012 8:39 am

Western Democrotic Germany wrote:Leviticus 18:22 read it

Do you eat pork and shellfish? Wear clothes of two fabrics?
Fan of Transformers?|Fan of Star Trek?|你会说中文吗?
Geopolitics: Internationalist, Pan-Asian, Pan-African, Pan-Arab, Pan-Slavic, Eurofederalist,
  • For the promotion of closer ties between Europe and Russia but without Dugin's anti-intellectual quackery.
  • Against NATO, the Anglo-American "special relationship", Israel and Wahhabism.

Sociopolitics: Pro-Intellectual, Pro-Science, Secular, Strictly Anti-Theocractic, for the liberation of PoCs in Western Hemisphere without the hegemony of white liberals
Economics: Indifferent

User avatar
Tmutarakhan
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8360
Founded: Dec 06, 2007
New York Times Democracy

Postby Tmutarakhan » Fri Apr 06, 2012 8:49 am

Neohippies wrote:Gay people should have all the same rights as straight people.

Marriage is not for the state to decide. It's for the church.

Marriage belongs to the LAW. The churches can hold whatever wedding ceremonies they do or do not want to perform, but they have no right whatsoever to interfere with marriage. Nor does one church have a right to interfere with wedding ceremonies which other churches are willing to perform.

My parents were married by a justice of the peace with no church involvement; in large sections of America this was the norm at the time. It is only in recent times that the Goddamned Christians have had the fucking nerve to attack other people's marriages. It is none of your business. Go away.
Life is a tragedy to those who feel, a comedy to those who think, and a musical to those who sing.

I am the very model of a Nation States General,
I am a holy terror to apologists Confederal,
When called upon to source a line, I give citations textual,
And argue about Palestine, and marriage homosexual!


A KNIGHT ON KARINZISTAN'S SPECIAL LIST OF POOPHEADS!

User avatar
Social
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 64
Founded: Jan 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Social » Fri Apr 06, 2012 8:52 am

Homosexuals should have the same rights as anyone. Anyway,come on people! Homosexuality was only talked about almost like twice in the Bible! Love is Love. If you love someone, marry them. And everyone just think about this for a second. What if you could not marry someone you loved with all your heart because you were straight?
Last edited by Social on Fri Apr 06, 2012 9:06 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Western Democrotic Germany
Diplomat
 
Posts: 727
Founded: Jan 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Western Democrotic Germany » Fri Apr 06, 2012 8:53 am

Chinese Regions wrote:
Western Democrotic Germany wrote:Leviticus 18:22 read it

Do you eat pork and shellfish? Wear clothes of two fabrics?


Old bible traditions are distinguished to all who have an argument as stupid as this!
Shorter sig coming soon!

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Fri Apr 06, 2012 8:53 am

Neohippies wrote:Gay people should have all the same rights as straight people.

Marriage is not for the state to decide. It's for the church.


Even though your church "argument" has been repeatedly beaten before, in previous threads, and in this one as well, I'll play along. Simple question: Says who?
Last edited by Samuraikoku on Fri Apr 06, 2012 8:55 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Person012345
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16783
Founded: Feb 16, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Person012345 » Fri Apr 06, 2012 8:56 am

Western Democrotic Germany wrote:
Chinese Regions wrote:Do you eat pork and shellfish? Wear clothes of two fabrics?


Old bible traditions are distinguished to all who have an argument as stupid as this!

Person012345 wrote:
9 And he continued, “You have a fine way of setting aside the commands of God in order to observe[c] your own traditions! 10 For Moses said, ‘Honor your father and mother,’[d] and, ‘Anyone who curses their father or mother is to be put to death.’[e] 11 But you say that if anyone declares that what might have been used to help their father or mother is Corban (that is, devoted to God)— 12 then you no longer let them do anything for their father or mother. 13 Thus you nullify the word of God by your tradition that you have handed down. And you do many things like that.”

Why do you hate the baby Jesus?

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Fri Apr 06, 2012 9:00 am

Western Democrotic Germany wrote:
Chinese Regions wrote:Do you eat pork and shellfish? Wear clothes of two fabrics?


Old bible traditions are distinguished to all who have an argument as stupid as this!

I don't think you know what distinguished means.
password scrambled

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Arval Va, Atlantic Isles, Dimetrodon Empire, Elejamie, Floofybit, Fractalnavel, Hispida, Hrofguard, Juansonia, Kenmoria, La Cocina del Bodhi, Neo-American States, New Ciencia, San Lumen, Tarsonis, The Archregimancy, The Two Jerseys

Advertisement

Remove ads