House of Representatives, and Senate. I just chose to use senator because its shorter than representative.
Advertisement

by Chetssaland » Sat Sep 19, 2009 5:14 am
by Sibirsky » Sat Sep 19, 2009 5:14 am
Post-Unity Terra wrote:Sibirsky wrote:
What? People that buy SUVs are regular people. Besides that they have one or more of the following; kids, outdoor hobbies, a boat to tow. You know, things that a government mandated Prius cannot accomplish. Capiche?
Dohohoho, oh you. There are people all over the world with families who don't feel the need to own a tank with the armour stripped off.

by Chetssaland » Sat Sep 19, 2009 5:15 am
Hairless Kitten II wrote:Are you Christian? If 'yes', how does this meet with your pro death penalty attitude?

by Post-Unity Terra » Sat Sep 19, 2009 5:15 am
Sibirsky wrote:Post-Unity Terra wrote:Sibirsky wrote:
What? People that buy SUVs are regular people. Besides that they have one or more of the following; kids, outdoor hobbies, a boat to tow. You know, things that a government mandated Prius cannot accomplish. Capiche?
Dohohoho, oh you. There are people all over the world with families who don't feel the need to own a tank with the armour stripped off.
Those people have to pay $10/gallon for gas because of taxes. So the Prius, or similar alternative is much easier on the wallet. It is not that they don't want and SUV. It's that if they wanted one, they most likely cannot afford one.

by Chetssaland » Sat Sep 19, 2009 5:17 am
Post-Unity Terra wrote:Sibirsky wrote:Post-Unity Terra wrote:Sibirsky wrote:
What? People that buy SUVs are regular people. Besides that they have one or more of the following; kids, outdoor hobbies, a boat to tow. You know, things that a government mandated Prius cannot accomplish. Capiche?
Dohohoho, oh you. There are people all over the world with families who don't feel the need to own a tank with the armour stripped off.
Those people have to pay $10/gallon for gas because of taxes. So the Prius, or similar alternative is much easier on the wallet. It is not that they don't want and SUV. It's that if they wanted one, they most likely cannot afford one.
You think so? Everyone's just jealous?
by Sibirsky » Sat Sep 19, 2009 5:19 am
Post-Unity Terra wrote:Sibirsky wrote:Post-Unity Terra wrote:Sibirsky wrote:
What? People that buy SUVs are regular people. Besides that they have one or more of the following; kids, outdoor hobbies, a boat to tow. You know, things that a government mandated Prius cannot accomplish. Capiche?
Dohohoho, oh you. There are people all over the world with families who don't feel the need to own a tank with the armour stripped off.
Those people have to pay $10/gallon for gas because of taxes. So the Prius, or similar alternative is much easier on the wallet. It is not that they don't want and SUV. It's that if they wanted one, they most likely cannot afford one.
You think so? Everyone's just jealous?
by Sibirsky » Sat Sep 19, 2009 5:20 am
Chetssaland wrote:Post-Unity Terra wrote:Sibirsky wrote:Post-Unity Terra wrote:Sibirsky wrote:
What? People that buy SUVs are regular people. Besides that they have one or more of the following; kids, outdoor hobbies, a boat to tow. You know, things that a government mandated Prius cannot accomplish. Capiche?
Dohohoho, oh you. There are people all over the world with families who don't feel the need to own a tank with the armour stripped off.
Those people have to pay $10/gallon for gas because of taxes. So the Prius, or similar alternative is much easier on the wallet. It is not that they don't want and SUV. It's that if they wanted one, they most likely cannot afford one.
You think so? Everyone's just jealous?
Can we all just agree an SUV is better than a minivan?

by Sibirsky » Sat Sep 19, 2009 5:21 am
Post-Unity Terra wrote:And I was saying SUV's are fucking ugly.

by Chetssaland » Sat Sep 19, 2009 5:21 am
by Sibirsky » Sat Sep 19, 2009 5:22 am

by Lunatic Goofballs » Sat Sep 19, 2009 5:23 am
RoI3 wrote:"Can you stop asking me where the nearest MacDonald's is when you visit my country?"


by Chetssaland » Sat Sep 19, 2009 5:24 am
by Sibirsky » Sat Sep 19, 2009 5:24 am


by Fartsniffage » Sat Sep 19, 2009 5:25 am

by Post-Unity Terra » Sat Sep 19, 2009 5:26 am
by Sibirsky » Sat Sep 19, 2009 5:26 am
Chetssaland wrote:
Meh, nothing I haven't done before. Of course, in RL arguing with a wall would look really weird. Wow...

by Al-Aqar » Sat Sep 19, 2009 5:27 am
Avenio wrote:The gov'ment dun took ma baybay!!! Thayre comm'nist tayxes done took mah libertays! I ahm gonna geet mah gun and tayke back mah baybay aynd mah tayxes!
Tubbsalot wrote:Yes, the success of a generation should be judged solely by how well they can murder people. I'll get on to the UN about that right away.
by Sibirsky » Sat Sep 19, 2009 5:27 am

by North Suran » Sat Sep 19, 2009 5:29 am
John 8:7 wrote:When they kept on questioning him, he straightened up and said to them, "If any one of you is without sin, let him be the first to throw a stone at her."
Neu Mitanni wrote:As for NS, his latest statement is grounded in ignorance and contrary to fact, much to the surprise of all NSGers.
Geniasis wrote:The War on Christmas

by Chetssaland » Sat Sep 19, 2009 5:30 am

by Fartsniffage » Sat Sep 19, 2009 5:30 am
North Suran wrote:
I'd then inquire as to why you are intentionally ignoring an important section of the Bible?John 8:7 wrote:When they kept on questioning him, he straightened up and said to them, "If any one of you is without sin, let him be the first to throw a stone at her."

by Chetssaland » Sat Sep 19, 2009 5:31 am
North Suran wrote:
I'd then inquire as to why you are intentionally ignoring an important section of the Bible?John 8:7 wrote:When they kept on questioning him, he straightened up and said to them, "If any one of you is without sin, let him be the first to throw a stone at her."

by North Suran » Sat Sep 19, 2009 5:33 am
Chetssaland wrote:North Suran wrote:
I'd then inquire as to why you are intentionally ignoring an important section of the Bible?John 8:7 wrote:When they kept on questioning him, he straightened up and said to them, "If any one of you is without sin, let him be the first to throw a stone at her."
So I should also believe men are above women? And gays are evil?
Neu Mitanni wrote:As for NS, his latest statement is grounded in ignorance and contrary to fact, much to the surprise of all NSGers.
Geniasis wrote:The War on Christmas

by Lunatic Goofballs » Sat Sep 19, 2009 5:35 am
Fartsniffage wrote:
But we do have some fabulous all you can eat Chinese places that charge £4.99 a head.
By fabulous I mean I've not yet had any food poisoning.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Fartsniffage, Glikogen, Grinning Dragon, Ifreann, Kenmoria, Marslandi, Mitranus, Ngelmish, Point Blob, Serlanda, The Rio Grande River Basin, World Anarchic Union
Advertisement