Obviously environment and life experiences would have an effect. Did they see if there was any correlation with the way they were brought up as children? Although the large numbers and variety over cultures might negate that.
Advertisement
by Kaeshar » Wed Mar 28, 2012 8:46 pm
by 1000 Cats » Wed Mar 28, 2012 8:46 pm
Peddieville wrote:1000 Cats wrote:If it helps, 1% of the population is psychopathic. Robert Hare identified this ages ago and it's stayed surprisingly constant, both over time, over different schedules, and different cultures. It's not something we can iron out of society, unfortunately.
Thanks-that seems about right to me. I guess it also matters whether FST meant psychopathic in a clinical sense, or in a more popular sense, which could include portions of the ASPD population.
Norstal wrote:You are a hatiater: one who radiates hate.
Meryuma wrote:No one is more of a cat person than 1000 Cats!
FST wrote:Any sexual desires which can be satiated within a healthy and consensual way should be freed from shame. Bizarre kinks and fetishes are acceptable and nothing to be ashamed of as long as they are acted out in a context where everyone consents and no one is hurt.
by Four-sided Triangles » Wed Mar 28, 2012 8:47 pm
Raeyh wrote:Well that's just character assassination, it's not hatred of women.
by The Grand World Order » Wed Mar 28, 2012 8:47 pm
Four-sided Triangles wrote:
I'm sorry, but "She was dressed in skimpy clothing and was therefore asking for it." and "She's slutty and has a lot of promiscuous sex so obviously she wanted it and it wasn't rape." are very common and very wrong responses to accusations of rape. These responses reflect a degrading view of female sexuality which is very ingrained in our culture.
by 1000 Cats » Wed Mar 28, 2012 8:47 pm
Kaeshar wrote:1000 Cats wrote:Twin studies put it at about 50%. That has to be taken with a grain of salt, but still, yes, quite high.
Obviously environment and life experiences would have an effect. Did they see if there was any correlation with the way they were brought up as children? Although the large numbers and variety over cultures might negate that.
Norstal wrote:You are a hatiater: one who radiates hate.
Meryuma wrote:No one is more of a cat person than 1000 Cats!
FST wrote:Any sexual desires which can be satiated within a healthy and consensual way should be freed from shame. Bizarre kinks and fetishes are acceptable and nothing to be ashamed of as long as they are acted out in a context where everyone consents and no one is hurt.
by Peddieville » Wed Mar 28, 2012 8:48 pm
1000 Cats wrote:Peddieville wrote:Thanks-that seems about right to me. I guess it also matters whether FST meant psychopathic in a clinical sense, or in a more popular sense, which could include portions of the ASPD population.
All psychopaths (as defined by Hare's inventory) have ASPD as well, and all people with ASPD must have met criteria for conduct disorder (as defined by the DSM IV-TR). It's a neat little line showing how horrible a person you are.
by Four-sided Triangles » Wed Mar 28, 2012 8:48 pm
Peddieville wrote:Those must be some pretty significant counter-factors.
by Northwest Slobovia » Wed Mar 28, 2012 8:49 pm
1000 Cats wrote:Peddieville wrote:
Fair point, although the differences between the two are a bit hazy, by the article's own admission. Best statistic I could find in my perusal of the psychopathy article is that (under one definition) 11-13% of the US prison population are psychopaths. I'm not really willing to extrapolate on that, but it pegs the lower bound at .1%, unless I'm missing something.
EDIT: Re-Reading the article, it's 11-25% for males, which makes the statistic even more difficult.
If it helps, 1% of the population is psychopathic. Robert Hare identified this ages ago and it's stayed surprisingly constant, both over time, over different schedules, and different cultures. It's not something we can iron out of society, unfortunately.
by Wikkiwallana » Wed Mar 28, 2012 8:49 pm
Kaeshar wrote:1000 Cats wrote:Twin studies put it at about 50%. That has to be taken with a grain of salt, but still, yes, quite high.
Obviously environment and life experiences would have an effect. Did they see if there was any correlation with the way they were brought up as children? Although the large numbers and variety over cultures might negate that.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.
by Four-sided Triangles » Wed Mar 28, 2012 8:50 pm
The Grand World Order wrote:And "He's a man without an alibi so he must've raped her" isn't just as bad, if not worse?
by 1000 Cats » Wed Mar 28, 2012 8:50 pm
Four-sided Triangles wrote:1000 Cats wrote:OK. These have all increased if not been introduced within the last forty years. Rape prevalence has decreased. What is your explanation?
Also, I am glad to hear that you are no longer entirely anti-sex.
That other counter-factors have also changed over the same time period.
Norstal wrote:You are a hatiater: one who radiates hate.
Meryuma wrote:No one is more of a cat person than 1000 Cats!
FST wrote:Any sexual desires which can be satiated within a healthy and consensual way should be freed from shame. Bizarre kinks and fetishes are acceptable and nothing to be ashamed of as long as they are acted out in a context where everyone consents and no one is hurt.
by Awesome Possum Land » Wed Mar 28, 2012 8:51 pm
by The Grand World Order » Wed Mar 28, 2012 8:52 pm
Four-sided Triangles wrote:In a total vacuum? Yes. In society with its present conditions? No.
by 1000 Cats » Wed Mar 28, 2012 8:52 pm
Northwest Slobovia wrote:1000 Cats wrote:If it helps, 1% of the population is psychopathic. Robert Hare identified this ages ago and it's stayed surprisingly constant, both over time, over different schedules, and different cultures. It's not something we can iron out of society, unfortunately.
I'd like the see citation. ...but not now; it's late here. If you get a chance, could you TG me a citation for one of his papers? Thanks in advance. (I'm not sure if I believe the claim, but I'm in no mental shape now to do serious critical reading of published research.)
Peddieville wrote:1000 Cats wrote:All psychopaths (as defined by Hare's inventory) have ASPD as well, and all people with ASPD must have met criteria for conduct disorder (as defined by the DSM IV-TR). It's a neat little line showing how horrible a person you are.
Hehe. And to clarify, I meant portions of the ASPD population outside of psychopaths.
Norstal wrote:You are a hatiater: one who radiates hate.
Meryuma wrote:No one is more of a cat person than 1000 Cats!
FST wrote:Any sexual desires which can be satiated within a healthy and consensual way should be freed from shame. Bizarre kinks and fetishes are acceptable and nothing to be ashamed of as long as they are acted out in a context where everyone consents and no one is hurt.
by Caninope » Wed Mar 28, 2012 8:53 pm
Agritum wrote:Arg, Caninope is Captain America under disguise. Everyone knows it.
Frisivisia wrote:Me wrote:Just don't. It'll get you a whole lot further in life if you come to realize you're not the smartest guy in the room, even if you probably are.
Because Caninope may be in that room with you.
Nightkill the Emperor wrote:Thankfully, we have you and EM to guide us to wisdom and truth, holy one. :p
Norstal wrote:What I am saying of course is that we should clone Caninope.
by Eden-Osiris » Wed Mar 28, 2012 8:53 pm
Four-sided Triangles wrote:1. Bringing up a woman's sexual history as if it's relevant to whether or not she was raped is a very common and highly misogynistic tactic used to dismiss all rape victims who aren't pretty little virgin white girls.
Four-sided Triangles wrote:2. Fair enough. You shouldn't have sex in the middle of school.
by Four-sided Triangles » Wed Mar 28, 2012 8:54 pm
Fersceau wrote:Sounds like old southern rape charges. A black man acused of a rape was not "guilty till proven innocent"; he was GUILTY.period
by Tlaceceyaya » Wed Mar 28, 2012 8:55 pm
Dimitri Tsafendas wrote:You are guilty not only when you commit a crime, but also when you do nothing to prevent it when you have the chance.
by Four-sided Triangles » Wed Mar 28, 2012 8:56 pm
by Four-sided Triangles » Wed Mar 28, 2012 8:57 pm
Tlaceceyaya wrote:You seriously believe that allowing women to send men to prison for whatever reason is just?
What if the two have a fight after sex or before it, and the woman decides that since the man doesn't have an alibi, she'll have him sent to prison for several years? When she calms down, she'll get in a LOT of trouble if she comes forward, so she'll probably not do anything. The innocent man who had a fight with his partner after consensual sex or before they were planning to have sex is now stuck in prison for several years and once he's out, his life will be ruined.
by Tlaceceyaya » Wed Mar 28, 2012 8:57 pm
Four-sided Triangles wrote:So what are your proposals to lower rape in society. NSG?
Dimitri Tsafendas wrote:You are guilty not only when you commit a crime, but also when you do nothing to prevent it when you have the chance.
by Northwest Slobovia » Wed Mar 28, 2012 8:58 pm
1000 Cats wrote:Northwest Slobovia wrote:I'd like the see citation. ...but not now; it's late here. If you get a chance, could you TG me a citation for one of his papers? Thanks in advance. (I'm not sure if I believe the claim, but I'm in no mental shape now to do serious critical reading of published research.)
The book is called The Mask of Sanity. It's old, but it's still worth considering
by Miyager » Wed Mar 28, 2012 8:58 pm
Four-sided Triangles wrote:Conserative Morality wrote:No. Why on Earth would I acknowledge any sort of legitimacy of such an intellectually bankrupt idea with an argument? Mockery is all it deserves, and shock.
I think it's our moral duty to bend over backwards in order to help people who have been historically oppressed. If this means a few innocent men go to prison in order to greatly reduce rape, doesn't the end justify the means?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ethel mermania, Khardsland, Lagene, Lemueria, Nu Elysium, Port Carverton, Sarduri, Simonia, Stellar Colonies, Tungstan, Xind
Advertisement