Samatolian City-States wrote:I'd swap out Andrew Jackson for Thomas Paine on the $20.
I second this motion.
Advertisement

by Conserative Morality » Thu Sep 17, 2009 6:08 pm
Samatolian City-States wrote:I'd swap out Andrew Jackson for Thomas Paine on the $20.

by Peddieville » Thu Sep 17, 2009 6:09 pm
OMGeverynameistaken wrote:*Ahem*
Andrew Jackson invented the bear at age 12. During the War of 1812 he personally swam across the Atlantic ocean and punched King George in the face, made the British promise to stop putting people on the rack, freed all the prisoners in the Tower of London and swam back to the US because there weren't enough Indians to kill in the UK.
After that he single-handedly won the Battle of New Orleans by shouting at the British soldiers so hard they fainted. He then built the Washington Monument as a 1:1 scale replica of his own penis.
He also drove the British out of Washington DC, but he was so hotblooded that it set the place on fire.
He is also the reason the US didn't take over Canada. He found out that there were more Indians westwards and decided to go that way instead.

by OMGeverynameistaken » Thu Sep 17, 2009 6:10 pm
Tsa-la-gi Nation wrote:OMGeverynameistaken wrote:Thethunderdome wrote:Jackson, what did he ever do to deserve the most useful bill ever? Killed Indians, defied the SC, and was a corrupt thug.
Truman 4 $20!
*Ahem*
Andrew Jackson invented the bear at age 12. During the War of 1812 he personally swam across the Atlantic ocean and punched King George in the face, made the British promise to stop putting people on the rack, freed all the prisoners in the Tower of London and swam back to the US because there weren't enough Indians to kill in the UK.
After that he single-handedly won the Battle of New Orleans by shouting at the British soldiers so hard they fainted. He then built the Washington Monument as a 1:1 scale replica of his own penis.
He also drove the British out of Washington DC, but he was so hotblooded that it set the place on fire.
He is also the reason the US didn't take over Canada. He found out that there were more Indians westwards and decided to go that way instead.
so I guess the only thing you would change is "In God We Trust" to "In Jackson We Trust"?

by Niur » Thu Sep 17, 2009 6:10 pm
Pevisopolis wrote:Seriously, I propose that we change the $100 bill to the name of a president/revolutionary/miscellaneous public figure whose name one can barely pronounce.

by Tsa-la-gi Nation » Thu Sep 17, 2009 6:10 pm
Pevisopolis wrote:Seriously, I propose that we change the $100 bill to the name of a president/revolutionary/miscellaneous public figure whose name one can barely pronounce.

by Peddieville » Thu Sep 17, 2009 6:11 pm

by Peddieville » Thu Sep 17, 2009 6:12 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:Try "Co-ordinated attacks and the Invasion on a massive scale" And "Outmaneuver your enemy if you can't bring your entire numerical advantage to bear." And don't forget "Fight fire with fire."

by Conserative Morality » Thu Sep 17, 2009 6:14 pm
Peddieville wrote:I agree that he didn't mess around with the Confederacy, just that he did not do anything particularly exceptional.


by Pevisopolis » Thu Sep 17, 2009 6:14 pm

by Tsa-la-gi Nation » Thu Sep 17, 2009 6:16 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:Peddieville wrote:I agree that he didn't mess around with the Confederacy, just that he did not do anything particularly exceptional.
Can I say this again?
He managed to outwit and defeat General ROBERT LEE! Even with the advantages he had, that was quite the accomplishment.

by Tsa-la-gi Nation » Thu Sep 17, 2009 6:17 pm


by Conserative Morality » Thu Sep 17, 2009 6:19 pm
Tsa-la-gi Nation wrote:By the time Grant met Lee, Lee was fighting with a lot less resources. Not that it's part of this topic, but do you think Grant was a better general than Lee?

by Pevisopolis » Thu Sep 17, 2009 6:21 pm

by Peddieville » Thu Sep 17, 2009 6:23 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:Can I say this again?
He managed to outwit and defeat General ROBERT LEE! Even with the advantages he had, that was quite the accomplishment.

by Tsa-la-gi Nation » Thu Sep 17, 2009 6:23 pm
Tunizcha wrote:Change the US to Obamia and replace his face on all the currency, just a different angle for each one.

by Conserative Morality » Thu Sep 17, 2009 6:25 pm
Peddieville wrote:He did not outwit Lee, just outnumber him. By the time Grant took over, the Confederacy was nearly bled dry. And while defeating Lee is quite an acomplishment, this did not come at a time when Lee was at full strength. Some of his best subordinate commanders were dead, such as "Stonewall" Jackson, and others, such as Stuart and Longstreet, were losing their effectiveness. Lee himself said that the South could not win a long, protracted war.


by Peddieville » Thu Sep 17, 2009 6:25 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:Better? No, I merely think that being able to beat Lee at all, even in the state Lee's Army was in, was an accomplishment in itself. Meaning I think he was a pretty damn good general, not that I think that he's better than Lee.

by Lackadaisical2 » Thu Sep 17, 2009 6:26 pm
Tunizcha wrote:Change the US to Obamia and replace his face on all the currency, just a different angle for each one.
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.

by Peddieville » Thu Sep 17, 2009 6:26 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:You do realize that every General before Grant also outnumbered Lee, right?

by Conserative Morality » Thu Sep 17, 2009 6:27 pm
Peddieville wrote:And they were all spectacularly bad generals.

by Island sodor » Thu Sep 17, 2009 6:27 pm

by Grays Harbor » Thu Sep 17, 2009 6:27 pm
Omigodtheykilledkenny wrote:Ugh, all of them. They've made American currency so freakin' ugly now it's not even funny. They should bring back the classic bills. I really couldn't care less which president (or Founding Father) is on which bill.






by Tsa-la-gi Nation » Thu Sep 17, 2009 6:27 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:Tsa-la-gi Nation wrote:By the time Grant met Lee, Lee was fighting with a lot less resources. Not that it's part of this topic, but do you think Grant was a better general than Lee?
Better? No, I merely think that being able to beat Lee at all, even in the state Lee's Army was in, was an accomplishment in itself. Meaning I think he was a pretty damn good general, not that I think that he's better than Lee.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Arin Graliandre, Eahland, Necroghastia, Page, Rusozak, Techocracy101010, The Sherpa Empire, The Two Jerseys
Advertisement