NATION

PASSWORD

What US currency president would you change?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Which president would you change & why?

$1 George Washington
3
4%
$2 Thomas Jefferson
2
2%
$5 Abraham Lincoln
1
1%
$20 Andrew Jackson
36
44%
$50 U.S. Grant
16
20%
$500 William McKinley
2
2%
$1000 Grover Cleveland
4
5%
$5000 James Madison
1
1%
$100,000 Woodrow Wilson
12
15%
$10,$100,or $10,000 Hamilton,Franklin,or Chase
5
6%
 
Total votes : 82

User avatar
BowlsofCream
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 54
Founded: Jul 15, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby BowlsofCream » Fri Sep 18, 2009 2:36 pm

I love Jackson. If it wasn't for him, I wouldn't be living in my nice home in sunny Florida :) Silly "injuns"

User avatar
The Norse Hordes
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1269
Founded: Sep 08, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Norse Hordes » Fri Sep 18, 2009 3:46 pm

Id replace Jackson with Teddy.


Teddy was the man.
Neesika wrote:Spongebob Squarepants turned my daughters into faggots.

Economic Left/Right: -9.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.23

User avatar
Katganistan
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 35947
Founded: Antiquity
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Katganistan » Fri Sep 18, 2009 4:34 pm

Pevisopolis wrote:Change the $100 bill. I'm so fucking tired of hearing "Benjamin" over nine thousand times daily.

NOT a President. ;)


User avatar
Drachmar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1126
Founded: Sep 10, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Drachmar » Fri Sep 18, 2009 7:26 pm

Lucky Bicycle Works wrote:Pictures on the money is stupid and infantile.

Each note should be unique. And no "money transfer" should be legal without reference to (ie verifiable possession of) a unique note or notes.

The anonymity of money is precisely what is evil about money. And it's not hard to fix.

It would put a spoke in the wheel of bankers, too. They have the power to mint currency (to create bargainable assets at no cost -- ie, mint currency) and they would not have that power if 'money' was strictly defined as unique treasury notes.

For nearly the first 100 years of the history of the U.S. this was done, and it was an absolute failure. Counterfeiting was rampant, and there was no guarantee that your notes were transferable from one bank to another. If one bank failed, another was not obligated to back your note. It's was a horrible system, and the reason the U.S. went to a standardized paper/coin system of notes.
Favorite quotes:

Grave_n_idle wrote:
United Marktoria wrote:Your unconscious mind is gold. my friend.

...which explains why people keep sticking shovels in your head.


Katganistan wrote:
North Wiedna wrote:I'm a monster in bed.

Women run screaming from you? ;)

User avatar
Lucky Bicycle Works
Diplomat
 
Posts: 884
Founded: Jul 08, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Lucky Bicycle Works » Fri Sep 18, 2009 9:07 pm

Drachmar wrote:
Lucky Bicycle Works wrote:Pictures on the money is stupid and infantile.

Each note should be unique. And no "money transfer" should be legal without reference to (ie verifiable possession of) a unique note or notes.

The anonymity of money is precisely what is evil about money. And it's not hard to fix.

It would put a spoke in the wheel of bankers, too. They have the power to mint currency (to create bargainable assets at no cost -- ie, mint currency) and they would not have that power if 'money' was strictly defined as unique treasury notes.

For nearly the first 100 years of the history of the U.S. this was done, and it was an absolute failure. Counterfeiting was rampant, and there was no guarantee that your notes were transferable from one bank to another. If one bank failed, another was not obligated to back your note. It's was a horrible system, and the reason the U.S. went to a standardized paper/coin system of notes.


I fail to see how counterfeiting is even possible if each note has a complete "paper trail" -- a searchable record of who legally owns each note. That might not have been possible a hundred years ago but it is now. Even in so far as paper money is even necessary (electronic transactions are already fully auditable) it can be made machine-readable by simply printing a bar-code on existing notes.

The next generation of notes should have microchips in them, so that the redemption value of a note can be cancelled at the Treasury's discretion. That puts a much higher onus on users of the money not to accept the proceeds of crime, which ultimately makes crime for profit less feasible. Yes, you can sell an illegal good for Ho-bucks, redeemable only with your local gang ... but that's a lot less attractive than legal cash which can be spent anywhere on earth. The exchange rate (or laundering cost) would be a strong deterrent to the black market, since it would settle at the level which law enforcement permits unauthorized transfer of money.

The benefits for tax compliance and detection of crime and corruption are alone enough to make such a scheme revenue-positive.

There are more serious objections, surely? Isn't what I'm suggesting exactly like the "gold standard" but without the gold to back it?

At the very least, object on the grounds of the vast restructuring necessary to back all existing debts with assets. Borrowing to invest puts the economy in an aggressive stance which is actually dependent on economic growth, and puts at a disadvantage any trader who tries to operate without debt. At some point of growing debt and growing ownership of debt (private corporate and governmental) someone isn't going to get their money back. We can't all be borrowers!

But let's just wait 'til it breaks, shall we? Because the alternative is like coming off drugs, a long hard grind which is experienced as a recession because profits are going to where they should always have stayed, in capital investments. The long period of consolidation means no new spending, no new sectors growing of the economy without reduction of some other. No, it's much easier to just stay artificially pumped on debt until something breaks ....

What about economic growth, you ask? Isn't growth good? Simple. Economic growth equals the rate of printing new money (unique bills or even just the identifying number of a virtual 'buck' being authorized to a spender -- who would of course be the government.) When the economy grows, government gets more spending money, when it shrinks government has to sell assets to cover the cost of the money they ... wait for it ... burn.

On economics I'm just a hare-brain. I'm sure you can raise more substantial objections to what I suggest, so hit me.
Lucky Bicycle Works, previously BunnySaurus Bugsii.
"My town is a teacher.
Oh, trucks and beers and memories
All spread out on the road.
Oh, my town is a leader of children,
To where Caution
Is a Long Wide Load"

-- Mark Seymour

User avatar
Tsa-la-gi Nation
Minister
 
Posts: 2823
Founded: Aug 19, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Tsa-la-gi Nation » Fri Sep 18, 2009 9:24 pm

Grays Harbor wrote:
Krypton-Zod wrote:
Grays Harbor wrote:of course, we could always dig a little deeper for older designs, like the pre-civil war days when it was banks that issued the currency, not the government.


Do the words 'Federal Reserve' mean anything to you?


umm....... yes. I've been a coin and banknote collector for about 40 years now, so I have done a fair bit of study. I showed those notes as an example of fine engraved design, not an advocation of returning to the bank issued system. so sorry you couldn't see that.

Hello Grays Harbor. I don't know why, but it didn't occur to me that this topic would bring out a coin collector. The Chief Running Antolope 5 dollar sivler certificate, how rare is it & what would be a fair market value? (If you don't mind me asking). I think the chief of my tribe would love one. Thanks for any info :)
P.S. we're birds of a feather. I've been a comic collector for over 25 years.

User avatar
Lucky Bicycle Works
Diplomat
 
Posts: 884
Founded: Jul 08, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Lucky Bicycle Works » Fri Sep 18, 2009 9:25 pm

As to why famous faces on notes are stupid and childish:

1. Actually makes forgeries easier to pass off, since the engagement of the visual cortex of the viewer is distracted by the image of a face.

2. It is demeaning to national heroes to make every note a little memorial. There is nothing grand or noble about a buck.

3. Money is valuable only in that it can be exchanged for other things. It either elates money itself, or demeans the person whose image is carried on it, to mark it with a recognizable face.
Lucky Bicycle Works, previously BunnySaurus Bugsii.
"My town is a teacher.
Oh, trucks and beers and memories
All spread out on the road.
Oh, my town is a leader of children,
To where Caution
Is a Long Wide Load"

-- Mark Seymour

User avatar
Grays Harbor
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18566
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Grays Harbor » Fri Sep 18, 2009 9:30 pm

Lucky Bicycle Works wrote:As to why famous faces on notes are stupid and childish:

1. Actually makes forgeries easier to pass off, since the engagement of the visual cortex of the viewer is distracted by the image of a face.

2. It is demeaning to national heroes to make every note a little memorial. There is nothing grand or noble about a buck.

3. Money is valuable only in that it can be exchanged for other things. It either elates money itself, or demeans the person whose image is carried on it, to mark it with a recognizable face.


Gotta disagree on that one. Nothing demeaning about it whatsoever.
Everything you know about me is wrong. Or a rumor. Something like that.

Not Ta'veren

User avatar
Tsa-la-gi Nation
Minister
 
Posts: 2823
Founded: Aug 19, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Tsa-la-gi Nation » Fri Sep 18, 2009 9:31 pm

Katganistan wrote:
Tekania wrote:Since when were Franklin and Chase Presidents? LOL

Or Hamilton.

Sorry for any confusion folks. On my 1st post I explained that the last poll choice I put Hamilton, Franklin, & Chase grouped together (as the non presidents) just to give all the possible bill choices up for debate. I guess I could have worded it better. :blush:

User avatar
Tsa-la-gi Nation
Minister
 
Posts: 2823
Founded: Aug 19, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Tsa-la-gi Nation » Fri Sep 18, 2009 9:37 pm

BowlsofCream wrote:I love Jackson. If it wasn't for him, I wouldn't be living in my nice home in sunny Florida :) Silly "injuns"

I'm meeting my tribe tomorrow. We will do a hurricane dance for "bowlsofcream", in sunny Fla. :twisted:

User avatar
Grays Harbor
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18566
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Grays Harbor » Fri Sep 18, 2009 9:44 pm

Tsa-la-gi Nation wrote: The Chief Running Antolope 5 dollar sivler certificate, how rare is it & what would be a fair market value? (If you don't mind me asking). I think the chief of my tribe would love one. Thanks for any info :)


Here are a couple links from websites that sell banknotes. That particular note seems to run rather high, anywhere from $300 up to $5000 depending on condition. Ebay may be your best bet as sometimes you can get "right place-right time" deals.

http://www.donckelly.com/lg_type/lg_type.html#Silver
http://www.sanchezcurrency.com/us_large_size_notes.aspx?tid=SC

This may be a reasonable alternative, a 1977 BEP issued souvenir card with the face of the bill engraved on it issued for the ANA convention that year. http://www.goantiques.com/detail,department-treasury-silver,2051084.html or http://www.ecrater.com/product.php?pid=1380212
Everything you know about me is wrong. Or a rumor. Something like that.

Not Ta'veren

User avatar
Tsa-la-gi Nation
Minister
 
Posts: 2823
Founded: Aug 19, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Tsa-la-gi Nation » Fri Sep 18, 2009 10:05 pm

Grays Harbor wrote:
Tsa-la-gi Nation wrote: The Chief Running Antolope 5 dollar sivler certificate, how rare is it & what would be a fair market value? (If you don't mind me asking). I think the chief of my tribe would love one. Thanks for any info :)


Here are a couple links from websites that sell banknotes. That particular note seems to run rather high, anywhere from $300 up to $5000 depending on condition. Ebay may be your best bet as sometimes you can get "right place-right time" deals.

http://www.donckelly.com/lg_type/lg_type.html#Silver
http://www.sanchezcurrency.com/us_large_size_notes.aspx?tid=SC

This may be a reasonable alternative, a 1977 BEP issued souvenir card with the face of the bill engraved on it issued for the ANA convention that year. http://www.goantiques.com/detail,department-treasury-silver,2051084.html or http://www.ecrater.com/product.php?pid=1380212

Isn't it amazing that a $5 note could be worth so much after time? I grew up in the antique business & sometimes the value of things as the get old still suprises me. Never collected much money. However I do have a small Indian Head Penny collection, 2 one dollar sivler certificates, & 1 two dollar siver certificate. There's a good story on how I got one of them. I was working food service at dullas airport & this guy got off the plane from europe & paid me for his burger with it. Of course, I took the siver certificate & gave the cash register a buck. Score 8)
Thanks for the info :)

User avatar
Sapphista
Envoy
 
Posts: 286
Founded: May 23, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Sapphista » Fri Sep 18, 2009 10:25 pm

I know! Screw paper money!! Let's go back to the good ole barter system!

I shall trade you a cow and two llamas for one of those talking picture boxes. See? You wouldn't even have to drag a purse or wallet around, just a livestock trailer.
It is my firm belief that it is a mistake to have firm beliefs.
~Sworn enemy of Misogynysta~

User avatar
Niur
Senator
 
Posts: 4018
Founded: Aug 01, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Niur » Fri Sep 18, 2009 10:30 pm

Sapphista wrote:I know! Screw paper money!! Let's go back to the good ole barter system!

I shall trade you a cow and two llamas for one of those talking picture boxes. See? You wouldn't even have to drag a purse or wallet around, just a livestock trailer.

Genius... pure genius... :bow:
"In cahuitontli ca otopan, yehuantzitzin yollochipahuac tonaz, yeceh yehuantzitzin tica imanimanmeh tlahueliloc telchihualozque. In cahuitontli ca teuctlatolli ic otopan, auh yehuan quitzacua, in neltiliztli, onyezque huetztoc!"

User avatar
Southern Americama
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 23
Founded: May 28, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Southern Americama » Fri Sep 18, 2009 11:39 pm

Amazing noones criticised Mckinley yet. Things must be looking up.

User avatar
Eternal Life with God
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1719
Founded: Sep 04, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Eternal Life with God » Fri Sep 18, 2009 11:55 pm

Obamas Ideology wrote:We only need one man’s face on our money. The Alpha and the Omega, Barack Obama.

We could just do various poses to tell them apart.


Alpha and Omega???????????????????? Recant! Imean... Please think before you talk!
Last edited by Eternal Life with God on Sat Sep 19, 2009 11:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.
John 14:6
Economic Left/Right: 4.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.56


“God became man so that man might become God.”
-St.Augustine of Hippo

User avatar
Grays Harbor
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18566
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Grays Harbor » Sat Sep 19, 2009 3:48 am

Southern Americama wrote:Amazing noones criticised Mckinley yet. Things must be looking up.


Myself, I just kinda figured it would be pointless to criticize McKinley's portrait as that denomination note hasn't been printed since it was withdrawn from circulation 40 years ago.
Everything you know about me is wrong. Or a rumor. Something like that.

Not Ta'veren

User avatar
Charlotte Ryberg
The Muse of the Westcountry
 
Posts: 15007
Founded: Mar 14, 2007
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Charlotte Ryberg » Sat Sep 19, 2009 4:00 am

There isn't a $200 note, and if that was to be introduced I would suggest Martin Luther King. In my opinion banknotes don't always have to have presidents (EDIT: and founders).
Last edited by Charlotte Ryberg on Sat Sep 19, 2009 4:25 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
RoI3
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 456
Founded: Sep 09, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby RoI3 » Sat Sep 19, 2009 4:14 am

All of em, then I'd replace em with HRH
CI
"I actually believe that in some
Economic Left/Right: -5.00
parts of America people have
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.97
started mating with vegetables"
Add 3465 to post count from Jolt
- Jeremy Clarkson, future PM

User avatar
Al Barakesh
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 102
Founded: May 13, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Al Barakesh » Sat Sep 19, 2009 4:17 am

Replace 'em all with Nixon, mwuhahahahahahahahaahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

User avatar
Grays Harbor
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18566
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Grays Harbor » Sat Sep 19, 2009 4:17 am

Just for S&G, here's what the high denomination notes looked like before they were withdrawn. The $500, $1000, $5000 and $10000 Federal Reserve Notes were last produced in 1934 and withdrawn from circulation by Nixon and the $1000 & $100000 Gold Certificate were last produced in 1928 and 1934 respectively. Both were withdrawn in the late 30's by FDR and it wasn't until the 60's that collectors could own them again.

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Reserve_Note
Everything you know about me is wrong. Or a rumor. Something like that.

Not Ta'veren

User avatar
Grays Harbor
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18566
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Grays Harbor » Sat Sep 19, 2009 4:21 am

Charlotte Ryberg wrote:There isn't a $200 note, and if that was to be introduced I would suggest Martin Luther King. In my opinion banknotes don't always have to have presidents.


They aren't always presidents. Several notes have been issued that have others on them, many of which have already been talked about here, with examples such as the Chief Running Antelope $5 from 1899, and the current $10 with Alexander Hamilton and the $100 with Benjamin Franklin.

Sometimes reading the entire topic before responding is a good thing. :p
Everything you know about me is wrong. Or a rumor. Something like that.

Not Ta'veren

User avatar
Pope Joan
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19500
Founded: Mar 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Pope Joan » Sat Sep 19, 2009 4:22 am

Jackson is overrated as a "strong" president.

He was a rqacist bigot who did much to harm the nation.

Put Jefferson on the 20 instead; he actually made a positive contribution.
"Life is difficult".

-M. Scott Peck

User avatar
Charlotte Ryberg
The Muse of the Westcountry
 
Posts: 15007
Founded: Mar 14, 2007
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Charlotte Ryberg » Sat Sep 19, 2009 4:27 am

Grays Harbor wrote:
Charlotte Ryberg wrote:There isn't a $200 note, and if that was to be introduced I would suggest Martin Luther King. In my opinion banknotes don't always have to have presidents.


They aren't always presidents. Several notes have been issued that have others on them, many of which have already been talked about here, with examples such as the Chief Running Antelope $5 from 1899, and the current $10 with Alexander Hamilton and the $100 with Benjamin Franklin.

Sometimes reading the entire topic before responding is a good thing. :p

Yes, I was also thinking about the founders being on the notes but the banknote series seems to forget about modern-day everyday heroes like Luther-King.
Last edited by Charlotte Ryberg on Sat Sep 19, 2009 4:27 am, edited 1 time in total.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Angeloid Astraea, Hollow Rock, Ifreann, Immoren, Point Blob, Port Caverton, Riviere Renard

Advertisement

Remove ads