Advertisement
by Samatolian City-States » Thu Sep 17, 2009 5:13 pm
by Buffett and Colbert » Thu Sep 17, 2009 5:13 pm
by Seculartopia » Thu Sep 17, 2009 5:13 pm
by Tekania » Thu Sep 17, 2009 5:15 pm
The Romulan Republic wrote:Bill O'Reily may often be wrong, and he may often be a jackass, but this is not the first time he has shown himself to be slightly less mad and fanatical, at least, than his fellows like Sean Hannity, Rush Limbau, and Glen Beck.
Nice to have you on our side for a change, Bill.
by JuNii » Thu Sep 17, 2009 5:27 pm
by OMGeverynameistaken » Thu Sep 17, 2009 5:32 pm
by Tekania » Thu Sep 17, 2009 5:34 pm
JuNii wrote:it's a trap!
He's using reverse psychology... he knows people will automatically disagree with him, so by stating he supports the Public Option, he's getting everyone to think that the Public Option is bad!
by JuNii » Thu Sep 17, 2009 6:04 pm
Tekania wrote:JuNii wrote:it's a trap!
He's using reverse psychology... he knows people will automatically disagree with him, so by stating he supports the Public Option, he's getting everyone to think that the Public Option is bad!
Aha! So, what he's doing is hoping that by supporting it, his opposition will continue to oppose his view and oppose their own former position in support. BUT! What if we KNOW he is opposing it to make up think we should oppose it? Perhaps then we'll have to continue to oppose opposing it despite his support contrary to his opposing view... Because if we oppose it because he opposes it we oppose ourselves and his opposition wins with support... So, we'll oppose opposing his opposition to opposing it... :nods:
by Northern Delmarva » Thu Sep 17, 2009 6:20 pm
JuNii wrote:Tekania wrote:JuNii wrote:it's a trap!
He's using reverse psychology... he knows people will automatically disagree with him, so by stating he supports the Public Option, he's getting everyone to think that the Public Option is bad!
Aha! So, what he's doing is hoping that by supporting it, his opposition will continue to oppose his view and oppose their own former position in support. BUT! What if we KNOW he is opposing it to make up think we should oppose it? Perhaps then we'll have to continue to oppose opposing it despite his support contrary to his opposing view... Because if we oppose it because he opposes it we oppose ourselves and his opposition wins with support... So, we'll oppose opposing his opposition to opposing it... :nods:
*tries to think of wittier response.*
I got...
by JuNii » Thu Sep 17, 2009 6:40 pm
Northern Delmarva wrote:JuNii wrote:Tekania wrote:JuNii wrote:it's a trap!
He's using reverse psychology... he knows people will automatically disagree with him, so by stating he supports the Public Option, he's getting everyone to think that the Public Option is bad!
Aha! So, what he's doing is hoping that by supporting it, his opposition will continue to oppose his view and oppose their own former position in support. BUT! What if we KNOW he is opposing it to make up think we should oppose it? Perhaps then we'll have to continue to oppose opposing it despite his support contrary to his opposing view... Because if we oppose it because he opposes it we oppose ourselves and his opposition wins with support... So, we'll oppose opposing his opposition to opposing it... :nods:
*tries to think of wittier response.*
I got...
You sir, have stolen my .gif!
Pistols at dawn, or you declare yourself a coward.
by Brandesax » Thu Sep 17, 2009 6:56 pm
by Barringtonia » Thu Sep 17, 2009 6:57 pm
Tekania wrote:The Romulan Republic wrote:Bill O'Reily may often be wrong, and he may often be a jackass, but this is not the first time he has shown himself to be slightly less mad and fanatical, at least, than his fellows like Sean Hannity, Rush Limbau, and Glen Beck.
Nice to have you on our side for a change, Bill.
Yep, it's not so much that O'Reily has moved left... It's just they've added people further right of him... So relatively he looks like he's more to the left now... :nods:
by Wilgrove » Thu Sep 17, 2009 6:59 pm
Barringtonia wrote:I've had long debates on this subject, I truly think he's mellowed somewhat,
He's still a little bat-shit on immigration but in terms of overall temper tantrums he's genuinely far better than he was a year ago,
I suspect he's on some sort of medication but others have argued that his interview with John Stewart was a slight turning point,
by Barringtonia » Thu Sep 17, 2009 7:04 pm
Wilgrove wrote:Barringtonia wrote:I've had long debates on this subject, I truly think he's mellowed somewhat,
He's still a little bat-shit on immigration but in terms of overall temper tantrums he's genuinely far better than he was a year ago,
I suspect he's on some sort of medication but others have argued that his interview with John Stewart was a slight turning point,
Didn't he admit on the Colbert Report that his show is just entertainment?
by Port Arcana » Thu Sep 17, 2009 8:10 pm
by Molested Sock » Thu Sep 17, 2009 8:15 pm
Maurepas wrote:I applaud Bill-O for seeing the truth for a change,
by Takaram » Thu Sep 17, 2009 8:16 pm
Tunizcha wrote:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/17/bill-oreilly-backs-public_n_290658.html
My jaw was wide open for a few minutes when I saw this on the front page of HuffPo.HuffPo wrote:Bombastic Fox News host Bill O'Reilly made a rather notable policy pronouncement on Wednesday's show: he supports the creation of a government-managed health care plan if it provides working Americans with an affordable option to other private insurance plans.
by The Ethereal Crescent » Thu Sep 17, 2009 8:18 pm
Tanaara wrote:What is broken can be remade, but it has to desire that remaking, and accept the fact that is not, and never can be what it was, must accept that what it becomes while different can be just as fine, just as good as what it was.
Users browsing this forum: Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States, Haganham, Hwiteard, Lysset, Necroghastia, Of Memers, Page, Senscaria, Techocracy101010, The Holy Therns, Torisakia, Wizlandia
