NATION

PASSWORD

US drops plans to build missile defence system in Poland

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Taeshan
Senator
 
Posts: 4877
Founded: Aug 11, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Taeshan » Thu Sep 17, 2009 2:35 pm

They will just try to build it somewhere else eventaully.
Champions - Copa Rushmori 22, Cup of Harmony 35, Di Bradini Cup 19, World Baseball Classic 13, Gridiron World Championships (World Bowl 0), World Bowl 34, World Lacrosse Championship 2

World Cup Qualifications-41, 44, 46, 59, 61(RoS), 62(Quarterfinals), 63 (RoS), 64 (Quarterfinals), 83, 84 (RoS), 85, 87

Hosts-Cup of Harmony 55, Copa Rushmori 14, Sporting World Cup 10,
Quidditch World Cup 10, World Cup of Hockey 41, World Cup 87

User avatar
Rhodmhire
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17421
Founded: Jun 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Rhodmhire » Thu Sep 17, 2009 2:39 pm

Maurepas wrote:
Thethunderdome wrote:From April. So in the past 4 months have we eliminated the Iranian threat?

Iran was a threat to the United States?


Surprised me too.
Part of me grew up here. But part of growing up is leaving parts of ourselves behind.

User avatar
Taeshan
Senator
 
Posts: 4877
Founded: Aug 11, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Taeshan » Thu Sep 17, 2009 2:41 pm

Rhodmhire wrote:
Maurepas wrote:
Thethunderdome wrote:From April. So in the past 4 months have we eliminated the Iranian threat?

Iran was a threat to the United States?


Surprised me too.


I'm somewhat shocked by this statment.
Champions - Copa Rushmori 22, Cup of Harmony 35, Di Bradini Cup 19, World Baseball Classic 13, Gridiron World Championships (World Bowl 0), World Bowl 34, World Lacrosse Championship 2

World Cup Qualifications-41, 44, 46, 59, 61(RoS), 62(Quarterfinals), 63 (RoS), 64 (Quarterfinals), 83, 84 (RoS), 85, 87

Hosts-Cup of Harmony 55, Copa Rushmori 14, Sporting World Cup 10,
Quidditch World Cup 10, World Cup of Hockey 41, World Cup 87

User avatar
The Bicycle
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 60
Founded: Sep 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Bicycle » Thu Sep 17, 2009 2:42 pm

Well, it doesn't matter if Iran is a threat or not, but that's the region an ABM in Central Europe would be able to protect against. Not Russia...

User avatar
Rhodmhire
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17421
Founded: Jun 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Rhodmhire » Thu Sep 17, 2009 2:43 pm

Taeshan wrote:
Rhodmhire wrote:
Maurepas wrote:
Thethunderdome wrote:From April. So in the past 4 months have we eliminated the Iranian threat?

Iran was a threat to the United States?


Surprised me too.


I'm somewhat shocked by this statment.


Why so?
Part of me grew up here. But part of growing up is leaving parts of ourselves behind.

User avatar
Taeshan
Senator
 
Posts: 4877
Founded: Aug 11, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Taeshan » Thu Sep 17, 2009 2:44 pm

Rhodmhire wrote:
Taeshan wrote:
Rhodmhire wrote:
Maurepas wrote:
Thethunderdome wrote:From April. So in the past 4 months have we eliminated the Iranian threat?

Iran was a threat to the United States?


Surprised me too.


I'm somewhat shocked by this statment.


Why so?


This statement was shockingly shocking, because in itself it was shocking.
Champions - Copa Rushmori 22, Cup of Harmony 35, Di Bradini Cup 19, World Baseball Classic 13, Gridiron World Championships (World Bowl 0), World Bowl 34, World Lacrosse Championship 2

World Cup Qualifications-41, 44, 46, 59, 61(RoS), 62(Quarterfinals), 63 (RoS), 64 (Quarterfinals), 83, 84 (RoS), 85, 87

Hosts-Cup of Harmony 55, Copa Rushmori 14, Sporting World Cup 10,
Quidditch World Cup 10, World Cup of Hockey 41, World Cup 87

User avatar
Rhodmhire
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17421
Founded: Jun 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Rhodmhire » Thu Sep 17, 2009 2:45 pm

Taeshan wrote:
Rhodmhire wrote:
Taeshan wrote:
Rhodmhire wrote:
Maurepas wrote:
Thethunderdome wrote:From April. So in the past 4 months have we eliminated the Iranian threat?

Iran was a threat to the United States?


Surprised me too.


I'm somewhat shocked by this statment.


Why so?


This statement was shockingly shocking, because in itself it was shocking.


That's, very...nice. I, agree?

I'm sorry, I have no idea what's going on.
Part of me grew up here. But part of growing up is leaving parts of ourselves behind.

User avatar
Metz-Lorraine
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 46
Founded: Feb 22, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Metz-Lorraine » Thu Sep 17, 2009 2:55 pm

You would think Obama would try and keep the good things and NOT try and ruin EVERYTHING :palm:

The missile defense wasn't supposed to stop the missiles from hitting the US but from hitting Europe. Us already has Canada :clap:

This was actually a good idea and a good way to stop any nukes from other countries including both Iran and Russia from getting to Europe. I have to say this to Obama "You God Damn Idiot..." :palm:

And he doesn't have the balls to get the Russians to make concessions. He probably just likes playing nice guy and hope everyone loves each other and make the world 70s America :p

User avatar
Exilia and Colonies
Diplomat
 
Posts: 626
Founded: Dec 09, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Exilia and Colonies » Thu Sep 17, 2009 2:57 pm

Metz-Lorraine wrote:You would think Obama would try and keep the good things and NOT try and ruin EVERYTHING :palm:

The missile defense wasn't supposed to stop the missiles from hitting the US but from hitting Europe. Us already has Canada :clap:

This was actually a good idea and a good way to stop any nukes from other countries including both Iran and Russia from getting to Europe. I have to say this to Obama "You God Damn Idiot..." :palm:

And he doesn't have the balls to get the Russians to make concessions. He probably just likes playing nice guy and hope everyone loves each other and make the world 70s America :p


Russia doesn't really need to nuke Europe nor is it sensible for them to do so, living right next door to Europe. A Russian Tank shield would have been far more useful.
VEGAN IS SYMBOLIC OPPRESSION! STOP THE MURDER OF PLANTS! GO SUNLIGHT DIET!

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:01 pm

Exilia and Colonies wrote:
Russia doesn't really need to nuke Europe nor is it sensible for them to do so, living right next door to Europe. A Russian Tank shield would have been far more useful.

Image

:blink:

User avatar
Unchecked Expansion
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5599
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Unchecked Expansion » Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:02 pm

Metz-Lorraine wrote:You would think Obama would try and keep the good things and NOT try and ruin EVERYTHING :palm:

The missile defense wasn't supposed to stop the missiles from hitting the US but from hitting Europe. Us already has Canada :clap:

This was actually a good idea and a good way to stop any nukes from other countries including both Iran and Russia from getting to Europe. I have to say this to Obama "You God Damn Idiot..." :palm:

And he doesn't have the balls to get the Russians to make concessions. He probably just likes playing nice guy and hope everyone loves each other and make the world 70s America :p

This isn't the cold war anymore, so there isn;t really an imminent nuclear threat. Anyway Russia would be foolish to nuke its neighbours, the areas that in the case of a war it would want to invade and reap the benefits of a fertile contient.
It bears repeating, we aren't in a cold war anymore, theres no need to adopt an Us vs Them mentality. It only makes things worse. Diplomacy is greatly pefferable

User avatar
Regios
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 15
Founded: Sep 16, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Regios » Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:04 pm

Im not really concerned about ICBM from Russia. I live in a tiny country in southern Europe, i dont think Russia's ICBM can target something this small. ;) Damm, if they do targets us, they would kill us all in one strike. Oh boy, im starting to get scared. :(

Another thing i just remembered. NATO. Many European country are in NATO. If Russia attacks Poland, the U.S.A will be forced to step in. Damm again, my country is part of NATO.

If things get any worse i think i'll move to Zimbabwe. :?
Last edited by Regios on Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Currently rulled by Benevolent Emperor Uriel Kasim.


98% of all internet users would cry if facebook broke down. If you are the 2% who would sit back and laugh, copy and paste this into your sig.

User avatar
Lackadaisical2
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 50831
Founded: Mar 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Lackadaisical2 » Thu Sep 17, 2009 4:09 pm

Unchecked Expansion wrote:
Metz-Lorraine wrote:You would think Obama would try and keep the good things and NOT try and ruin EVERYTHING :palm:

The missile defense wasn't supposed to stop the missiles from hitting the US but from hitting Europe. Us already has Canada :clap:

This was actually a good idea and a good way to stop any nukes from other countries including both Iran and Russia from getting to Europe. I have to say this to Obama "You God Damn Idiot..." :palm:

And he doesn't have the balls to get the Russians to make concessions. He probably just likes playing nice guy and hope everyone loves each other and make the world 70s America :p

This isn't the cold war anymore, so there isn;t really an imminent nuclear threat. Anyway Russia would be foolish to nuke its neighbours, the areas that in the case of a war it would want to invade and reap the benefits of a fertile contient.
It bears repeating, we aren't in a cold war anymore, theres no need to adopt an Us vs Them mentality. It only makes things worse. Diplomacy is greatly pefferable


Thats the thing I don't get though, why was Russia so miffed about the missile defense shield? It doesn't seem that it could have possibly have intercepted Russian ICBM's. Diplomacy is fine, but giving up on something that has a tangible benefit to one party and doesn't do anything bad to another seems a bit weird. The only thing I can think of is that they were pissed we were playing in their old sandbox. Poland is in NATO anyway isn't it?
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.

User avatar
United Russian State
Minister
 
Posts: 2897
Founded: Jul 03, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby United Russian State » Thu Sep 17, 2009 4:24 pm

I am not sure why the goverment has been so against the missile sheild. To me it looks as if it never posed a threat. It's not like shooting down a few dozen missiles would save NATO when there are thousands to be fired on NATO. Maybe I am missing the bigger picture though.

In the end this will more than likely do little to ease tensions between the west. The missile sheild was never the real spark of new growing tensions, which Obama has done nothing to ease. It is a step though.

Maybe Obama is trying to do something good for America and cut speding on the military to due so, this being on of the cuts. Or he will use this to see "Look I fixed realtions with Russia", Americans will delcare him a hero, when he did little.

The real winners and ones to gain from this is Poland and Czech Republic, they won't be a target for WMDs. Most never did support the missile sheild in their country anyway.
Defcon: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
State of War: Chernobyl-Pripyat
Establish Embassy in URS
URS Economy Information
Join Pan-Slavic Union State!
My long term plan is to contribute to globally warming as much as possible so my grandchildren can live in a world that is a few degrees warmer and where there is new coast land being created every day.- The Scandinvans

The U.S. did not controle the corrupt regiems it set up against the Soviet Union, it just sugested things and changed leaders if they weer not takeing enough sugestions-Omnicracy

NO ONE is poor and suffering in the US- they're pretending that while rollicking in welfare money-Pythria

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Thu Sep 17, 2009 4:29 pm

United Russian State wrote:It's not like shooting down a few dozen missiles would save NATO when there are thousands to be fired on NATO.

We love you too, ;)

User avatar
United Russian State
Minister
 
Posts: 2897
Founded: Jul 03, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby United Russian State » Thu Sep 17, 2009 4:31 pm

Maurepas wrote:
United Russian State wrote:It's not like shooting down a few dozen missiles would save NATO when there are thousands to be fired on NATO.

We love you too, ;)


I was just making a point on how I see any missile sheild proves of no threat. Take it anyway you wish though. :lol:
Defcon: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
State of War: Chernobyl-Pripyat
Establish Embassy in URS
URS Economy Information
Join Pan-Slavic Union State!
My long term plan is to contribute to globally warming as much as possible so my grandchildren can live in a world that is a few degrees warmer and where there is new coast land being created every day.- The Scandinvans

The U.S. did not controle the corrupt regiems it set up against the Soviet Union, it just sugested things and changed leaders if they weer not takeing enough sugestions-Omnicracy

NO ONE is poor and suffering in the US- they're pretending that while rollicking in welfare money-Pythria

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Thu Sep 17, 2009 4:34 pm

United Russian State wrote:
Maurepas wrote:
United Russian State wrote:It's not like shooting down a few dozen missiles would save NATO when there are thousands to be fired on NATO.

We love you too, ;)


I was just making a point on how I see any missile sheild proves of no threat. Take it anyway you wish though. :lol:

I figured, but I never miss an opportunity for smart assery, :lol2:

User avatar
Unchecked Expansion
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5599
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Unchecked Expansion » Thu Sep 17, 2009 4:47 pm

Lackadaisical2 wrote:
Unchecked Expansion wrote:
Metz-Lorraine wrote:You would think Obama would try and keep the good things and NOT try and ruin EVERYTHING :palm:

The missile defense wasn't supposed to stop the missiles from hitting the US but from hitting Europe. Us already has Canada :clap:

This was actually a good idea and a good way to stop any nukes from other countries including both Iran and Russia from getting to Europe. I have to say this to Obama "You God Damn Idiot..." :palm:

And he doesn't have the balls to get the Russians to make concessions. He probably just likes playing nice guy and hope everyone loves each other and make the world 70s America :p

This isn't the cold war anymore, so there isn;t really an imminent nuclear threat. Anyway Russia would be foolish to nuke its neighbours, the areas that in the case of a war it would want to invade and reap the benefits of a fertile contient.
It bears repeating, we aren't in a cold war anymore, theres no need to adopt an Us vs Them mentality. It only makes things worse. Diplomacy is greatly pefferable


Thats the thing I don't get though, why was Russia so miffed about the missile defense shield? It doesn't seem that it could have possibly have intercepted Russian ICBM's. Diplomacy is fine, but giving up on something that has a tangible benefit to one party and doesn't do anything bad to another seems a bit weird. The only thing I can think of is that they were pissed we were playing in their old sandbox. Poland is in NATO anyway isn't it?

In the past, American presence in Europe was, from the Soviet perspective, threatening, especially as they had no comparable positioning near the US. America positioning a significant defence system on their border seems to show a level of mistrust in them even now, regardles of the effectiveness of the system.
Is it an aggressive act to start defending before a war is imminent? It just seems antagonistic in the current climate - there is no reason to strain relations with Russia

User avatar
JarVik
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1554
Founded: Jun 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby JarVik » Thu Sep 17, 2009 4:50 pm

I wonder if the real reason it's being dropped is the US govt can't afford it right now? Might aswell try and get something from Russia anyways though and just not mention its cause their broke and need desperatly find some projects to axe.
I like pancakes!
In search of SpellCheck
Swims with Leaches!

User avatar
United Russian State
Minister
 
Posts: 2897
Founded: Jul 03, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby United Russian State » Thu Sep 17, 2009 4:54 pm

there is no reason to strain relations with Russia


Ah, but it is too late. The missile sheild does nothing in my veiw to undue the damage done. Maybe Obama is trying to take the first steps to imporve realtions besides this, but is seems unlikey looking at his statements and actions. I have a feeling this more of an action he can try and gain domesticly, but it will do little eles outside of Amercia. I do look forward to my friends opion on this later today though.
Last edited by United Russian State on Thu Sep 17, 2009 4:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Defcon: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
State of War: Chernobyl-Pripyat
Establish Embassy in URS
URS Economy Information
Join Pan-Slavic Union State!
My long term plan is to contribute to globally warming as much as possible so my grandchildren can live in a world that is a few degrees warmer and where there is new coast land being created every day.- The Scandinvans

The U.S. did not controle the corrupt regiems it set up against the Soviet Union, it just sugested things and changed leaders if they weer not takeing enough sugestions-Omnicracy

NO ONE is poor and suffering in the US- they're pretending that while rollicking in welfare money-Pythria

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Thu Sep 17, 2009 4:59 pm

United Russian State wrote:
there is no reason to strain relations with Russia


Ah, but it is too late. The missile sheild does nothing in my veiw to undue the damage done. Maybe Obama is trying to take the first steps to imporve realtions besides this, but is seems unlikey looking at his statements and actions. I have a feeling this more of an action he can try and gain domesticly, but it will do little eles outside of Amercia. I do look forward to my friends opion on this later today though.

Really though, other than Georgia, what would repair it?

User avatar
New Mitanni
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1239
Founded: Jan 22, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby New Mitanni » Thu Sep 17, 2009 7:23 pm

Why is anyone surprised by this? An inexperienced, incompetent clown betrays the trust of important allies in Eastern Europe, boosts Putin and his neo-Soviet gang, and once again displays weakness worthy of The Worthless One (Jimmy Carter). And it's not like we weren't warned. He said he'd do as much before the irresponsible 52% put him in charge of this nation's security.

And the best thing about it is, he did it on the 70th anniversary of the Soviet invasion of Poland!

Good job, Barack Hussein CHAMBERLAIN! :palm:
November 2, 2010: Judgment Day. The 2010 anthem: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xgNFNTi46R4

You can't spell "liberal" without the L, the I and the E.

Smash Socialism Now!

User avatar
Kyronea
Diplomat
 
Posts: 626
Founded: Feb 26, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Kyronea » Thu Sep 17, 2009 8:12 pm

So, how many of you people missed the fact that he's not scrapping the idea of missile defense against Iran entirely, but simply the system that was being put into place by President Bush, a system which protects against longer range missiles than the Iranians have?

The missile defense against Iran will still take place, but in a different location, with different missiles, both sea and land based.

User avatar
Meridistan
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 145
Founded: Aug 19, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Meridistan » Thu Sep 17, 2009 8:49 pm

Regios wrote:Im not really concerned about ICBM from Russia. I live in a tiny country in southern Europe, i dont think Russia's ICBM can target something this small. ;) Damm, if they do targets us, they would kill us all in one strike. Oh boy, im starting to get scared. :(

Another thing i just remembered. NATO. Many European country are in NATO. If Russia attacks Poland, the U.S.A will be forced to step in. Damm again, my country is part of NATO.

If things get any worse i think i'll move to Zimbabwe. :?


Quem atacará Portugal? Mesmo se nós estamos na NATO? Que vocês querem, bacalhau? Porque eu quero bacalhau . . . Não pode comprar bacalhau aqui.

Seriously though, I must ask, was this missile shield really going to do anything of significance? I mean, besides the effect of a US Military installation boosting the local economies. Because if this was basically going to turn into a waste of resource then it needed to end.

United Russian State wrote:I am not sure why the goverment has been so against the missile sheild. To me it looks as if it never posed a threat. It's not like shooting down a few dozen missiles would save NATO when there are thousands to be fired on NATO. Maybe I am missing the bigger picture though.

In the end this will more than likely do little to ease tensions between the west. The missile sheild was never the real spark of new growing tensions, which Obama has done nothing to ease. It is a step though.

Maybe Obama is trying to do something good for America and cut speding on the military to due so, this being on of the cuts. Or he will use this to see "Look I fixed realtions with Russia", Americans will delcare him a hero, when he did little.

The real winners and ones to gain from this is Poland and Czech Republic, they won't be a target for WMDs. Most never did support the missile sheild in their country anyway.


If you don't mind me asking, from your experience, how do most Russians feel about this whole thing? Because the impression I had was that it was causing trouble and making Russians uncomfortable, but your post suggests that nobody really gave a shit in the first place.

User avatar
Delator
Minister
 
Posts: 2223
Founded: Nov 29, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Delator » Fri Sep 18, 2009 12:41 am

Very good...I'm tired of the US subsidising Europe's defense. They've got money, if they want missile defense against Iran so badly (as we all know the scrapped system was of absolutely no value against Russia), they can pay for it themselves.

If Iran does complete a nuke, I very much doubt they'll try to deliver it via missile anyways. It's far more likely to reach it's target via covert means.

I'm hopeful that this will mean good things for the upcoming arms reduction talks. Maybe even convince the Russians to put a little more pressure on Iran.

...and as usual, New Mitanni demonstrates a total lack of understanding of Realpolitik.
Those that seek to place heel upon the throat of Liberty will fall to the cry of Freedom!

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States, Haganham, Hwiteard, Necroghastia, Of Memers, Page, Senscaria, Techocracy101010, The Holy Therns, Torisakia, Wizlandia

Advertisement

Remove ads