NATION

PASSWORD

Women Serving in the Armed Forces?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Tubbsalot
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9196
Founded: Oct 17, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Tubbsalot » Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:58 pm

If they satisfy the requirements, they deserve a place.
"Twats love flags." - Yootopia

User avatar
Shofercia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31342
Founded: Feb 22, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Shofercia » Sat Mar 03, 2012 9:00 pm

Valkmar wrote:Women Serving in the Armed Forces? Do you think women should serve in the armed forces? I personally think not, they are generally weak and would just get raped by enemy troops.


I think they should be allowed to serve.

Image
Come, learn about Russian Culture! Bring Vodka and Ushanka. Interested in Slavic Culture? Fill this out.
Stonk Power! (North) Kosovo is (a de facto part of) Serbia and Crimea is (a de facto part of) Russia
I used pronouns until the mods made using wrong pronouns warnable, so I use names instead; if you see malice there, that's entirely on you, and if pronouns are no longer warnable, I'll go back to using them

User avatar
Forsher
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22041
Founded: Jan 30, 2012
New York Times Democracy

Postby Forsher » Sat Mar 03, 2012 9:02 pm

Valkmar wrote:Women Serving in the Armed Forces? Do you think women should serve in the armed forces? I personally think not, they are generally weak and would just get raped by enemy troops.


Well, who doesn't want to join an armed construction team?
That it Could be What it Is, Is What it Is

Stop making shit up, though. Links, or it's a God-damn lie and you know it.

The normie life is heteronormie

We won't know until 2053 when it'll be really obvious what he should've done. [...] We have no option but to guess.

User avatar
Cannot think of a name
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45100
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Cannot think of a name » Sat Mar 03, 2012 9:02 pm

Better them than me.


-or-

I have a few lady friends who are tri-athletes. I am a pasty fuck. It would be ridiculous beyond belief to determine that I would be better suited for a combat role then they are because I have a wang. Those ladies could kick my ass without breaking a sweat.
"...I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." -MLK Jr.

User avatar
Shofercia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31342
Founded: Feb 22, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Shofercia » Sat Mar 03, 2012 9:05 pm

Lackadaisical2 wrote:I don't mind the idea, better than getting drafted, although more and more, that seems like it'd be a fun adventure (as naive as I know that sounds).


Want a "fun" adventure? Gear up, and head to the middle of the Mojave Desert. Let me know when you're having fun ;)

Or pick up a book, Killing Time in Iraq - by Colby Buzzel. Read it. Combat's rarely fun. Training, preparation and anticipation ain't supposed to be fun, period.
Come, learn about Russian Culture! Bring Vodka and Ushanka. Interested in Slavic Culture? Fill this out.
Stonk Power! (North) Kosovo is (a de facto part of) Serbia and Crimea is (a de facto part of) Russia
I used pronouns until the mods made using wrong pronouns warnable, so I use names instead; if you see malice there, that's entirely on you, and if pronouns are no longer warnable, I'll go back to using them

User avatar
Serlingua
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 3
Founded: Feb 29, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Serlingua » Sat Mar 03, 2012 9:54 pm

If a woman wants to fight, let her, by all means. Women can be easily as strong as men. In fact I think the whole notion that women shouldn't be hit is sort of overrated, given that it underplays the strength a woman can achieve. Of course women should be allowed to fight, in our armed forces or in any society! All humans are equally capable of exchanging death, with the proper tools.

If I had an army, I would try to keep a gender balance and encourage sex among the fighters... Sex has a marvelous effect on morale, you know. Another good advantage of a unisex army. I would absolutely tolerate homosexuals, too. Whoever can fight.

User avatar
Individual Impersonators
Diplomat
 
Posts: 642
Founded: Jan 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Individual Impersonators » Sun Mar 04, 2012 12:00 am

Why remove half of a potential fighting force?
Let the physical and psychological tests determine the role and not gender.

User avatar
Hoyteca
Diplomat
 
Posts: 680
Founded: Jan 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Hoyteca » Sun Mar 04, 2012 12:56 am

Women should be able to serve. The biggest thing, imo, keeping more women from wanting to join is the notion that physical strength and aggressiveness are manly. How many women want to be manly? It's like a man trying to be more womanlike. Take out the social conditioning and the idea that "masculinity" and "femininity" can't exist in the same person and the military won't be such a sausagefest.

User avatar
Alien Space Bats
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10073
Founded: Sep 28, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Women Serving in the Armed Forces?

Postby Alien Space Bats » Sun Mar 04, 2012 1:18 am

James Cameron had it right: Women can be deadly when provoked.

Or, as the old saying goes:

Image

Don't mess with Mama Bear.
"These states are just saying 'Yes, I used to beat my girlfriend, but I haven't since the restraining order, so we don't need it anymore.'" — Stephen Colbert, Comedian, on Shelby County v. Holder

"Do you see how policing blacks by the presumption of guilt and policing whites by the presumption of innocence is a self-reinforcing mechanism?" — Touré Neblett, MSNBC Commentator and Social Critic

"You knew damn well I was a snake before you took me in."Songwriter Oscar Brown in 1963, foretelling the election of Donald J. Trump

President Donald J. Trump: Working Tirelessly to Make Russia Great Again

User avatar
Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9191
Founded: Jan 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f » Sun Mar 04, 2012 3:00 am

Alien Space Bats wrote:
Valkmar wrote:Women Serving in the Armed Forces? Do you think women should serve in the armed forces? I personally think not, they are generally weak and would just get raped by enemy troops.

The question is not whether women ought to have the right to die in war. They already can and do die in war.

The question is whether women ought to have the right to fire back.


First UK female soldier to kill...and ironically she was a medic...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/ ... fight.html
PLEASE DO NOT SEND ME TG's. MODERATORS READ YOUR TG's WITHOUT YOUR PERMISSION.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tommy_Flowers Call me Rubi for short or Vonners

User avatar
Free foundation
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 185
Founded: Aug 08, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Free foundation » Sun Mar 04, 2012 3:05 am

Oceanic people wrote:In the Republic they are expected to serve in the same manner and proportion as men! They benefit equally from their citizenship and are expected to serve equally for it. Any other point of view is morally and ethically corrupt promoting inequity between the sexes and outdated stereotypes.

this

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55272
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Sun Mar 04, 2012 3:25 am

Valkmar wrote:Women Serving in the Armed Forces? Do you think women should serve in the armed forces? I personally think not, they are generally weak

You don't enlist the "generic" woman just as you don't enlist the "generic" man. You screen EVERY SINGLE candidate for physical and mental fitness.
I'd guess that a female triathlete would qualify for the Army better than a male wimpy nerd.

and would just get raped by enemy troops.

Because men don't get raped. Oh no. :palm:
Last edited by Risottia on Sun Mar 04, 2012 3:27 am, edited 2 times in total.
.

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55272
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Sun Mar 04, 2012 3:28 am

Fluffy Coyotes wrote:Don't men and women serve in separate units?


Dunno in your country, but in Italy that's not the case.
.

User avatar
The Alma Mater
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25619
Founded: May 23, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby The Alma Mater » Sun Mar 04, 2012 3:47 am

Alien Space Bats wrote:The question is not whether women ought to have the right to die in war. They already can and do die in war.

The question is whether women ought to have the right to fire back.


This. If a woman wants to defend her friends, family and fellow citizens... why on earth should one tell her "no - go back to the kitchen while the enemy kills your offspring" ?
Getting an education was a bit like a communicable sexual disease.
It made you unsuitable for a lot of jobs and then you had the urge to pass it on.
- Terry Pratchett, Hogfather

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 112546
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Sun Mar 04, 2012 8:04 am

Valkmar wrote:Women Serving in the Armed Forces? Do you think women should serve in the armed forces? I personally think not, they are generally weak and would just get raped by enemy troops.

Besides being a troll, you're a coward as well. Not even one post after the OP. Typical.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Sun Mar 04, 2012 8:05 am

Farnhamia wrote:
Valkmar wrote:Women Serving in the Armed Forces? Do you think women should serve in the armed forces? I personally think not, they are generally weak and would just get raped by enemy troops.

Besides being a troll, you're a coward as well. Not even one post after the OP. Typical.


Not very successfull of a troll, since he didn't get the whole rage going.

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 112546
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Sun Mar 04, 2012 8:07 am

Samuraikoku wrote:
Farnhamia wrote:Besides being a troll, you're a coward as well. Not even one post after the OP. Typical.


Not very successfull of a troll, since he didn't get the whole rage going.

Except against him.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Sun Mar 04, 2012 8:08 am

Farnhamia wrote:
Samuraikoku wrote:
Not very successfull of a troll, since he didn't get the whole rage going.

Except against him.


Judging by the posts of the previous page... I think he was ignored.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163905
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Sun Mar 04, 2012 8:09 am

Delanshar wrote:Yes, but they should be assigned to different roles.
Frontline infantry should be male, but females could do other things like fly warplanes, Military Police or serve on naval vessels.

Do explain why.


The Alma Mater wrote:
Alien Space Bats wrote:The question is not whether women ought to have the right to die in war. They already can and do die in war.

The question is whether women ought to have the right to fire back.


This. If a woman wants to defend her friends, family and fellow citizens... why on earth should one tell her "no - go back to the kitchen while the enemy kills your offspring" ?

As a test. If she respond by punching you in the face, she moves on to the next stage of screening.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
SaintB
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21792
Founded: Apr 18, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby SaintB » Sun Mar 04, 2012 8:10 am

Women should serve in whatever job they want in any field as long as they can qualify for it, just like any man. Anyone who thinks otherwise should go to Saudi Arabia where they can be happier.
Hi my name is SaintB and I am prone to sarcasm and hyperbole. Because of this I make no warranties, express or implied, concerning the accuracy, completeness, reliability or suitability of the above statement, of its constituent parts, or of any supporting data. These terms are subject to change without notice from myself.

Every day NationStates tells me I have one issue. I am pretty sure I've got more than that.

User avatar
SaintB
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21792
Founded: Apr 18, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby SaintB » Sun Mar 04, 2012 8:11 am

Ifreann wrote:
Delanshar wrote:Yes, but they should be assigned to different roles.
Frontline infantry should be male, but females could do other things like fly warplanes, Military Police or serve on naval vessels.

Do explain why.


*Insert generic false statement that makes men and women both look bad here*
Hi my name is SaintB and I am prone to sarcasm and hyperbole. Because of this I make no warranties, express or implied, concerning the accuracy, completeness, reliability or suitability of the above statement, of its constituent parts, or of any supporting data. These terms are subject to change without notice from myself.

Every day NationStates tells me I have one issue. I am pretty sure I've got more than that.

User avatar
St Joanne
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 199
Founded: Mar 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby St Joanne » Sun Mar 04, 2012 8:12 am

While I do agree that men are indeed (generally, there are many exceptions) born with a naturally robust physique in comparison to women, that doesnt cut off a womans right to join.
There are many men that are fat lards flopping around that arent fit to join the army, so what does that tell you?
My standards would be "If you can take a recoil, shoot a gun, and not whine, your in", a broken down rule that should apply to all.
“The difference between a neurotic, a psychotic, and a psychiatrist. The neurotic builds castles in the sky, the psychotic lives in them and the psychiatrist collects the rent.”
Anonymous
Economic-Left/Right: -4.62
Social-Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.92

User avatar
Four-sided Triangles
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5537
Founded: Aug 15, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Four-sided Triangles » Sun Mar 04, 2012 9:45 am

This is hard for me. But, I suppose I can't stop them from doing what they want, if they really want to.
This is why gay marriage will destroy American families.
Gays are made up of gaytrinos and they interact via faggons, which are massless spin 2 particles. They're massless because gays care so much about their weight, and have spin 2, cause that's as much spin as particles can get, and liberals love spin. The exchange of spin 2 particles creates an attractive force between objects, which is why gays are so promiscuous. When gays get "settle down" into a lower energy state by marrying, they release faggon particles in the form of gaydiation. Everyone is a little bit gay, so every human body has some gaytrinos in it, meaning that the gaydiation could cause straight people to be attracted to gays and choose to turn gay.

User avatar
St Joanne
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 199
Founded: Mar 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby St Joanne » Sun Mar 04, 2012 9:47 am

Four-sided Triangles wrote:This is hard for me. But, I suppose I can't stop them from doing what they want, if they really want to.

I fail to see why its hard, would you mind explaining?
“The difference between a neurotic, a psychotic, and a psychiatrist. The neurotic builds castles in the sky, the psychotic lives in them and the psychiatrist collects the rent.”
Anonymous
Economic-Left/Right: -4.62
Social-Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.92

User avatar
Four-sided Triangles
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5537
Founded: Aug 15, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Four-sided Triangles » Sun Mar 04, 2012 9:49 am

St Joanne wrote:I fail to see why its hard, would you mind explaining?


Because I feel that women's lives are more important than men's.
This is why gay marriage will destroy American families.
Gays are made up of gaytrinos and they interact via faggons, which are massless spin 2 particles. They're massless because gays care so much about their weight, and have spin 2, cause that's as much spin as particles can get, and liberals love spin. The exchange of spin 2 particles creates an attractive force between objects, which is why gays are so promiscuous. When gays get "settle down" into a lower energy state by marrying, they release faggon particles in the form of gaydiation. Everyone is a little bit gay, so every human body has some gaytrinos in it, meaning that the gaydiation could cause straight people to be attracted to gays and choose to turn gay.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Bovad, Cyptopir, Fartsniffage, Ifreann, Keltionialang, Speranzist, Statesburg, Stellar Colonies, Terra Magnifica Gloria, The Kharkivan Cossacks, Valyxias, Zurkerx

Advertisement

Remove ads