NATION

PASSWORD

The Most Hideous Betrayer

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

The most hideous betrayer

Poll ended at Tue Mar 06, 2012 5:26 pm

Judah Iscariot
11
17%
Marcus Junius Brutus
13
21%
Julius Rosenberg
3
5%
Kim Philby
0
No votes
Somebody else
36
57%
 
Total votes : 63

User avatar
New Sapienta
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9298
Founded: Sep 28, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New Sapienta » Sat Mar 03, 2012 7:42 pm

Jerusalem and Damascus wrote:
New Sapienta wrote:Not to mentions the "Republic" was corrupt as hell.


Not to mention, it is undetermined whether or not Caesar would return power. So they may have killed an innocent man.


Considering the Roman people got a lot nicer than the general subhuman cruelty common to the Republic era, I'd say Caesar improved the place.

I know, the Senate was so much in the wrong it's hard for me to see how someone would support them.
Last edited by New Sapienta on Sat Mar 03, 2012 7:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Sabara
Senator
 
Posts: 3513
Founded: Jan 14, 2012
Democratic Socialists

Postby Sabara » Sat Mar 03, 2012 7:43 pm

New Sapienta wrote:
Jerusalem and Damascus wrote:
Considering the Roman people got a lot nicer than the general subhuman cruelty common to the Republic era, I'd say Caesar improved the place.

I know, the Senate was so much in the wrong it's hard for me to see how someone would support them.


Julius was a complete Dictator.
A unique MT rp: Tiandi

User avatar
Jerusalem and Damascus
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5632
Founded: Oct 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Jerusalem and Damascus » Sat Mar 03, 2012 7:43 pm

Sabara wrote:
New Sapienta wrote:I know, the Senate was so much in the wrong it's hard for me to see how someone would support them.


Julius was a complete Dictator.


Absolutely, he was, but the people loved him for a reason, and chose him over the Senate, for a reason.

Having a jerk as a leader is better than an oligarchy of Hannibal Lecters.
Roman Catholic, Constitutional Monarchist ala the Duma, Political Pluralist, Laissez-Faire Capitalist, Civil Libertarian (Don't have a link for this one -- just let people do as they do, so to speak)
Economic Left/Right: 3.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.00

NUMBER ONE ON KARINZISTAN'S NATION STATES LIST. HELLS YEAH.
Official recipient of Cu Math's "Let's Be Civil" Potato
How physicists I've met seem to function.

User avatar
New Sapienta
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9298
Founded: Sep 28, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New Sapienta » Sat Mar 03, 2012 7:44 pm

Sabara wrote:
New Sapienta wrote:I know, the Senate was so much in the wrong it's hard for me to see how someone would support them.


Julius was a complete Benovalant Dictator.

Fixed

User avatar
Sabara
Senator
 
Posts: 3513
Founded: Jan 14, 2012
Democratic Socialists

Postby Sabara » Sat Mar 03, 2012 7:45 pm

Jerusalem and Damascus wrote:
Sabara wrote:
Julius was a complete Dictator.


Absolutely, he was, but the people loved him for a reason, and chose him over the Senate, for a reason.

Having a jerk as a leader is better than an oligarchy of Hannibal Lecters.


But still, a complete takeover of the Senate is unnacceptable.
A unique MT rp: Tiandi

User avatar
Celritannia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18405
Founded: Nov 10, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Celritannia » Sat Mar 03, 2012 7:45 pm

Anakin Skywalker/Darth Vader

(He betrayed both the Jedi and the Emperor)

:p

My DeviantArt
Obey
When you annoy a Celritannian
U W0T M8?
Zirkagrad wrote:A person with a penchant for flying lions with long tongues, could possibly be a fan of Kiss. Maybe the classiest nation with a lion with its tongue hanging out. Enjoys only the finest tea.

Nakena wrote:NSG's Most Serene Salad
Citizen of Earth, Commonwealthian, European, British, Yorkshireman.
Atheist, Environmentalist

User avatar
New Sapienta
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9298
Founded: Sep 28, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New Sapienta » Sat Mar 03, 2012 7:46 pm

Sabara wrote:
Jerusalem and Damascus wrote:
Absolutely, he was, but the people loved him for a reason, and chose him over the Senate, for a reason.

Having a jerk as a leader is better than an oligarchy of Hannibal Lecters.


But still, a complete takeover of the Senate is unnacceptable.

You do realize the Senate was pretty much just an Oligarchy right?

User avatar
New Freedomstan
Minister
 
Posts: 2822
Founded: Dec 19, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby New Freedomstan » Sat Mar 03, 2012 7:46 pm

Vidkun Quisling.

User avatar
Jerusalem and Damascus
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5632
Founded: Oct 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Jerusalem and Damascus » Sat Mar 03, 2012 7:46 pm

New Sapienta wrote:
Sabara wrote:
Julius was a complete Benovalant Dictator.

Fixed


Thinking about it, you might be closer to the truth. The man eliminated an entire fourth of debts in the Roman Imperium, introduced term limits to governors, rebuilt Carthage and Corinth...
Roman Catholic, Constitutional Monarchist ala the Duma, Political Pluralist, Laissez-Faire Capitalist, Civil Libertarian (Don't have a link for this one -- just let people do as they do, so to speak)
Economic Left/Right: 3.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.00

NUMBER ONE ON KARINZISTAN'S NATION STATES LIST. HELLS YEAH.
Official recipient of Cu Math's "Let's Be Civil" Potato
How physicists I've met seem to function.

User avatar
Astrolinium
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36603
Founded: Mar 05, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Astrolinium » Sat Mar 03, 2012 7:47 pm

Sabara wrote:
New Sapienta wrote:I know, the Senate was so much in the wrong it's hard for me to see how someone would support them.


Julius was a complete Dictator.


Hey, that's not fair.
The title was "Dictator Perpetuo".
The Sublime Island Kingdom of Astrolinium
Ilia Franchisco Attore, King Attorio Maldive III
North Carolina | NSIndex Page | Embassies
Pop: 3,082 | Tech: MT | DEFCON: 5-4-3-2-1
SEE YOU SPACE COWBOY...
About Me: Ravenclaw, Gay, Cis Male, 5’4”.
"Don't you forget about me."

Ex-Delegate of Ankh Mauta | NSG Sodomy Club
Minor Acolyte of the Vast Jewlluminati Conspiracy™

User avatar
New Sapienta
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9298
Founded: Sep 28, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New Sapienta » Sat Mar 03, 2012 7:48 pm

Jerusalem and Damascus wrote:
New Sapienta wrote:Fixed


Thinking about it, you might be closer to the truth. The man eliminated an entire fourth of debts in the Roman Imperium, introduced term limits to governors, rebuilt Carthage and Corinth...

I wonder what would have happened if he wasn't assassinated.

User avatar
Jerusalem and Damascus
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5632
Founded: Oct 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Jerusalem and Damascus » Sat Mar 03, 2012 7:49 pm

New Sapienta wrote:
Jerusalem and Damascus wrote:
Thinking about it, you might be closer to the truth. The man eliminated an entire fourth of debts in the Roman Imperium, introduced term limits to governors, rebuilt Carthage and Corinth...

I wonder what would have happened if he wasn't assassinated.


Probably no massive civil wars like the ones that followed his death in the OTL?
Roman Catholic, Constitutional Monarchist ala the Duma, Political Pluralist, Laissez-Faire Capitalist, Civil Libertarian (Don't have a link for this one -- just let people do as they do, so to speak)
Economic Left/Right: 3.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.00

NUMBER ONE ON KARINZISTAN'S NATION STATES LIST. HELLS YEAH.
Official recipient of Cu Math's "Let's Be Civil" Potato
How physicists I've met seem to function.

User avatar
Natty Narwhal
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1621
Founded: Jun 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Natty Narwhal » Sat Mar 03, 2012 7:50 pm

Bill Nye.
All the people I admire can fly -
Why can't I do that?

User avatar
New Sapienta
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9298
Founded: Sep 28, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New Sapienta » Sat Mar 03, 2012 7:50 pm

Jerusalem and Damascus wrote:
New Sapienta wrote:I wonder what would have happened if he wasn't assassinated.


Probably no massive civil wars like the ones that followed his death in the OTL?

Althoguh it did lead to Octavian being in charge, and it made sureCaesar didn't give power back to the corrupt Senate.

SeemsBrutus actualy made sure the Senate didn't get power again.

User avatar
Jerusalem and Damascus
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5632
Founded: Oct 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Jerusalem and Damascus » Sat Mar 03, 2012 7:52 pm

New Sapienta wrote:
Jerusalem and Damascus wrote:
Probably no massive civil wars like the ones that followed his death in the OTL?

Althoguh it did lead to Octavian being in charge, and it made sureCaesar didn't give power back to the corrupt Senate.

SeemsBrutus actualy made sure the Senate didn't get power again.


True enough. Considering his own attempts at power grabs during the war, I think the Republic era was just at a natural sort of end.
Roman Catholic, Constitutional Monarchist ala the Duma, Political Pluralist, Laissez-Faire Capitalist, Civil Libertarian (Don't have a link for this one -- just let people do as they do, so to speak)
Economic Left/Right: 3.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.00

NUMBER ONE ON KARINZISTAN'S NATION STATES LIST. HELLS YEAH.
Official recipient of Cu Math's "Let's Be Civil" Potato
How physicists I've met seem to function.

User avatar
New Sapienta
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9298
Founded: Sep 28, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New Sapienta » Sat Mar 03, 2012 7:54 pm

Jerusalem and Damascus wrote:
New Sapienta wrote:Althoguh it did lead to Octavian being in charge, and it made sureCaesar didn't give power back to the corrupt Senate.

SeemsBrutus actualy made sure the Senate didn't get power again.


True enough. Considering his own attempts at power grabs during the war, I think the Republic era was just at a natural sort of end.

Indeed.

User avatar
Thatchland
Envoy
 
Posts: 254
Founded: Dec 18, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Thatchland » Sat Mar 03, 2012 7:55 pm

Bookburnia wrote:
Thatchland wrote:No. What I'm saying is - it cannot be a betrayal if it is part of the entire process to complete the plan. What would have been a betrayal, to Jesus and "God's plan", if Judas had not been an informant. Then a new person would have had to be persuaded to do the task for the plan to come to fruition.


An interesting version. But nobody forced him to be an informant.


Didn't say he was forced. Jesus and Judas could have had a long heart-to-heart about "God's Plan". Those that wrote the new testament weren't with Jesus and Judas 24/7. It could have gone down something like this:

  • Jesus: Yo, Judas - so you know how I'm the Son of God, right?
  • Judas: Damn straight, bro - we wouldn't be spreading your good word if you weren't.
  • Jesus: Well, see ... how do I say this ... Dad says that in order for people to go to heaven ... I, well, I have to die. On a cross. Soon.
  • Judas: Wha?!?! No way!!!
  • Jesus: Yep. It's tough to wrap my head around to. But Dad's always right, ya know?
  • Judas: ...
  • Jesus: Ok. Well, anyway, I'm to die on a cross then be buried in a tomb. For three days. During those three days, my soul will go preach Dad's plan to the souls that have gone on before us. That way they can accept me as their savior and go to heaven.
  • Judas: Wait. You mean for thousands of years people have been going to hell because you weren't born yet?
  • Jesus: It's not that simple - but in summary, yes.
  • Judas: WTF, dude???
  • Jesus: Just hear me out. After those three days, I will be resurrected and roll away the stone to my tomb. I'll say a few words and then head up to heaven. Body and soul.
  • Judas: ...
  • Jesus: This is Dad's plan. Gotta go with it, you know? I'm the savior.
  • Judas: You know I'll follow you to the ends of the earth. But man, this is deep shit to understand.
  • Jesus: Now you know why I was in the desert for 40 days. Took me that long to get used to the idea, myself.
  • Judas: So when are you going to tell the rest of the Apostles?
  • Jesus: Well, see ... I can't. It would ruin the surprise. They have to live it fresh. Kind of a Stanislavski "method" thing that Dad prefers. I'm only supposed to tell you.
  • Judas: ... whhhhyyyyyy?
  • Jesus: Well, someone has to turn me into the priests and the Romans so that I can be crucified ...
  • Judas: ...
  • Jesus: ...
  • Judas: ... and ... This has to do with me, how?
  • Jesus: ...
  • Judas: HOLY SHIT! NO WAY MAN! I'M NOT TURNING YOU IN!!! You're my bro!
  • Jesus: Dad's will be done, Judas.
  • Judas: Really? Can I think about this?
  • Jesus: Well, yes. But I really need you as my wingman on this. You are the guy who can get this done. You've been a successful business man, our treasurer, you have the connections. All the others are fishermen and shepherds. No one is going to really listen to them. But you, you're the one whom the priests will believe.
  • Judas: I guess ... but this is heavy shit. This is God's plan for salvation though, right?
  • Jesus: As Dad as my witness. I truly need you to do this for me. For us. For them. For everyone's soul for eternity.
  • Judas: But they are all going to hate me. They'll think I betrayed you. I'll be Numero uno on the most wanted list.
  • Jesus: Earthly possessions and pride are not our way. Our true rewards awaits in heaven. I've got you covered.
  • Judas: ...
  • Jesus: What do you say? Can I count on you?
  • Judas: (sighs) I'll do it. For you ... and for them. I've got your back, bro.
  • Jesus and Judas fist-bump and head back to the rest of the Apostles
American Progress "The Progressive Quiz": 358/400 (Extremely Progressive)
The Political Compass: Economic -9.50 | Social -7.18

User avatar
Forsher
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22040
Founded: Jan 30, 2012
New York Times Democracy

Postby Forsher » Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:00 pm

Thatchland wrote:
Bookburnia wrote:
An interesting version. But nobody forced him to be an informant.


Didn't say he was forced. Jesus and Judas could have had a long heart-to-heart about "God's Plan". Those that wrote the new testament weren't with Jesus and Judas 24/7. It could have gone down something like this:

  • Jesus: Yo, Judas - so you know how I'm the Son of God, right?
  • Judas: Damn straight, bro - we wouldn't be spreading your good word if you weren't.
  • Jesus: Well, see ... how do I say this ... Dad says that in order for people to go to heaven ... I, well, I have to die. On a cross. Soon.
  • Judas: Wha?!?! No way!!!
  • Jesus: Yep. It's tough to wrap my head around to. But Dad's always right, ya know?
  • Judas: ...
  • Jesus: Ok. Well, anyway, I'm to die on a cross then be buried in a tomb. For three days. During those three days, my soul will go preach Dad's plan to the souls that have gone on before us. That way they can accept me as their savior and go to heaven.
  • Judas: Wait. You mean for thousands of years people have been going to hell because you weren't born yet?
  • Jesus: It's not that simple - but in summary, yes.
  • Judas: WTF, dude???
  • Jesus: Just hear me out. After those three days, I will be resurrected and roll away the stone to my tomb. I'll say a few words and then head up to heaven. Body and soul.
  • Judas: ...
  • Jesus: This is Dad's plan. Gotta go with it, you know? I'm the savior.
  • Judas: You know I'll follow you to the ends of the earth. But man, this is deep shit to understand.
  • Jesus: Now you know why I was in the desert for 40 days. Took me that long to get used to the idea, myself.
  • Judas: So when are you going to tell the rest of the Apostles?
  • Jesus: Well, see ... I can't. It would ruin the surprise. They have to live it fresh. Kind of a Stanislavski "method" thing that Dad prefers. I'm only supposed to tell you.
  • Judas: ... whhhhyyyyyy?
  • Jesus: Well, someone has to turn me into the priests and the Romans so that I can be crucified ...
  • Judas: ...
  • Jesus: ...
  • Judas: ... and ... This has to do with me, how?
  • Jesus: ...
  • Judas: HOLY SHIT! NO WAY MAN! I'M NOT TURNING YOU IN!!! You're my bro!
  • Jesus: Dad's will be done, Judas.
  • Judas: Really? Can I think about this?
  • Jesus: Well, yes. But I really need you as my wingman on this. You are the guy who can get this done. You've been a successful business man, our treasurer, you have the connections. All the others are fishermen and shepherds. No one is going to really listen to them. But you, you're the one whom the priests will believe.
  • Judas: I guess ... but this is heavy shit. This is God's plan for salvation though, right?
  • Jesus: As Dad as my witness. I truly need you to do this for me. For us. For them. For everyone's soul for eternity.
  • Judas: But they are all going to hate me. They'll think I betrayed you. I'll be Numero uno on the most wanted list.
  • Jesus: Earthly possessions and pride are not our way. Our true rewards awaits in heaven. I've got you covered.
  • Judas: ...
  • Jesus: What do you say? Can I count on you?
  • Judas: (sighs) I'll do it. For you ... and for them. I've got your back, bro.
  • Jesus and Judas fist-bump and head back to the rest of the Apostles


Where did you find the time to type that out of the Bible?

Seriously, I was told that's pretty much how it went.
That it Could be What it Is, Is What it Is

Stop making shit up, though. Links, or it's a God-damn lie and you know it.

The normie life is heteronormie

We won't know until 2053 when it'll be really obvious what he should've done. [...] We have no option but to guess.

User avatar
The Anglo-Saxon Empire
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13903
Founded: Nov 21, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Anglo-Saxon Empire » Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:06 pm

New Sapienta wrote:
Jerusalem and Damascus wrote:
Considering the Roman people got a lot nicer than the general subhuman cruelty common to the Republic era, I'd say Caesar improved the place.

I know, the Senate was so much in the wrong it's hard for me to see how someone would support them.

Because an incompetent corrupt senate is a better governing body than Nero or Caligula or Caracalla. Also, it was more stable, the Republic never had four coups in a single year. Hell just look at the first five emperors, one was known to have died peacefully, one may have been assassinated, two were assassinated, and the fifth killed himself to avoid assassination. Doesn't exactly sound stable. Rome wasn't even so much a monarchy as it was a third world country with every other leader getting murdered or executed after a coup.
IC Nation Name: The Glorious Empire of Luthoria
Monarch: Emperor Siegfried XVI

User avatar
New Sapienta
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9298
Founded: Sep 28, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New Sapienta » Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:13 pm

The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:
New Sapienta wrote:I know, the Senate was so much in the wrong it's hard for me to see how someone would support them.

Because an incompetent corrupt senate is a better governing body than Nero or Caligula or Caracalla. Also, it was more stable, the Republic never had four coups in a single year. Hell just look at the first five emperors, one was known to have died peacefully, one may have been assassinated, two were assassinated, and the fifth killed himself to avoid assassination. Doesn't exactly sound stable. Rome wasn't even so much a monarchy as it was a third world country with every other leader getting murdered or executed after a coup.

The string of poor emperors were a bad case number of events, but you seem to forget the 5 good emperors(http://ancienthistory.about.com/od/roma ... perors.htm)
An I would say Rome was pretty stable during the Pax Romana.(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pax_Romana)
Ans it's funny you call it a Repbulic, when it was really just an Oligarchy of the old Roman nobles, rather than something the people actually supported.
Third world country? Rome controlled almost the entirity of Europe under its Monarchy

User avatar
Nightkill the Emperor
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 88776
Founded: Dec 28, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Nightkill the Emperor » Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:18 pm

Thatchland wrote:
Bookburnia wrote:
An interesting version. But nobody forced him to be an informant.


Didn't say he was forced. Jesus and Judas could have had a long heart-to-heart about "God's Plan". Those that wrote the new testament weren't with Jesus and Judas 24/7. It could have gone down something like this:

  • Jesus: Yo, Judas - so you know how I'm the Son of God, right?
  • Judas: Damn straight, bro - we wouldn't be spreading your good word if you weren't.
  • Jesus: Well, see ... how do I say this ... Dad says that in order for people to go to heaven ... I, well, I have to die. On a cross. Soon.
  • Judas: Wha?!?! No way!!!
  • Jesus: Yep. It's tough to wrap my head around to. But Dad's always right, ya know?
  • Judas: ...
  • Jesus: Ok. Well, anyway, I'm to die on a cross then be buried in a tomb. For three days. During those three days, my soul will go preach Dad's plan to the souls that have gone on before us. That way they can accept me as their savior and go to heaven.
  • Judas: Wait. You mean for thousands of years people have been going to hell because you weren't born yet?
  • Jesus: It's not that simple - but in summary, yes.
  • Judas: WTF, dude???
  • Jesus: Just hear me out. After those three days, I will be resurrected and roll away the stone to my tomb. I'll say a few words and then head up to heaven. Body and soul.
  • Judas: ...
  • Jesus: This is Dad's plan. Gotta go with it, you know? I'm the savior.
  • Judas: You know I'll follow you to the ends of the earth. But man, this is deep shit to understand.
  • Jesus: Now you know why I was in the desert for 40 days. Took me that long to get used to the idea, myself.
  • Judas: So when are you going to tell the rest of the Apostles?
  • Jesus: Well, see ... I can't. It would ruin the surprise. They have to live it fresh. Kind of a Stanislavski "method" thing that Dad prefers. I'm only supposed to tell you.
  • Judas: ... whhhhyyyyyy?
  • Jesus: Well, someone has to turn me into the priests and the Romans so that I can be crucified ...
  • Judas: ...
  • Jesus: ...
  • Judas: ... and ... This has to do with me, how?
  • Jesus: ...
  • Judas: HOLY SHIT! NO WAY MAN! I'M NOT TURNING YOU IN!!! You're my bro!
  • Jesus: Dad's will be done, Judas.
  • Judas: Really? Can I think about this?
  • Jesus: Well, yes. But I really need you as my wingman on this. You are the guy who can get this done. You've been a successful business man, our treasurer, you have the connections. All the others are fishermen and shepherds. No one is going to really listen to them. But you, you're the one whom the priests will believe.
  • Judas: I guess ... but this is heavy shit. This is God's plan for salvation though, right?
  • Jesus: As Dad as my witness. I truly need you to do this for me. For us. For them. For everyone's soul for eternity.
  • Judas: But they are all going to hate me. They'll think I betrayed you. I'll be Numero uno on the most wanted list.
  • Jesus: Earthly possessions and pride are not our way. Our true rewards awaits in heaven. I've got you covered.
  • Judas: ...
  • Jesus: What do you say? Can I count on you?
  • Judas: (sighs) I'll do it. For you ... and for them. I've got your back, bro.
  • Jesus and Judas fist-bump and head back to the rest of the Apostles

This is my personal canon.
Hi! I'm Khan, your local misanthropic Indian.
I wear teal, blue & pink for Swith.
P2TM RP Discussion Thread
If you want a good rp, read this shit.
Tiami is cool.
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".

Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.

Monfrox wrote:
The balkens wrote:
# went there....

It's Nightkill. He's been there so long he rents out rooms to other people at a flat rate, but demands cash up front.

User avatar
Daistallia 2104
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7848
Founded: Jan 14, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Daistallia 2104 » Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:24 pm

Mushrenia wrote:No Quisling?

I am disappoint.


Seconded. Quisling is synonymous with betrayal.

Sabara wrote:Holy mackerel people, Judah betrayed the Lord our Savior.


Very interesting. When did Judas creep replace Devadatta in the story?

Idaho Conservatives wrote:It's just a fad, like the "can X country vs Y country: who will win?" we had a month or two ago.


A month ago? Those havce been around since before NSG existed.
NSWiki|HP
Stupidity is like nuclear power; it can be used for good or evil, and you don't want to get any on you. - Scott Adams
Sometimes it's better to light a flamethrower than curse the darkness. - Terry Pratchett
Sometimes the smallest softest voice carries the grand biggest solutions
How our economy really works.
Obama is a conservative, not a liberal, and certainly not a socialist.

User avatar
Tagmatium
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16600
Founded: Dec 17, 2004
Authoritarian Democracy

Postby Tagmatium » Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:24 pm

The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:
New Sapienta wrote:I know, the Senate was so much in the wrong it's hard for me to see how someone would support them.

Because an incompetent corrupt senate is a better governing body than Nero or Caligula or Caracalla. Also, it was more stable, the Republic never had four coups in a single year. Hell just look at the first five emperors, one was known to have died peacefully, one may have been assassinated, two were assassinated, and the fifth killed himself to avoid assassination. Doesn't exactly sound stable. Rome wasn't even so much a monarchy as it was a third world country with every other leader getting murdered or executed after a coup.

You did get characters like Sulla fairly regularly, however.
The above post may or may not be serious.
"For too long, we have been a passive, tolerant society, saying to our citizens: as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone."
North Calaveras wrote:Tagmatium, it was never about pie...

User avatar
Bookburnia
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 58
Founded: Feb 26, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Bookburnia » Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:33 pm

Daistallia 2104 wrote:Seconded. Quisling is synonymous with betrayal.

Yes. I have forgot him. But there was a Finnish Quisling also. But he is not as well-known as Quisling http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otto_Wille ... Government

User avatar
Bookburnia
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 58
Founded: Feb 26, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Bookburnia » Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:41 pm

Daistallia 2104 wrote:Seconded. Quisling is synonymous with betrayal.

Hungarian Quisling http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ern%C5%91_Ger%C5%91

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cerespasia, Dimetrodon Empire, Elwher, Emotional Support Crocodile, Google [Bot], Ifreann, Jerzylvania, Keltionialang, Kostane, Lower Antegria, Plan Neonie, Rusrunia, Shidei, The H Corporation, Tricorniolis, Tungstan

Advertisement

Remove ads