NATION

PASSWORD

DE City Council Passes Resolution Urging sperm 'Personhood'

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
Jari Head
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1297
Founded: Nov 24, 2010
Ex-Nation

DE City Council Passes Resolution Urging sperm 'Personhood'

Postby Jari Head » Sat Mar 03, 2012 2:53 pm

Here appears to provide proof the the 'Right to Life' gang have gone plumb loco, 'round the bend and off the deep end.
The Wilmington City Council has a message for men -- sperm are people, too.

The council for Delaware's largest city passed a resolution by an 8-4 vote Thursday calling on the Delaware legislature, other state legislatures and the U.S. Congress to pass laws granting "personhood" rights to eggs and sperm. The resolution was authored by councilwoman Loretta Walsh as a protest in the current battle over women's health care access.
"[E]ach 'egg person' and each 'sperm person' should be deemed equal in the eyes of the government and be subject to the same laws and regulations as any other dependent minor and be protected against abuse, neglect or abandonment by the parent or guardian," says the resolution. "[L]aws should be enacted by all legislative bodies in the United States to promote equal representation, and should potentially include laws in defense of 'personhood,' forbidding every man from destroying his semen."
:eek: :shock:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/02/wilmington-city-council-sperm-egg-personhood_n_1316924.html

Why don't they save something this mind numbingly idiotic for the first of next month? One must wonder if the DEA needs to look into what members of the city council are smoking, drinking or snorting.
We have two companies of Marines running rampant all over the northern half of this island, and three Army regiments pinned down in the southwestern corner, doing nothing. What the hell is going on?
Gen. John W. Vessey Jr., USA, Chairman of the the Joint Chiefs of Staff during the assault on Grenada, 1983
A bullet may have your name on it, but a grenade is addressed: "To whom it may concern."

User avatar
Cannot think of a name
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45100
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Cannot think of a name » Sat Mar 03, 2012 2:55 pm

Jari Head wrote:Here appears to provide proof the the 'Right to Life' gang have gone plumb loco, 'round the bend and off the deep end.
The Wilmington City Council has a message for men -- sperm are people, too.

The council for Delaware's largest city passed a resolution by an 8-4 vote Thursday calling on the Delaware legislature, other state legislatures and the U.S. Congress to pass laws granting "personhood" rights to eggs and sperm. The resolution was authored by councilwoman Loretta Walsh as a protest in the current battle over women's health care access.
"[E]ach 'egg person' and each 'sperm person' should be deemed equal in the eyes of the government and be subject to the same laws and regulations as any other dependent minor and be protected against abuse, neglect or abandonment by the parent or guardian," says the resolution. "[L]aws should be enacted by all legislative bodies in the United States to promote equal representation, and should potentially include laws in defense of 'personhood,' forbidding every man from destroying his semen."
:eek: :shock:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/02/wilmington-city-council-sperm-egg-personhood_n_1316924.html

Why don't they save something this mind numbingly idiotic for the first of next month? One must wonder if the DEA needs to look into what members of the city council are smoking, drinking or snorting.

Alright, before I proceed I need to gauge something: Do you think Jonathan Swift really wanted people to eat babies?
"...I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." -MLK Jr.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163895
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Sat Mar 03, 2012 2:55 pm

Bat shit insane hardly seems to cover it.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Revolutopia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5741
Founded: May 25, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Revolutopia » Sat Mar 03, 2012 2:57 pm

Jari Head wrote:Here appears to provide proof the the 'Right to Life' gang have gone plumb loco, 'round the bend and off the deep end.
The Wilmington City Council has a message for men -- sperm are people, too.

The council for Delaware's largest city passed a resolution by an 8-4 vote Thursday calling on the Delaware legislature, other state legislatures and the U.S. Congress to pass laws granting "personhood" rights to eggs and sperm. The resolution was authored by councilwoman Loretta Walsh as a protest in the current battle over women's health care access.
"[E]ach 'egg person' and each 'sperm person' should be deemed equal in the eyes of the government and be subject to the same laws and regulations as any other dependent minor and be protected against abuse, neglect or abandonment by the parent or guardian," says the resolution. "[L]aws should be enacted by all legislative bodies in the United States to promote equal representation, and should potentially include laws in defense of 'personhood,' forbidding every man from destroying his semen."
:eek: :shock:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/02/wilmington-city-council-sperm-egg-personhood_n_1316924.html

Why don't they save something this mind numbingly idiotic for the first of next month? One must wonder if the DEA needs to look into what members of the city council are smoking, drinking or snorting.


Read the bolded text of your OP.
The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little.-FDR

Economic Left/Right: -3.12|Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.49

Who is Tom Joad?

User avatar
Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9191
Founded: Jan 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f » Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:07 pm

Actually its an interesting protest against the male dominated debate over women's health care...

The council passed a resolution that asks state legislatures and U.S. Congress to enact laws that forbid men from destroying their semen.

For Loretta Walsh, the councilwoman who introduced the resolution, it's a way -- an admittedly "tongue-in-cheek" way -- to call attention to "the absurdity of men making health decisions for women."

Two weeks ago, at the last City Council meeting, Walsh railed against Virginia lawmakers pushing to require women to undergo ultrasounds before having an abortion. So upset over the issue, Walsh said, she stayed up until 3 a.m. drafting her resolution.


http://www.delawareonline.com/article/2 ... ck_check=1
PLEASE DO NOT SEND ME TG's. MODERATORS READ YOUR TG's WITHOUT YOUR PERMISSION.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tommy_Flowers Call me Rubi for short or Vonners

User avatar
Arkinesia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13210
Founded: Aug 22, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Arkinesia » Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:11 pm

Jari Head wrote:Here appears to provide proof the the 'Right to Life' gang have gone plumb loco, 'round the bend and off the deep end.
The Wilmington City Council has a message for men -- sperm are people, too.

The council for Delaware's largest city passed a resolution by an 8-4 vote Thursday calling on the Delaware legislature, other state legislatures and the U.S. Congress to pass laws granting "personhood" rights to eggs and sperm. The resolution was authored by councilwoman Loretta Walsh as a protest in the current battle over women's health care access.
"[E]ach 'egg person' and each 'sperm person' should be deemed equal in the eyes of the government and be subject to the same laws and regulations as any other dependent minor and be protected against abuse, neglect or abandonment by the parent or guardian," says the resolution. "[L]aws should be enacted by all legislative bodies in the United States to promote equal representation, and should potentially include laws in defense of 'personhood,' forbidding every man from destroying his semen."
:eek: :shock:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/02/wilmington-city-council-sperm-egg-personhood_n_1316924.html

Why don't they save something this mind numbingly idiotic for the first of next month? One must wonder if the DEA needs to look into what members of the city council are smoking, drinking or snorting.

Hey, looks like Loretta Walsh has a sense of humor. Good on her, we don't have enough politicians with that these days.
Bisexual, atheist, Southerner. Not much older but made much wiser.

Disappointment Panda wrote:Don't hope for a life without problems. There's no such thing. Instead, hope for a life full of good problems.

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:13 pm

Jari Head wrote:Here appears to provide proof the the 'Right to Life' gang have gone plumb loco, 'round the bend and off the deep end.
The Wilmington City Council has a message for men -- sperm are people, too.

The council for Delaware's largest city passed a resolution by an 8-4 vote Thursday calling on the Delaware legislature, other state legislatures and the U.S. Congress to pass laws granting "personhood" rights to eggs and sperm. The resolution was authored by councilwoman Loretta Walsh as a protest in the current battle over women's health care access.
"[E]ach 'egg person' and each 'sperm person' should be deemed equal in the eyes of the government and be subject to the same laws and regulations as any other dependent minor and be protected against abuse, neglect or abandonment by the parent or guardian," says the resolution. "[L]aws should be enacted by all legislative bodies in the United States to promote equal representation, and should potentially include laws in defense of 'personhood,' forbidding every man from destroying his semen."
:eek: :shock:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/02/wilmington-city-council-sperm-egg-personhood_n_1316924.html

Why don't they save something this mind numbingly idiotic for the first of next month? One must wonder if the DEA needs to look into what members of the city council are smoking, drinking or snorting.


Makes sense to me. I think you're reading it as something other than what it is - a 'protest' resolution. Hey, if an egg becomes a 'person' the instant a sperm enters it... then why not give the egg and the sperm 'people' rights, too?

It's designed to draw attention to the stupidity of the 'person-since-conception' argument.
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
The Ilk
Attaché
 
Posts: 88
Founded: Jan 03, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Ilk » Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:15 pm

I wonder how much ejaculate I can donate to the sperm bank over the course of my life?
Unidox- "2012: Asteroid mining was serious news. A black man was president of the United States. 3D movies play in theaters. Gays could serve openly in the military. Democracy spread to the middle East. Transgender people are indeed protected under federal job discrimination laws."

Lackadaisical2- "The whole world is going to shit. :("

Norstal- "I hope Jebus comes to deliver us from this liberal hellhole. Equality? Freedom? Damn this liberal hellhole."

User avatar
The Republic of Lanos
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17727
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Republic of Lanos » Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:22 pm

The Ilk wrote:I wonder how much ejaculate I can donate to the sperm bank over the course of my life?


I'm waiting to see someone there call the cops on a sperm bank because they're holding "hostages."

Honestly, this is getting ridiculous...

User avatar
OMGeverynameistaken
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12437
Founded: Jun 24, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby OMGeverynameistaken » Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:32 pm

You guys should read the OP's article more carefully. Or just look at the guy who bolded a certain sentence.

Otherwise, does this mean we get to vote on behalf of our reproductive organs? This is clearly an attempt to disenfranchise female voters!
I AM DISAPPOINTED

User avatar
Cannot think of a name
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45100
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Cannot think of a name » Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:34 pm

OMGeverynameistaken wrote:You guys should read the OP's article more carefully. Or just look at the guy who bolded a certain sentence.

Otherwise, does this mean we get to vote on behalf of our reproductive organs? This is clearly an attempt to disenfranchise female voters!

Interesting...women would get one less vote every month until they were reduced to one at menopause...

I wonder if this would lead to a new "3/5ths compromise of dez nutz..."




...

Sorry, I just wanted to type "3/5ths compromise of dez nutz..." I'll go now...
"...I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." -MLK Jr.

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:37 pm

The Ilk wrote:I wonder how much ejaculate I can donate to the sperm bank over the course of my life?

^Does this count as human trafficking? :p

User avatar
Big Jim P
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55158
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Big Jim P » Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:40 pm

Well, I am now a mass murderer of godlike proportions. :D
Hail Satan!
Happily married to Roan Cara, The first RL NS marriage, and Pope Joan is my Father-in-law.
I edit my posts to fix typos.

User avatar
Fluffy Coyotes
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1055
Founded: Nov 08, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Fluffy Coyotes » Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:41 pm

Grave_n_idle wrote:Makes sense to me. I think you're reading it as something other than what it is - a 'protest' resolution. Hey, if an egg becomes a 'person' the instant a sperm enters it... then why not give the egg and the sperm 'people' rights, too?

It's designed to draw attention to the stupidity of the 'person-since-conception' argument.

Something about the way they're going about it strikes me as disingenuous, though I'm not sure what.

Also, as I pointed out elsewhere, it's ignoring the differences between pre-fertilization and post-fertilization. I don't agree with making it the basis, but let's not pretend they're the exact same thing here. We need to maintain the high ground.
Nazi Flower Power wrote:If the teachings of Christ can't get his followers to behave peacefully, then he obviously did not teach them very well.

User avatar
Northwest Slobovia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12548
Founded: Sep 16, 2006
Anarchy

Please check the calibration of your humor meter

Postby Northwest Slobovia » Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:41 pm

It's a joke. One of the councilbabes thought it would make an amusing protest, and apparently she succeeded:

The (Wilmington) News Urinal wrote:Wilmington City Council sent a message to lawmakers everywhere Thursday night: It's time to hold men accountable for the well-being of their sperm.

The council passed a resolution that asks state legislatures and U.S. Congress to enact laws that forbid men from destroying their semen.

For Loretta Walsh, the councilwoman who introduced the resolution, it's a way -- an admittedly "tongue-in-cheek" way -- to call attention to "the absurdity of men making health decisions for women."


Source
Last edited by Northwest Slobovia on Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Gollum died for your sins.
Power is an equal-opportunity corrupter.

User avatar
Northwest Slobovia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12548
Founded: Sep 16, 2006
Anarchy

Postby Northwest Slobovia » Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:43 pm

Big Jim P wrote:Well, I am now a mass murderer of godlike proportions. :D

"One death is a tradedy. A million deaths is rather relaxing."
Gollum died for your sins.
Power is an equal-opportunity corrupter.

User avatar
Sane Outcasts
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1601
Founded: Aug 19, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Sane Outcasts » Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:52 pm

Like any good piece of satire, half of the entertainment is in watching so many people take something like this measure seriously.

User avatar
Tlaceceyaya
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9932
Founded: Oct 17, 2011
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Tlaceceyaya » Sat Mar 03, 2012 4:08 pm

I wonder if the person who proposed that resolution has ever had safe sex or masturbated.
EDIT: Reread it and it says the person who proposed it was a woman. I wonder if she has ever not had a child the moment she was able to.
Last edited by Tlaceceyaya on Sat Mar 03, 2012 4:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Economic Left/Right -9.75, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian -8.87
Also, Bonobos.

Dimitri Tsafendas wrote:You are guilty not only when you commit a crime, but also when you do nothing to prevent it when you have the chance.

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Sat Mar 03, 2012 4:08 pm

Northwest Slobovia wrote:
Big Jim P wrote:Well, I am now a mass murderer of godlike proportions. :D

"One death is a tradedy. A million deaths is rather relaxing."

:lol2:

User avatar
The Corparation
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34138
Founded: Aug 31, 2009
Father Knows Best State

Postby The Corparation » Sat Mar 03, 2012 4:19 pm

This screams satire. I find it even more amusing that people have fallen for it.
Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting)
Orbital Freedom Machine Here
A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc.Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia-
Making the Nightmare End 2020 2024 WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety This Cell is intentionally blank.

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Sat Mar 03, 2012 4:19 pm

The Corparation wrote:This screams satire. I find it even more amusing that people have fallen for it.

You must not live in the Bible Belt.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163895
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Sat Mar 03, 2012 4:21 pm

Northwest Slobovia wrote:
Big Jim P wrote:Well, I am now a mass murderer of godlike proportions. :D

"One death is a tradedy. A million deaths is rather relaxing."

A million seems a bit low.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
The Pretend Pub
Diplomat
 
Posts: 806
Founded: Jan 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Pretend Pub » Sat Mar 03, 2012 4:22 pm

Tlaceceyaya wrote:I wonder if the person who proposed that resolution has ever had safe sex or masturbated.
EDIT: Reread it and it says the person who proposed it was a woman. I wonder if she has ever not had a child the moment she was able to.

I wonder if you've ever read A Modest Proposal.
Alter ego of Bluth Corporation

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sat Mar 03, 2012 4:22 pm

"Personhood" rights to eggs and sperm? Seriously? Favoring "personhood" for fetuses has some sense, but eggs and sperm?
Last edited by Geilinor on Sat Mar 03, 2012 4:23 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Tlaceceyaya
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9932
Founded: Oct 17, 2011
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Tlaceceyaya » Sat Mar 03, 2012 4:34 pm

The Pretend Pub wrote:
Tlaceceyaya wrote:I wonder if the person who proposed that resolution has ever had safe sex or masturbated.
EDIT: Reread it and it says the person who proposed it was a woman. I wonder if she has ever not had a child the moment she was able to.

I wonder if you've ever read A Modest Proposal.

No, but I just wikipedia'd it.
Economic Left/Right -9.75, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian -8.87
Also, Bonobos.

Dimitri Tsafendas wrote:You are guilty not only when you commit a crime, but also when you do nothing to prevent it when you have the chance.

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bombadil, Kostane, Plan Neonie, Senatus Populi, Shrillland, Statesburg, The Vooperian Union, Tungstan

Advertisement

Remove ads