NATION

PASSWORD

Rush Limbaugh: Women Who Want Birth Control Are Sluts

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
The Anti-Cosmic Gods
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1696
Founded: Jun 11, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Anti-Cosmic Gods » Mon Mar 05, 2012 6:49 pm

Bottle wrote:
Distruzio wrote:Wait.... we don't like sluts now?

WTF why?????

You know how people talk about the "virgin/whore dichotomy"?

The real problem is actually that conservatives are struggling with the "slut/whore dichotomy."

See, you pay a whore, and she provides you with sex that is all about you. That's the kind of transactional relationship they can understand. They assume women never actually want sex, they just can be bribed to submit (grudgingly) to sex.

But a slut, she's a female person who...wants sex?? For herself??? Because she LIKES IT???

That's...why, that's almost...human. And we all know that can't be right. Women are alien creatures made of sugar and spice and that weird blue liquid they use in the maxi pad commercials. Woman, she is a mystery, right fellas?

Besides, if it's possible for a woman to actually want sex, or even to seek it out for her own pleasure, then that would lead to all sorts of uncomfortable possibilities. Like, say, the reason why women won't sleep with you might not be simply because all women hate the very idea of sex. It might, in fact, be because women hate the idea of sex WITH YOU. It might be that a lot of women simply aren't interested in being bribed to please you, when they could be out having their fun-to-rub bits rubbed by somebody fun.

Those fucking sluts.


Its amazing to me how many men resist the notion that women...enjoy sex.

User avatar
Fluffy Coyotes
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1055
Founded: Nov 08, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Fluffy Coyotes » Mon Mar 05, 2012 6:53 pm

Bottle wrote:Besides, if it's possible for a woman to actually want sex, or even to seek it out for her own pleasure, then that would lead to all sorts of uncomfortable possibilities. Like, say, the reason why women won't sleep with you might not be simply because all women hate the very idea of sex. It might, in fact, be because women hate the idea of sex WITH YOU. It might be that a lot of women simply aren't interested in being bribed to please you, when they could be out having their fun-to-rub bits rubbed by somebody fun.

You say this as if the assumption that women don't want sex was all about not getting it themselves. As if it couldn't have anything to do with finding the reasoning why more convincing than the reasoning why not. Or just getting the impression from the nature and tone of the discussions of the subject that the "women enjoy sex" crowd didn't seem to be the most rational side. (Don't get me wrong, it's a mixed bag either way, but I can see how someone could get the wrong first impression, especially given a limited sample of such discussions.)

If that's the case, to what do you attribute the attitudes towards sexuality of more popular celebrities? (IIRC Chris Rock had somewhat of a "men have to fend for themselves, women can get sex when they want" attitude and he's fairly popular.)
Last edited by Fluffy Coyotes on Mon Mar 05, 2012 6:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Nazi Flower Power wrote:If the teachings of Christ can't get his followers to behave peacefully, then he obviously did not teach them very well.

User avatar
Bottle
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14985
Founded: Dec 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Bottle » Mon Mar 05, 2012 6:53 pm

Fluffy Coyotes wrote:
Bottle wrote:Besides, if it's possible for a woman to actually want sex, or even to seek it out for her own pleasure, then that would lead to all sorts of uncomfortable possibilities. Like, say, the reason why women won't sleep with you might not be simply because all women hate the very idea of sex. It might, in fact, be because women hate the idea of sex WITH YOU. It might be that a lot of women simply aren't interested in being bribed to please you, when they could be out having their fun-to-rub bits rubbed by somebody fun.

You say this as if the assumption that women don't want sex was all about not getting it themselves. As if it couldn't have anything to do with finding the reasoning why more convincing than the reasoning why not. Or perceiving

No, actually I don't. Try again. :D
"Until evolution happens like in pokemon I'll never accept your 'evidence'!" -Ifreann
"Well, excuuuuuuse me, feminist." -Ende

User avatar
Fluffy Coyotes
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1055
Founded: Nov 08, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Fluffy Coyotes » Mon Mar 05, 2012 6:55 pm

... then how the hell else am I to interpret that post? Try to be a bit clearer.

Also, I finished the first paragraph (forgot to first time) please edit that in accordingly.
Nazi Flower Power wrote:If the teachings of Christ can't get his followers to behave peacefully, then he obviously did not teach them very well.

User avatar
The Anti-Cosmic Gods
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1696
Founded: Jun 11, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Anti-Cosmic Gods » Mon Mar 05, 2012 6:56 pm

Wait, someone is really objecting to the idea that women like having their naughty bits touched?

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Mon Mar 05, 2012 6:58 pm

And the Limblob Advertisers Body Count has increased by two more (AOL and Tax Resolution Services) to nine total. Ten if you count Peter Gabriel demanding that his song "Sledgehammer" be stripped of the Slut Taint of the Limbaugh Show.

Rush Limbaugh Loses More Advertisers, But Protests: ‘The Left Made Me Do It’

Rush Limbaugh Advertiser Tax Resolution Services Co. Is Ninth Company To Pull Content From Radio Program

Peter Gabriel Withdraws Music From Rush Limbaugh Show Following Sandra Fluke Controversy
Last edited by Gauthier on Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Wikkiwallana
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22500
Founded: Mar 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Wikkiwallana » Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:01 pm

The Anti-Cosmic Gods wrote:
Bottle wrote:You know how people talk about the "virgin/whore dichotomy"?

The real problem is actually that conservatives are struggling with the "slut/whore dichotomy."

See, you pay a whore, and she provides you with sex that is all about you. That's the kind of transactional relationship they can understand. They assume women never actually want sex, they just can be bribed to submit (grudgingly) to sex.

But a slut, she's a female person who...wants sex?? For herself??? Because she LIKES IT???

That's...why, that's almost...human. And we all know that can't be right. Women are alien creatures made of sugar and spice and that weird blue liquid they use in the maxi pad commercials. Woman, she is a mystery, right fellas?

Besides, if it's possible for a woman to actually want sex, or even to seek it out for her own pleasure, then that would lead to all sorts of uncomfortable possibilities. Like, say, the reason why women won't sleep with you might not be simply because all women hate the very idea of sex. It might, in fact, be because women hate the idea of sex WITH YOU. It might be that a lot of women simply aren't interested in being bribed to please you, when they could be out having their fun-to-rub bits rubbed by somebody fun.

Those fucking sluts.


Its amazing to me how many men resist the notion that women...enjoy sex.

Well, if you are 100% perfect and the person everyone should model themselves after, and yet every time you have sex your partner looks like she is trying to hold back vomit the entire time, it clearly can't be your fault, you are perfect, after all, therefore, the obvious reason is that only men are capable of enjoying sex.
Proud Scalawag and Statist!

Please don't confuse my country for my politics; my country is being run as a parody, my posts aren't.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Xenohumanity wrote:
Nulono wrote:Snip
I'm a pro-lifer who runs a nation of dragon-men...
And even I think that's stupid.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:07 pm

The Anti-Cosmic Gods wrote:
Bottle wrote:You know how people talk about the "virgin/whore dichotomy"?

The real problem is actually that conservatives are struggling with the "slut/whore dichotomy."

See, you pay a whore, and she provides you with sex that is all about you. That's the kind of transactional relationship they can understand. They assume women never actually want sex, they just can be bribed to submit (grudgingly) to sex.

But a slut, she's a female person who...wants sex?? For herself??? Because she LIKES IT???

That's...why, that's almost...human. And we all know that can't be right. Women are alien creatures made of sugar and spice and that weird blue liquid they use in the maxi pad commercials. Woman, she is a mystery, right fellas?

Besides, if it's possible for a woman to actually want sex, or even to seek it out for her own pleasure, then that would lead to all sorts of uncomfortable possibilities. Like, say, the reason why women won't sleep with you might not be simply because all women hate the very idea of sex. It might, in fact, be because women hate the idea of sex WITH YOU. It might be that a lot of women simply aren't interested in being bribed to please you, when they could be out having their fun-to-rub bits rubbed by somebody fun.

Those fucking sluts.


Its amazing to me how many men resist the notion that women...enjoy sex.


Being realistic,if you are Rush Limbaugh, chances are you've never encountered a woman enjoying sex.

Yeah. I went there.
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
New England and The Maritimes
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28872
Founded: Aug 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New England and The Maritimes » Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:09 pm

Grave_n_idle wrote:
The Anti-Cosmic Gods wrote:
Its amazing to me how many men resist the notion that women...enjoy sex.


Being realistic,if you are Rush Limbaugh, chances are you've never encountered a woman enjoying sex.

Yeah. I went there.


I don't think Rush has ever encountered a woman having sex, either. I heartell he's more into little girls on caribbean islands, honestly.
All aboard the Love Train. Choo Choo, honeybears. I am Ininiwiyaw Rocopurr:Get in my bed, you perfect human being.
Yesterday's just a memory

Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

Also, Bonobos
Formerly Brandenburg-Altmark Me.

User avatar
The Anti-Cosmic Gods
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1696
Founded: Jun 11, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Anti-Cosmic Gods » Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:09 pm

Grave_n_idle wrote:
The Anti-Cosmic Gods wrote:
Its amazing to me how many men resist the notion that women...enjoy sex.


Being realistic,if you are Rush Limbaugh, chances are you've never encountered a woman enjoying sex.

Yeah. I went there.



Hehehe

User avatar
Fluffy Coyotes
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1055
Founded: Nov 08, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Fluffy Coyotes » Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:10 pm

Grave_n_idle wrote:
The Anti-Cosmic Gods wrote:
Its amazing to me how many men resist the notion that women...enjoy sex.


Being realistic,if you are Rush Limbaugh, chances are you've never encountered a woman enjoying sex.

Yeah. I went there.

That... seems to be a bit redundant with Bottle's point, though given that I supposedly misinterpreted I'm not sure.
Nazi Flower Power wrote:If the teachings of Christ can't get his followers to behave peacefully, then he obviously did not teach them very well.

User avatar
Augarundus
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7004
Founded: Dec 22, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Augarundus » Mon Mar 05, 2012 9:54 pm

Doesn't conceive when she consummates her marriage?

whooooooooore
Libertarian Purity Test Score: 160
Capitalism is always the answer. Whenever there's a problem in capitalism, you just need some more capitalism. If the solution isn't capitalism, then it's not really a problem. If your capitalism gets damaged, you just need to throw some capitalism on it and get on with your life.

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Mon Mar 05, 2012 10:09 pm

Augarundus wrote:Doesn't conceive when she consummates her marriage?

whooooooooore


Whores are sterile, it's a fact!
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Cannot think of a name
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41590
Founded: Antiquity
New York Times Democracy

Postby Cannot think of a name » Tue Mar 06, 2012 12:44 am

Bottle wrote:Besides, if it's possible for a woman to actually want sex, or even to seek it out for her own pleasure, then that would lead to all sorts of uncomfortable possibilities. Like, say, the reason why women won't sleep with you might not be simply because all women hate the very idea of sex. It might, in fact, be because women hate the idea of sex WITH YOU. It might be that a lot of women simply aren't interested in being bribed to please you, when they could be out having their fun-to-rub bits rubbed by somebody fun.

Those fucking sluts.

This has always been more frustrating to me than anything...because if anyone was honest with themselves this is everyone's default position.

Like, look...I live in California, there are attractive women fucking everywhere. And I look, I'm not running for saint, there are times I have to remind myself I'm being rude and I work on it. But even in those moments, I don't actually want to fuck that person. I might think they're attractive, my libido might be interested in seeing them naked, but actually do the dirty deed, dude, c'mon.

And it has nothing to do with 'standards,' it has everything to do with not having any sort of connection with this stranger that makes me want to be naked in their presence. "I'd hit that" is more bravado and bullshit than it is gospel. Most of the people we meet we haven't the slightest interest in boning. Even if you're a 'horn dog', you'd have to be Wilt Fucking Chamberlan to want to fuck every set of compatible genitalia that wandered your way.


...off the rails here, I'll just let myself out.
"...I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." -MLK Jr.

User avatar
Socialdemokraterne
Minister
 
Posts: 3448
Founded: Dec 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Socialdemokraterne » Tue Mar 06, 2012 1:15 am

Gauthier wrote:And the Limblob Advertisers Body Count has increased by two more (AOL and Tax Resolution Services) to nine total. Ten if you count Peter Gabriel demanding that his song "Sledgehammer" be stripped of the Slut Taint of the Limbaugh Show.

Rush Limbaugh Loses More Advertisers, But Protests: ‘The Left Made Me Do It’

Rush Limbaugh Advertiser Tax Resolution Services Co. Is Ninth Company To Pull Content From Radio Program

Peter Gabriel Withdraws Music From Rush Limbaugh Show Following Sandra Fluke Controversy


I respond thus:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OlVS_A1nouI

Let's hope the Rush Limbaugh show has finally met its end.
Last edited by Socialdemokraterne on Tue Mar 06, 2012 1:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
A social democracy following a variant of the Nordic model of the European welfare state composed of a union of Norway, Sweden, Iceland, Greenland, Denmark, Sleswig-Holstein, and a bit of Estonia.

Leder du måske efter en dansk region? Dansk!

User avatar
Alien Space Bats
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10073
Founded: Sep 28, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Rush Limbaugh: Women Who Want Birth Control Are Sluts

Postby Alien Space Bats » Tue Mar 06, 2012 3:30 am

New England and The Maritimes wrote:You're on a place where 14 year old boys pretend they're doctors and assert that pregnancy is magical and safe and anyone who would rather not get one is actually a stupid lazy slut.

Or that short life and early death are God's punishment for being a stupid lazy slut, take your pick.
"These states are just saying 'Yes, I used to beat my girlfriend, but I haven't since the restraining order, so we don't need it anymore.'" — Stephen Colbert, Comedian, on Shelby County v. Holder

"Do you see how policing blacks by the presumption of guilt and policing whites by the presumption of innocence is a self-reinforcing mechanism?" — Touré Neblett, MSNBC Commentator and Social Critic

"You knew damn well I was a snake before you took me in."Songwriter Oscar Brown in 1963, foretelling the election of Donald J. Trump

President Donald J. Trump: Working Tirelessly to Make Russia Great Again

User avatar
Bottle
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14985
Founded: Dec 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Bottle » Tue Mar 06, 2012 5:33 am

Grave_n_idle wrote:
The Anti-Cosmic Gods wrote:
Its amazing to me how many men resist the notion that women...enjoy sex.


Being realistic,if you are Rush Limbaugh, chances are you've never encountered a woman enjoying sex.

Yeah. I went there.

It's not just that. If you are Rush Limbaugh, what you resent is the very suggestion that a woman COULD enjoy sex. Women's sexuality is supposed to be passive. Their various holes and parts exist for male gratification. The suggestion that the female entity who is providing life support for said holes and parts might have desires of her own is as offensive as if your fleshlight spoke up and suggested that you try a different grip tonight.
Last edited by Bottle on Tue Mar 06, 2012 5:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
"Until evolution happens like in pokemon I'll never accept your 'evidence'!" -Ifreann
"Well, excuuuuuuse me, feminist." -Ende

User avatar
Poorisolation
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1326
Founded: Dec 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Poorisolation » Tue Mar 06, 2012 6:48 am

Bottle wrote:
Grave_n_idle wrote:
Being realistic,if you are Rush Limbaugh, chances are you've never encountered a woman enjoying sex.

Yeah. I went there.

It's not just that. If you are Rush Limbaugh, what you resent is the very suggestion that a woman COULD enjoy sex. Women's sexuality is supposed to be passive. Their various holes and parts exist for male gratification. The suggestion that the female entity who is providing life support for said holes and parts might have desires of her own is as offensive as if your fleshlight spoke up and suggested that you try a different grip tonight.


His latest concern is that Obama is trying to get in touch with women voters when any true Limbaughian knows that in America women vote as their husbands or failing that, fathers tell them to.
Make Love While Making War: the combination is piquant

98% of all internet users would cry if facebook would break down, if you are part of that 2% who simply would sit back and laugh then copy and paste this into your sig.

Why does google seem to be under the impression I am a single lesbian living in Reading?

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159034
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Tue Mar 06, 2012 7:03 am

Bottle wrote:
Grave_n_idle wrote:
Being realistic,if you are Rush Limbaugh, chances are you've never encountered a woman enjoying sex.

Yeah. I went there.

It's not just that. If you are Rush Limbaugh, what you resent is the very suggestion that a woman COULD enjoy sex. Women's sexuality is supposed to be passive. Their various holes and parts exist for male gratification. The suggestion that the female entity who is providing life support for said holes and parts might have desires of her own is as offensive as if your fleshlight spoke up and suggested that you try a different grip tonight.

That said, I bet someone's working on installing sensors into Real Dolls that'll do exactly that. Some day even the robot women you order from a very discreet website(hookerbotloveyoulongtime.jp) will enjoy sex. I dare say Rush would be rendered incoherent with bafflement and impotent rage.

User avatar
Four-sided Triangles
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5537
Founded: Aug 15, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Four-sided Triangles » Tue Mar 06, 2012 7:51 am

The Anti-Cosmic Gods wrote:Its amazing to me how many men resist the notion that women...enjoy sex.


Men seem to attach their self-worth to their ability to get laid. If they aren't getting laid, they figure, something must be wrong with them.
This is why gay marriage will destroy American families.
Gays are made up of gaytrinos and they interact via faggons, which are massless spin 2 particles. They're massless because gays care so much about their weight, and have spin 2, cause that's as much spin as particles can get, and liberals love spin. The exchange of spin 2 particles creates an attractive force between objects, which is why gays are so promiscuous. When gays get "settle down" into a lower energy state by marrying, they release faggon particles in the form of gaydiation. Everyone is a little bit gay, so every human body has some gaytrinos in it, meaning that the gaydiation could cause straight people to be attracted to gays and choose to turn gay.

User avatar
Xsyne
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6537
Founded: Apr 30, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Xsyne » Tue Mar 06, 2012 9:43 am

Bottle wrote:That's...why, that's almost...human. And we all know that can't be right. Women are alien creatures made of sugar and spice and that weird blue liquid they use in the maxi pad commercials.

I believe the technical term for that is "Chemical X".
Last edited by Xsyne on Tue Mar 06, 2012 9:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
If global warming is real, why are there still monkeys? - Msigroeg
Pro: Stuff
Anti: Things
Chernoslavia wrote:
Free Soviets wrote:according to both the law library of congress and wikipedia, both automatics and semi-autos that can be easily converted are outright banned in norway.


Source?

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Tue Mar 06, 2012 9:49 am

Xsyne wrote:
Bottle wrote:That's...why, that's almost...human. And we all know that can't be right. Women are alien creatures made of sugar and spice and that weird blue liquid they use in the maxi pad commercials.

I believe the technical term for that is "Chemical X".


Nah, if that was the case every woman in the country would have flown over to Limblob and beat the crap out of him. :D
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Revolutopia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5741
Founded: May 25, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Revolutopia » Tue Mar 06, 2012 10:22 am

The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little.-FDR

Economic Left/Right: -3.12|Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.49

Who is Tom Joad?

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111674
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Tue Mar 06, 2012 10:36 am

Four-sided Triangles wrote:
The Anti-Cosmic Gods wrote:Its amazing to me how many men resist the notion that women...enjoy sex.


Men seem to attach their self-worth to their ability to get laid. If they aren't getting laid, they figure, something must be wrong with them.

No, they figure something must be wrong with women, not with them. It's women who think, something must be wrong with me.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Evraim
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6148
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Evraim » Tue Mar 06, 2012 10:58 am

The Anti-Cosmic Gods wrote:
Bottle wrote:You know how people talk about the "virgin/whore dichotomy"?

The real problem is actually that conservatives are struggling with the "slut/whore dichotomy."

See, you pay a whore, and she provides you with sex that is all about you. That's the kind of transactional relationship they can understand. They assume women never actually want sex, they just can be bribed to submit (grudgingly) to sex.

But a slut, she's a female person who...wants sex?? For herself??? Because she LIKES IT???

That's...why, that's almost...human. And we all know that can't be right. Women are alien creatures made of sugar and spice and that weird blue liquid they use in the maxi pad commercials. Woman, she is a mystery, right fellas?

Besides, if it's possible for a woman to actually want sex, or even to seek it out for her own pleasure, then that would lead to all sorts of uncomfortable possibilities. Like, say, the reason why women won't sleep with you might not be simply because all women hate the very idea of sex. It might, in fact, be because women hate the idea of sex WITH YOU. It might be that a lot of women simply aren't interested in being bribed to please you, when they could be out having their fun-to-rub bits rubbed by somebody fun.

Those fucking sluts.


Its amazing to me how many men resist the notion that women...enjoy sex.

I do not resist it. I believe that anybody who utilizes sexual activity in the absence of love is engaging in a masturbatory endeavor, which I perceive as less noble, less beautiful, and less worthy than a relationship based on something more meaningful than physical pleasure. That's my opinion. I consider a slut, male or female, anybody who participate in sexual activity devoid of emotions. Essentially, to me, a slut is somebody who turns it into something masturbatory. Yes, it's pleasurable. I understand that, but you shouldn't expect me to consider pleausre as something necessarily ethical or good. Especially not as ethical or good as actual passions.

Farnhamia wrote:
Four-sided Triangles wrote:
Men seem to attach their self-worth to their ability to get laid. If they aren't getting laid, they figure, something must be wrong with them.

No, they figure something must be wrong with women, not with them. It's women who think, something must be wrong with me.

This does differ from person to person. Both men and women have feelings of inadequacy about sexual intercourse, and both men and women can choose to believe that something is wrong with the opposite sex.
Last edited by Evraim on Tue Mar 06, 2012 11:01 am, edited 1 time in total.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Benuty, Dakran, Dimetrodon Empire, Duvniask, Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States, Kenowa, Necroghastia, Senkaku, The Huskar Social Union, The Most Grand Feline Empire

Advertisement

Remove ads