Rush doesn't like them, in that even sluts wouldn't touch him for a million dollars.
Advertisement

by Revolutopia » Sun Mar 04, 2012 12:08 am

by Socialdemokraterne » Sun Mar 04, 2012 12:09 am

by Tekania » Sun Mar 04, 2012 12:10 am
Saiwania wrote:It disappoints me that Bill O'Reilly is deciding to side with Rush Limbaugh in attacking Sandra Fluke. He's also been misled into thinking that this issue is somehow about taxpayer money. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDcT6r1DOXE

by Tekania » Sun Mar 04, 2012 12:15 am

by Miss Defied » Sun Mar 04, 2012 12:16 am
Grave_n_idle wrote:The Pill costs the same no matter if you have sex one time per year, or three times a night.
Revolutopia wrote:Moreover, you don't need more pills if you have more sex. Instead, you take the same amount of pills if you have sex once a year as you do if you have daily gang bangs.
Alien Space Bats wrote:IOW, the number of pills a woman must take to avoid pregnancy is entirely independent of the frequency with which a woman has sex.

by Tekania » Sun Mar 04, 2012 12:21 am
Cannot think of a name wrote:Farnhamia wrote:Rats.
@Gauthier: Yeah, that's undoubtedly what it is. Someone said to Rush, "You put your foot in it, the liberals are on the warpath, just say you're sorry for your choice of words." And that is basically what he said, too.
Well, I mean, honestly though, what's he going to say? People aren't upset at him for being against the proposal, that's a given. Of course he's against it. That's not the offensive part. The offensive part was calling her a slut and a prostitute.
The part where he doesn't seem to understand how hormonal birth control works or obfiscates the issue to make people think it's about 'their money' etc, that's just run of the mill Rush bullshit to which we can point and laugh and correct.
But the part that crossed the line was calling her a slut and a whore and suggesting that she put up sex videos for everyone to see because we're paying for her birth control...
Of course, we're not paying for shit, she is paying for her own healthcare coverage. But that part isn't offensive as much as it's just stupid.

by The Black Forrest » Sun Mar 04, 2012 12:21 am
Farnhamia wrote:Tekania wrote:
Yeah, someone noted the "apology" a few pages back.
Rats.
@Gauthier: Yeah, that's undoubtedly what it is. Someone said to Rush, "You put your foot in it, the liberals are on the warpath, just say you're sorry for your choice of words." And that is basically what he said, too.

by New England and The Maritimes » Sun Mar 04, 2012 12:23 am
The Black Forrest wrote:Farnhamia wrote:Rats.
@Gauthier: Yeah, that's undoubtedly what it is. Someone said to Rush, "You put your foot in it, the liberals are on the warpath, just say you're sorry for your choice of words." And that is basically what he said, too.
He is sorry about lost sponsorship. For example, sleep train canceled advertising on his show. Others probably did as well.
I don't buy the apology. What he said wasn't a simple bad choice of words.
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.
by Cannot think of a name » Sun Mar 04, 2012 12:25 am
The Black Forrest wrote:
He is sorry about lost sponsorship. For example, sleep train canceled advertising on his show. Others probably did as well.
I don't buy the apology. What he said wasn't a simple bad choice of words.
Tekania wrote:
Well, that's all just his "poor choice of words".... after all in calling her a "slut" and requesting that she post her sex tapes online for him he "did not mean [it] as a personal attack".

by Tekania » Sun Mar 04, 2012 12:25 am
The Black Forrest wrote:Farnhamia wrote:Rats.
@Gauthier: Yeah, that's undoubtedly what it is. Someone said to Rush, "You put your foot in it, the liberals are on the warpath, just say you're sorry for your choice of words." And that is basically what he said, too.
He is sorry about lost sponsorship. For example, sleep train canceled advertising on his show. Others probably did as well.
I don't buy the apology. What he said wasn't a simple bad choice of words.

by New England and The Maritimes » Sun Mar 04, 2012 12:26 am
Tekania wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:
He is sorry about lost sponsorship. For example, sleep train canceled advertising on his show. Others probably did as well.
I don't buy the apology. What he said wasn't a simple bad choice of words.
Sure it was a poor choice of words... yeah.... he meant to say she was a... a ... um.. a... sleuth... yah, sleuth... that's the ticket.
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

by Ora Amaris » Sun Mar 04, 2012 12:26 am

by The Black Forrest » Sun Mar 04, 2012 12:28 am

by Lacadaemon » Sun Mar 04, 2012 12:28 am

by Lacadaemon » Sun Mar 04, 2012 12:30 am

by New England and The Maritimes » Sun Mar 04, 2012 12:31 am
Lacadaemon wrote:
No we don't. Because it's a totally judgmental and derogatory term for someone who is exercising the right of self determination over her own body.
That said, this nation has totally jumped the shark. So called 'birth control' is often used for reasons other than 'birth control'. Moreover, to those that couldn't see that quasi-nationalizing healthcare in the US in this fashion would make the medication du jour a political issue, well then, you really ought to learn to ride a unicycle and spend the next decade riding around your neighborhood with a dunces hat on.
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

by Tekania » Sun Mar 04, 2012 12:32 am

by New England and The Maritimes » Sun Mar 04, 2012 12:33 am
Tekania wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:
That' explains it. He is a card reader. Somebody else wrote it on his card and he read it before he realized what he was saying.
Yeah, that's it... he's a card reader, yeah.... and...um....and... yeah... and...... his glasses lenses fell out that day, yeah, that's the ticket... and he did the program while wearing just the frames... yeah.
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

by Lacadaemon » Sun Mar 04, 2012 12:35 am
New England and The Maritimes wrote:Forcing this confrontation when he knows he has the numbers to win it may just be Obama's smartest move, if he has the balls to run with it.

by New England and The Maritimes » Sun Mar 04, 2012 12:41 am
Lacadaemon wrote:New England and The Maritimes wrote:Forcing this confrontation when he knows he has the numbers to win it may just be Obama's smartest move, if he has the balls to run with it.
It will never end though. It's politicizing medicine. Sure, I agree that the pill should be covered, no questions about it. Ultimately though, medicine should be in the hands of medical professionals, not politics.
So this week the pill, next week, I don't know. But fuck me, should we be having to select our vote over specifics of medical treatment? As if there aren't enough retarded wedge issues to begin with.
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

by Dark Fire Ice » Sun Mar 04, 2012 12:51 am

by Farnhamia » Sun Mar 04, 2012 12:55 am
Dark Fire Ice wrote:Why do churches have the privilege of choosing, whats medicine or not? True they did during the plague, and their cure was to a, huddle around the sick and pray, b, run like yell, or c, blame and kill the Jews, so their track record on logic, morals, or basic humanity is on par with genocidal maniacs, so sure lets take their word how act on human reproduction; the product is holy, but the carrier is the basis of sin. If they want don't want to provide healthcare, then let them, and how about getting rid the rest of special privileges they get from the US government.

by Alien Space Bats » Sun Mar 04, 2012 1:02 am
Miss Defied wrote:Wow. Hard to fathom that after 30 pages, this still needs to be stated.

by Dark Fire Ice » Sun Mar 04, 2012 1:21 am
Farnhamia wrote:Dark Fire Ice wrote:Why do churches have the privilege of choosing, whats medicine or not? True they did during the plague, and their cure was to a, huddle around the sick and pray, b, run like yell, or c, blame and kill the Jews, so their track record on logic, morals, or basic humanity is on par with genocidal maniacs, so sure lets take their word how act on human reproduction; the product is holy, but the carrier is the basis of sin. If they want don't want to provide healthcare, then let them, and how about getting rid the rest of special privileges they get from the US government.
It's not all health care, it's just birth control. And it's not all churches, mostly just the Roman Catholics. They have their reasons.

by Farnhamia » Sun Mar 04, 2012 1:22 am
Dark Fire Ice wrote:Farnhamia wrote:It's not all health care, it's just birth control. And it's not all churches, mostly just the Roman Catholics. They have their reasons.
But they are still saying they want to cover what they want in healthcare, and Roman Catholics are not very high on the sanity bar.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: 0cala, Benuty, Dakran, Dimetrodon Empire, El Lazaro, Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States, Kenowa, Necroghastia, Senkaku, The Most Grand Feline Empire
Advertisement