NATION

PASSWORD

Homosexuality and parenthood: your thoughts.

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Jormengand
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8414
Founded: May 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Jormengand » Fri Feb 24, 2012 10:26 am

Norstal wrote:
The ruivan Empire wrote:here here! you can use all of mine too... give this person a good shot from me too will you? thanks.

There is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING wrong with a homosexual couple or a single homosexual either for that matter wanting to raise a child. i think these people and the ops friends should be EXTREMELY proud of what they want to do and i hope that they get what they wish for. a person should be judged on their actions NOT their lifestyles, choices, or sexuality. if only everyone else thought this way...

Jormengand argued that, if there are differences between gay and straight parents AND we are to oppress gay people/parents, straight parents would be worse parents than gay parents. Which, I have to agree with Lacky here, is pretty bigoted. Your opinion of a group of people does not or should not influence your parenting style. Otherwise, we can say that white parents are worse than black parents before 1850s, which is just ridiculously absurd. Ridiculous.

Moreover, perhaps we SHOULD oppress parents to make them better parents. Which, again, absurd.

I argued that straight people are more likely to be homophobic than gays. If their child is gay, this causes problems. How is this bigoted, or what you said I said?
Jormengand wrote:It would be really meta if I sigged this.

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Fri Feb 24, 2012 10:29 am

Jormengand wrote:
Norstal wrote:Jormengand argued that, if there are differences between gay and straight parents AND we are to oppress gay people/parents, straight parents would be worse parents than gay parents. Which, I have to agree with Lacky here, is pretty bigoted. Your opinion of a group of people does not or should not influence your parenting style. Otherwise, we can say that white parents are worse than black parents before 1850s, which is just ridiculously absurd. Ridiculous.

Moreover, perhaps we SHOULD oppress parents to make them better parents. Which, again, absurd.

I argued that straight people are more likely to be homophobic than gays. If their child is gay, this causes problems. How is this bigoted, or what you said I said?

No, you argued that if there are differences in parenting between straight and homosexual couples, homosexuals would be better parents.

That's what you posted. I suggest you revise your post or choose your words carefully if that's not what you meant.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Pope Joan
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19500
Founded: Mar 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Pope Joan » Fri Feb 24, 2012 10:30 am

Let's just have the same standards for every would-be adoptive couple.

Do a home study. Do they have employment, or a reliable income? Is the rap sheet clean? Do they live next to a nuclear dump? etc.

Blank out the names, just call them Z and K or something.

I have known homosexual parents to be good at the task, and some were not. It's about the same ratio as hetero parents.
"Life is difficult".

-M. Scott Peck

User avatar
Jormengand
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8414
Founded: May 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Jormengand » Fri Feb 24, 2012 10:59 am

Norstal wrote:
Jormengand wrote:I argued that straight people are more likely to be homophobic than gays. If their child is gay, this causes problems. How is this bigoted, or what you said I said?

No, you argued that if there are differences in parenting between straight and homosexual couples, homosexuals would be better parents.

That's what you posted. I suggest you revise your post or choose your words carefully if that's not what you meant.

I said that homosexuals could be better, because and only because there is practically no chance of them being homophobic themselves. I thought that was obvious from the fact that I said it.
Jormengand wrote:It would be really meta if I sigged this.

User avatar
The Armed Persons Project
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 120
Founded: Jan 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Armed Persons Project » Fri Feb 24, 2012 11:03 am

The chances of them being good or shitty parents are just as great as for straight couples - so treat them the same.

Everyone is entitled to have their opinion on homosexuality, but some of those opinions are just plain wrong.

User avatar
Distruzio
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23841
Founded: Feb 28, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Distruzio » Fri Feb 24, 2012 1:46 pm

Sumadesia wrote:
Distruzio wrote:Straight parents bring up gay kids all the time. Your friends may bring up a straight kid... likely with impeccable fashion sense and a quality of class, but a straight kid, nonetheless.

I've no issue with it. I love seeing two people in love caring for a child no matter what.


Not, of course, that it would be a problem if the child did turn out to be gay :blink:


Of course it wouldn't. I figured that was a given considering my comment regarding people in love.
Eastern Orthodox Christian

Anti-Progressive
Conservative

Anti-Feminist
Right leaning Distributist

Anti-Equity
Western Chauvanist

Anti-Globalism
Nationalist

User avatar
Wazkyraque
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12527
Founded: May 23, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Wazkyraque » Fri Feb 24, 2012 2:05 pm

Well, I don't see any difference between homosexual parenting and heterosexual parenting. I think it's discriminatory that they are treated less.
"Everything takes time. Bees have to move very fast to stay still."

User avatar
Forsher
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21487
Founded: Jan 30, 2012
New York Times Democracy

Postby Forsher » Fri Feb 24, 2012 3:09 pm

Risottia wrote:I gather now that your comment wasn't necessarily aimed at using the "natural/unnateral" argument in this debate. Anyway, dropping "natural/unnatural" in an issue where "innaturality" has been exploited by at least one of the sides might lead to misunderstanding, don't you think so?


In hindsight, I would have to say yes. Luckily I think my explanations have been clear enough.
That it Could be What it Is, Is What it Is

Stop making shit up, though. Links, or it's a God-damn lie and you know it.

The normie life is heteronormie

We won't know until 2053 when it'll be really obvious what he should've done. [...] We have no option but to guess.

User avatar
Forsher
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21487
Founded: Jan 30, 2012
New York Times Democracy

Postby Forsher » Fri Feb 24, 2012 3:11 pm

Grenartia wrote:
Forsher wrote:
Politics.


One thing I've always felt is that politics should never be the deciding factor on anything.


Too true. In this case I mean politics of everyone involved.
That it Could be What it Is, Is What it Is

Stop making shit up, though. Links, or it's a God-damn lie and you know it.

The normie life is heteronormie

We won't know until 2053 when it'll be really obvious what he should've done. [...] We have no option but to guess.

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Fri Feb 24, 2012 3:13 pm

How on earth is this still an issue? Seriously, this is the 21st Century, and for the majority of us, the developed world. Surely we're past this shit already?
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 158977
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Fri Feb 24, 2012 3:26 pm

Cruciland wrote:
Ifreann wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MassResistance Those guys are your source? The people described as an active anti-gay hate group?

Believe it or not, sometimes extremists are right...

That's as may be, but they're far from trustworthy.

User avatar
Auremena
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26352
Founded: Mar 04, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Auremena » Fri Feb 24, 2012 3:35 pm

Could the take me as parents? I'd love it.
NS's aviation and train sabelotodo.
Post-left anarchist and sad about it.
Killdash, Firsthome, Coffee Cakes, SSC, GCoCS, Snowy, Val, Aeqy, and Replevion are my bitches.
Foot worshipper: Lutvikkia. Dakky's mom, I had her with Nana.
The female Jim Morrison; not as talented, but just as attractive and self destructive. The one true heir to the throne of the Lizard King.
Some poetry I write sometimes
Tearing the MBTA a new one since 2014. The MTA too since 2016. Cover the world in trains 2030
COYS!

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Fri Feb 24, 2012 6:46 pm

Jormengand wrote:
Norstal wrote:No, you argued that if there are differences in parenting between straight and homosexual couples, homosexuals would be better parents.

That's what you posted. I suggest you revise your post or choose your words carefully if that's not what you meant.

I said that homosexuals could be better, because and only because there is practically no chance of them being homophobic themselves. I thought that was obvious from the fact that I said it.

No, it isn't "obvious" because you just pulled it out of your arse. If there are any difference between gays or straight parenting skills you wouldn't know it. I wouldn't know it. Lacky wouldn't know it.

Point is, and really you should've stopped it right there, there's no real difference between gay or straight parenting. Homophobia, heterophobia, etc. has no bearing on parenting skills. Completely different issues.
Last edited by Norstal on Fri Feb 24, 2012 6:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
New Rogernomics
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9422
Founded: Aug 22, 2006
Left-wing Utopia

Postby New Rogernomics » Fri Feb 24, 2012 7:06 pm

Salandriagado wrote:How on earth is this still an issue? Seriously, this is the 21st Century, and for the majority of us, the developed world. Surely we're past this shit already?
If only that were true, unfortunately normally intelligent people become irrational when it comes to homosexuality, and spend their lives finding pseudo-intellectual arguments against homosexual rights. :meh:
Herald (Vice-Delegate) of Lazarus
First Citizen (PM) of Lazarus
Chocolate & Italian ice addict
"Ooh, we don't talk about Bruno, no, no, no..."
  • Former Proedroi (Minister) of Foreign Affairs of Lazarus
  • Former Lazarus Delegate (Humane Republic of Lazarus, 2015)
  • Minister of Culture & Media (Humane Republic of Lazarus)
  • Foreign Minister of The Ascendancy (RIP, and purged)
  • Senator of The Ascendancy (RIP, and purged)
  • Interior Commissioner of Lazarus (Pre-People's Republic of Lazarus)
  • At some point a member of the Grey family...then father vanished...
  • Foreign Minister of The Last Kingdom (RIP)
  • ADN:DSA Rep for Eastern Roman Empire
  • Honoratus Servant of the Holy Land (Eastern Roman Empire)
  • UN/WA Delegate of Trans Atlantice (RIP)

User avatar
Kaizerxisiv
Diplomat
 
Posts: 841
Founded: Oct 28, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Kaizerxisiv » Fri Feb 24, 2012 7:19 pm

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:Brief background:
A couple who are friends of mine got married a year ago, more or less. They're homosexuals. As many couples do, they are thinking about parenting. Nothing wrong there, right? Wrong, it seems.

Because of the stigma that exists in many places, since they're gay, this apparently renders them immediately as bad candidates for parenting. Adoption, for example, has been made very difficult for them. It seems some think that homosexuality automatically turns them into bad people and, therefore, unfit for parenthood.

(Yes, I am aware that they can go the IVF way, surrogate parenting, yadda yadda. But they wish to adopt.)

My friends want to adopt, they fervently believe that they have all that is necessary to give a needy child (and they're not dead set on adopting a baby) all the love this child needs. They're economically stable, they have a good house and will be able to provide excellently for this child. These, IMO, are sufficient reasons for them to be able to adopt. The desire alone, to give love to an abandoned child, is enough.

However, this doesn't seem to be the case for the adoption agency. And the main strike against them is, sadly, their sexuality. Something that I don't see as key to bring up a happy and healthy child. If they're able to lovingly care for a son/daughter, why should their sexuality matter?

My question is simple: what do you think of homosexual parenting? Aye or nay and why do you think this way? (aside from the religion excuse)


I think it's great. Wasn't there a study about two months ago that said kids from gay households were more stable or something? Either way, it's fantastic that they were allowed to marry. In my home state it's now illegal under the constitution.. :(
Milks Empire wrote:A thread late last year. Someone said same-sex behavior/attractions don't happen outside of humans. Bonobos debunk that crock of shit rather quickly.

1 2 3 4a 4b [5a] 5b 6


User avatar
Hathradic States
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 29895
Founded: Mar 26, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Hathradic States » Fri Feb 24, 2012 7:25 pm

Though I myself am not a large supporter of gay rights and its advocates, this is a case in which I side with them. If someone is going to be a good parent, it doesn't matter if they are attracted to men, women, or purple sheep. (Paedophiles, ont he other hand...)

Liberals: Honestly I was wrong bout em.
I swear I'm not as terrible as you remember.
Sadly Proven Right in 2016
Final text here.

User avatar
Ceannairceach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26637
Founded: Sep 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Ceannairceach » Fri Feb 24, 2012 7:32 pm

Hathradic States wrote:Though I myself am not a large supporter of gay rights and its advocates, this is a case in which I side with them. If someone is going to be a good parent, it doesn't matter if they are attracted to men, women, or purple sheep. (Paedophiles, ont he other hand...)

Unless they act on their desires, even paedophiles could be good parents.

@}-;-'---

"But who prays for Satan? Who in eighteen centuries, has had the common humanity to pray for the one sinner that needed it most..." -Mark Twain

User avatar
Desperate Measures
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10149
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Desperate Measures » Fri Feb 24, 2012 7:33 pm

Hathradic States wrote:Though I myself am not a large supporter of gay rights and its advocates, this is a case in which I side with them. If someone is going to be a good parent, it doesn't matter if they are attracted to men, women, or purple sheep. (Paedophiles, ont he other hand...)

I don't know if I can vouch for the dude dying his sex sheep purple but... other than that, it's horrible not to let loving people care for children that need loving people.
"My loathings are simple: stupidity, oppression, crime, cruelty, soft music."
- Vladimir Nabokov US (1899 - 1977)
Also, me.
“Man has such a predilection for systems and abstract deductions that he is ready to distort the truth intentionally, he is ready to deny the evidence of his senses only to justify his logic”
- Fyodor Dostoyevsky Russian Novelist and Writer, 1821-1881
"All Clock Faces Are Wrong." - Gene Ray, Prophet(?) http://www.timecube.com
A simplified maxim on the subject states "An atheist would say, 'I don't believe God exists'; an agnostic would say, 'I don't know whether or not God exists'; and an ignostic would say, 'I don't know what you mean when you say, "God exists" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignosticism

User avatar
Osterra
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 410
Founded: Aug 15, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Osterra » Fri Feb 24, 2012 7:41 pm

This reluctance to put two loving same sex prospective parents through this denial reflects how the world is still too judgmental. I wanted to punch my classmate who said he was against it when he tried to point out a correlation between homosexual men and paedophiles. DISGUSTING.

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202532
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Fri Feb 24, 2012 7:45 pm

Wikkiwallana wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
I am sure there is no real reason for that belief, that homosexuals make worse/better parents than straight couples. To some, the main problem is their sexual orientation, which somehow, in the minds of the bigots, impedes them from raising a child. That because they're gay, parenting is out of the question.

A lame reason to disallow gay people from becoming parents, if you ask me.

It's at least partly because the idea that homosexuality is the same as pederasty or pedophilia still has traction for some stupid reason.


That reminds me of something I was told a few days ago. That a woman ceases to be a woman if she's a lesbian. I still don't see how sexual preference cancels gender.

I guess that's the same with parenthood. That some consider sexual preference as a 'yay/nay' characteristic for how 'suited' one is as a parent. Something I don't see factoring in into that. A gay parent could be as good of a parent as a straight parent. Or not.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202532
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Fri Feb 24, 2012 7:48 pm

Katganistan wrote:I would sooner see a kid in a loving, stable home than to be passed around the foster care system or in a state-run institution.


That's exactly my thought. If a loving family is there, why would the parents's sexuality matter?
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 158977
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Fri Feb 24, 2012 7:51 pm

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Katganistan wrote:I would sooner see a kid in a loving, stable home than to be passed around the foster care system or in a state-run institution.


That's exactly my thought. If a loving family is there, why would the parents's sexuality matter?

We have to protect kids from gaydiation!

User avatar
SaintB
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21792
Founded: Apr 18, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby SaintB » Fri Feb 24, 2012 7:54 pm

Best we can do is work on improving the future generation's perception of homosexuality. Its that or hope for some miracle disease that only affects homophobes.
Hi my name is SaintB and I am prone to sarcasm and hyperbole. Because of this I make no warranties, express or implied, concerning the accuracy, completeness, reliability or suitability of the above statement, of its constituent parts, or of any supporting data. These terms are subject to change without notice from myself.

Every day NationStates tells me I have one issue. I am pretty sure I've got more than that.

User avatar
Hathradic States
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 29895
Founded: Mar 26, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Hathradic States » Fri Feb 24, 2012 7:56 pm

Ceannairceach wrote:
Hathradic States wrote:Though I myself am not a large supporter of gay rights and its advocates, this is a case in which I side with them. If someone is going to be a good parent, it doesn't matter if they are attracted to men, women, or purple sheep. (Paedophiles, ont he other hand...)

Unless they act on their desires, even paedophiles could be good parents.

I will cede that point to you.

Desperate Measures wrote:
Hathradic States wrote:Though I myself am not a large supporter of gay rights and its advocates, this is a case in which I side with them. If someone is going to be a good parent, it doesn't matter if they are attracted to men, women, or purple sheep. (Paedophiles, ont he other hand...)

I don't know if I can vouch for the dude dying his sex sheep purple but... other than that, it's horrible not to let loving people care for children that need loving people.

There is nothing wrong with dying a sex sheep purple...and I agree.

Liberals: Honestly I was wrong bout em.
I swear I'm not as terrible as you remember.
Sadly Proven Right in 2016
Final text here.

User avatar
Desperate Measures
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10149
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Desperate Measures » Fri Feb 24, 2012 7:59 pm

Hathradic States wrote:
Ceannairceach wrote:Unless they act on their desires, even paedophiles could be good parents.

I will cede that point to you.

Desperate Measures wrote:I don't know if I can vouch for the dude dying his sex sheep purple but... other than that, it's horrible not to let loving people care for children that need loving people.

There is nothing wrong with dying a sex sheep purple...and I agree.

There... might not be anything wrong with the purple sex sheep. I'm still not letting my kid play in that yard.
"My loathings are simple: stupidity, oppression, crime, cruelty, soft music."
- Vladimir Nabokov US (1899 - 1977)
Also, me.
“Man has such a predilection for systems and abstract deductions that he is ready to distort the truth intentionally, he is ready to deny the evidence of his senses only to justify his logic”
- Fyodor Dostoyevsky Russian Novelist and Writer, 1821-1881
"All Clock Faces Are Wrong." - Gene Ray, Prophet(?) http://www.timecube.com
A simplified maxim on the subject states "An atheist would say, 'I don't believe God exists'; an agnostic would say, 'I don't know whether or not God exists'; and an ignostic would say, 'I don't know what you mean when you say, "God exists" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignosticism

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alvecia, Dimetrodon Empire, Dumb Ideologies, Fahran, Perikuresu, The Astral Mandate, Tillania, Vassenor

Advertisement

Remove ads