Dream Vehicle

by **Former Principalities** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 11:50 pm

I have two dream vehicles. You know, something simple that gets me from A to B, something like a T-90 MBT or a WWII German King Tiger (with a better engine of course).

by **Kanabia** » Mon Sep 14, 2009 12:09 am

If I could have any means of transportation i'd forgo a vehicle and just have a personal teleporter thingymagiggy.

by **Lunatic Goofballs** » Mon Sep 14, 2009 12:13 am

Kanabia wrote:If I could have any means of transportation i'd forgo a vehicle and just have a personal teleporter thingymagiggy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m6vYKJerstg

by **Wilgrove** » Mon Sep 14, 2009 12:14 am

A truck that runs on Algae fuel.

by **Kanabia** » Mon Sep 14, 2009 12:27 am

Lunatic Goofballs wrote:
Kanabia wrote:If I could have any means of transportation i'd forgo a vehicle and just have a personal teleporter thingymagiggy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m6vYKJerstg

Oh well that's a small price to pay. <.<

by **Alsatian Knights** » Mon Sep 14, 2009 12:29 am

currently I have an '08 Lancer.

and I know the cap is modern tech but this thin actually works.

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1091/880 ... 7e01_b.jpg

by **Midnight Wandering** » Mon Sep 14, 2009 12:34 am

Something by Ducati - whichever one that looks most similar to the one Natsuki rides in Mai HiME

by **Cameroi** » Mon Sep 14, 2009 12:41 am

Tunizcha wrote:

i'll second THAT one.

by **Alsatian Knights** » Mon Sep 14, 2009 12:44 am

Cameroi wrote:
Tunizcha wrote:

i'll second THAT one.

I don't like to share with 50 other people who are coughing and sneezing and picking their noses and talking of the cell phone about how Janie screw their brother or boy friend...I hate trains...

by **Sho Trii** » Mon Sep 14, 2009 12:49 am

The batmobile from the original batman movie

by **RightWingChristians** » Mon Sep 14, 2009 12:51 am

To pick up the ladies, and drop them off.

by **Alsatian Knights** » Mon Sep 14, 2009 12:56 am

RightWingChristians wrote:To pick up the ladies, and drop them off.

Hell Yes!

by **Cameroi** » Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:24 am

Alsatian Knights wrote:
Cameroi wrote:
Tunizcha wrote:

i'll second THAT one.

I don't like to share with 50 other people who are coughing and sneezing and picking their noses and talking of the cell phone about how Janie screw their brother or boy friend...I hate trains...

but do you hate them more then walking when the oil runs out?

by **Wilgrove** » Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:25 am

RightWingChristians wrote:To pick up the ladies, and drop them off.

They need to replace the tires. No threads on them.

by **Alsatian Knights** » Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:29 am

Cameroi wrote:
Alsatian Knights wrote:
Cameroi wrote:
Tunizcha wrote:

i'll second THAT one.

I don't like to share with 50 other people who are coughing and sneezing and picking their noses and talking of the cell phone about how Janie screw their brother or boy friend...I hate trains...

but do you hate them more then walking when the oil runs out?

I'm a jogger, I jog a good 5 miles every morning and 20 when I'm pissed off or with my dog, and no not all at once and with out stopping...I'm not superman.

by **GetBert** » Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:32 am

I am still waiting for that jetpack people kept promising in the 1960s.

by **Lunatic Goofballs** » Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:34 am

GetBert wrote:I am still waiting for that jetpack people kept promising in the 1960s.

They realized in the early 1990s that the only thing more dangerous than people driving is people driving at high speed in three dimensions. The real flaw with flying vehicles for everyone is the quality of everyone. Once we figure out how to make them pilot themselves then we're good.

by **Wilgrove** » Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:36 am

Lunatic Goofballs wrote:
GetBert wrote:I am still waiting for that jetpack people kept promising in the 1960s.

They realized in the early 1990s that the only thing more dangerous than people driving is people driving at high speed in three dimensions. The real flaw with flying vehicles for everyone is the quality of everyone. Once we figure out how to make them pilot themselves then we're good.

I agree. We'd also need to bring down the cost of flying. There's a reason you don't see a Cessna and Piper in every driveway. $$$.

by **Allbeama** » Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:39 am

We should have flying hydrogen fueled cars, but no, Big Oil won't allow it.

by **Wilgrove** » Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:45 am

Allbeama wrote:We should have flying hydrogen fueled cars, but no, Big Oil won't allow it.

Oh God no, my car accident tonight reinforce the idea that people do not need a 3rd dimension added into driving.

by **Cheviott** » Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:47 am

by **Cameroi** » Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:52 am

Allbeama wrote:We should have flying hydrogen fueled cars, but no, Big Oil won't allow it.

hydogen pintos in the sky. i can see it now. fourth of july every day.

big oil IS the robber barony of this century. they WANT us to persue the yet to be practical to mass produce fuel cell though. to distract us from the practical and reliable use of photovoltaics, among other things.

the jetpack problem is that it takes a pretty hefty guy to carry a jetpack on his back with enough fuel in it to just barely make it across a relatively not so wide river. rocket man was/is something of a fantasy.

of course anyone WANTS to walk around with that much HYDROGEN on their back ...
um, ok if i just watch?

by **GetBert** » Mon Sep 14, 2009 2:04 am

Lunatic Goofballs wrote:
GetBert wrote:I am still waiting for that jetpack people kept promising in the 1960s.

They realized in the early 1990s that the only thing more dangerous than people driving is people driving at high speed in three dimensions. The real flaw with flying vehicles for everyone is the quality of everyone. Once we figure out how to make them pilot themselves then we're good.

All my dreams are crushed, still I suppose going round with a lot of hydrogen peroxide strapped to my body is likely to get me shot as a potential suicide bomber.

by **Imperial isa** » Mon Sep 14, 2009 2:08 am

Gauntleted Fist wrote:For the tankers:

You would never have trouble with traffic jams.

tanks are useful for that but not cheap to run

by **Alsatian Knights** » Mon Sep 14, 2009 2:15 am

Imperial isa wrote:
Gauntleted Fist wrote:For the tankers:

You would never have trouble with traffic jams.

tanks are useful for that but not cheap to run

Flintstone Tanks...

Dream Vehicle

Who is online