Advertisement

by EnragedMaldivians » Thu Feb 23, 2012 2:47 pm
Gauthier wrote:EnragedMaldivians wrote:
Look at your sig.
Tell me what's the difference between refusing to vote for someone because s/he is a Sunni and refusing to vote for someone because he's Mormon?
If a Mitt Romney is a Mormon who will actually defer to scripture as a basis for policy, fair enough - but not voting for him just because he is Mormon is exactly like not voting for someone because s/he is Sunni/Catholic/Whatever.
Except far as I can tell there isn't any significant sectarian split amongst the Mormons. Plus when was the last time Muslims pumped money into an American campaign to legalize discrimination? Proposition 8 is proof that Mormons would try to subvert law to suit their bigotted beliefs given the opportunity. Can't say Muslims as a whole would try to do something similar in the United States given a chance.

by Nationstatelandsville » Thu Feb 23, 2012 3:05 pm

by The Rich Port » Thu Feb 23, 2012 3:16 pm

by Bontivate » Thu Feb 23, 2012 3:18 pm

by Nationstatelandsville » Thu Feb 23, 2012 3:21 pm
Bontivate wrote:Having a Mormon as President is about as dangerous as having a Christian as President. So essentially, it's very dangerous. Nah, just kiddin'. I'd say Mitt Romney is currently the least dangerous Republican candidate. He doesn't seem like he'd execute gays (Santorum) or set up child labor sweat shops (Gingrich).

by Bontivate » Thu Feb 23, 2012 3:23 pm
Nationstatelandsville wrote:Bontivate wrote:Having a Mormon as President is about as dangerous as having a Christian as President. So essentially, it's very dangerous. Nah, just kiddin'. I'd say Mitt Romney is currently the least dangerous Republican candidate. He doesn't seem like he'd execute gays (Santorum) or set up child labor sweat shops (Gingrich).
He would, however, lead his army of time-displaced Terminators in taking over Iran.
So there's that.

by Ovisterra » Thu Feb 23, 2012 3:26 pm

by Gauthier » Thu Feb 23, 2012 3:30 pm
Genivaria wrote:Change the word 'Mormon' to the word 'Jew' and you'll realize how backwards this entire line of thinking is.

by The Rich Port » Thu Feb 23, 2012 3:30 pm
Genivaria wrote:Change the word 'Mormon' to the word 'Jew' and you'll realize how backwards this entire line of thinking is.

by Cill Charthaigh » Thu Feb 23, 2012 3:40 pm
Eleutheria wrote:most ludicrous and most obviously man made religion i can think of

by Putria » Thu Feb 23, 2012 3:43 pm
Bottle wrote:Putria wrote:
I would have to be ignorant to not see how offensive thay may be to some faiths, I personally would be honored if a Jewish faith offered me a similiar gift, but that is because I was raised in a different Religious culture. But our Commandments are already given; we cannot simply stop because popular demand says so.
If you are seriously arguing that you are incapable of stopping when somebody says stop because your religion tells you to do something, then you just provided an absolutely convincing argument for why NOBODY of your faith should ever be allowed to serve in public office. Hell, you're making a good case for why you shouldn't be permitted to walk free at all...
Now, I personally think you're quite capable of stopping when people say stop. I think you choose to continue doing things that you know are offensive and rude, for a range of reasons which all just boil down to garden variety character flaws and cultural problems. I don't think your rudeness is actually a sign that Mormonism is a pathology, it's just a sign that you, personally, are acting like a jerk. I wouldn't vote for YOU for that reason, but I also wouldn't automatically hold it against all people who are Mormon.

by Cill Charthaigh » Thu Feb 23, 2012 3:44 pm

by Bottle » Thu Feb 23, 2012 3:44 pm
Putria wrote:Bottle wrote:If you are seriously arguing that you are incapable of stopping when somebody says stop because your religion tells you to do something, then you just provided an absolutely convincing argument for why NOBODY of your faith should ever be allowed to serve in public office. Hell, you're making a good case for why you shouldn't be permitted to walk free at all...
Now, I personally think you're quite capable of stopping when people say stop. I think you choose to continue doing things that you know are offensive and rude, for a range of reasons which all just boil down to garden variety character flaws and cultural problems. I don't think your rudeness is actually a sign that Mormonism is a pathology, it's just a sign that you, personally, are acting like a jerk. I wouldn't vote for YOU for that reason, but I also wouldn't automatically hold it against all people who are Mormon.
You took that about... 3 and a half thousands miles too far.


by EnragedMaldivians » Thu Feb 23, 2012 3:50 pm
Putria wrote:Bottle wrote:If you are seriously arguing that you are incapable of stopping when somebody says stop because your religion tells you to do something, then you just provided an absolutely convincing argument for why NOBODY of your faith should ever be allowed to serve in public office. Hell, you're making a good case for why you shouldn't be permitted to walk free at all...
Now, I personally think you're quite capable of stopping when people say stop. I think you choose to continue doing things that you know are offensive and rude, for a range of reasons which all just boil down to garden variety character flaws and cultural problems. I don't think your rudeness is actually a sign that Mormonism is a pathology, it's just a sign that you, personally, are acting like a jerk. I wouldn't vote for YOU for that reason, but I also wouldn't automatically hold it against all people who are Mormon.
You took that about... 3 and a half thousands miles too far.

by Astrolinium » Thu Feb 23, 2012 3:54 pm

by Gauthier » Thu Feb 23, 2012 3:56 pm
Astrolinium wrote:John F. Kennedy-is it safe to have a Catholic as President?

by Wellboneland » Thu Feb 23, 2012 3:56 pm
Salandriagado wrote:Of all of the things to complain about with Romney, you pick his religion? Seriously?
I know hat what I said I probably wrote poorly... but my past actions probably make more sense.

by The Republic of Lanos » Thu Feb 23, 2012 3:56 pm
Astrolinium wrote:John F. Kennedy-is it safe to have a Catholic as President?

by Disserbia » Thu Feb 23, 2012 3:58 pm

by Putria » Thu Feb 23, 2012 3:59 pm
If you are seriously arguing that you are incapable of stopping when somebody says stop because your religion tells you to do something, then you just provided an absolutely convincing argument for why NOBODY of your faith should ever be allowed to serve in public office. Hell, you're making a good case for why you shouldn't be permitted to walk free at all...
Now, I personally think you're quite capable of stopping when people say stop. I think you choose to continue doing things that you know are offensive and rude, for a range of reasons which all just boil down to garden variety character flaws and cultural problems. I don't think your rudeness is actually a sign that Mormonism is a pathology, it's just a sign that you, personally, are acting like a jerk. I wouldn't vote for YOU for that reason, but I also wouldn't automatically hold it against all people who are Mormon.

by Gauthier » Thu Feb 23, 2012 4:00 pm
Disserbia wrote:So you've never heard of scientology...

by EnragedMaldivians » Thu Feb 23, 2012 4:07 pm

by Bottle » Thu Feb 23, 2012 4:09 pm
Putria wrote:Bottle wrote:Again with this weird attitude that you get to dictate how other people should feel about your behavior. Sorry, but you have no right to have people be okay with your rudeness.If you are seriously arguing that you are incapable of stopping when somebody says stop because your religion tells you to do something, then you just provided an absolutely convincing argument for why NOBODY of your faith should ever be allowed to serve in public office. Hell, you're making a good case for why you shouldn't be permitted to walk free at all...
Now, I personally think you're quite capable of stopping when people say stop. I think you choose to continue doing things that you know are offensive and rude, for a range of reasons which all just boil down to garden variety character flaws and cultural problems. I don't think your rudeness is actually a sign that Mormonism is a pathology, it's just a sign that you, personally, are acting like a jerk. I wouldn't vote for YOU for that reason, but I also wouldn't automatically hold it against all people who are Mormon.
Both are incredibly personal and extremely offensive. Probably on the scale of reporting to Moderators.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: A Cardboard Box, Aureumterra III, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Bradfordville, Corporate Collective Salvation, El Lazaro, Gallade, Hurdergaryp, Kenmoria, Maineiacs, Necroghastia, Ostroeuropa, Rary, Republica de Sierra Nevada, Spirit of Hope, Subi Bumeen, The Jamesian Republic, The Union of Galaxies, Valrifall, Vassenor
Advertisement