NATION

PASSWORD

Income Taxes: Are They Theft?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Salvarity
Senator
 
Posts: 4344
Founded: Jun 28, 2011
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Salvarity » Sun Feb 19, 2012 9:24 pm

Sibirsky wrote:
Wikkiwallana wrote:Funny, the net value of the world economy seems to be doing just fine despite every major nation using a fiat currency. Doesn't seem to have failed at all.

:palm:
Do you not understand what "store of value" means? Your money decreases in value. That's not storing it.


I ask you this. What does not decrease or increase in value over time.
Supply and Demand will always be in effect.
Praetor of the Empire of Mare Nostrum
World Assembly Delegate of the Empire of Mare Nostrum

King of the British Isles
Prime Minister of the British Isles
Defense Minister of the British Isles
Home Minister of the British Isles
Culture Minister of the British Isles
MP of Parliament for Northern Ireland
Co-Founder of the SDLP in the British Isles
Admiral of the Royal British Isles Navy
Marquess of Winchester

Minister of the Exterior in the Land of Kings and Emperors
Minister of the Interior in the Land of Kings and Emperors
Senator in the Imperial Senate
Field Marshal Lieutenant of the Imperial Army of the Land of Kings and Emperors
Baron of Nassau

Lance Corporal in the North Pacific Army

Merryman in the United Defenders League

User avatar
Yootwopia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7866
Founded: Aug 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Yootwopia » Sun Feb 19, 2012 9:25 pm

Sibirsky wrote:Money could be metal, like coins. Or it could be anything. It could be electronic. But it must meet the criteria above. Fiat money fails the 3rd function?

Right...

See the thing is, right, the thing is. You aren't right. What about currencies that are no longer accepted after states fall apart/come together/just change currency?

Because I have some D-marks kinda lying around, and that was a Top Currency. Now it isn't.
Technically a Polanski.

User avatar
Sibirsky
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44940
Founded: Mar 22, 2009
Anarchy

Postby Sibirsky » Sun Feb 19, 2012 9:26 pm

Wikkiwallana wrote:
Sibirsky wrote:I showed that the 1990 formula shows 6%+ inflation. I addressed how they lower the rate as well.

I posted that before I saw your chart because I accidentally skipped a few posts using the "unread posts" feature. I still have yet to see anything resembling an addressal of rate lowering methods.

For like the 5th time...

Hedonics, geometric weighting, and substitution. The BLS admits that they do this, although they do not release the official formula.
Free market capitalism, path to prosperity
Свободный рынок капитализма, путь к процветанию
IBC 7 Finalists
8 Gold, 9 Silver, 2 Bronze medals IV Summer Olympics
2 Silver, 4 Bronze medals V Winter Olympics
Golfinator Classic Champion
Scott Cup I Champions
World Bowl 11 4th Place

User avatar
Wikkiwallana
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22500
Founded: Mar 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Wikkiwallana » Sun Feb 19, 2012 9:26 pm

Sibirsky wrote:
Wikkiwallana wrote:Funny, the net value of the world economy seems to be doing just fine despite every major nation using a fiat currency. Doesn't seem to have failed at all.

:palm:
Do you not understand what "store of value" means? Your money decreases in value. That's not storing it.

If I have 5 X and they are worth 3 Y each, then I get 3 more X, but as a consequence an X is now worth only 2 Y, I haven't lost anything, I've gained.
Proud Scalawag and Statist!

Please don't confuse my country for my politics; my country is being run as a parody, my posts aren't.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Xenohumanity wrote:
Nulono wrote:Snip
I'm a pro-lifer who runs a nation of dragon-men...
And even I think that's stupid.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

User avatar
Sibirsky
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44940
Founded: Mar 22, 2009
Anarchy

Postby Sibirsky » Sun Feb 19, 2012 9:27 pm

New Conglomerate wrote:
Sibirsky wrote:Do you?

Yes, a lower rate of inflation does 2 things. First, COLA is lower, saving the government money. 2nd, it makes GDP growth look better, so consumers and investors are more confident. Spending more, and investing more.

Damn the retirees living on fixed incomes.

COLA only includes variables that are definately inflation. Many other factors could cause rises in fuel prices, rises in cost of living, etc.

That's why they changed it. The old formula created excessive panic in the financial sector.

Right. And the fact that it lowered government expenses had nothing to do with it!
Free market capitalism, path to prosperity
Свободный рынок капитализма, путь к процветанию
IBC 7 Finalists
8 Gold, 9 Silver, 2 Bronze medals IV Summer Olympics
2 Silver, 4 Bronze medals V Winter Olympics
Golfinator Classic Champion
Scott Cup I Champions
World Bowl 11 4th Place

User avatar
Wikkiwallana
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22500
Founded: Mar 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Wikkiwallana » Sun Feb 19, 2012 9:27 pm

Sibirsky wrote:
Wikkiwallana wrote:I posted that before I saw your chart because I accidentally skipped a few posts using the "unread posts" feature. I still have yet to see anything resembling an addressal of rate lowering methods.

For like the 5th time...

Hedonics, geometric weighting, and substitution. The BLS admits that they do this, although they do not release the official formula.

Then for the 4th time what are hedonics, geometric weighting, and substitution, and why are they bad. Seriously you're just waving them about as boogeymen at this point.
Proud Scalawag and Statist!

Please don't confuse my country for my politics; my country is being run as a parody, my posts aren't.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Xenohumanity wrote:
Nulono wrote:Snip
I'm a pro-lifer who runs a nation of dragon-men...
And even I think that's stupid.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

User avatar
Wikkiwallana
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22500
Founded: Mar 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Wikkiwallana » Sun Feb 19, 2012 9:28 pm

Sibirsky wrote:
Salvarity wrote:
And that is a bad thing how?

It steals from retirees, the poor, people on fixed incomes, veterans, etc.

I said it right there, in the 2nd sentence. Why do you hate the poor?

And deflation steals from anyone with a savings account.
Proud Scalawag and Statist!

Please don't confuse my country for my politics; my country is being run as a parody, my posts aren't.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Xenohumanity wrote:
Nulono wrote:Snip
I'm a pro-lifer who runs a nation of dragon-men...
And even I think that's stupid.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

User avatar
Hydesland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15120
Founded: Nov 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Hydesland » Sun Feb 19, 2012 9:28 pm

Sibirsky wrote:
Salvarity wrote:
What makes the 1990 Formula the true formula and the current formula the false one?

I never said the 1990s formula is the true formula, just that it is closer to reality.


Being more convenient politically =/= closer to reality. Inflation is complicated, because in the real world things are ALWAYS CHANGING. Perhaps a high range intel processor back in 1990 costed $400, and now a high range processor costs $700, however the processor today is several hundred thousand times more efficient. So what is the inflation rate for this product? 75%? Or is it -500,000% when taking into account efficiency gain? All inflation measures are samples, why on earth would the sample used in the 1990 measure (which inherently MUST be weighted to some products more and other products less) be any better than the modern sample?

Furthermore, reality actually shows that modern CPI is perfectly close to reality, because you can easily compare it to independent statistical price indexes, like billion price index which uses no 'hedonics'.

Image
Last edited by Hydesland on Sun Feb 19, 2012 9:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Mad Monarch
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1405
Founded: Nov 30, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mad Monarch » Sun Feb 19, 2012 9:31 pm

Wikkiwallana wrote:
Sibirsky wrote:For like the 5th time...

Hedonics, geometric weighting, and substitution. The BLS admits that they do this, although they do not release the official formula.

Then for the 4th time what are hedonics, geometric weighting, and substitution, and why are they bad. Seriously you're just waving them about as boogeymen at this point.

Hedonics-the branch of psychology that deals with pleasurable and unpleasurable states of consciousness.
geometric weighting- doesn't exist in any online dictionary
substitution- Do I even have to define this?

He is throwing around big words that are in no way connected in an effort to make a point.

My response: 911, terrorism, intercourse, INTERCOURSE!

User avatar
Sibirsky
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44940
Founded: Mar 22, 2009
Anarchy

Postby Sibirsky » Sun Feb 19, 2012 9:31 pm

Mad Monarch wrote:
Sibirsky wrote:Sure. We already have private hospitals. And to a limited extent roads, fire stations, police and utilities.

Ya, several states have "pay for your fire department" taxes. Here is what happens if you don't pay and your house catches fire:

They show up, don't enter the property, don't let you near the property, and watch it burn while keeping your neighbors safe (if they payed). This actually isn't fear mongering, it actually does happen in states that have this fun little idea. How do you expect private business would be any better in that regard?

And? Your point is? Those are city run departments. You know, the fucks that write the laws.
Free market capitalism, path to prosperity
Свободный рынок капитализма, путь к процветанию
IBC 7 Finalists
8 Gold, 9 Silver, 2 Bronze medals IV Summer Olympics
2 Silver, 4 Bronze medals V Winter Olympics
Golfinator Classic Champion
Scott Cup I Champions
World Bowl 11 4th Place

User avatar
Salvarity
Senator
 
Posts: 4344
Founded: Jun 28, 2011
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Salvarity » Sun Feb 19, 2012 9:31 pm

Sibirsky wrote:
Salvarity wrote:
And that is a bad thing how?

It steals from retirees, the poor, people on fixed incomes, veterans, etc.

I said it right there, in the 2nd sentence. Why do you hate the poor?


Also retirees don't they get social services which are returns on there taxes. The poor gets IRS returns. Fixed Income people so? Veterans they can get a job.
Praetor of the Empire of Mare Nostrum
World Assembly Delegate of the Empire of Mare Nostrum

King of the British Isles
Prime Minister of the British Isles
Defense Minister of the British Isles
Home Minister of the British Isles
Culture Minister of the British Isles
MP of Parliament for Northern Ireland
Co-Founder of the SDLP in the British Isles
Admiral of the Royal British Isles Navy
Marquess of Winchester

Minister of the Exterior in the Land of Kings and Emperors
Minister of the Interior in the Land of Kings and Emperors
Senator in the Imperial Senate
Field Marshal Lieutenant of the Imperial Army of the Land of Kings and Emperors
Baron of Nassau

Lance Corporal in the North Pacific Army

Merryman in the United Defenders League

User avatar
Sibirsky
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44940
Founded: Mar 22, 2009
Anarchy

Postby Sibirsky » Sun Feb 19, 2012 9:32 pm

Salvarity wrote:
Sibirsky wrote:Sure. We already have private hospitals. And to a limited extent roads, fire stations, police and utilities.



I'll give you private hospitals and private roads but

-Fire Fighter. Your in one of your most economic lows when your house just got set on fire. Having to Pay for a fire fighter is going to be economically draining on the victim

-Police. Well your a Libertarian. In a perfect Libertarian world how long until Private Law Enforcement become Private Offense.

-Utilities. I'll give you this also.

Insurance, for fire protection.

The police portion is confusing.
Free market capitalism, path to prosperity
Свободный рынок капитализма, путь к процветанию
IBC 7 Finalists
8 Gold, 9 Silver, 2 Bronze medals IV Summer Olympics
2 Silver, 4 Bronze medals V Winter Olympics
Golfinator Classic Champion
Scott Cup I Champions
World Bowl 11 4th Place

User avatar
Mad Monarch
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1405
Founded: Nov 30, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mad Monarch » Sun Feb 19, 2012 9:32 pm

Sibirsky wrote:
Mad Monarch wrote:Ya, several states have "pay for your fire department" taxes. Here is what happens if you don't pay and your house catches fire:

They show up, don't enter the property, don't let you near the property, and watch it burn while keeping your neighbors safe (if they payed). This actually isn't fear mongering, it actually does happen in states that have this fun little idea. How do you expect private business would be any better in that regard?

And? Your point is? Those are city run departments. You know, the fucks that write the laws.

Thank you for saying that.

You hear that guys, he just admitted taxes are good. We can pack up and go home now.

User avatar
Salvarity
Senator
 
Posts: 4344
Founded: Jun 28, 2011
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Salvarity » Sun Feb 19, 2012 9:33 pm

Sibirsky wrote:
Salvarity wrote:
What makes the 1990 Formula the true formula and the current formula the false one?

I never said the 1990s formula is the true formula, just that it is closer to reality.

Less hedonics, substitution and geometric weighting. All these are verifiable. While the BLS does not release the exact formula, they admit that they engage is such practices.


Which Reality. I'm sorry but i'm not comprehending what this post is supposed to mean.
Last edited by Salvarity on Sun Feb 19, 2012 9:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Praetor of the Empire of Mare Nostrum
World Assembly Delegate of the Empire of Mare Nostrum

King of the British Isles
Prime Minister of the British Isles
Defense Minister of the British Isles
Home Minister of the British Isles
Culture Minister of the British Isles
MP of Parliament for Northern Ireland
Co-Founder of the SDLP in the British Isles
Admiral of the Royal British Isles Navy
Marquess of Winchester

Minister of the Exterior in the Land of Kings and Emperors
Minister of the Interior in the Land of Kings and Emperors
Senator in the Imperial Senate
Field Marshal Lieutenant of the Imperial Army of the Land of Kings and Emperors
Baron of Nassau

Lance Corporal in the North Pacific Army

Merryman in the United Defenders League

User avatar
Yootwopia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7866
Founded: Aug 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Yootwopia » Sun Feb 19, 2012 9:33 pm

Mad Monarch wrote:geometric weighting- doesn't exist in any online dictionary

It's the element that transforms a Classical Heist into a Fat Chalet.
Technically a Polanski.

User avatar
United Dependencies
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13659
Founded: Oct 22, 2007
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby United Dependencies » Sun Feb 19, 2012 9:34 pm

Mad Monarch wrote:
Sibirsky wrote:And? Your point is? Those are city run departments. You know, the fucks that write the laws.

Thank you for saying that.

You hear that guys, he just admitted taxes are good. We can pack up and go home now.

He's a libertarian not an an-cap.
Alien Space Bats wrote:2012: The Year We Lost Contact (with Reality).

Cannot think of a name wrote:
Obamacult wrote:Maybe there is an economically sound and rational reason why there are no longer high paying jobs for qualified accountants, assembly line workers, glass blowers, blacksmiths, tanners, etc.

Maybe dragons took their jobs. Maybe unicorns only hid their jobs because unicorns are dicks. Maybe 'jobs' is only an illusion created by a drug addled infant pachyderm. Fuck dude, if we're in 'maybe' land, don't hold back.

This is Nationstates we're here to help

Are you a native or resident of North Carolina?

User avatar
Sibirsky
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44940
Founded: Mar 22, 2009
Anarchy

Postby Sibirsky » Sun Feb 19, 2012 9:34 pm

Mad Monarch wrote:
Salvarity wrote:

I'll give you private hospitals and private roads but

-Fire Fighter. Your in one of your most economic lows when your house just got set on fire. Having to Pay for a fire fighter is going to be economically draining on the victim

-Police. Well your a Libertarian. In a perfect Libertarian world how long until Private Law Enforcement become Private Offense.

-Utilities. I'll give you this also.

Don't give him privatized hospitals, actually. not until he finds a viable answer to the blaring hole in his logic should all hospitals become privatized. Don't even give him roads until he plugs the obvious hole in that that I pointed out should roads become fully privatized.


You haven't pointed out shit.
Free market capitalism, path to prosperity
Свободный рынок капитализма, путь к процветанию
IBC 7 Finalists
8 Gold, 9 Silver, 2 Bronze medals IV Summer Olympics
2 Silver, 4 Bronze medals V Winter Olympics
Golfinator Classic Champion
Scott Cup I Champions
World Bowl 11 4th Place

User avatar
Wikkiwallana
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22500
Founded: Mar 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Wikkiwallana » Sun Feb 19, 2012 9:35 pm

Salvarity wrote:
Sibirsky wrote:I never said the 1990s formula is the true formula, just that it is closer to reality.

Less hedonics, substitution and geometric weighting. All these are verifiable. While the BLS does not release the exact formula, they admit that they engage is such practices.


Which Reality. I'm sorry but i'm not comprehending what this post is supposed to mean.

Austrian School reality. It's an entire school of economics devoted to "I reject your reality and substitute my own."
Proud Scalawag and Statist!

Please don't confuse my country for my politics; my country is being run as a parody, my posts aren't.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Xenohumanity wrote:
Nulono wrote:Snip
I'm a pro-lifer who runs a nation of dragon-men...
And even I think that's stupid.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

User avatar
Mad Monarch
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1405
Founded: Nov 30, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mad Monarch » Sun Feb 19, 2012 9:36 pm

Sibirsky wrote:**


Mad Monarch wrote:
What part of "they can't legally deny you care" which you fucking quoted, do you not understand?

the part where, if there are no taxes, they have no viable to give you care. Medial supplies don't come out of thin air, they cost money. Money the hospital won't have if they don't deny you coverage in a government without taxes.

Now that I painted the obvious in bright red letters, maybe you will notice.


Now do you remember how you ran away from our little debate? I'll be back with the road debate shortly
Last edited by Mad Monarch on Sun Feb 19, 2012 9:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Sibirsky
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44940
Founded: Mar 22, 2009
Anarchy

Postby Sibirsky » Sun Feb 19, 2012 9:36 pm

New Conglomerate wrote:
Salvarity wrote:

I'll give you private hospitals and private roads but

-Fire Fighter. Your in one of your most economic lows when your house just got set on fire. Having to Pay for a fire fighter is going to be economically draining on the victim

-Police. Well your a Libertarian. In a perfect Libertarian world how long until Private Law Enforcement become Private Offense.

-Utilities. I'll give you this also.

That's not how it works for privatized police and fire departments. Local areas that are too small to maintain a professional police force or firefighters can contract private groups to supplement volunteer services.

Privatizing utilities is a bad idea, though. Enron. 'Nuff said.

Enron was an accounting scandal. It has nothing to do with utilities.
Free market capitalism, path to prosperity
Свободный рынок капитализма, путь к процветанию
IBC 7 Finalists
8 Gold, 9 Silver, 2 Bronze medals IV Summer Olympics
2 Silver, 4 Bronze medals V Winter Olympics
Golfinator Classic Champion
Scott Cup I Champions
World Bowl 11 4th Place

User avatar
Mad Monarch
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1405
Founded: Nov 30, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mad Monarch » Sun Feb 19, 2012 9:40 pm

here is the road debate:

Living Freedom Land wrote:
Sadly a closed system would work. They would have a very captive consumer base. They could, realistically, charge as high as they want do to that one factor.

Well, many other monopolies have been shown to deteriorate if just given time, but you very well may be right. However, just because the entire road system can't be privatized doesn't mean that the private sector can't be a part of the roads.


Another debate you guys conveniently avoided.

User avatar
Puissancevise
Diplomat
 
Posts: 972
Founded: Sep 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Puissancevise » Sun Feb 19, 2012 9:41 pm

Alyakia wrote:pritivitze the roads

And while your at it, just empty our pockets into whatever company decides to toll the roads outrageous amounts. Id love to have to pay some rich guy just to drive on the highway. He needs a new car, or a boat.

...now for the topic:
If there was no income tax, there would be no schools, no postal service, no highway upkeep, no police force, no courts, no law, no military, and no...any other public service. Now i don't know about you, but i kinda like having that stuff around. There is a reason there is income tax. Every time you use some sort of public service, it is being paid for by taxes. Most of which come from income tax. Not to mention all of the jobs that would be lost by suddenly losing all of the above. So if you want to live in a country that has no military, police force, schools, or courts, has a 30% unemployment rate, and is run by rich corporations that will fuck you just to make an extra million dollars for pocket money, feel free to remove income tax. Just lemme know so i can leave first.
President Desmond Salirne
"We, humanity, shall live free."
Puissancevise Factbook

User avatar
Distruzio
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23841
Founded: Feb 28, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Distruzio » Sun Feb 19, 2012 9:41 pm

New Genoa wrote:Property is theft.


Who did I rob?
Eastern Orthodox Christian

Anti-Progressive
Conservative

Anti-Feminist
Right leaning Distributist

Anti-Equity
Western Chauvanist

Anti-Globalism
Nationalist

User avatar
Distruzio
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23841
Founded: Feb 28, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Distruzio » Sun Feb 19, 2012 9:42 pm

Ravineworld wrote:Theft by Definition: The act of stealing property.
So, income taxes, are when the government forces you to give up your property. How is that not stealing property?
I believe that taxes are an act of theft. I believe that since theft is illegal, then taxes are illegal.
So, NSG, what do you think about income taxes? Illegal, legal, good, bad?


All taxes are theft.
Eastern Orthodox Christian

Anti-Progressive
Conservative

Anti-Feminist
Right leaning Distributist

Anti-Equity
Western Chauvanist

Anti-Globalism
Nationalist

User avatar
Death Metal
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13542
Founded: Dec 22, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Death Metal » Sun Feb 19, 2012 9:42 pm

Wikkiwallana wrote:
Salvarity wrote:
Which Reality. I'm sorry but i'm not comprehending what this post is supposed to mean.

Austrian School reality. It's an entire school of economics devoted to "I reject your reality and substitute my own."


Made "legitimate" by giving Nobel Prizes to people who agree with it. Truly a Monty Burns Award For Excellence In The Field Of Excellence.
Only here when I'm VERY VERY VERY bored now.
(Trump is Reagan 2.0: A nationalistic bimbo who will ruin America.)
Death Metal: A nation founded on the most powerful force in the world: METAL! \m/
A non-idealist centre-leftist

Alts: Ronpaulatia, Bisonopolis, Iga, Gygaxia, The Children of Skyrim, Tinfoil Fedoras

Pro: Civil Equality, Scaled Income Taxes, Centralized Govtt, Moderate Business Regulations, Heavy Metal
Con: Censorship in any medium, Sales Tax, Flat Tax, Small Govt, Overly Large Govt, Laissez Faire, AutoTuner.

I support Obama. And so would FA Hayek.

34 arguments Libertarians (and sometimes AnCaps) make, and why they are wrong.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Benuty, Concejos Unidos, Ifreann, Kerwa, La Xinga, Pizza Friday Forever91, Port Caverton, The Two Jerseys, TheKeyToJoy, Thermodolia

Advertisement

Remove ads