Obama or Bush?

[Buffett and Colbert]

actually Yes they did.

Actually, no they didn't.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25546334/

Yellow cake is by no means WMD's.

They also found chemical weapons,

Mustard gas?

but the story proves what the UN failed to find and if you believe the Yellowcake was for nuclear reactors then you need to take another look at who Saddam was.

No, I think I'll stick with thinking you're full of crap.

[New Kereptica]

Ya gotta admitt. For 9/11, Bush was the right man at the right time.

Also, mad respect for Appointing John Bolton as our UN rep.

/sarcasm?

Do you remember the eyewitness accounts of Bush when he learned of the attacks?

He stood there, slack-jawed with his eyes wide open for about a minute.

And? What was your response? Shock and horror?

Mine was something like that. But, you see, I wasn't the President of the United States at the time. I had the luxury of non-action.

[Brogavia]

Also, mad respect for Appointing John Bolton as our UN rep.

I may be getting him mixed up with someone else, but was he not part of the whole "Niger uranium" lie used to justify an invasion of Iraq?

No he's the guy that despies the UN.

[Emericanland]

In Soviet America, liberals screw you!

Soviet America is exactly what liberals want, but we all know how the Soviet Union turned out

A major superpower?

I don't see the Soviet Union on a map anymore. Do you? I would maybe recommend a new map.

I do see a mighty big Russian Federation on there, which comprised, oh, just a fair bit of the former USSR.

yea I guess you're right Socialism is mostly communism, so therefore Obama is at least partly Communist according to you're logic.

[Ralkovia]

Wow. You seriously have no idea what you are talking about do you? Your telling me they found WMD's in Iraq?

actually Yes they did.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25546334/
They also found chemical weapons, but the story proves what the UN failed to find and if you believe the Yellowcake was for nuclear reactors then you need to take another look at who Saddam was.

Yellowcake is not a WMD. It is primarily used in the preparation of fuel for nuclear reactors.

And dirty bombs, while rather ineffective 550 metric tons can create a lot of shit...

[Buffett and Colbert]

Yet Obama has managed to spend more then the whole of Obama's presidency, So I think we have a good idea.

Fail. And if you meant Bush's presidency, you still fail.

Yes I did mess up there, but unlike a democrat would do I will admit my mistake, but you're argument isn't exactly an argument.

Yes it is. Not even Bill O'Reilly will say that Obama has spent more now than in the entire Bush presidency. That's not even possible.

So, you still fail.

[Tunizcha]

Ya gotta admitt. For 9/11, Bush was the right man at the right time.

Also, mad respect for Appointing John Bolton as our UN rep.

/sarcasm?

Do you remember the eyewitness accounts of Bush when he learned of the attacks?

He stood there, slack-jawed with his eyes wide open for about a minute.

And? What was your response? Shock and horror?

Yes, I understand that things of such magnitude would be sufficient to shock someone something fierce, but a good president would have bounced back and reacted calmly.

[New Kereptica]

In Soviet America, liberals screw you!

Soviet America is exactly what liberals want, but we all know how the Soviet Union turned out

A major superpower?

I don't see the Soviet Union on a map anymore. Do you? I would maybe recommend a new map.

I do see a mighty big Russian Federation on there, which comprised, oh, just a fair bit of the former USSR.

yea I guess you're right Socialism is mostly communism, so therefore Obama is at least partly Communist according to you're logic.

You know absolutely nothing.

[Emericanland]

Also, mad respect for Appointing John Bolton as our UN rep.

I may be getting him mixed up with someone else, but was he not part of the whole "Niger uranium" lie used to justify an invasion of Iraq?

actually it wasn't a lie
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25546334/

[New Kereptica]

Wow. You seriously have no idea what you are talking about do you? Your telling me they found WMD's in Iraq?

actually Yes they did.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25546334/
They also found chemical weapons, but the story proves what the UN failed to find and if you believe the Yellowcake was for nuclear reactors then you need to take another look at who Saddam was.

Yellowcake is not a WMD. It is primarily used in the preparation of fuel for nuclear reactors.

And dirty bombs, while rather ineffective 550 metric tons can create a lot of shit...

But we didn't find dirty bombs, did we?

[Buffett and Colbert]

yea I guess you're right Socialism is mostly communism, so therefore Obama is at least partly Communist according to you're logic.

I said no such thing, and apparently, logic and coherency continues to escape you. Socialism is not "almost Communism."

I sincerely suggest you read some books before you debate. You obviously are not up to date with you politics, philosophy or common sense. You can hold these beliefs but please, don't waste our time. Back your shit up.

[Parthenon]

Ya gotta admitt. For 9/11, Bush was the right man at the right time.

Also, mad respect for Appointing John Bolton as our UN rep.

/sarcasm?

Do you remember the eyewitness accounts of Bush when he learned of the attacks?

He stood there, slack-jawed with his eyes wide open for about a minute.

And? What was your response? Shock and horror?

Yes, I understand that things of such magnitude would be sufficient to shock someone something fierce, but a good president would have bounced back and reacted calmly.

Right, a "GOOD" president would be able to devise a strategy for dealing with the largest attack on American soil since Pearl Harbor instantaneously without knowing the details (or that there was even more hijacked planes). Bush sat around for a few minutes at a prior speaking engagement before acting, TERRIBLE!

[North Suran]

Parthenon!!! Didn't you know that bringing down dictators is a war crime. You apparently didn't hear about the plans to try Roosevelt and Churchill for war crimes.

You mean like Kuwait?

[Ralkovia]

Ya gotta admitt. For 9/11, Bush was the right man at the right time.

Also, mad respect for Appointing John Bolton as our UN rep.

/sarcasm?

Do you remember the eyewitness accounts of Bush when he learned of the attacks?

He stood there, slack-jawed with his eyes wide open for about a minute.

And? What was your response? Shock and horror?

Mine was something like that. But, you see, I wasn't the President of the United States at the time. I had the luxury of non-action.

So you would assume that the President of the United States would immediately rip off his clothes, don his costume and magically save the day. It wasn't like he could have magically stopped the planes from smashing into the towers. Plus it takes time to formulate an effective response. What would you have him do?

Obama/anyone would do the same thing as Bush did.

[Buffett and Colbert]

Also, mad respect for Appointing John Bolton as our UN rep.

I may be getting him mixed up with someone else, but was he not part of the whole "Niger uranium" lie used to justify an invasion of Iraq?

actually it wasn't a lie
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25546334/

There's three problems with this.

1. MSNBC is crap.
2. This doesn't even vaguely support your claim.
3. The what the fuck factor is just too overwhelming.

[North Suran]

Yes, I understand that things of such magnitude would be sufficient to shock someone something fierce, but a good president would have bounced back and reacted calmly.

Right, a "GOOD" president would be able to devise a strategy for dealing with the largest attack on American soil since Pearl Harbor instantaneously without knowing the details (or that there was even more hijacked planes). Bush sat around for a few minutes at a prior speaking engagement before acting, TERRIBLE!

Nah; a good President would be able to devise a strategy for dealing with an attack that he had been fully briefed on previously.

[Emericanland]

You know absolutely nothing.

I'm just basing my logic off of liberal logic, so I guess you're right because their is no Liberal logic because that is an oxymoron.

[Ralkovia]

Ya gotta admitt. For 9/11, Bush was the right man at the right time.

Also, mad respect for Appointing John Bolton as our UN rep.

/sarcasm?

Do you remember the eyewitness accounts of Bush when he learned of the attacks?

He stood there, slack-jawed with his eyes wide open for about a minute.

And? What was your response? Shock and horror?

Yes, I understand that things of such magnitude would be sufficient to shock someone something fierce, but a good president would have bounced back and reacted calmly.

Right, a "GOOD" president would be able to devise a strategy for dealing with the largest attack on American soil since Pearl Harbor instantaneously without knowing the details (or that there was even more hijacked planes). Bush sat around for a few minutes at a prior speaking engagement before acting, TERRIBLE!

Wasn't he talking to kindengartners or something? Oh what fun it would have been,"Sorry kids I have to go now, we just had a major terrorist attack and a bunch of people are dead."

[New Kereptica]

So you would assume that the President of the United States would immediately rip off his clothes, don his costume and magically save the day. It wasn't like he could have magically stopped the planes from smashing into the towers. Plus it takes time to formulate an effective response. What would you have him do?

Obama/anyone would do the same thing as Bush did.

I would have him do something. And I'm not saying that Obama wouldn't.

[Emericanland]

Also, mad respect for Appointing John Bolton as our UN rep.

I may be getting him mixed up with someone else, but was he not part of the whole "Niger uranium" lie used to justify an invasion of Iraq?

actually it wasn't a lie
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25546334/

There's three problems with this.

1. MSNBC is crap.
2. This doesn't even vaguely support your claim.
3. The what the fuck factor is just too overwhelming.

ok go look it up yourself, but be careful if you find too liberal of a news source then they might not have reported it.
How does this not support my claim?
If Liberals could stop being emotional for five seconds then they would realize how stupid they sound.

[Parthenon]

Yes, I understand that things of such magnitude would be sufficient to shock someone something fierce, but a good president would have bounced back and reacted calmly.

Right, a "GOOD" president would be able to devise a strategy for dealing with the largest attack on American soil since Pearl Harbor instantaneously without knowing the details (or that there was even more hijacked planes). Bush sat around for a few minutes at a prior speaking engagement before acting, TERRIBLE!

Nah; a good President would be able to devise a strategy for dealing with an attack that he had been fully briefed on previously.

Did you read the 9/11 commission report? The briefings on potential attacks are hazy at best and there are dozens upon dozens received daily, of which a majority never materialize or are bogus to begin with.

[North Suran]

Wasn't he talking to kindengartners or something? Oh what fun it would have been,"Sorry kids I have to go now, we just had a major terrorist attack and a bunch of people are dead."

As opposed to just - you know - leaving early?

I doubt the kids would have demanded to know why he had to leave.

And if the worst came to worst, he could have lied; Christ knows, he has enough experience.

[New Kereptica]

You know absolutely nothing.

I'm just basing my logic off of liberal logic, so I guess you're right because their is no Liberal logic because that is an oxymoron.

I fail to see where a "liberal" claimed or insinuated that "Socialism is mostly communism".

[Buffett and Colbert]

You know absolutely nothing.

I'm just basing my logic off of liberal logic, so I guess you're right because their is no Liberal logic because that is an oxymoron.

Oh, the irony. You must realise that you are giving Republicans a bad name, yes?

[Parthenon]

Ya gotta admitt. For 9/11, Bush was the right man at the right time.

Also, mad respect for Appointing John Bolton as our UN rep.

/sarcasm?

Do you remember the eyewitness accounts of Bush when he learned of the attacks?

He stood there, slack-jawed with his eyes wide open for about a minute.

And? What was your response? Shock and horror?

Yes, I understand that things of such magnitude would be sufficient to shock someone something fierce, but a good president would have bounced back and reacted calmly.

Right, a "GOOD" president would be able to devise a strategy for dealing with the largest attack on American soil since Pearl Harbor instantaneously without knowing the details (or that there was even more hijacked planes). Bush sat around for a few minutes at a prior speaking engagement before acting, TERRIBLE!

Wasn't he talking to kindengartners or something? Oh what fun it would have been,"Sorry kids I have to go now, we just had a major terrorist attack and a bunch of people are dead."

A plane struck the empire state building previously in history. It wouldn't be completely out of the question for it to be an accidental occurrence. These facts weren't known within 5 seconds...