Ralkovia wrote:North Suran wrote:Ralkovia wrote:North Suran wrote:Ralkovia wrote:Wasn't he talking to kindengartners or something? Oh what fun it would have been,"Sorry kids I have to go now, we just had a major terrorist attack and a bunch of people are dead."
As opposed to just - you know - leaving early?
I doubt the kids would have demanded to know why he had to leave.
And if the worst came to worst, he could have lied; Christ knows, he has enough experience.
And risk fright. You obviously have never had a president just get up and leave without knowing something horribly wrong happened. Its an OSHI- kind of state of mind when the leader of the free world gets up and leaves in the middle of something. I'm sure he could have lied but you want him to lie when the oppurtunity suits you best.
The President of the USA has better things to do than read "My Pet Goat" with a bunch of pre-teens?
OGOD ANARCHY WE'RE ALL GOING TO DIE AH JIHAD AHAHAHAH.
At any rate, I'm pretty sure the whole nation takes priority over a bunch of kids.
And there's a big difference between lying to some school children and lying to the UN.
The whole nation? So your preaching lets go out and traumatize some kids for life. The President was acting calm, do you think that possibly while he finished it up he was planning some sort of response or do you think he was preoccupied with reading his book and can't multi-task. I'm sure if your human you can read a Pre-K book and formulate some sort of plan.
1. I'm not preaching to "traumatize some kids for life", as you so eloquently attacked that strawman. I am merely stating that pre-teens aren't going to immediately realise that the country was under attack because the President had to leave early. Hell, they would have been much more traumatised by the various news reports that clearly displayed the World Trade Centre being taken down.
2. As has been established many a time, Bush's intelligence often reached sub-human standards.






